Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 June; 36(287): 276–279.
PMCID: PMC1960557

Screening for antenatal and postnatal depressive symptoms in general practice using a microcomputer-delivered questionnaire


One-hundred and eight women participated in a study which screened for depressive symptoms in the antenatal period. Of these women, 92 completed at least two further screenings during the postnatal year. The screening tool was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, adapted for self-rating, and administered by a microcomputer. It was found that mean scores and the prevalence of depressive symptoms rose throughout pregnancy, with a sharp peak in the third trimester. Following delivery there was an abrupt fall in the prevalence of depressive symptoms, followed by another rise, with a postnatal peak at six months.

There were significant associations, at all levels of severity, between raised scores antenatally, and those developing postnatally in women completing the study. These were more marked in multiparae than primiparae. There was also a significant association between a past history of treated depression and the development of raised postnatal scores for depression.

The routine use of a microcomputer to administer questionnaires to patients has proved feasible within general practice.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (860K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • RYLE A. The psychological disturbances associated with 345 pregnancies in 137 women. J Ment Sci. 1961 Mar;107:279–286. [PubMed]
  • Playfair HR, Gowers JI. Depression following childbirth--a search for predictive signs. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Apr;31(225):201–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Pitt B. "Atypical" depression following childbirth. Br J Psychiatry. 1968 Nov;114(516):1325–1335. [PubMed]
  • Kumar R, Robson KM. A prospective study of emotional disorders in childbearing women. Br J Psychiatry. 1984 Jan;144:35–47. [PubMed]
  • Carr AC, Ancill RJ, Ghosh A, Margo A. Direct assessment of depression by microcomputer. A feasibility study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1981 Nov;64(5):415–422. [PubMed]
  • Ancill RJ, Rogers D, Carr AC. Comparison of computerised self-rating scales for depression with conventional observer ratings. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Mar;71(3):315–317. [PubMed]
  • Akhtar MJ, Davey A, Cox HE, Ancill RJ. A double-blind study comparing mianserin and dothiepin: an application for computers in clinical psychiatry. Br J Clin Pract. 1984 Sep;38(9):316–319. [PubMed]
  • Margo A, Johnson C, Ancill R, Carr T. Assessment of depression by microcomputer. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):434–435. [PubMed]
  • O'Hara MW, Neunaber DJ, Zekoski EM. Prospective study of postpartum depression: prevalence, course, and predictive factors. J Abnorm Psychol. 1984 May;93(2):158–171. [PubMed]
  • Bridge LR, Little BC, Hayworth J, Dewhurst J, Priest RG. Psychometric ante-natal predictors of post-natal depressed mood. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(3):325–331. [PubMed]
  • Kaij L, Jacobson L, Nilsson A. Post-partum mental disorder in an unselected sample. The influence of parity. J Psychosom Res. 1967 May;10(4):317–325. [PubMed]
  • HAMILTON M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23:56–62. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners