Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 October; 36(291): 454–457.
PMCID: PMC1960621

An epidemiological study of digoxin prescribing in general practice


The epidemiology of prescribing long-term digoxin was studied in 241 patients from six group general practices. Each patient was assessed for the initial reason for prescribing digoxin and present clinical status, and the serum digoxin concentration was measured between six and 12 hours after the previous dose.

The results show that digoxin was most commonly prescribed for elderly patients; 90% of patients were aged 60 years or more. The reasons for prescribing digoxin were considered adequate in only 55% of the total group; 71% of the patients were judged to be clinically well and 75% of the 95 patients with atrial fibrillation had ventricular rates of less than 90 beats per minute. `Therapeutic' serum digoxin concentrations (0.8—2.0 ng ml-1) were observed in only 48% of patients; the level was sub-therapeutic in 46% and potentially toxic in 6%. No clear-cut relationship was found between clinical well-being and serum digoxin concentration. The type of supervision (whether hospital or general practice) did not affect appropriateness of prescribing, clinical well-being or likelihood of achieving a therapeutic serum digoxin level.

This study would suggest the need for critical review of digoxin therapy in all patients who are taking it long-term. In some patients its continuance would appear unnecessary; in others, efficacy may be improved either by dose adjustment or by ensuring compliance. On occasions, particularly in patients with sinus rhythm, measurement of serum digoxin concentrations may prove helpful in this evaluation.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1008K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Opie LH. Drugs and the heart. V. Digitalis and sympathomimetic stimulants. Lancet. 1980 Apr 26;1(8174):912–918. [PubMed]
  • Johnson GD, McDevitt DG. Epidemiology of plasma digoxin concentrations in three patient populations. Ir J Med Sci. 1980 Feb;149(2):43–48. [PubMed]
  • Whiting B, Sumner DJ, Goldberg A. An assessment of digoxin radio-immunoassay. Scott Med J. 1973 May;18(3):69–74. [PubMed]
  • Curtis P. Long-term digoxin treatment in general practice. Br Med J. 1975 Dec 27;4(5999):747–749. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pedoe HD. Digoxin prescribing in general practice 1967--77. Lancet. 1978 Oct 28;2(8096):931–933. [PubMed]
  • Krakauer R, Petersen B. The effects of discontinuing maintenance digoxin therapy; a study of elderly cardiac patients in sinus rhythm. Dan Med Bull. 1979 Feb;26(1):10–13. [PubMed]
  • Taggart AJ, McDevitt DG. Digitalis: its place in modern therapy. Drugs. 1980 Nov;20(5):398–404. [PubMed]
  • Johnston GD, McDevitt DG. Is maintenance digoxin necessary in patients with sinus rhythm? Lancet. 1979 Mar 17;1(8116):567–570. [PubMed]
  • Carruthers SG, Kelly JG, McDevitt DG. Plasma digoxin concentrations in patients on admission to hospital. Br Heart J. 1974 Jul;36(7):707–712. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Johnston GD, McDevitt DG. Digoxin compliance in patients from general practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Oct;6(4):339–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Johnston GD, Kelly JG, McDevitt DG. Do patients take digoxin? Br Heart J. 1978 Jan;40(1):1–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners