PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of annrheumdAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 June; 66(6): 815–817.
Published online 2007 January 4. doi:  10.1136/ard.2006.067777
PMCID: PMC1954667

Antimalarials may influence the risk of malignancy in systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

Background

Recent studies suggest that antimalarials have antineoplastic properties.

Objective

To investigate whether antimalarials decrease the risk of cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods

An observational prospective cohort study was carried out. 235 patients were included in the study at the time of diagnosis (American College of Rheumatology criteria). The end point was the diagnosis of cancer. Kaplan–Meier cancer‐free survival curves for patients treated and not treated with antimalarials were compared. A Cox proportional hazards model was fitted, with cancer as the dependent variable. Age at diagnosis, gender, treatment with azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, smoking, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index 6 months after diagnosis, year of diagnosis and treatment with antimalarials were entered as independent variables.

Results

209 (89%) patients were women. 233 (99%) patients were white. Mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 37 (16) years. Median (range) follow‐up was 10 (1–31) years. 156 (66%) patients had ever received antimalarials. 2/156 (1.3%) ever‐treated patients compared with 11/79 (13%) never‐treated patients had cancer (p<0.001). Cumulative cancer‐free survival in treated and not treated patients was 0.98 and 0.73, respectively (p<0.001). Adjusted hazard ratio for cancer among malaria drug users compared with non‐users was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.99).

Conclusions

This study launches the hypothesis of a protective action of antimalarials against cancer in patients with SLE. This effect should be confirmed in larger multicentre studies.

Recent studies have shown that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at increased risk of cancer.1,2 Not surprisingly, neoplastic diseases are among the leading causes of death in patients with lupus.3,4

Antimalarials are among the most frequent medications for lupus. They are usually prescribed to patients with mild–moderate disease, but long‐term beneficial effects are being recognised.4 A new potential therapeutic field has just opened for antimalarials. A recent randomised clinical trial has shown that chloroquine could be useful as adjuvant therapy in patients with glioblastoma.5 Our aim is thus to investigate the potential effects of malaria drug treatment on the development of cancer among patients with SLE.

Methods

Study design and patients

All patients with lupus attending the Internal Medicine Department, Hospital de Cruces, University of the Basque Country, Bizkaia, Spain, have been included in an ongoing prospective, observational study. All patients fulfilled the updated American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of SLE6 and were included in the cohort at the time of lupus diagnosis (T0). This was defined as the point when four American College of Rheumatology criteria were first met and was also the starting point of the follow‐up time. For the purposes of this study, patients who were children (ie, <14 years) at the time of SLE diagnosis were excluded (n = 5).

Variables studied

Detailed information on the characteristics of our cohort and database have been published.4 Briefly, patients are assessed every 3 months, unless more (active patients) or less frequent visits (long‐standing inactive patients) are required. Clinical and immunological variables are incorporated into the database at T0, and then on every subsequent visit. The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index (SDI) has been used to quantify the presence of irreversible organ damage.7 For the purposes of this study, we considered that a given patient was exposed to antimalarials if treated for any period lasting at least 6 months.

End point

The end point of this study is the development of a neoplasm. The diagnosis required radiological and/or histological confirmation, either before or after death. Premalignant lesions were not included as end points.

Statistical analysis

Patients were divided into those ever treated and never treated with antimalarials. The χ2 test was used to compare the frequencies of cancer in both groups. Kaplan–Meier cancer‐free survival curves were created and compared by means of the log rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was fitted, with cancer as the dependent variable. Apart from antimalarials, age at diagnosis, gender, treatment with azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate, smoking, SDI 6 months after diagnosis (divided into three categories: 0, 1 and >1) and year of diagnosis (divided into three groups: 1975–85, 1986–95 and 1996–2005) were entered as independent variables, given their potential influence in the development of neoplasms. Treatment variables were only counted if patients received the drug prior to the time of diagnosis of cancer. The proportionality of the risk of cancer over the time was confirmed using Schoenfeld residuals.

Results

General characteristics of the cohort

A total of 235 patients were studied. Of them, 209 (89%) were women. Only 2 (0.9%) patients were black. Mean (SD) age at T0 was 37 (16) years. Median (range) follow‐up time was 10 (1–31) years. A total of 156 (66%) patients were ever treated with antimalarials. Median time on antimalarials was 53 (6–238) months.

Comparison between patients receiving and not receiving antimalarials

Patient ever receiving antimalarials were younger, more likely to receive methotrexate and less likely to have severe damage at 6 months than never‐treated patients. Likewise, patients diagnosed with SLE during the years 1996–2005 were given antimalarials more frequently. For the remaining variables included in the Cox model, differences between groups were not statistically significant (table 11).

Table thumbnail
Table 1 Distribution of potential risk factors for cancer among patients treated and not treated with malaria drugs

Cancer

The total observational time of the cohort from T0 was 2620 patient‐years. During this period, 13 patients had cancer, resulting in an incidence of 4.9 cases per 1000 patient‐years (95% CI 2.6 to 8.5 cases per 1000 patient‐years). The specific neoplasms observed were: basal cell carcinoma (n = 3), glioblastoma (n = 2), hepatocarcinoma (n = 1), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), endometrial carcinoma (n = 1), carcinoma of the cervix (n = 1), breast cancer (n = 1), sarcoma (n = 1), urothelial carcinoma (n = 1) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1). Median (range) follow‐up from T0 to the time of the diagnosis of cancer was 3 (1–24) years. Seven patients died as a consequence of cancer.

Among patients treated with antimalarials, 2/156 (1.3%) patients had cancer compared with 11/79 (13%, p<0.001) not‐treated patients. The cumulative cancer‐free survival was 0.98 and 0.73, respectively (p<0.001; fig 11).). The unadjusted hazard ratio for cancer in ever users of antimalarials compared with never users was 0.10 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.45). The adjusted hazard ratio of patients treated with antimalarials was 0.15 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.99). Apart from antimalarials, only age at diagnosis and male gender showed an independent association with cancer (table 22).).

figure ar67777.f1
Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier cancer‐free survival curves.
Table thumbnail
Table 2 Cox proportional hazards model with cancer as the dependent variable

Discussion

A recent international collaborative project, recruiting 9547 patients from 23 centres in North America, Europe and Korea, has found an increased risk of malignancy in patients with SLE, particularly non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma, lung and hepatobiliary carcinoma.2 The incidences of neoplasms found by Bernatski et al2 and ourselves were remarkably similar (5.6 and 4.9 cases per 1000 patient‐years, respectively), although no case of non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma was seen among our patients.

The causes for the increased susceptibility of patients with lupus to cancer are a matter of debate. The use of immunosuppressive drugs has been frequently advocated, however this point has not been confirmed by most studies.1,8,9 Likewise, the link between cyclophosphamide and urological malignancies has not been established in lupus, maybe owing to the lower toxic potential of intravenous schedules.1

antimalarials are widely used in SLE. They are usually prescribed for mild–moderate manifestations. However, they have important long‐term effects in lupus. A recent study has shown that treatment with antimalarials reduces the accrual of damage in patients with SLE.10 Data from two different observational cohorts suggest that treatment with antimalarials reduces long‐term mortality in patients with lupus.4,11 Such a reduced mortality has been primarily attributed to the prevention of cardiovascular events. However, some influence on the other causes of death cannot be discarded. Sultan et al8 included antimalarials in their analysis of risk factors for cancer in SLE and did not find any association, however the temporal relationship with exposure was not taken into account.

Some recent data point to a potential influence of antimalarials in malignancy. antimalarials are weak bases with a well‐known tropism for lysosomes.12 In addition, they are strong DNA‐intercalating agents that prevent mutations in cells with a high mitotic rate.5 Chloroquine has shown an inhibitory action on telomerase, which is centrally involved in the unlimited replication of tumorous cells.5 Chloroquine also increases the synthesis of Tp53, a short‐lived protein which protects DNA against genotoxic stimuli.13 Although an increase in Tp53 levels usually occurs in response to DNA damage, there is evidence for the lack of mutagenicity of antimalaria agents in mammalian cells.14 Moreover, chloroquine improves cellular mechanisms of DNA repair after damage caused by alkylating therapy.15

These protective properties against DNA damage have potential implications in patients with cancer. In a recent randomised clinical trial, Sotelo et al5 have shown that the addition of chloroquine to conventional treatment with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. The presumed mechanism of action was preventing the mutagenicity of tumorous cells.

Although the potential utility of antimalarials as coadjuvant agents in cancer treatment does not imply any preventive action on the development of neoplasms, this possibility is suggested by our results. We found an inverse relationship between the use of antimalarials and the development of cancer that persisted after adjustment for the variables potentially associated with malignancy.

This study has some limitations. First, patients ever treated with antimalarials were, on average, younger and had a lower frequency of severe damage at diagnosis. However, patients with severe damage were few (18 patients, 7.6% of the cohort). Only age, gender and antimalarials showed an independent association with cancer (table 22).

Second, some patients included in the antimalarials group spent part of the time at risk without actually receiving these drugs. The intermittency in the treatment with antimalarials would have tended to dilute their effect, thus a significant association with a lower frequency of cancer is unlikely to be explained by this fact. In addition, antimalarials accumulate in tissues such as the liver and skin, persisting for several years after withdrawing the drug,12 although the clinical implications of this are not known.

Third, carcinogenesis is an extremely complex process in which different factors take part. We found a great variety of neoplasms with different underlying biology in our population. Nevertheless, antimalarials could exert some favourable action against some of the yet unidentified predisposing factors in patients with SLE. This working hypothesis should be confirmed in larger and more ethnically diverse cohorts. If that were the case, this additional beneficial action of antimalarials would reinforce the recommendation of universal use of hydroxychloroquine in all patients with SLE.4

Abbreviations

SDI - Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index

SLE - systemic lupus erythematosus

Footnotes

Dr Garmendia is supported by a grant from Actelion and BIOEF.

Competing interests: None.

References

1. Bernatski S, Ramsey‐Goldman R, Clarke A. Exploring the links between systemic lupus erythematosus and cancer. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2005. 31387–402.402 [PubMed]
2. Bernatski S, Boivin J F, Joseph L, Rajan R, Zoma A, Manzi S. et al An international cohort study of cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2005. 521481–1490.1490 [PubMed]
3. Moss K E, Ioannou Y, Sultan S M, Haq I, Isenberg D A. Outcome of a cohort of 300 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus attending a dedicated clinic for over two decades. Ann Rheum Dis 2002. 61409–413.413 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
4. Ruiz‐Irastorza G, Egurbide M V, Pijoan J I, Garmendia M, Villar I, Martinez‐Berriotxoa A. et al Effect of antimalarials on thrombosis and survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 2006. 15577–583.583 [PubMed]
5. Sotelo J, Briceño E, López‐González M A. Adding chloroquine to conventional treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: a randomized, double blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2006. 144337–343.343 [PubMed]
6. Hochberg M C. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1997. 401725
7. Gladman D D, Goldsmith C H, Urowitz M B, Bacon P, Fortin P, Ginzler E. et al The systemic lupus erythematosus international collaborating clinics/American College of Rheumatology index for systemic lupus erythematosus international comparison. J Rheumatol 2000. 27373–376.376 [PubMed]
8. Sultan S M, Ioannou Y, Isenberg D A. Is there an association of malignancy with systemic lupus erythematosus? An analysis of 276 patients under long‐term review. Rheumatology 2000. 391147–1152.1152 [PubMed]
9. Cibere J, Sibley J, Haga M. Systemic lupus erythematosus and the risk of malignancy. Lupus 2001. 10394–400.400 [PubMed]
10. Fessler B S, Alarcón G S, McGwin G, Jr, Roseman J, Bastian H M, Friedman A W. et al Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups XVI: hydroxychloroquine usage is associated with a lower risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum 2005. 521473–1480.1480 [PubMed]
11. Alarcón G S, McGwin G, Jr, Fessler B J, Bertoli A M, Calvo‐Alén J, Bastian H M. et al “Confounding by indications” partially explains the protective effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in SLE survival: data from a multiethnic US cohort. Arthritis Rheum 2005. 52S726
12. Wallace D J. Antimalarials agents and lupus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994. 20243–263.263 [PubMed]
13. Sohn T A, Bansal R, Su G H, Murphy K M, Kern S E. High‐throughput measurement of the Tp53 response to anticancer drugs and random compounds using a stably integrated Tp53‐responsive luciferase reporter. Carcinogenesis 2002. 23949–957.957 [PubMed]
14. Riccio E S, Lee P S, Winegar R A, Krogstad D J, De D, Mirsalis J C. Genetic toxicology testing of the antimalarial drugs chloroquine and a new analog, AQ‐13. Environ Mol Mutagen 2001. 3869–79.79 [PubMed]
15. Briceno E, Reyes S, Sotelo J. Therapy of glioblastoma multiforme improved by the antimutagenic chloroquine. Neurosurg Focus 2003. 14e3

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group