PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjopthalBritish Journal of OphthalmologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 May; 91(5): 620–623.
Published online 2007 January 3. doi:  10.1136/bjo.2006.103135
PMCID: PMC1954765

Photodynamic treatment versus photodynamic treatment associated with systemic steroids for idiopathic choroidal neovascularisation

Abstract

Aim

To compare photodynamic therapy (PDT) with PDT associated with systemic steroids (SS) for the control of juxta/subfoveal idiopathic choroidal neovascularisation (ICNV).

Methods

Patients with juxta/subfoveal ICNV were randomised and then treated. Visual gain and loss were defined as improvement in or worsening for two or more lines of best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), respectively. Choroidal neovascularisation size after treatment was classified as “increased” and “reduced” if it was increased or reduced by >200 μm2, respectively.

Results

10 patients were treated with PDT, 10 with SS followed by PDT. The median follow‐up time was 22 and 21 months for the “steroid+PDT group” and the “PDT group”, respectively. At 1 year, in the PDT group, five patients had stable/improved BCVA, and five became worse; the mean number of PDT was 2.3; in the steroid+PDT group, all patients were stable/improved and the mean number of PDT was 1.2. The difference between the two groups was significant (p<0.05). At 1 year, the ICNV size after treatment was better in the steroid+PDT group than in the PDT group (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The use of SS before PDT has shown better BCVA outcome than PDT alone (p<0.05), reducing the mean number of PDT applications (1.2 vs 2.3, respectively), with smaller scar size.

Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) without signs of retinal scars, age‐related macular degeneration lesions or high myopia is defined as idiopathic1 CNV (ICNV).

Several papers described that indocyanine green angiography can detect choroidal abnormalities, suggesting a possible role for low‐grade choroidal inflammation,2,3,4 further supported by previous publications showing CNV as its possible sequela.5

The use of steroids for the control of inflammation is well established, and steroids represent the preferred treatment for non‐infectious choroidal inflammation.6,7

Different techniques have been proposed for the management of ICNV, such as photodynamic therapy (PDT),8,9 surgical removal10,11 and thermal laser photocoagulation,12 and even though the efficacy of local13 and systemic steroids14 (SS) for CNV secondary to inflammation has been described, there are, as far as we know, no publications on their use for the management of ICNV.

The aim of our study was to compare the outcome of PDT alone versus PDT with a previous course of SS.

Methods

Patients younger than 50 years, with impairment in visual acuity, methamorphopsia and scotoma in the centre of the visual field, were referred to the Retina Unit of the Eye Clinic, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy, from the casualty, the retina clinic itself and other hospitals belonging to the Italian National Health Service (table 11).

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Patient data

The study was designed as a prospective, consecutive, open‐label, randomised control trial. The aim was to compare the efficacy of PDT versus SS with PDT in patients with ICNV. Stable/improved best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was the primary end point. The secondary end point was the reduction of the lesion size including the atrophic border. To detect a difference in efficacy between the two methods, we estimated that 48 patients would need to be recruited to each treatment group. This estimate was performed using a χ2 test with a two‐sided significance level of 0.05 and 80% power. CNVs without evidence of both retinal and choroidal abnormalities were included. ICNVs previously treated and patients with comorbidity were not considered. All patients were examined by AG. Two groups were created: group 1 to be treated with PDT alone, and group 2 to be treated with PDT associated with SS. Patients were randomised by casual numbers generated by SPSS software V.11.0.1. Ethics committee approval from the “Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona” was obtained. BCVA outcomes were classified according to two dichotomous predictors, defined as “stable/improved” and “worse”.

CNV size after treatment was dichotomised as “increased”, when the lesion size, including peri‐lesional atrophy, was increased [gt-or-equal, slanted]200 μm2; “stable/reduced”, if reduced [gt-or-equal, slanted]200 μm2 or not modified by >200 μm2. The lesion's size was calculated by Topcon Imagenet 2000 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the median time of follow‐up. Differences in the BCVA between groups 1 and 2 were evaluated considering the ICNV size modification after treatment, dichotomised as “stable/reduced” and “increased” as a classification criterion; the Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess any significant difference. Fluorescein angiography (FA; TRC‐50 IX, Topcon) was performed. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was used for the visual acuity examination; a decrease or increase in visual acuity was defined as a decrease or an increase of [gt-or-equal, slanted]10 letters (two lines) of vision from the initial BCVA, respectively.

For group 2, the initial treatment was intravenous steroids (methylprednisolone) at a dose of 1 g daily for 3 days, followed by oral steroids (prednisone) at a dose of 1 mg/kg daily. The steroids were tapered on an individual basis. PDT was performed following the parameters indicated in the Treatment of Age‐related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy and Verteporfin In Photodynamic therapy studies.9,15 The timing for PDT treatment was established according to FA leakage, CNV size reduction, and decrease and flattening of neurosensory detachment.

Results

A total of 20 patients were included: 11 males and 9 females. The groups showed a similar distribution of patients by sex and age (all comparisons >0.3). Mean age was 29.7 (7.3) years (range 10–44). All patients had unilateral involvement. The median follow‐up was 23 months. The Wilcoxon test did not reveal statistically significant difference of the median follow‐up time between the two groups. Ten patients were included in group 1; this group had a mean (SD) BCVA of 0.34 (0.19) at baseline (T0) (table 22),), with a median follow‐up of 21 months.

Table thumbnail
Table 2 Best‐corrected visual acuity scores at last follow‐up (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart) in the groups (n = 20)

The mean number of PDT was 2.3. At 1 year, group 1 had 5 (50%) patients with stable/improved BCVA and 5 (50%) with deteriorated BCVA; 5 (50%) patients had stable/reduced lesions. The mean (SD) BCVA at the last follow‐up (T1) was 0.31 (0.29); 4 (40%) patients were stable/improved, and 6 (60%) had deteriorated.

At the last follow‐up, the analysis of the CNV size showed 4 (40%) cases with stable/reduced lesions compared with T0 and 6 (60%) with increased lesions (fig 11).

figure bj103135.f1
Figure 1 Lesion size of patient 1, a 14‐year‐old girl, treated only with photodynamic therapy (PDT), at baseline (A) and after two applications of PDT (B). Lesion size of patient 16, a 23‐year‐old woman, treated ...

Ten patients were included in group 2; this group had a mean (SD) T0 BCVA of 0.26 (0.13; table 22),), with a median follow‐up of 22 months. The median time between the beginning of steroid treatment and PDT was 1.5 months. The median duration of steroid treatment was 5 months. The mean number of PDT was 1.5.

After 1 year of follow‐up, all patients in group 2 had stable/improved BCVA with stable/reduced lesions. At T1, the mean (SD) BCVA was 0.41 (0.26); 9 (90%) patients had stable/improved BCVA and 1 (10%) patient had a worse BCVA. At the last follow‐up, the analysis of CNV size showed 9 (90%) cases with stable/reduced CNV size (fig 11)) and 1 (10%) case with increased CNV size .

At 1 year, the BCVA outcome was better in group 2 (p = 0.0147), with a significant reduction of CNV size (p = 0.0389). The better outcome of group 2 remained statistically significant at the last follow‐up. The number of PDTs was 2.3 for group 1 versus 1.5 for group 2. After treatment, BCVA was better in patients with stable/reduced lesions (p<0.001, fig 22).). Severe side effects have not been observed in both groups.

figure bj103135.f2
Figure 2 Box‐plot of the best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain after treatment in patients showing a stable/reduced and an increased choroidal neovascularisation CNV size.

Discussion

The pathophysiology of ICNV is still not well known. A low‐grade choroidal inflammation may be a reasonable promoter, as suggested by changes of choroidal permeability in ICNV similar to choriocapillaritis/choroiditis.2,3 Limits of indocyanine green angiography are due to poor specificity, and we cannot prove whether these alterations are due to a low‐grade non‐infectious choroidal inflammation or not. However, the hypothesis that a low‐grade inflammation could be the cause of pathogenesis of ICNV is supported by evidence that inflammation can be a determinant cofactor for the neoangiogesis, even for those not purely due to inflammation itself.16,17

The supposed role of SS for the control of CNV has been reported previously,18 but data on their use for ICNV are lacking at present. The rationale for using SS is based on the fact that recruitment of white blood cells involved in inflammation starts from bone marrow and SS are able to stop it.7

The natural history of subfoveal ICNV showed an association between CNV size at the onset and visual outcome: CNVs less than one disc area had better visual prognosis than larger ones.1 Although its natural history is not necessarily associated with severe visual loss, pilot studies on PDT for subfoveal ICNV reported promising results.8,9 In our trial, steroids have shown a better reduction of CNV size (fig 11)) after combined treatment than afetr PDT alone (fig 11),), with a better BCVA outcome, reducing the risk of exuberant subretinal fibrosis19 and severe pigment epithelial alterations20 observed after PDT. In addition, in group 1 the mean number of PDT was 2.3, whereas that in group 2 was 1.2, suggesting that a reduction in the number of treatments could reduce oxidative damage to the retinal pigmented epithelial cells and preserve its function.

Patients in group 2, who received steroids before PDT, had a dramatic reduction of CNV size with a smaller perimetric atrophy, suggesting that steroids act a strong control against the activation of fibroblast cells,7 contributing to a smaller scar tissue, which correlates well with our results: we observed hyperplastic fibrosis only in cases treated with PDT alone.

On the basis of our results, the better strategy for the treatment of ICNV seems to be a combination of preliminary treatment with steroids, followed by PDT: intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g for 3 days), followed by oral prednisone (1 mg/kg), has produced a dramatic effect in the control of ICNV.

The timing of the PDT application was decided on the basis of FA leakage, CNV size reduction, and decrease and flattening of neurosensory detachment. Because of these criteria and also because the dose of steroids is tailored individually, it is important to proceed with short follow‐ups for the first 2 months, which will help best define the correct timing for the first PDT treatment. In our experience, the median time from the beginning of steroid treatment to PDT was 1.5 months.

Considering our results, PDT preceded by SS seems to produce smaller scars and less hyperplastic fibrosis. However, this study should be interpreted with the limitation of an insufficient number of patients recruited on the basis of a power calculation, suggesting the need for multicentric trials for a larger recruitment. In addition, on the basis of our data, further case‐control trials on SS alone for ICNV are strongly suggested.

Acknowledgement

We thank Prof Flavia Carle, Professor of Statistics, for her help with the statistical analysis.

Abbreviations

BCVA - best‐corrected visual acuity

CNV - choroidal neovascularisation

FA - fluorescein angiography

ICNV - idiopathic choroidal neovascularisation

PDT - photodynamic therapy

SS - systemic steroids

Footnotes

Sponsors: None.

Competing interests: None.

References

1. Allen C H, Yannuzzi L A, Pisicano K. et al The natural history of idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. Ophthalmology 1995. 102782–789.789 [PubMed]
2. Giovannini A, Scassellati‐Sforzolini B, Mariotti C. et al Indocyanine green angiography findings in idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. Int Ophthalmol. 1996–97 20171–179.179 [PubMed]
3. Gharbiya M, Pantaleoni F B, Grandinetti F. et al Indocyanine green angiographic findings in idiopathic choroidal neovascularization. Eye 1999. 13(Pt 5)621–628.628 [PubMed]
4. Parvan P R, Margo C E. Submacular neovascular membrane and focal granulomatous inflammation. Ophthalmology 1996. 103586–589.589 [PubMed]
5. Forrester J V, Liversidge J, Dua H S. et al Comparison of clinical experimental uveitis. Curr Eye Res 1990. 975–84.84 [PubMed]
6. Gordon D M. Prednisone and prednisolone in ocular disease. Am J Ophthalmol 1956. 41593–600.600 [PubMed]
7. Vitale A T, Foster C S. Corticosteroids. Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002. 142–158.158
8. Spaide R F, Martin M L, Slakter J. et al Treatment of idiopasubfoveal choroidal neovascularization lesions using photodynamic therapy with verteporfin. Am J Ophthalmol 2002. 13462–68.68 [PubMed]
9. Chan W M, Lam D S, Wong T H. et al Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal idiopathic choroidal neovascularization: one‐year results from a prospective case series. Ophthalmology 2003. 1102395–2402.2402 [PubMed]
10. Sears J, Capone A, Jr, Aaberg T., Sr et al Surgical management of subfoveal neovascularization in children. Ophthalmology 1999. 106920–924.924 [PubMed]
11. Lit E S, Kim R Y, Damico D J. Surgical removal of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization without removal of posterior hyaloid: a consecutive series in younger patients. Retina 2001. 21317–323.323 [PubMed]
12. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesion nasal to the fovea. Results from clinical trials for lesions secondary to ocular histoplasmosis or idiopathic causes. Arch Ophthalmol 1995. 11356–61.61 [PubMed]
13. Okada A A, Wakabayashi T, Kojima E. et al Trans‐tenon's retrobulbar triamcinolone infusion for small choroidal neovascularization. Br J Ophthalmol 2004. 881097–1098.1098 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Flaxel C J, Owens S L, Mulholland B. et al The use of corticosteroids for choroidal neovascularization in young patients. Eye 1998. 12(Pt 2)266–272.272 [PubMed]
15. Treatment of Age‐related macular degeneration with Photodynamic therapy (TAP) Study Group Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age‐related macular degeneration with verteporfin. One year results of 2 randomized clinical trail‐TAP report 1. Arch Ophthalmol 1999. 1171329–1345.1345 [PubMed]
16. Espinosa‐Heidmann D, Suner I J, Hernandez E P. et al Macrophage depletion diminishes lesion size and severity in experimental choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003. 443586–3592.3592 [PubMed]
17. Reddy V M, Zamora R L, Kaplan H J. Distribution of growth factors in subfoveal neovascular membranes in age related macular degeneration and presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 1995. 120291–301.301 [PubMed]
18. Levy J, Shneck M, Klemperer I. et al Punctate inner choroidopathy: resolution after oral steroid treatment and review of the literature. Can J Ophthalmol 2005. 40605–608.608 [PubMed]
19. Puliafito C A, Rogers A H, Martidis A. et al Ophthalmic complications of photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization. In: Ocular photodynamic therapy. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Inc, 2002. 109–116.116
20. Postelmans L, Pasteels B, Coquelet P. et al Severe pigment epithelial alterations in the treatment area following photodynamic therapy for classic choroidal neovascularizaìtion in young females. Am J Ophthalmol 2004. 138803–808.808 [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group