Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of bmjThe BMJ
BMJ. 1992 May 30; 304(6839): 1406–1409.
PMCID: PMC1882203

Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia.


OBJECTIVE--To compare percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. DESIGN--Randomised 28 day study of inpatients requiring long term enteral nutrition. SETTING--Three Glasgow teaching hospitals. SUBJECTS--40 patients with dysphagia for at least four weeks secondary to neurological disorders: 20 patients (10 women) were randomised to nasogastric feeding and 20 (eight women) to endoscopic gastrostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Treatment failure (blocked or displaced tubes on three or more occasions or refusal to continue treatment); duration of feeding; intake of liquid diets; complications; nutritional status at end of trial. RESULTS--One patient in each group died before starting feeding. Treatment failure occurred in 18 of the 19 nasogastric patients and in none of the gastrostomy group. The mean (SE) duration of feeding for the nasogastric group was 5.2 (1.5) days. No complications occurred in the nasogastric group but three (16%) of the gastrostomy group developed minor problems (aspiration pneumonia (two patients) wound infection (one)). Gastrostomy patients received a significantly greater proportion of their prescribed feed (93% (2%)) compared with the nasogastric group, (55% (4%); p less than 0.001) and also gained significantly more weight after seven days of feeding (1.4 (0.5) kg v 0.6 (0.1) kg; p less than 0.05). Analyses at days 14, 21, and 28 were not possible due to the small numbers remaining in the nasogastric group. CONCLUSION--Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding is a safe and effective method of providing long term enteral nutrition to patients with neurological dysphagia and offers important advantages over nasogastric tube feeding.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (923K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Rees RG, Payne-James JJ, King C, Silk DB. Spontaneous transpyloric passage and performance of 'fine bore' polyurethane feeding tubes: a controlled clinical trial. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1988 Sep-Oct;12(5):469–472. [PubMed]
  • Ciocon JO, Silverstone FA, Graver LM, Foley CJ. Tube feedings in elderly patients. Indications, benefits, and complications. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Feb;148(2):429–433. [PubMed]
  • Finucane P, Aslan SM, Duncan D. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in elderly patients. Postgrad Med J. 1991 Apr;67(786):371–373. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wasiljew BK, Ujiki GT, Beal JM. Feeding gastrostomy: complications and mortality. Am J Surg. 1982 Feb;143(2):194–195. [PubMed]
  • Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a nonoperative technique for feeding gastrostomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1981 Feb;27(1):9–11. [PubMed]
  • Ruge J, Vazquez RM. An analysis of the advantages of Stamm and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jan;162(1):13–16. [PubMed]
  • Jones M, Santanello SA, Falcone RE. Percutaneous endoscopic vs surgical gastrostomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990 Sep-Oct;14(5):533–534. [PubMed]
  • Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Silas D, Pearlman N, Sun J, Norton L. Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1990 Jan-Feb;36(1):1–5. [PubMed]
  • Moran BJ, Taylor MB, Johnson CD. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Br J Surg. 1990 Aug;77(8):858–862. [PubMed]
  • Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW, Stellato TA, Aszodi A. Percutaneous approaches to enteral alimentation. Am J Surg. 1985 Jan;149(1):102–105. [PubMed]
  • Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987 Jul;93(1):48–52. [PubMed]
  • Benya R, Mobarhan S. Enteral alimentation: administration and complications. J Am Coll Nutr. 1991 Jun;10(3):209–219. [PubMed]
  • Keohane PP, Attrill H, Jones BJ, Silk DB. Limitations and drawbacks of 'fine bore' nasogastric feeding tubes. Clin Nutr. 1983 Jul;2(2):85–86. [PubMed]
  • Foutch PG, Woods CA, Talbert GA, Sanowski RA. A critical analysis of the Sacks-Vine gastrostomy tube: a review of 120 consecutive procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 Aug;83(8):812–815. [PubMed]
  • Wolfsen HC, Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, Botoman VA, Ryan JA. Long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Sep;85(9):1120–1122. [PubMed]
  • Hogan RB, DeMarco DC, Hamilton JK, Walker CO, Polter DE. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy--to push or pull. A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986 Aug;32(4):253–258. [PubMed]
  • Kirby DF, Craig RM, Tsang TK, Plotnick BH. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies: a prospective evaluation and review of the literature. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1986 Mar-Apr;10(2):155–159. [PubMed]
  • Cogen R, Weinryb J. Aspiration pneumonia in nursing home patients fed via gastrostomy tubes. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989 Dec;84(12):1509–1512. [PubMed]
  • Allison MC, Morris AJ, Park RH, Mills PR. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding may improve outcome of late rehabilitation following stroke. J R Soc Med. 1992 Mar;85(3):147–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The BMJ are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group