Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jclinpathJournal of Clinical PathologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
J Clin Pathol. 2007 August; 60(8): 881–884.
Published online 2006 November 1. doi:  10.1136/jcp.2006.041251
PMCID: PMC1994497

Epidermal growth factor receptor status in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma



The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been reported to be overexpressed in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). In vitro studies have shown that EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) greatly inhibit cellular growth and induced apoptosis in the ATC cell lines, while somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain or an increased gene copy number are associated with increased sensitivity to TKIs in non‐small cell lung cancer.


To investigate the prevalence of EGFR overexpression, gene amplification and activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase domain in patients with ATC.


The EGFR gene status and protein expression were investigated by direct DNA sequencing of the hot‐spot regions in exons 18, 19 and 21, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and immunohistochemistry in tumour tissues from 23 patients with ATC.


On mutational analysis and FISH, neither mutations in the hot‐spots nor gene amplification was observed. However, high polysomy was identified in 14/23 (60.9%) patients with ATC. All cases with immunohistochemistry (IHC) positivity (n = 6) had high polysomy, whereas 8/17 (47.1%) cases with IHC negativity had high polysomy (p = 0.048). High polysomy was observed in all 10 cases with giant cell subtype, but in only 4/11 (36.3%) with squamoid and 0/2 with spindle cell sarcomatoid subtype. There was no statistically significant correlation between FISH positivity of ATC tumour and presence of well‐differentiated component.


Despite the low incidence of somatic EGFR gene mutation and amplification in the study samples, in view of the fact that high polysomy was often identified by FISH, as well as the current lack of therapeutic options, EGFR TKIs are worth investigating for treating the patients with ATC who have at least giant cell subtype.

Keywords: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, EGFR, high polysomy

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rarely encountered tumour, but is one of the most aggressive malignancies.1 Most patients with ATC have an extremely poor prognosis,2 which reflects the current lack of curative therapeutic options and also the need for developing novel therapeutic strategies. Fortunately, the recent advance of molecular‐targeted therapy has introduced several new therapeutic strategies against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which has been reported to be overexpressed in ATC.3,4,5 These drugs included the small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib and gefitinib, and the monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab that are directed at the receptor. Of particular interest, the specific EGFR gene mutations that are clustered within the tyrosine kinase domain were recently reported to be associated with the sensitivity of small molecule TKIs.6,7,8 Furthermore, a high EGFR gene copy number, including gene amplification and high polysomy, has been shown to be significantly associated with a better response and improved survival for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).9,10 Therefore, as indicators for the effectiveness of TKIs, the mutational status of the tyrosine kinase domain and a high gene copy number of the EGFR gene in different primary cancers may have important clinical consequences, although there are still numerous questions to be answered concerning the relevant biological parameters.

Based on these current results, we analysed the mutational status of the tyrosine kinase domain and the gene copy number of the EGFR gene in ATC tissues to infer whether TKIs may have anti‐tumour activity against ATC; if so, this would provide a rationale for clinical trials with TKIs.

Materials and methods

Tissue samples and pathology

We retrieved tumour tissue samples from 23 patients with ATC from the archives of the Departments of Pathology at Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea and at the National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. The pathological diagnosis was made by three professional pathologists (GKL, SYP and SHP) according to the World Health Organization classification; the representativeness of the samples was reconfirmed from the H&E stained slides by GKL. The patients' ages ranged from 52 to 80 years with a median age of 63 years. There were 7 men and 16 women. The subtypes of ATC were as follows: 11 squamoid; 7 giant cell; 2 spindle cell sarcomatoid; and 3 mixed giant and spindle cell sarcomatoid. Of note, 13/23 (56.5%) cases contained a well‐differentiated component. There was no paucicellular variant.


Expression of EGFR was determined by means of immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the mouse anti‐human EGFR (clone H11 monoclonal antibody; DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, California, USA). Evaluation was done according to the proportion of reactive cells within the tumours. The proportion score described the estimated fraction of positively stained tumour cells (0, no visible reaction; 1, <10%; 2, 10–50%; 3, 50–100% of the tumour cells were stained). When >10% of tumour cells showed membranous staining of any intensity (score 2 or 3), the tumour was considered positive for EGFR.

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) studies were performed using the LSI EGFR SpectrumOrange/CEP7 Spectrum Green probe (Vysis, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA). We analysed 50 non‐overlapping tumour cell nuclei for the observed number of red (EGFR) and green (CEP7) signals. We determined the number of gene copies of the EGFR gene and we classified them according to the six FISH categories defined by Cappuzzo et al.9 Those tumours with a high degree of polysomy or amplification were considered to be FISH positive.

Detection of hot‐spot mutation for EGFR gene

The two 10 μm tissue sections that were taken from the paraffin‐embedded tumour specimens were incubated at 60°C for 1 hour, deparaffinised by washing in xylene, and dehydrated in 100%, 95% and 80% solutions of ethanol. The tumour specimen was then scraped from the slide for performing DNA isolation; the genomic DNA was extracted using a Purgene Kit (Gentra, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PCR was performed using 5 μl of the genomic DNA extract, 1U Taq polymerase, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, 10 mM Tris‐HCl, 40 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 20 pmol of the primers in a final volume of 20 μl. The PCR conditions were 95°C for 5 min, 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for ×30 s, 72°C for 30 s for 40 cycles, and then 72°C for 10 min. All PCR procedures were repeated twice. The EGFR mutations that are sensitive to TKIs in NSCLC have been reported within exons 18, 19, and 21. Therefore, exons 18, 19, and 21 of the EGFR gene were amplified using PCR assays with the following primers: exon 18, GACCCTTGTCTCTGTGTTCTTGT (forward), TATACAGCTTGCAAGGACGG (reverse outside) and CCAGACCATGAGAGGCCCTG (reverse inside); exon 19, CACAATTGCCAGTTAACGTCTTC (forward), AGGGTCTAGAGCAGAGCAGC (reverse outside) and GCCTGAGGTTCAGAGCCAT (reverse inside); exon 21, CATGATGATCTCTCCCTCACAG (forward), CTGGTCCCTGGTGTCAGGAA (reverse outside) and GCTGGCTGACCTAAAGCCACC (reverse inside). After purification of the PCR products, direct DNA sequencing was performed using the MegaBACE DNA Analysis System (Amersham Biosciences, Sunnyvale, California, USA) as the standard protocol.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


IHC and FISH analyses were available in 23 ATC cases (table 11 and fig 11).). We found neither EGFR kinase domain mutations nor gene amplification. We observed 6/23 patients (26.1%) with IHC positivity and 14/23 (60.9%) with high polysomy or FISH positivity. All 6 IHC positive cases were found to be FISH positive (100.0%), while 8/17 IHC negative cases were FISH positive (47.1%). However, 6/14 (42.9%) FISH positive cases showed IHC positivity, while 0/9 FISH negative cases showed IHC positivity. There was a statistically significant correlation between FISH positivity and IHC positivity (p = 0.048). By subtype of ATC, all 10 cases with giant cell only or mixed giant cell and spindle cell sarcomatoid subtype showed high polysomy, while 4/11 (36.3%) cases with squamoid and no cases with spindle cell sarcomatoid showed high polysomy (table 22).). The frequency of high polysomy or FISH positive in ATC patients with a well‐differentiated component and in those without was not statistically different (8/13 (61.5%) vs 6/10 (60.0%), p = 1.0). When the FISH status of both the ATC tumour component and the well‐differentiated component was examined in 4/11 cases having both components, two cases were FISH positive in the ATC tumour but FISH negative in the well‐differentiated component, while the other two were FISH negative in both the ATC component and the well‐differentiated component.

figure cp41251.f1
Figure 1 Expression of EGFR protein on immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis (A and B) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of the number of gene copes (C and D). No tumour staining was scored as IHC negative (A), and moderate to ...
Table thumbnail
Table 1 EGFR gene status in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma
Table thumbnail
Table 2 EGFR gene status in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma according to histological subtype


Recently, the newer molecular targeted therapies have entered or are rapidly entering into clinical practice. In particular, such EGFR inhibitors as gefitinib or erlotinib have been reported to produce an objective tumour response and/or survival benefit for patients with NSCLC.11,12,13 Furthermore, specific mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain and a high gene copy number of the EGFR gene have been shown to be significantly associated with EGFR TKI sensitivity and an objective tumour response.7,8,9,10 In the current study, we found neither gene mutations in the EGFR hot‐spot regions nor gene amplification in the ATC specimens, but we observed a high frequency of high polysomy in 14/23 (60.9%) patients. Of note, FISH positivity or increase in EGFR gene copy number was more frequently found in the specimens with EGFR overexpression, and there was a statistically significant association between FISH status and IHC status, suggesting that high polysomy might be one of the underlying genetic mechanism of EGFR overexpression in ATC. Of greater interest, we observed a high frequency of high polysomy in a particular subtype, ie giant cell histology (giant cell subtype and mixed giant cell and spindle cell sarcomatoid subtype). Whether ATC had a well‐differentiated component did not correlate with FISH positivity. Although only a small number of specimens were analysed, we could not identify gene amplification or high polysomy in a well‐differentiated component; however, corresponding ATC tumour cells showed high polysomy. In addition, we also could not identify any gene mutation, amplification or high polysomy in four poorly differentiated carcinomas (data not shown). Those findings might help to explain or shed some light on the tumourigenesis of ATC.

Aberrantly activated EGFR receptors contribute to many stages of the malignant process, and the recent discovery of tyrosine kinase domain activating mutations is very important in this respect.14 However, EGFR gene amplification has also been described in many tumours, such as central nervous system tumours,15,16 gastric cancer17 and breast cancers.18,19 Furthermore, high polysomy has been reported recently to play a role in overexpression of EGFR in NSCLC and of HER2 in breast cancer.20,21 For NSCLC, the patients with a high gene copy number such as gene amplification or high polysomy had a better response to EGFR TKIs,9,10 while there was no association between a high gene copy number and the responsiveness to EGFR TKIs in glioblastomas.22 Therefore, whether a high number of gene copies is associated with responsiveness to EGFR TKIs in different primary cancers should be addressed. In addition, the responsiveness to EGFR TKIs between the patients with gene amplification and those with high polysomy should also be evaluated in further studies.

Take‐home messages

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) will help to explain the tumourigenesis of ATC and to provide the rationale for use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment of this tumour.
  • Neither gene mutations in the activating domain nor gene amplification of EGFR were found, but high polysomy was frequently observed in ATC, especially in the giant cell histological subtype.
  • There was no correlation between FISH positivity of the ATC tumour and presence of a well‐differentiated component.

We should be cautious in interpreting the results of our study because only 23 cases were analysed, which is a relatively small sample. The recent study of the EGFR amplicon which investigated whether amplified DNAs were specific to EGFR or just represented polysomy of chromosome 7 has shown that EGFR gene copy number gain may occur by amplification of a discrete genomic region or by gains of the short arm of chromosome 7 with a breakpoint near the EGFR gene locus.19,23 Gene amplification leading to EGFR overexpression is often found in human cancers. Therefore, as the frequency of EGFR overexpression is lower than that of high polysomy, another locus segregating with EGFR gene can be more relevant. Furthermore, although in vitro studies have shown that gefitinib greatly inhibited cellular proliferation and induced apoptosis in the ATC cell lines, and also slowed tumour growth in a nude mouse model,4,5 it is difficult to predict in vivo whether patients with ATC, especially those who exhibit high polysomy without any mutation or gene amplification, will benefit from EGFR TKIs.

In conclusion, although we were not able to identify EGFR gene mutations in hot‐spot regions or gene amplifications, we found an increased EGFR gene copy number in 60.9% of patients with ATC, especially in those with giant cell subtype. In addition, it should be remembered that there are few treatment options for patients with advanced ATC, especially for those in whom surgery, radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy have been unsuccessful. Therefore, further clinical investigations using EGFR TKIs for treating this type of tumour are warranted.


ATC - anaplastic thyroid carcinoma

EGFR - epidermal growth factor receptor

FISH - fluorescence in situ hybridisation

IHC - immunohistochemistry

NSCLC - non‐small cell lung cancer

TKI - tyrosine kinase inhibitor


Funding: This work was supported by NCC Grants 610050‐1 from the National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Korea.

Competing interests: None declared.


1. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A. et al Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2003. 535–26.26 [PubMed]
2. McIver B, Hay I D, Giuffrida D F. et al Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: a 50‐year experience at a single institution. Surgery 2001. 1301028–1034.1034 [PubMed]
3. Ensinger C, Spizzo G, Moser P. et al Epidermal growth factor receptor as a novel therapeutic target in anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004. 103069–77.77 [PubMed]
4. Schiff B A, McMurphy A B, Jasser S A. et al Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in anaplastic thyroid cancer, and the EGFR inhibitor gefitinib inhibits the growth of anaplastic thyroid cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004. 108594–8602.8602 [PubMed]
5. Nobuhara Y, Onoda N, Yamashita Y. et al Efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor‐targeted molecular therapy in anaplastic thyroid cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 2005. 921110–1116.1116 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Lynch T J, Bell D W, Sordella R. et al Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non‐small‐cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med 2004. 3502129–2139.2139 [PubMed]
7. Paez J G, Janne P A, Lee J C. et al EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004. 3041497–1500.1500 [PubMed]
8. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M. et al EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancer from “never‐smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004. 10113306–13311.13311 [PubMed]
9. Cappuzzo F, Hirsch F R, Rossi E. et al Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number, gene mutations and protein level predict outcome to gefitinib therapy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005. 97643–655.655 [PubMed]
10. Hirsch F R, Varella‐Garcia M, McCoy J. et al Increased EGFR gene copy numbers detected by FISH associates with increased sensitivity to gefitinib in patients with bronchioalveolar carcinoma cell types. A Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2005. 236838–6845.6845 [PubMed]
11. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G. et al Multi‐institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003. 212237–2246.2246 [PubMed]
12. Kris M G, Natale R B, Herbst R S. et al Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non‐small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2003. 2902149–2158.2158 [PubMed]
13. Shepherd F A, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T. et al Erlotinib in previously treated non‐small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2005. 353123–132.132 [PubMed]
14. Holbro T, Hynes N E. ErbB receptors: directing key signaling networks throughout life. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2004. 44195–217.217 [PubMed]
15. Fallon K B, Palmer C A, Roth K A. et al Prognostic value of 1p,19q,9q,10q, and EGFR‐FISH analyses in recurrent oligodendrogliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004. 63314–322.322 [PubMed]
16. Marquez A, Wu R, Zhao J. et al Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) by chromgenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in archival gliomas using bright‐field microscopy. Diagn Mol Pathol 2004. 131–8.8 [PubMed]
17. Takehana T, Kunitomo K, Suzuki S. et al Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in gastric carcinomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003. 1438–445.445 [PubMed]
18. Bhargava R, Gerald W L, Li A R. et al EGFR gene amplification in breast cancer: correlation with epidermal growth factor mRNA and protein expression and HER‐2 status and absence of EGFR‐activating mutations. Mod Pathol 2005. 181027–1033.1033 [PubMed]
19. Reis‐Filho J S, Pinheiro C, Lambros M B K. et alEGFR amplification and lack of activating mutations in metaplastic breast carcinomas. J Pathol 2006. 209445–453.453 [PubMed]
20. Hirsch F R, Varella‐Garcia M, Bunn P A., Jr et al Epidermal growth factor receptor in non‐small cell lung carcinomas; correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 2003. 213798–3807.3807 [PubMed]
21. Lal P, Salazar P A, Ladnanyi M. et al Impact of polysomy 17 on HER‐2/neu immunohistochemistry in breast carcinomas without HER‐2/neu gene amplification. J Mol Diagn 2003. 5155–159.159 [PubMed]
22. Mellinghoff I K, Wang M Y, Vivanco I. et al Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2005. 3532012–2024.2024 [PubMed]
23. Ooi A, Takehan T, Li X. et al Protein overexpression and gene amplification of HER‐2 and EGFR in colorectal cancers: an immunohistochemical and fluorescent in situ hybridization study. Mod Pathol 2004. 17895–904.904 [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group