PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jroyalcgpracBJGP at RCGPBJGP at PubMed CentralJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralRCGP homepage
 
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985 November; 35(280): 516–519.
PMCID: PMC1960325

Doctors' opinions on the prevention of myocardial infarction

Abstract

In 1979, 1981 and 1983 random samples of approximately 200 general practitioners, 200 members of the Royal College of General Practitioners and 200 hospital physicians were asked to list, in order of effectiveness, measures which they considered useful in the prevention of myocardial infarction and reinfarction. The overall response rate was 67% and of the responses 77% were eligible for inclusion in the analysis.

There was a high degree of concordance between the opinions of the nine doctor-year groups (Kendall's W = 0.89, P < 0.001). Behavioural measures, such as diet, weight control, exercise and cessation of smoking, were mentioned frequently and were ranked above most drug therapies. Overall, opinions concerning the relative utility of different measures did not change between 1979 and 1983 yet there were significant changes in the frequency with which specific therapies were mentioned as useful preventive measures. Beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and arteriograms/coronary artery bypass grafting were mentioned more frequently in 1983 than in 1979 while lowering the lipid levels (with drugs) and sulphinpyrazone were mentioned less frequently. The changes in the opinions of doctors are discussed in the context of new therapeutic information published between 1979 and 1983.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (830K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hampton JR, Morris GK, Mason C. Survey of general practitioners' attitudes to management of patients with heart attacks. Br Med J. 1975 Oct 18;4(5989):146–148. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Mason C, Murdoch JC. Current opinion concerning the treatment of heart disease. Report of a postal survey among Tayside general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Feb;33(247):91–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • DOLL R, HILL AB. MORTALITY IN RELATION TO SMOKING: TEN YEARS' OBSERVATIONS OF BRITISH DOCTORS. Br Med J. 1964 May 30;1(5395):1399–1410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Gordon T, Kannel WB, Dawber TR, McGee D. Changes associated with quitting cigarette smoking: the Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1975 Sep;90(3):322–328. [PubMed]
  • Morris JN, Everitt MG, Pollard R, Chave SP, Semmence AM. Vigorous exercise in leisure-time: protection against coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1980 Dec 6;2(8206):1207–1210. [PubMed]
  • Temple R, Pledger GW. The FDA's critique of the anturane reinfarction trial. N Engl J Med. 1980 Dec 18;303(25):1488–1492. [PubMed]
  • Elwood PC, Cochrane AL, Burr ML, Sweetnam PM, Williams G, Welsby E, Hughes SJ, Renton R. A randomized controlled trial of acetyl salicylic acid in the secondary prevention of mortality from myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1974 Mar 9;1(5905):436–440. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Breddin K, Loew D, Lechner K, Uberla K, Walter E. Secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. Comparison of acetylsalicylic acid, phenprocoumon and placebo. A multicenter two-year prospective study. Thromb Haemost. 1979 Feb 28;41(1):225–236. [PubMed]
  • Elwood PC, Sweetnam PM. Aspirin and secondary mortality after myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1979 Dec 22;2(8156-8157):1313–1315. [PubMed]
  • Hjalmarson A, Elmfeldt D, Herlitz J, Holmberg S, Málek I, Nyberg G, Rydén L, Swedberg K, Vedin A, Waagstein F, et al. Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A double-blind randomised trial. Lancet. 1981 Oct 17;2(8251):823–827. [PubMed]
  • Hampton JR. Coronary artery bypass grafting for the reduction of mortality: an analysis of the trials. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Nov 3;289(6453):1166–1170. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners