PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
 
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 May; 36(286): 217–219.
PMCID: PMC1960453

Family practitioner committee records — a neglected resource. 3. Three inner city areas compared

Abstract

Data from the family practitioner committees of three inner city areas — Kensington, Chelsea and Westminster; Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark; and Manchester — were compared. The information about general practitioners over one year included number of principals, distribution by partnership size and numbers working from health centre premises. Data about practices covered the five years 1979—83, with figures for mean list size, registrations and removals, temporary residents and claims for various items of service. Comparisons between the three areas showed great differences for which no convincing explanation could be found. The possibility that people living in these areas have different primary care health services suggests that comparisons should be made nationally; this requires family practitioner committees to be fully computerized and to collect their data in the same way.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (642K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Harris CM, Hanson F. Family practitioner committee records--a neglected resource. 1. An information service for general practitioners based on claims for fees. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Mar;36(284):111–113. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wood J. Are the problems of primary care in inner cities fact or fiction? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Apr 2;286(6371):1109–1112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wood JO. Are general practitioners in inner Manchester worse off than those in adjacent areas? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Apr 16;286(6373):1249–1252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wilkin D, Metcalfe DH, Hallam L, Cooke M, Hodgkin PK. Area variations in the process of care in urban general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Jul 28;289(6439):229–232. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wilkin D, Metcalfe DH. List size and patient contact in general medical practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Dec 1;289(6457):1501–1505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hanson F, Harris CM. Family practitioner committee records--a neglected resource. 2. Drawing the profile of an area. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Apr;36(285):165–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sheldon MG, Harris SJ. Use of deputising services and night visit rates in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Aug 25;289(6443):474–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hobday PJ. Night workload in one health district. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Sep 15;289(6446):663–664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ellis N. Family practitioner committee independence: what will it mean? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Feb 23;290(6468):607–611. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners