The Effect of PPARα, PPARδ, PPARγ, and PPARpan Agonists on Body Weight, Body Mass, and Serum Lipid Profiles in Diet-Induced Obese AKR/J Mice

doi:10.1155/2007/97125

PPAR Res. 2007; 2007: 97125.

Published online 2007 June 6. doi: 10.1155/2007/97125

PMCID: PMC1940322

The Effect of PPARα, PPARδ, PPARγ, and PPARpan Agonists on Body Weight, Body Mass, and Serum Lipid Profiles in Diet-Induced Obese AKR/J Mice

W. Wallace Harrington,^* Christy S. Britt, Joan G. Wilson, Naphtali O. Milliken, Jane G. Binz, David C. Lobe, William R. Oliver, Michael C. Lewis, and Diane M. Ignar

Department of Metabolic Diseases, GlaxoSmithKline Research, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA

*W. Wallace Harrington: Email: wallace.w.harrington/at/gsk.com

Recommended by Francine M. Gregoire

Received November 18, 2006; Revised February 8, 2007; Accepted March 3, 2007.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α, δ, and γ subtypes increases expression of genes involved in fatty acid transport and oxidation and alters adiposity in animal models of obesity and type-2 diabetes. PPARpan agonists which activate all three receptor subtypes have antidiabetic activity in animal models without the weight gain associated with selective PPARγ agonists. Herein we report the effects of selective PPAR agonists (GW9578, a PPARα agonist, GW0742, a PPARδ agonist, GW7845, a PPARγ agonist), combination of PPARα and δ agonists, and PPARpan (PPARα/γ/δ) activators (GW4148 or GW9135) on body weight (BW), body composition, food consumption, fatty acid oxidation, and serum chemistry of diet-induced obese AKR/J mice. PPARα or PPARδ agonist treatment induced a slight decrease in fat mass (FM) while a PPARγ agonist increased BW and FM commensurate with increased food consumption. The reduction in BW and food intake after cotreatment with PPARα and δ agonists appeared to be synergistic. GW4148, a PPARpan agonist, induced a significant and sustained reduction in BW and FM similar to an efficacious dose of rimonabant, an antiobesity compound. GW9135, a PPARpan agonist with weak activity at PPARδ, induced weight loss initially followed by rebound weight gain reaching vehicle control levels by the end of the experiment. We conclude that PPARα and PPARδ activations are critical to effective weight loss induction. These results suggest that the PPARpan compounds may be expected to maintain the beneficial insulin sensitization effects of a PPARγ agonist while either maintaining weight or producing weight loss.

1. INTRODUCTION

Obesity has risen to epidemic proportions world wide and is one the most visible, yet often neglected, of public health issues. It is now prevalent in virtually all age and socio-economic groups in both developed and developing nations [1]. Obesity is a complex, multifactorial condition produced by genetic, social, and psychological factors, the most significant being high-fat diet and sedentary life style. The health consequences of obesity range from increased risk of premature death to serious chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, and certain forms of cancer [2–5]. Agents that reduce obesity through reductions in food intake or increased energy expenditure could serve as therapeutic options for the prevention of obesity and its comorbidities [6–8].

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that belong to the superfamily of nuclear receptors [9]. Three subtypes, designated PPARα (NR1C1), PPARδ (NR1C2), and PPARγ (NR1C3) have been identified whose endogenous ligands include fatty acids and fatty acid metabolites. PPARs form heterodimers with retinoid X receptors (RXRs) and bind to the hexanucleotidic PPAR responsive element (PPRE), thereby regulating the expression of target genes involved in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.

PPARs are found in species ranging from Xenopus to humans [9] with each receptor having a distinct tissue expression profile. PPARα is expressed mainly in the liver, heart, and muscle. The discovery that fibrates are hypolipidemic agents which activate PPARα suggested that this receptor may play a role in lipid metabolism [9, 10]. Indeed, activation of PPARα has been shown to upregulate genes involved in hepatic lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle. In addition, these agents decrease adiposity in animal models of obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). For example, fenofibrate has been shown to reduce food intake, body weight, and adiposity in several mouse models and obesity-prone rats [11, 12]. PPARδ has a broad pattern of distribution and is expressed in many tissues, including muscle and kidney [13]. Recent work has suggested that PPARδ is involved in overall energy regulation and fatty acid oxidation in the muscle. Activation of PPARδ has also been shown to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) in diabetic db/db mice and obese rhesus monkeys [14]. Studies by Wang et al. [15] suggest that overexpression of PPARδ in adipose tissue protects against diet-induced obesity in mice and treatment with a PPARδ selective agonist reduces weight gain without effects on food intake in fat-fed mice [16].

The discovery that glitazones activate PPARγ receptor has elucidated the role of this receptor in lipid transport and storage and carbohydrate metabolism [17]. PPARγ is expressed predominantly in white and brown adipose tissue and is important in the regulation and control of adipocyte development and function [18]. Treatment with PPARγ agonists enhances the action of insulin and reduces serum glucose in subjects with T2DM, however, substantial body weight gain also occurs that is comprised of both fat mass and fluid volume [19–22].

PPARpan agonists can activate all three PPAR receptor subtypes and exert a variety of effects on multiple tissues simultaneously. This class of compounds has been shown to have antidiabetic efficacy in several animal models of T2DM [23]. These compounds also affect lipoprotein composition and reduce atherosclerotic plaque formation without the weight gain associated with PPARγ agonists suggesting their utility in treatment of metabolic syndrome [24, 25].

A number of studies have described the effect of individual PPAR agonists in a variety of animal models or experimental paradigms [14, 26–28]. This study provides a systematic four-week evaluation of potent and selective agonists of the three PPAR isoforms, the combination of PPARα and δ agonists and PPARpan agonists in a single chronic model of diet-induced obesity. We report the effects of these agents on body weight, body composition, fatty acid oxidation, and clinical chemistry in obesity-prone AKR/J mice.

2. METHODS

2.1. In vitro potency and selectivity

2.1.1. Assessment of PPAR activation using GAL4 transient transfection assay

The functional potency of selected ligands was evaluated using a transient transfection assay in CV-1 cells. The ligand binding domains for murine PPARα, PPARδ, and PPARγ were fused to the yeast transcription factor GAL4 DNA binding domain as a chimera. CV-1 cells were propagated and transiently transfected with expression vectors for the respective PPAR chimera as previously described [29, 30]. Test compounds were compared to reference comparators that give maximum responses in this assay. Compounds which produced an activation of at 70% or greater, compared to a positive control, were considered full agonists.

2.1.2. Ex vivo quantification of PPAR-induced fatty acid oxidation

Fatty acid oxidation (FAO) was determined by ¹⁴C-labeled CO₂ capture from tissue homogenates using a method modified from Dohm et al. [31]. Following treatment with either vehicle or a PPAR agonist, livers from fed mice were surgically removed and a section excised from the same lobe. The tissue was immediately weighed, minced with scissors and placed in tubes (Falcon #2063) on ice. Cold SET buffer (250 mM Sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4) was added at a ratio of 10 mL SET:1 gram of tissue and the tissue homogenized on ice for 15 sec using a hand-held homogenizer (Polytron PT1200; Kinematica AG). The homogenates remained on ice until assayed.

The labeled reaction buffer was prepared by first drying ¹⁴C-oleic acid (0.5 μCi/reaction; PerkinElmer #NEC-317) under nitrogen. The dried fraction is re-suspended in unlabeled oleic acid such that the final concentration of oleic acid in the reaction buffer was 0.2 mM. BSA was added slowly while mixing to a final concentration of 0.5% and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 15 minutes. The labeled cocktail was then added to the reaction buffer to give a produce concentration of 100 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris pH 7.4, 4 mM ATP, 0.05 mM Coenzyme A, 0.1 mM malic acid, 1 mM magnesium chloride, 80 mM potassium chloride, 5 mM potassium phosphate, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 2 mM L-carnitine, as described previously [32, 33].

Oxidation reactions were performed in tubes (Falcon #352059) fitted with a stopper top (KONTES Glass Co., #882310-0000), center well (KONTES #882320-0000), and filter (Socorex #322.02) soaked with 175 μL of 1N NaOH. 100 μL of homogenate was dispensed into each tube and the reactions initiated by adding 400 μL of reaction buffer. The tubes were quickly capped and incubated with gentle shaking for 60 minutes in a 37°C water bath. After incubation, the filters were removed, from the tubes, placed in 7 mL of scintillant, and counted for 2 minutes (PerkinElmer Tri-Carb 3100TR). The oxidative activity of each compound was calculated as nmole CO₂ captured/gram tissue/hour and reported as fold change relative to vehicle control.

2.2. In vivo animal studies

All procedures were performed in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act, USDA regulations and approved by the GlaxoSmithKline Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Animals were housed at 72°F and 50% relative humidity with a 12-hour light and dark cycle.

2.2.1. Compounds

All compounds evaluated were synthesized by the Medicinal Chemistry Department at GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., and were determined to be >90% pure by HPLC and/or NMR analysis [34]. Dosing solutions of GW7845, GW0742, GW9578, GW4148, and GW9135 were prepared as a suspension in a vehicle of 0.5% methylcellulose and 0.1% Tween 80 and dosed at 10 mL/kg. Doses of each PPAR ligand were chosen from results of previous in-house efficacy studies.

2.2.2. Effect of PPAR agonists on body weight, body mass, and food consumption

The effects of monotherapy with selective PPAR agonists, combination therapy with PPARα and PPARδ, and treatment with PPARpan agonists were evaluated in four experiments in diet-induced obese (DIO) AKR/J mouse. The AKR/J mouse is a polyoma-susceptible strain originally utilized to study accelerated tumor development [35]. This strain becomes obese and hyperinsulemic when fed a high fat diet [36–39]. Age-matched, male AKR/J mice were allowed ad libitum access to Research Diet D12331 (Research Diet, Brunswick, NJ) at the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) beginning at 6 weeks of age. The diet has an energy density of 5.56 kcal/g (58% kcal from fat; 26% kcal from carbohydrates, and 16% kcal from protein). The animals were allowed to become obese, achieving BW >40 grams before shipping to GlaxoSmithKline laboratory animal facility at 13 weeks of age. The mice were housed 4 per cage in standard shoebox cages and were fed the high fat diet until they reached approximately 50 grams. Age-matched lean control animals obtained from Jackson Laboratories were fed a diet of normal chow (3.04 kcal/g energy density, 12% kcal from fat, LabDiet 5001, St. Louis, MO) and used for comparison.

At the beginning of each study, the animals were weighed and body composition obtained using an EchoMRI-100 quantitative magnetic resonance (qMR, EchoMRI, Houston, TX) whole body composition analyzer [40, 41]. Mice were sorted into groups (n = 8–10/group) such that BW and body mass (% lean and fat mass) were not significantly different at the beginning of the study. 16 lean control mice on standard chow were used as reference. All mice were dosed orally with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose and 0.1% Tween 80, 10 mL/kg) for six days prior to the beginning of dosing for acclimation to handling and treatment before drug treatment was initiated.

In each experiment, BW of each animal was measured and recorded three times weekly throughout the treatment period. Body mass was obtained weekly on days 0, 7, 13, 20, and 27 of treatment. The effects of selective PPARα, δ, and γ agonists on food consumption were also assessed. Food consumption is expressed as total energy consumed (kcal) over a 24-period and as cumulative consumption over the course of the experiment.

The fat content of Research Diets D12331 chow results in pellets that crumbles making it difficult to quantify food consumption thus, Research Diets D12451 chow (4.7 kcal/g (45% kcal from fat, 35% kcal from carbohydrates and 20% kcal from protein)) was used in studies where food consumption was determined as these pellets are more solid. The animals were transitioned two weeks before compound dosing from Research Diets D12331 chow to Research Diets D12451 chow. Previous experiments (data not presented) have shown that animals fed this diet maintain the same BW and fat mass level as observed at the time of transition.

On the final day of each experiment, a terminal blood sample (800–1000 μL) was obtained via cardiac puncture under isoflurane anesthesia. Whole blood was placed in a Terumo Capiject blood collection tube (Terumo Medical Corp., Elkton, Md, USA), allowed to sit at room temperature for 20 minutes then centrifuged to obtain serum. Serum levels of glucose, triglycerides, glycerol, nonesterified fatty acids, total cholesterol, the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and β-hydroxybutyrate were determined in all mice using an Olympus AU640 clinical chemistry immuno-analyzer (Olympus America Inc., Melville, NY, USA). In addition, liver weights were obtained following the terminal blood sample on the final day of the study and samples were used to determine liver fatty acid oxidation activity.

3. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Experiment 1 was designed to study the effects of a selective PPARα agonist and PPARδ agonist as mono and combination therapy. 48 mice were sorted into 6 groups and blocked such that initial BW and body composition were not different between groups. Three groups of animals (n = 8) were dosed with Vehicle, the PPARα agonist (GW9578, 1 mg/kg), or the PPARδ agonist (GW0742, 30 mg/kg) for 4 weeks. Two additional groups of mice were dosed for the first 14 days with either a PPARα agonist or a PPARδ agonist alone. At day 15, the PPARδ agonist was added to the treatment regimen of animals dosed with PPARα, and the PPARα agonist was added to the dosing material of animals previously dosed with PPARδ alone. The sixth group was dosed with both the PPARα and PPARδ agonists for the entire 28-day period. BW and food consumption were assessed 3 times per week and body composition was measured weekly.

In Experiment 2, 32 mice were sorted into 4 groups (n = 8/group) and dosed with vehicle and a selective PPARγ agonist (GW7845, 3 mg/kg) for 28 days. Rimonabant (RIM, 10 or 30 mg/kg, q.d.), a CB1 receptor antagonist, was used as a positive control for weight loss. As in Experiment 1, BW and food consumption were determined 3 times per week and body composition was measured weekly.

In Experiment 3, three groups of mice (n = 9) were dosed for 28 days with vehicle or GW4148 (3 or 10 mg/kg), a PPARpan agonist that potently activates all three receptor subtypes. In Experiment 4, five groups of mice (n = 8) were dosed for 28 days with vehicle or GW9135 (3 or 10 mg/kg), a PPARpan agonist that has a different profile of PPARα, δ, and γ activation from GW4148.

4. DATA ANALYSIS

All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean. Weight loss experiments were analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. Comparison of serum chemistry values, food consumption and fat and lean mass changes between start and end of studies was analyzed by two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures model (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. Values were considered to be significant when a value of P < .05 was achieved.

5. RESULTS

5.1. Assessment of PPAR activation using GAL4 transient transfection assay

Each compound evaluated in vivo was characterized with regard to activation of the three PPAR subtypes [36] as shown in Table 1. These compounds are full agonists of their respective receptors. GW9578 is a potent agonist of murine PPARα receptors with an EC₅₀ of 8 nM and more than a 250-fold selectivity over PPARγ and PPARδ [34]. GW0742 is a potent and selective PPARδ agonist, (EC₅₀ = 28 nM) having a 300-fold selectivity over PPARα and PPARγ [26]. GW7845 is a potent and selective PPARγ agonist with an EC₅₀ of 1.2 nM and >1000-fold selectivity over the other murine PPAR subtypes [27]. Both PPARpan agonists used in this study activate all of the PPAR subtypes, however, GW4148 and GW9135 have different potency profiles. GW4148 is nearly equipotent at murine PPARα/δ/γ (EC₅₀ < 100 nM), while GW9135 is most potent at the PPARα receptor with significant activity on PPARγ and weak potency at PPARδ.

Table 1

Activation of murine PPAR receptors by PPAR agonists in cell-based transactivation assays. Compounds were assayed for agonist activity using the PPAR-GAL4 transactivation assay using an SPAP reporter transiently transfected in CV-1 cells as described (more ...)

5.2. In vivo studies

Experiment 1. Effect of mono- and combination therapy of PPARα and PPARδ Agonists in Obese AKR/J Mice

The first experiment was designed to compare the effects of selective PPARα (GW9578, 1 mg/kg) and PPARδ (GW0742, 30 mg/kg) agonists, and the combination of the two agents, on BW, fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and food consumption. Data are shown in Figures Figures1,1, ,2,2, and Table 2. Vehicle-treated mice weighed approximately 50 grams at initiation of the study and BW did not change during the study. While there was an initial weight loss trend, neither compound induced a sustained decrease in BW after 28 days of dosing (see Figure 1(a)).

Figure 1

Effect of treatment with selective PPARα and PPARδ agonists on BW in lean and DIO AKR/J mice. (a) GW9578, a PPARα agonist (1 mg/kg), GW0742, a PPARδ agonist (30 mg/kg). (b) Filled triangle: GW9578 dosed for 14 days (more ...)

Figure 2

Effect of treatment with selective PPARα and PPARδ agonists on food consumption (kcal) in lean and DIO AKR/J mice. (a) GW9578, a PPARα agonist (1 mg/kg), GW0742, a PPARδ agonist (30 mg/kg). (b) Filled triangle: GW9578 (more ...)

Table 2

Effect of treatment with PPAR agonists on body weight (BW), body composition (FM and LM), and liver weight (LW). Shown in the table are body weight (g) and fat and lean mass (g) values of each group. FM and LM were determined using qMR at the final (more ...)

On day 0, FM and LM (see Table 2) comprised 21.8 ± 1.6% (7.2 ± 0.6 grams) and 63.1 ± 1.3% (20.8 ± 0.4 grams) of total body weight, respectively, in lean mice. The remaining mass of each animal is composed of bone, free water (as cellular, interstitial and, blood volumes), and the contents of the gastrointestinal tract and bladder. In the DIO vehicle group, FM was nearly twice that of the lean mice (16.1 ± 1.4 grams; 39.5% of BW), but LM was similar (21.2 ± 0.2 grams; 53.1% of BW). FM and LM did not change in the DIO or lean vehicle groups in any of the experiments.

In spite of the fact that neither agent produced a significant decrease in BW, there was a slight decrease in FM after treatment with either the PPARα or PPARδ agonist while LM was unaffected (see Table 2, Experiment 1). Both agents produced a statistically significant increase in liver weight of nearly 1 gram that appears to have counterbalanced the change in fat mass resulting in unaltered BW.

Both the PPARα and PPARδ agonists affected food consumption. Compared to vehicle-treated animals, the PPARα agonist reduced food consumption while the PPARδ agonist produced a small but statistically significant increase in feeding (see Figure 2(a)). The effect of PPARα activation on feeding did not occur until day 10, the same point when weight loss had reached a plateau and subsequently began to rebound.

A second goal of Experiment 1 was to examine the effects of PPARα and PPARδ in combination on BW, body mass, and food consumption. Minimal BW changes were observed with the PPARα or PPARδ agonists alone similar to Figure 1(a). At Day 14, the PPARα agonist was added to the group dosed with PPARδ alone or vice versa for an additional 14 days. Both conditions resulted in weight loss (see Figure 1(b)) greater than observed with either agent alone. The overall weight loss from either combination was approximately 15% which was commensurate to the decrease in FM. A third group of mice was dosed with a combination of the PPARα and PPARδ agonists for the entire 28- day period. This treatment resulted in a 22% reduction in BW that occurred by 14 days. Both final BW and FM were similar to that of lean controls.

Addition of the PPARδ agonist to the PPARα agonist dosing regimen at 14 days did not have a significant effect on food consumption (see Figure 2(b)). However, adding PPARα to the dosing regimen of mice receiving the PPARδ agonist reduced food consumption to the level seen with PPARα agonist alone. Interestingly, simultaneous dosing from study outset with both the PPARα and PPARδ agonists reduced feeding to a greater extent then the sequential addition of the agents.

Experiment 2. Effect of a PPARγ agonist and rimonabant in obese AKR/J mice

Where Experiment 1 focused on the effects of selective PPARα and PPARδ agonists, Experiment 2 was designed to examine the effect of GW7845, a selective PPARγ agonist dosed at 3 mg/kg on BW, FM, LM, and food consumption. RIM, a CB-1R antagonist was used as a positive control for weight loss.

Treatment with RIM at doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg produced significant, dose-related decreases of BW. At the highest dose, RIM reduced BW by 17% within the first 10 days of treatment (see Figure 3(a)) and the effect was maintained over the remainder of the study. RIM also decreased FM in a dose-dependent manner (see Table 2, Experiment 2). In contrast, the PPARγ agonist produced a steady and consistent increase in BW over the course of the experiment (see Figure 3(b)). After 28 days, the weight of these animals had increased by almost 4 grams (8.6 ± 1.4% BW) and the mice were continuing to gain weight at 4 weeks. The PPARγ agonist produced a significant increase in FM over the 28 days of the study accounting for much of the weight gain in these animals.

Figure 3

Effect of treatment with rimonabant or selective PPARγ agonist on BW. (a) RIM (10 and 30 mg/kg). (b) GW7845, a selective PPARγ agonist (3 mg/kg). Data were analyzed by ANCOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. (more ...)

RIM induced dose-related decreases in food consumption with the greatest suppression observed on day 3 (see Figure 4(a)). After day 3, food consumption suppression began to wane, eventually returning to control levels by day 10 and remained at that level for the duration of the study. In contrast to the effect of RIM, food consumption of animals dosed with the PPARγ agonist increased 46% after only one day and remained elevated by more than 20% over the remaining treatment period (see Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4

Effect of treatment with rimonabant or selective PPARγ agonist on food consumption (kcal). (a) RIM (10 and 30 mg/kg). (b) GW7845, a selective PPARγ agonist (3 mg/kg). Data were analyzed by ANCOVA with repeated measures followed by (more ...)

Experiments 3 and 4. Effect of PPARpan agonists in obese AKR/J mice

Experiments 3 and 4 explore the effects of two PPARpan agonists with different selectivity profiles (see Figure 5, Table 1). GW4148, a potent activator of all three PPAR receptor subtypes, was used in Experiment 3. Dosed at 3 mg/kg, GW4148 did not induce weight loss. In contrast, a dose of 10 mg/kg significantly decreased BW by 18% after 19 days of dosing (see Figure 5(a)). This change mirrored the effects seen when PPARα and PPARδ were coadministered in Experiment 1. GW4148 also produced a significant decrease in FM that was commensurate with the reduction in BW.

Figure 5

Effect of treatment with PPARpan agonists on BW. (a) GW4148 dosed at 3 and 10 mg/kg. (b) GW9135 dosed at 3 and 10 mg/kg. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and were analyzed by ANCOVA with repeated measures followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. (more ...)

GW9135 is a PPARpan compound with a different pattern of activation than GW9148, being very potent at PPARα and PPARγ and weaker at PPARδ. Dosing GW9135 at 3 mg/kg had no effect on BW (see Figure 5(b)). Treatment with 10 mg/kg GW9135 reduced body weight 10% by day 8, however, the mice regained weight after that time and final BW was not significantly different from vehicle-treated animals at day 27 (see Figure 5(b)). This dose of GW9135 significantly reduced FM by 4 grams. Both GW4148 and GW9135 treatments increased liver weights by approximately 2.5 grams (see Table 2) which counterbalanced the final BW to some extent.

Effect of PPAR agonists on serum chemistry

Serum chemistry results are shown as group means in Table 3. None of the PPAR agonists tested in these experiments had a significant effect on blood glucose levels. The PPARα and PPARδ agonists alone significantly reduced circulating insulin (INS) levels. The combination of the two agents not only reduced insulin but also significantly reduced triglyceride (TG) and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) and elevated total cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), and β-Hydroxybutyric acid (βHBA). The selective PPARγ agonist produced a significant reduction in circulating INS, TG, and NEFA levels. Both PPARpan agonists significantly reduced fed glucose, INS, NEFAs, and TG and increased total CHOL, HDL-c, and βHBA.

Table 3

Group means of clinical chemistry results of DIO-AKR mice. Terminal blood samples were obtained at the end of treatment. Serum levels of analytes were determined using an Olympus AU640 clinical chemistry analyzer and analyzed by a two-way analysis of (more ...)

Effect of PPAR agonists on ex vivo fatty acid oxidation

Changes in drug-induced fatty acid oxidation (FAO) were evaluated in mouse liver extracts from animals treated with compound for 28 days (see Figure 6). Activation of the PPARδ agonist produced a 1.9-fold increase in FAO while the PPARγ agonist and PPARα agonist were not different from vehicle. The PPARpan agonists elicited responses similar to the PPARδ agonist and this response most likely reflects the activity of PPARpan agonists at the PPARδ receptor.

Figure 6

Effect of PPAR agonist treatment on fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in liver was assessed using a ¹⁴C capture method modified from Dohm et al. [28]. Data are expressed as fold change from vehicle control (mean ± SEM). N = 6 determinations/compound. (more ...)

6. DISCUSSION

There is a critical medical need to develop effective strategies for long-term weight loss and weight maintenance although it is unlikely that any single therapy will yield maximal efficacy. Currently, the few therapies actually shown to be effective for weight loss include lifestyle modifications (diet and exercise), bariatric surgery, and pharmacological targets that modulate central pathways that regulate food intake [41]. PPARs are known to modulate enzymes involved in lipid metabolism and are expressed in many, if not all, metabolically active tissues including liver, heart, kidney, skeletal muscle, intestine, pancreas, and adipose tissue [42, 43]. This suggests that PPARs play a key role in energy metabolism and homeostasis that may ultimately affect body weight and body mass. In this report, we present data showing that potent and selective agonists of all three PPAR isoforms serve to modulate food intake and energy balance in DIO AKR/J mice.

Selective activators of PPARγ, such as glitazones, have been successfully used to treat T2DM for nearly a decade. Treatment with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone induce body weight gain in mice [45, 46, 49], rats [44, 47–50], nonhuman primates [51, 52], and humans [53–55]. Weight gain is manifested as increased adiposity, total body water and plasma volume. In this report, mice treated with a potent and selective PPARγ activator gained more weight than obese vehicle controls and the weight gain could be completely accounted for by increased fat mass which was equivalent to the increase in caloric intake. In addition to stimulation of food consumption, activation of PPARγ promotes triglyceride accumulation by increasing expression of genes modulating adipogenesis [56–58], lipid transport [58, 59], storage [46, 60], and glucose homeostasis [61]. We also observed that GW7845 had no effect on FAO in mouse liver. In summary, PPARγ agonism induces food consumption and energy storage without an effect on energy utilization resulting in net weight gain.

A number of studies have suggested that PPARδ agonists regulate food intake, body weight, insulin sensitivity, and adiposity [8, 62–68]. Transgenic mice in which constitutively active PPARδ is expressed in muscle are highly resistant to high-fat, diet-induced obesity [15]. Administration of GW501516, a selective PPARδ agonist, promotes FAO and utilization, depleting lipid accumulation in adipocytes, skeletal muscle, and liver in DIO, ob/ob [68], and db/db mice [67].

Similarly, there are numerous studies that suggest that PPARα can regulate food intake, body weight, and adiposity in rodents [69–74]. PPARα has been shown to modulate target genes involved in uptake, activation, and degradation of fatty acids maintaining lipid homeostasis in liver, heart, and oxidative muscles [33, 75, 76]. It is possible that the combination of these mechanisms could result in reduction of body weight. Djouadi et al. [76] and Muoio et al. [33] have shown that the body weight of PPARα-KO mice was greater than WT littermates, and that they became obese when fed a high fat diet, confirming the role of PPARα receptors in modulating energy utilization and BW in rodents. In humans, fibrate treatment has not been associated with body weight loss (73), thus, the role of PPARα agonism in human body weight regulation is unclear.

Neither PPARα nor PPARδ agonists had a sustained effect on body weight. While the increase in liver weights observed with both treatments counterbalanced the initial weight loss induced by these compounds, this change did not completely explain the rebound.

GW0742, the PPARδ agonist, had a transient stimulatory effect on food intake from days 12–17 and it was during this time that the rebound increase in weight occurred. There was a significant increase in liver FAO induced by GW0742 after chronic dosing. The increase in food intake may have occurred in response to elevated energy expenditure, thus, an agent that only modulates energy expenditure did not induce significant weight loss in this model.

After 10 days of treatment with GW9578, the PPARα agonist, a significant suppression of food intake was observed that persisted throughout the rest of the study. The timing of this effect coincided with the timing of the rebound in weight gain. Currently, we do not have an explanation for this phenomenon, yet it appears that chronic PPARα agonism induces a metabolic compensation resulting in weight regain and the food intake suppression could be a counteracting mechanism. The effect on food consumption could be regulated centrally as PPARα is expressed in low but detectable levels in mouse hypothalamus, a major center of appetite and satiety regulation. PPARα could also modulate peripheral mechanisms that affect appetite or central response to lipid levels resulting from changes in FAO [12, 75]. While several reports have shown that PPARα increased FAO, the measurement of this parameter at the end of the study indicated that there was only a modest alteration. We did observe weight loss during the first 10 days of the study without a change in food intake thus it is possible that there could have been induction of FAO during this time.

A combination study of PPARα and PPARδ agonists was performed to determine if greater weight loss could be achieved together than with either compound alone. After 2 weeks of dosing with either single agent, addition of the second agent further reduced body weight and fat mass, suggesting a synergistic effect of the two agents. Combination dosing of both agents for the entire 4 weeks of the study produced even greater reduction in body weight and fat mass. Interestingly, the suppression of food intake after addition of GW9578 to GW0742 and with the straight combination dosing occurred immediately as opposed to the 10-day delay observed with GW9578 alone. The immediate effect on food intake through PPARα, increase in liver FAO from PPARδ, and the initial induction of weight loss by PPARα through a nonfood intake mechanism all account for the greater efficacy observed with the combination dosing from day 1 of treatment.

PPARpan agonists are a class of compounds that activate all three PPAR receptor subtypes and are currently being evaluated as antidiabetic agents. Compared to selective PPAR agonists, PPARpan ligands are expected to display unique characteristics as a result of ligand-activation profiles combining features of all three PPAR receptor subtypes, however, the effects are not simply the sum of the activities, but reflect a careful balance of lipid handling and energy. Both compounds used in this study are potent activators of all three isoforms but the potency ratio across the isoforms is different. GW4148 is an extremely potent agonist of murine PPARδ (9 nM) and is 4-fold selective over PPARα or PPARγ receptors. In contrast, GW9135 is a potent agonist of murine PPARα (13 nM) and is 18-fold and 50-fold selective over PPARγ and PPARδ, respectively. Other factors such as cofactor affinities contribute to the physiological behavior of each molecule.

GW9135 had little effect on overall weight loss, a pattern not different from PPARα agonist treatment alone, where there was an initial decrease in weight followed by regain. This effect can be explained by the greater potency of the molecule at PPARα and its weaker potency on PPARδ. In contrast, GW4148, which is most potent at the PPARα and PPARδ receptors, behaved similarly to combination dosing of GW9578 and GW0742 producing significant weight loss at 10/mg/kg.

Contrary to the differential effects on body weight, both PPARpan agonists produced similar metabolic effects. Each compound reduced TG, NEFA, and circulating insulin levels, and elevated HDL-c and bHBA. A similar pattern was noted with the combination of GW9578 and GW0742, however, these two agents alone did not have significant effects on any parameter except insulin. The combination of PPARα and PPARδ activation results in a synergistic effect on serum chemistry parameters.

In summary, these studies demonstrate that PPARs are integrally involved in energy maintenance. The PPARα and PPARδ receptors are responsible for induction of weight loss in AKR/J mice through suppression of food intake and increased energy expenditure. Activation of PPARα and PPARδ receptors by PPARpan compounds may be expected to induce weight loss or provide weight maintenance while combining the beneficial insulin sensitization effects of a PPARγ agonist.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Portions of this study were presented at the 2004 American Diabetes Association meeting. The authors wish to acknowledge the technical skill of Tracy Brainard in helping to perform these experiments and analyze serum insulin samples, Deborah Winegar and Kathleen K. Brown for critical reading of the manuscript, and Dixie Harrington for editing the final document.

ABBREVIATIONS


PPAR:	Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

RIM:	Rimonabant

CB1-R:	Cannabinoid 1-receptor

d:	Day

BW:	Body weight

FM:	Fat mass

LM:	Lean mass

LW:	Liver weight

qMR:	Quantitative magnetic resonance

FAO:	Fatty acid oxidation

GLU:	Glucose

INS:	Insulin

TG:	Triglyceride

NEFA:	Nonesterified fatty acid

CHOL:	Cholesterol

HDLc:	High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

βHBA:	β-hydroxybutyric acid

References

1. WHO. Tech. Rep. 884. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Consultation on Obesity; 1999. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of WHO consultation.

2. Nammi S, Koka S, Chinnala KM, Boini KM. Obesity: an overview on its current perspectives and treatment options. Nutrition Journal. 2004;3:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

3. von Eckardstein A, Assmann G. Prevention of coronary heart disease by raising high-density lipoprotein cholesterol? Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2000;11(6):627–637. [PubMed]

4. James PT, Rigby N, Leach R. The obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome and future prevention strategies. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. 2004;11(1):3–8. [PubMed]

5. Liberopoulos EN, Mikhailidis DP, Elisaf MS. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome in obesity. Obesity Reviews. 2005;6(4):283–296. [PubMed]

6. Korner J, Aronne LJ. Pharmacological approaches to weight reduction: therapeutic targets. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2004;89(6):2616–2621. [PubMed]

7. Cota D, Woods SC. The role of the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Current Opinion in Endocrinology and Diabetes. 2005;12(5):338–351.

8. Evans RM, Barish GD, Wang Y-X. PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nature Medicine. 2004;10(4):355–361. [PubMed]

9. Willson TM, Brown PJ, Sternbach DD, Henke BR. The PPARs: from orphan receptors to drug discovery. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2000;43(4):527–550. [PubMed]

10. Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, et al. Molecular recognition of fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Molecular Cell. 1999;3(3):397–403. [PubMed]

11. Guerre-Millo M, Gervois P, Raspé E, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(22):16638–16642. [PubMed]

12. Erol E, Kumar LS, Cline GW, Shulman GI, Kelly DP, Binas B. Liver fatty acid binding protein is required for high rates of hepatic fatty acid oxidation but not for the action of PPARα in fasting mice. The FASEB Journal. 2004;18(2):347–349. [PubMed]

13. Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauca M, Wahli W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-α, -β, and -γ in the adult rat. Endocrinology. 1996;137(1):354–366. [PubMed]

14. Oliver WR, Shenk JL, Snaith MR, et al. A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(9):5306–5311. [PubMed]

15. Wang Y-X, Lee C-H, Tiep S, et al. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor δ activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity. Cell. 2003;113(2):159–170. [PubMed]

16. Wang YX, Zhang CL, Yu RT, et al. Regulation of muscle fiber type and running endurance by PPARδ . PLoS Biology. 2004;2(10):e294. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

17. Spiegelman BM. PPAR-γ: adipogenic regulator and thiazolidinedione receptor. Diabetes. 1998;47(4):507–514. [PubMed]

18. Fajas L, Fruchart J-C, Auwerx J. Transcriptional control of adipogenesis. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 1998;10(2):165–173. [PubMed]

19. Lehrke M, Lazar MA. The many faces of PPARγ . Cell. 2005;123(6):993–999. [PubMed]

20. Cecil JE, Watt P, Palmer CN, Hetherington M. Energy balance and food intake: the role of PPARγ gene polymorphisms. Physiology and Behavior. 2006;88(3):227–233. [PubMed]

21. Mudaliar S, Chang AR, Henry RR. Thiazolidinediones, peripheral edema, and type 2 diabetes: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. Endocrine Practice. 2003;9(5):406–416. [PubMed]

22. Guan Y, Hao C, Cha DR, et al. Thiazolidinediones expand body fluid volume through PPARγ stimulation of ENaC-mediated renal salt absorption. Nature Medicine. 2005;11(8):861–866. [PubMed]

23. Lewis MC, Wilson JG, Ignar DM, Oliver WR. The effects of PPARα, δ and PPARpan agonist on diet-induced obesity in fat-fed AKR mice. Diabetes. 2004;53(supplement 2):A134.

24. Pourcet B, Fruchart J-C, Staels B, Glineur C. Selective PPAR modulators, dual and pan PPAR agonists: multimodal drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs. 2006;11(3):379–401. [PubMed]

25. Ramachandran U, Kumar R, Mittal A. Fine tuning of PPAR ligands for type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. 2006;6(5):563–573. [PubMed]

26. Brown PJ, Winegar DA, Plunket KD, et al. A ureido-thioisobutyric acid (GW9578) is a subtype-selective PPARα agonist with potent lipid-lowering activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1999;42(19):3785–3788. [PubMed]

27. Yang B, Brown KK, Chen L, et al. Serum adiponectin as a biomarker for in vivo PPARγ activation and PPARγ agonist-induced efficacy on insulin sensitization/lipid lowering in rats. BMC Pharmacology. 2004;4(1):23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

28. Henke BR, Blanchard SG, Brackeen MF, et al. N-(2-benzoylphenyl)-L-tyrosine PPARγ agonists. 1. Discovery of a novel series of potent antihyperglycemic and antihyperlipidemic agents. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1998;41(25):5020–5036. [PubMed]

29. Lehmann JM, Moore LB, Smith-Oliver TA, Wilkison WO, Willson TM, Kliewer SA. An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270(22):12953–12956. [PubMed]

30. Nichols JS, Parks DJ, Consler TG, Blanchard SG. Development of a scintillation proximity assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligand binding domain. Analytical Biochemistry. 1998;257(2):112–119. [PubMed]

31. Dohm GL, Huston RL, Askew EW, Weiser PC. Effects of exercise on activity of heart and muscle mitochondria. The American Journal of Physiology. 1972;223(4):783–787. [PubMed]

32. Scholte HR, Yu Y, Ross JD, Oosterkamp II, Boonman AMC, Busch HFM. Rapid isolation of muscle and heart mitochondria, the lability of oxidative phosphorylation and attempts to stabilize the process in vitro by taurine, carnitine and other compounds. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 1997;174(1-2):61–66. [PubMed]

33. Muoio DM, MacLean PS, Lang DB, et al. Fatty acid homeostasis and induction of lipid regulatory genes in skeletal muscles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) α knock-out mice: evidence for compensatory regulation by PPARδ . Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2002;277(29):26089–26097. [PubMed]

34. Brown PJ, Smith-Oliver TA, Charifson PS, et al. Identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands from a biased chemical library. Chemistry and Biology. 1997;4(12):909–918. [PubMed]

35. Dey DC, Bronson RP, Dahl J, Carroll JP, Benjamin TL. Accelerated development of polyoma tumors and embryonic lethality: different effects of p53 loss on related mouse backgrounds. Cell Growth & Differentiation. 2000;11(5):231–237. [PubMed]

36. Sznaidman ML, Haffner CD, Maloney PR, et al. Novel selective small molecule agonists for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ)—synthesis and biological activity. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2003;13(9):1517–1521. [PubMed]

37. West DB, Boozer CN, Moody DL, Atkinson RL. Dietary obesity in nine inbred mouse strains. American Journal of Physiology. 1992;262(6, part 2):R1025–R1032. [PubMed]

38. Smith BK, West DB, York DA. Carbohydrate versus fat intake: differing patterns of macronutrient selection in two inbred mouse strains. The American Journal of Physiology. 1997;272(1, part 2):R357–R362. [PubMed]

39. Prpic V, Watson PM, Frampton IC, Sabol MA, Jezek GE, Gettys TW. Adaptive changes in adipocyte gene expression differ in AKR/J and SWR/J mice during diet-induced obesity. Journal of Nutrition. 2002;132(11):3325–3332. [PubMed]

40. Künnecke B, Verry P, Bénardeau A, von Kienlin M. Quantitative body composition analysis in awake mice and rats by magnetic resonance relaxometry. Obesity Research. 2004;12(10):1604–1615. [PubMed]

41. Jobst EE, Enriori PJ, Sinnayah P, Cowley MA. Hypothalamic regulatory pathways and potential obesity treatment targets. Endocrine. 2006;29(1):33–48. [PubMed]

42. Escher P, Wahli W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: insight into multiple cellular functions. Mutation Research. 2000;448(2):121–138. [PubMed]

43. Moller DE, Berger JP. Role of PPARs in the regulation of obesity-related insulin sensitivity and inflammation. International Journal of Obesity. 2003;27(supplement 3):S17–S21. [PubMed]

44. Törüner F, Akbay E, Çakir N, et al. Effects of PPARγ and PPARα agonists on serum leptin levels in diet-induced obese rats. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2004;36(4):226–230. [PubMed]

45. Iwamoto Y, Kosaka K, Kuzuya T, Akanuma Y, Shigeta Y, Kaneko T. Effects of troglitazone: a new hypoglycemic agent in patients with NIDDM poorly controlled by diet therapy. Diabetes Care. 1996;19(2):151–156. [PubMed]

46. Narce M, Poisson J-P. Novel PPARγ-dependent and independent effects for thiazolidinediones. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2003;14(6):651–652. [PubMed]

47. Rossmeisl M, Rim JS, Koza RA, Kozak LP. Variation in type 2 diabetes—related traits in mouse strains susceptible to diet-induced obesity. Diabetes. 2003;52(8):1958–1966. [PubMed]

48. Pickavance LC, Brand CL, Wassermann K, Wilding JPH. The dual PPARα/γ agonist, ragaglitazar, improves insulin sensitivity and metabolic profile equally with pioglitazone in diabetic and dietary obese ZDF rats. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2005;144(3):308–316. [PubMed]

49. Chakrabarti R, Vikramadithyan RK, Misra P, et al. Ragaglitazar: a novel PPARα & PPARγ agonist with potent lipid-lowering and insulin-sensitizing efficacy in animal models. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2003;140(3):527–537. [PubMed]

50. Koh EH, Kim M-S, Park J-Y, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats: comparison with PPAR-γ activation. Diabetes. 2003;52(9):2331–2337. [PubMed]

51. Gee MK, Zhang L, Rankin SE, Collins JN, Kauffman RF, Wagner JD. Rosiglitazone treatment improves insulin regulation and dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetic cynomolgus monkeys. Metabolism. 2004;53(9):1121–1125. [PubMed]

52. Campbell IW. The clinical significance of PPAR γ agonism. Current Molecular Medicine. 2005;5(3):349–363. [PubMed]

53. Gegick CG, Altheimer MD. Thiazolidinediones: comparison of long-term effects on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2004;20(6):919–930. [PubMed]

54. Stolar MW, Chilton RJ. Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk, and the link to insulin resistance. Clinical Therapeutics. 2003;25(supplement 2):B4–B31. [PubMed]

55. Duez H, Fruchart J-C, Staels B. PPARs in inflammation, atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk. 2001;8(4):187–194. [PubMed]

56. Way JM, Harrington WW, Brown KK, et al. Comprehensive messenger ribonucleic acid profiling reveals that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ activation has coordinate effects on gene expression in multiple insulin-sensitive tissues. Endocrinology. 2001;142(3):1269–1277. [PubMed]

57. Hummasti S, Laffitte BA, Watson MA, et al. Liver X receptors are regulators of adipocyte gene expression but not differentiation: identification of apoD as a direct target. Journal of Lipid Research. 2004;45(4):616–625. [PubMed]

58. Martin G, Schoonjans K, Staels B, Auwerx J. PPARγ activators improve glucose homeostasis by stimulating fatty acid uptake in the adipocytes. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137(supplement 1):S75–S80. [PubMed]

59. Bocher V, Pineda-Torra I, Fruchart J-C, Staels B. PPARS: transcription factors controlling lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002;967:7–18. [PubMed]

60. Rocchi S, Auwerx J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ: a versatile metabolic regulator. Annals of Medicine. 1999;31(5):342–351. [PubMed]

61. Picard F, Auwerx J. PPARγ and glucose homeostasis. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2002;22:167–197.

62. Zhang F, Lavan B, Gregoire FM. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as attractive antiobesity targets. Drug News and Perspectives. 2004;17(10):661–669. [PubMed]

63. Fredenrich A, Grimaldi PA. PPAR δ: an uncompletely known nuclear receptor. Diabetes and Metabolism. 2005;31(1):23–27. [PubMed]

64. Luquet S, Lopez-Soriano J, Holst D, et al. Roles of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) in the control of fatty acid catabolism. A new target for the treatment of metabolic syndrome. Biochimie. 2004;86(11):833–837. [PubMed]

65. Shin HD, Park BL, Kim LH, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ associated with obesity. Diabetes. 2004;53(3):847–851. [PubMed]

66. Muurling M, Mensink RP, Pijl H, Romijn JA, Havekes LM, Voshol PJ. Rosiglitazone improves muscle insulin sensitivity, irrespective of increased triglyceride content, in ob/ob mice. Metabolism. 2003;52(8):1078–1083. [PubMed]

67. Leibowitz MD, Fiévet C, Hennuyer N, et al. Activation of PPARδ alters lipid metabolism in db/db mice. FEBS Letters. 2000;473(3):333–336. [PubMed]

68. Lee C-H, Olson P, Hevener A, et al. PPARδ regulates glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103(9):3444–3449. [PubMed]

69. Fukui Y, Masui S-I, Osada S, Umesono K, Motojima K. A new thiazolidinedione, NC-2100, which is a weak PPAR-γ activator, exhibits potent antidiabetic effects and induces uncoupling protein 1 in white adipose tissue of KKAy obese mice. Diabetes. 2000;49(5):759–767. [PubMed]

70. Bodkin NL, Pill J, Meyer K, Hansen BC. The effects of K-111, a new insulin-sensitizer, on metabolic syndrome in obese prediabetic rhesus monkeys. Hormone and Metabolic Research. 2003;35(10):617–624. [PubMed]

71. Koh EH, Kim M-S, Park J-Y, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α activation prevents diabetes in OLETF rats: comparison with PPAR-γ activation. Diabetes. 2003;52(9):2331–2337. [PubMed]

72. Larsen PJ, Jensen PB, Sørensen RV, et al. Differential influences of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ and -α on food intake and energy homeostasis. Diabetes. 2003;52(9):2249–2259. [PubMed]

73. Corton JC, Apte U, Anderson SP, et al. Mimetics of caloric restriction include agonists of lipid-activated nuclear receptors. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279(44):46204–46212. [PubMed]

74. Ferré P. The biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: relationship with lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes. 2004;53(supplemnet 1):S43–S50. [PubMed]

75. Navarro V, Fernández-Quintela A, Churruca I, Portillo MP. The body fat-lowering effect conjugated linoleic acid: a comparison between animal and human studies. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2006;62(2):137–147. [PubMed]

76. Djouadi F, Brandt JM, Weinheimer CJ, Leone TC, Gonzalez FJ, Kelly DP. The role of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) in the control of cardiac lipid metabolism. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 1999;60(5-6):339–343.

Articles from PPAR Research are provided here courtesy of
Hindawi Publishing Corporation