In this study, we have further investigated the process of primer selection by retroviruses by using a genetic approach in which the PBS was altered to be complementary to alternative (non-wild-type) tRNAs. Analysis of the replication and stability of MuLVs with alternative PBSs revealed a preference for a PBS complementary to tRNA
Pro, tRNA
Gly, or tRNA
Arg. The selection of tRNA
Arg for MuLV was probably facilitated, in part, by the multiple isoacceptors for tRNA
Arg. The preference of MuLV for tRNA
Gly is also supported by the characterization, in a previous study, of a MuLV retrovirus DNA that contained a complete copy of tRNA
Gly, indicating that this tRNA was selected during replication and subsequently copied during plus-strand synthesis in reverse transcription (
8). What might account for this selection preference for certain tRNAs? Our previous studies suggested that primer selection occurred from a pool of tRNAs that were involved in viral translation (
23,
24,
34). A search for proline, glycine, and arginine revealed a 9-amino-acid cluster near the Gag-Pol frameshift junction. This correlation between amino acids near the Gag-Pol junction and tRNA primer selection prompted a reexamination of the preferences of HIV-1 to use alternative, non-wild-type (

) tRNAs. HIV-1 will utilize

, tRNA
His, tRNA
Met, or tRNA
Glu as a primer for replication if additional mutations are made upstream in a region designated the A-loop region, which is complementary to the anticodon of the primer tRNA (
11,
20-
22,
44,
47). Consistent with the findings for MuLV, the codons for lysine, methionine, histidine, and glutamic acid were present near the Gag-Pol frameshift region of HIV-1, although we did not find a striking cluster of amino acids like the proline, glycine, and arginine for MuLV.
To further pursue the connection between viral translation, codon use within Gag-Pol, and tRNA primer selection, we focused on HIV-1. Previous studies have shown that viruses in which the PBS was made complementary to

were unstable in cell culture and rapidly reverted to use of

(
20,
21,
31). However, mutation of the upstream A-loop region to include nucleotides that were complementary to the anticodon of

allowed these viruses to stably utilize

for replication, although the viruses replicated more slowly than the wild-type virus. Thus, even though both

and

are present within HIV virions, the virus has a clear and distinct preference for the use of

(
25,
28). By scanning of the amino acid sequence upstream of the Gag-Pol frameshift region, three of five lysine codons were found to be specific for the

isoacceptor, whereas two were specific for

. The three

codons were targeted for mutation to give codons for

. The replication of HIV-1 in which either the PBS alone or both the PBS and the A-loop were altered to be complementary to

with these additional mutations in the Gag region was dramatically enhanced relative to the replication of the similar virus with the A-loop and PBS complementary to

but without the changes in the lysine codons. In the current study, we have altered only three codons prior to the Gag-Pol junction to use

in order to achieve this change in replication and infectivity. Codons for

and

are dispersed throughout HIV-1 Gag, and additional studies will be needed to determine if the five codons for lysine prior to the Gag-Pol protein are the only ones influencing primer selection or whether the overall ratio of

to

influences primer selection. While the replication of HIV-1 with the A-loop and PBS complementary to

was enhanced by the changes in the lysine codons near the Gag-Pol frameshift, we found that its replication was still slightly lower than that of the wild type, which uses

. Unique features of

might also facilitate selection and use in HIV-1 reverse transcription that would account for the differences in replication when HIV-1 is forced to use

(
5,
6,
17).
The results of our current study support a link between primer selection and the synthesis of the Gag-Pol polyprotein. Previous studies have shown that when the translational frameshifting occurs during the synthesis of HIV-1 Gag-Pol, ribosomes stall near the Gag-Pol junction (
38,
42,
45). During the pause in translation, the ribosomes could become stalled over codons on the viral mRNA (
45). Aminoacylated tRNA entering the stalled ribosome would be rejected and, following disassociation from the ribosome, would become a substrate for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase to recycle the tRNA for inclusion in the protein synthesis cycle (
9,
13,
15). We postulate, then, that the ribosomal pausing that occurs during frameshifting results in a local increase of tRNAs that could be captured as primers for retrovirus replication. For HIV-1, it is possible at this time that the lysyl-synthetase is occupied mainly with

, which would also facilitate the capture of this tRNA (
7,
18,
19). As in the case of our Gag-Pol mutants, if we alter the codon usage to favor

, the synthetase would have an overabundance of

to facilitate capture. However, the mechanism by which the virus might acquire the tRNA from the synthetase is unclear and will require further study. This interpretation, though, would not account for primer capture by MuLV, which does not incorporate prolyl-synthetase in virions. An alternative possibility is that as a result of the pausing, the tRNAs that are entering and leaving the ribosome would become deaminoacylated to allow the tRNAs to reenter the translational machinery following interaction with the synthetase (
9,
13). Interestingly, previous studies with prokaryotes have shown that tRNA
Lys and tRNA
Arg are especially prone to “drop off” from stalled ribosomes and are substrates for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase. As a result of pausing, there would be a local increase in the population of deacylated tRNA, possibly as a result of transient saturation of the synthetase. During this time, a direct interaction with the A-loop and/or the PBS might occur to capture the free tRNA for use as the primer. The mechanism for capture could involve direct RNA:tRNA interaction facilitated by complementarity with the PBS for MuLV and with both the A-loop and the PBS for HIV-1. Further studies will be needed to clarify the dynamics of primer capture as well as of the egress of the primer, viral genome, and proteins from the infected cell.
In summary, the results of our studies provide a new and important insight into retrovirus preferences in primer selection. From the analysis of the preference for tRNAs of MuLV and HIV-1, we have identified a region within Gag upstream of the Gag-Pol junction that is enriched with codons for tRNAs that can be selected by MuLV or HIV-1 for replication. The results of our studies are consistent with the idea that primer selection and viral translation, in particular the synthesis of Gag-Pol, are linked and that both MuLV and HIV-1 have evolved to preferentially select certain tRNAs using similar, but not identical, mechanisms that could involve ribosomal pausing before the synthesis of the Gag-Pol polyprotein. The linking of primer selection and synthesis of the Gag-Pol polyprotein would allow the virus to coordinate these two processes during viral replication.