|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) form an important arm of the immune system responsible for suppressing untoward immune responses. Tregs can be thymically derived or peripherally induced, even from CD4+CD25−FOXP3− T-cells. FOXP3 expression and in vitro suppressive activity are considered unique hallmarks of this dedicated and stable lineage of regulatory cells. Here we show that virtually all human CD4+CD25−FOXP3− T-cells and CD8+CD25−FOXP3− T-cells attain a transient FOXP3+CD25+ state during activation. In this state of activation, these cells possess the classic phenotype of Tregs, in that they express similar markers and inhibit in vitro proliferation of autologous CD4+CD25− T-cells. This state is characterized by suppressed IFN-γ production and robust TNF-α and IL-10 production. Interestingly, the great majority of the activated cells eventually downregulate FOXP3 expression, with a concomitant drop in suppressive ability. Our results show that, in humans, FOXP3 expression and Treg functionality are not exclusive features of a stable or unique lineage of T-cells, but may also be a transient state attained by almost all T-cells. These results warrant caution in interpreting human studies using FOXP3 and suppressive activity as readouts and suggest that attempts to induce “Tregs” may paradoxically result in induction of effector T-cells, unless stability is confirmed.
CD4+CD25+/high regulatory T (Treg) cells are an important arm of the immune system that downregulate potentially harmful effector immune responses . They have been shown to play a role in autoimmune disorders, infections, tumors, asthma, allergy and transplantation and hence their modulation in these diseases is thought to be of great potential benefit . Further elucidation of this subset has been hampered by the lack of a specific surface marker to isolate and study these cells. Markers identified as being expressed on Tregs are also expressed by activated T-cells. Hence, the discovery of the transcription factor FOXP3 as a marker that is expressed in Tregs but not on activated T-cells held major significance. Predominantly through murine studies it was shown that FOXP3 is necessary and sufficient for the development and function of Tregs [3; 4; 5; 6; 7]. Transduction of FOXP3 in human CD4+CD25− T-cells appeared to confer regulatory properties to those cells . FOXP3 regulates T-cell activation by interacting with NF-AT or NF-κB and consequently repressing IL-2 secretion [8; 9].
CD4+CD25+/high Tregs can be subdivided into natural Tregs and induced Tregs. Natural CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs are thought to arise in the thymus and suppress harmful immune responses in the periphery . While FOXP3 expression is thought to be a unique feature of natural Tregs in mice [3; 4; 5], several human studies and some murine studies have suggested that CD4+CD25− T-cells may give rise to induced CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells following stimulation [10; 11; 12; 13]. However, due to the lack of antibodies against intranuclear FOXP3 at that time, it had been repeatedly suggested that such cells merely represent an expansion of contaminating populations of natural Tregs [14; 15; 16; 17]. This continues to be a controversy in the field, with some studies reporting no upregulation of FOXP3 expression  and others proposing that induced FOXP3+ T-cells may not be regulatory in function . However, these studies did not directly evaluate suppressor function. Also, it is currently unclear if the induced and natural Tregs represent separate lineages or if they belong to the same lineage but just differ in their location and timing of their origin. In either case, it is generally believed that FOXP3-expressing T-cells, induced or natural, are a stable population of T-cells with immune regulatory functions. Thus, the presence of FOXP3 and the ability to suppress effector T-cell responses in-vitro have been used as the hallmarks for the detection and quantification of this population . This approach has been widely used recently in human disease settings where presence or absence of FOXP3+ T-cells at the disease site or in the blood (with or without the presence of concomitant suppressive activity) is interpreted as evidence for involvement of Tregs in the disease pathogenesis/modulation [19; 20; 21; 22; 23].
In this study, we evaluated the immune biology of adaptively induced FOXP3+ T-cells by using polychromatic flow cytometry and recently developed robust anti-FOXP3 antibodies including one that recognizes a specific spliced isoform of human FOXP3 . Using CFSE staining of highly purified T-cell populations, we tracked their dynamics and function following activation with different stimuli. Using this approach, we conclusively show that virtually all activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells transiently upregulate FOXP3 and show transient suppressive activity. We further show that this transient regulatory state and certain effector functions are differentially regulated, suggesting that this state might be a general immune mechanism of fine-tuning an ongoing immune response.
PBMC were isolated from fresh buffy coats from healthy blood donors using Ficoll Hypaque density gradient. “Untouched” CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells were negatively selected using negative selection kits and AutoMacs (DEPLETE program) from Miltenyi Biotech. Total CD3+ T-cells were negatively selected using MagCellect negative selection kits from R&D systems. All of these were negatively selected to greater than 85% purity. CD25+ T-cells were depleted from the purified CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells using CD25 microbeads and AutoMacs (DEPLETES program) to greater than 95% purity. CD45RO microbeads were used for CD45RO depletion (depletion greater than 95%). CD3 microbeads were used to deplete T-cells from PBMC to enrich for antigen-presenting cells (APC). The CD3+ T-cell-depleted population was irradiated at 3000 rads before being used as APC’s. Aliquots of CD4+CD25− T-cells and CD3-depleted cells were frozen for use at later time points as responders and APC’s, respectively.
T-cell proliferation was detected and quantified by flow cytometric proliferation assays, utilizing the green fluorescent dye, 5 (and 6)-carboxyfluorescien diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE), as described previously [25; 26]. Briefly, cells were first suspended at 1 X 106/ml in PBS and incubated at 37oC for 7 min with 0.25 μM CFSE, followed by serum quenching and PBS washes. These cells were subjected to the indicated culture conditions (in human serum-containing media), followed by evaluation of their proliferative responses and expression of various markers. Importantly, no exogenous cytokines (such as IL-2) were added to any of the cultures.
Human FOXP3 staining kits from eBiosciences were used to stain for intracellular FOXP3. PCH101 anti-FOXP3-PE or anti-FOXP3-AlexaFluor700 were used to stain for total FOXP3, while FJK16S anti-FOXP3-PE was used to stain for full-length FOXP3.
Flow cytometric sorting of dividing vs. non-dividing populations by CFSE was performed on a FACSVantage (with FACSDiva upgrade) to greater than 95% purity, as described previously [25; 26]. Multicolor phenotyping panels were set up using different combinations of CTLA-4-PECY5, CCR7-PECY7, CD4-PECY5.5 (Caltag), CD8-Pacific Blue, CD25-APC or APCCY7, CD62L-PE or PECY5, CD27-APCCY7, CD28-PECY5 or Biotin+ strepavidin Qdot 655 (Invitrogen), CD127 (IL-7R) APC (R&D systems), CD45RA-FITC and CD45RO-APC (all antibodies from BD Biosciences unless indicated otherwise). Flow cytometric data was acquired on a 4-Laser, 17-color custom BD LSRII using FACSDiva software. Linear uncompensated data was then transferred as FCS 3.0 files and analysed after compensation and transformation using FlowJo version 6.4.1 (TreeStar), as recommended [27; 28]. Gating and analysis were performed as described [25; 26]. Cut-offs for positive populations were determined by using either fluorescence minus one (FMO) staining for polychromatic flow cytometry, no stimulus background staining or isotype control staining, as appropriate [28; 29]. Samples from experiments involving readouts at different days were run with the same appropriate instrument and compensation settings to ensure comparability. The proliferation platform in FlowJo was used to back-calculate the precursor frequency of the dividing cells by CFSE dilution.
Anti-CD3 (BD Biosciences) was used at a concentration of 1 μg/ml/million cells. Anti-CD28 (BD Biosciences) was used at 1 μg/ml/million cells. Whole CMV lysates (50 μg/ml, Microbix Biosystems), tetanus toxoid (20 μg/ml; Accurate Chemical and Scientific) were used as antigens to stimulate PBMC.
Suppression assays were performed in duplicate in 96-well plates. 50,000 CD4+CD25− T cells (Responders) were cultured with 50,000 irradiated APC and anti-CD3 in a total volume of 200 μl/well as previously described . Varying ratios of induced or ex vivo-purified Tregs were added to the cultures. The cultures were pulsed with 3H-thymidine on day 4 and harvested on day 5 to determine their proliferation, as previously described [10; 25; 26].
Total RNA was isolated using the QIAamp RNA mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Random hexamers were used to convert mRNA into cDNA using SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis system from Invitrogen. Isoforms of FOXP3 were then amplified using 5’-GCCCTTGGACAAGGACCCGATG-3’ as the sense and 5’-CATTTGCCAGCAGTGGGTAGGA-3’ as the antisense primers (Invitrogen), allowing for detection of FOXP3 isoforms . Relative expression of total FOXP3 was determined by normalizing to β-actin expression in SYBR-Green-based real time PCR reactions, as described previously [25; 26]. IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-4 and TNF-α messages were also quantified using published protocols and primers .
First, we negatively selected “untouched” human CD3+CD25− (or CD4+CD25−) T-cells and stained them with CFSE. These cells were stimulated either in a mixed lymphocyte reaction using allogeneic, T-cell-depleted antigen-presenting cells (APC) or with anti-CD3 and autologous APC to stimulate the formation of induced FOXP3+ T-cells, as previously described [10; 11]. Following activation, these cells were monitored longitudinally for CFSE dilution and FOXP3/CD25 expression (to determine their proliferation and activation). In the absence of stimulation, the CD4+ T-cells did not show significant proliferation and remained CD25− and FOXP3− (Fig. 1a and 1b). In contrast, stimulated cells showed distinct upregulation of FOXP3 and CD25 as early as 2 days post-stimulation with peak FOXP3 expression at 4–6 days, depending on the stimulus. Of note, virtually all dividing cells (CFSElow) and CD25+ (activated) cells expressed FOXP3 at earlier time points (Fig. 1a, 1b and 1c). This was clearly visible in allostimulated cells at the 6-day time point. A similar pattern was noted following stimulation of PBMC with nominal antigens, such as tetanus toxoid (TT) or cytomegalovirus (CMV) lysate (Fig. 1d). Importantly, FOXP3 expression by all activated cells was a transient phenomenon, lasting for 48–72 hours, followed by downregulation and plateauing around day 10–14 of culture (Fig. 1a, 1c). While the kinetics varied according to the stimulus and geometry of culture (flask versus tube), all stimuli invariably resulted in the same pattern of transient upregulation followed by downregulation.
The expression of FOXP3 was confirmed with RT-PCR assays. Ex vivo-purified or unstimulated CD4+CD25− T-cells showed no detectable FOXP3 (Fig. 1e). In contrast, cells from activated cultures showed distinct upregulation of FOXP3, expressing both human isoforms . Real time quantification showed that the levels of FOXP3 in activated cells were higher than ex vivo-purified CD4+CD25+ Tregs (Fig. 1f). As stated earlier and as shown in Fig. 1e, on day 6, FOXP3 expression had passed its peak in anti-CD3-stimulated cells, while it was at its peak in allostimulated cells. We also confirmed that FOXP3 message was downregulated at later time points (data not shown).
A significant portion of ex vivo-purified CD25− T-cells is made up of antigen-experienced, memory T-cells and it is possible that the induced FOXP3+ T-cells might predominantly arise from these antigen experienced populations. We next addressed whether FOXP3+ T-cells could be generated from naïve T-cells. We depleted the initial CD4+CD25− T-cells of CD45RO+ cells using microbeads, yielding >95% CD45RA+CD62Lhigh naïve T-cells . Following anti-CD3 or allostimulation, we again observed a similar expression pattern of FOXP3 and CD25 over time (Fig.1g). Thus, virtually all activated/proliferating T-cells express FOXP3, even when originating from naïve T-cells.
It has been suggested that a minute population of contaminating FOXP3+ or CD25+ T-cells may account for the FOXP3+CD25+ population following stimulation [14; 15]. However, we did not observe appreciable FOXP3 expression in the initial or unstimulated population of CD4+CD25− T-cells, either by flow cytometry or by molecular assays. Even with liberal gating, FOXP3+ cells were always less than 1%. Moreover, the use of CFSE in our system allowed us to “back-calculate” the percentage of cells from the initial population that responded to the stimulus and expressed FOXP3. Following anti-CD3 stimulation, at least 40% of the original cells had divided and expressed FOXP3, making it impossible to explain this population merely as an expansion of contaminating FOXP3+ cells.
FOXP3+ Tregs suppress the in vitro proliferation of autologous CD4+CD25− effector T-cells [10; 11]. We asked whether the transient expression of FOXP3 in activated T-cells also imparted a transient regulatory functionality. For this, we used two approaches. First, we confirmed previous results by utilizing CD25 magnetic microbeads to obtain CD25+ T-cells from early cell cultures (at this time point, CD25 expression correlated with high FOXP3 expression). We tested their ability to suppress the proliferation of freshly purified, autologous CD4+CD25− T-cells in standard 3H-thymidine-based suppression assays (Fig. 2a). Similar to ex vivo-purified CD4+CD25+ Tregs, the CD25+ T-cells from anti-CD3 or allostimulated cultures showed robust suppressive activity as well as a relatively anergic phenotype (Fig. 2a). The induced Tregs being highly enriched in FOXP3+ T-cells appeared to have higher suppressive activity than bead-sorted CD25+ natural Tregs. However, this could be explained by the fact that the natural Treg population had contaminating CD25+FOXP3− effector T-cells (data not shown).
In the second approach, we addressed whether this suppressive potential diminished over time, corresponding with downregulation of FOXP3. For this, we could not use a CD25-based sorting technique as CD25 expression decreases over time. Thus, we flow-sorted the CFSElow (dividing) and CFSEhigh (non-dividing) cells from stimulated cultures either on day 5 or day 13, which correspond to peak and plateaued FOXP3 expression, respectively (day 10 and day 13 FOXP3 expression was not significantly different). In suppression assays, the dividing cells from day 5 cultures robustly inhibited in vitro proliferation of CD4+CD25− T-cells (Fig. 2b, 2c). Interestingly, suppressive ability was significantly diminished in dividing cells sorted on day 13 (p<0.05), corresponding to downregulated FOXP3 expression. Non-dividing cells from the day 5 culture did not show either the anergic or the suppressive phenotype of 5-day dividing cells (Fig. 2c).
FOXP3+ induced Tregs may serve to limit local immune responses and tissue damage [15; 32]. In our culture system, activated T-cells accumulate higher quantities of FOXP3 as they divide, with cells in later divisions showing preferential FOXP3 and CD25 expression, suggesting that these cells may inhibit the division of other cells in the same culture (especially, the non-dividing, CFSEhighCD4+ cells). In order to test this hypothesis, we flow-sorted dividing and non-dividing cells from a 13-day anti-CD3-activated culture (Fig. 2d). On re-stimulation with anti-CD3 for an additional 6 days, the non-dividing cells robustly upregulated CD25, expressed FOXP3 and went through multiple rounds of division, suggesting that the non-dividing cells may have been suppressed in the prior culture. Re-stimulation of the CFSElow populations resulted in a re-upregulation of FOXP3 and CD25 (not shown), suggesting that T-cells may potentially upregulate FOXP3 and CD25 during multiple activation cycles, attaining a transient regulatory phenotype each time.
We used 8-color flow cytometric panels to evaluate the immunophenotype of the transiently induced Tregs (Fig. 3a). The anti-CD3 or allo-induced FOXP3+ T-cells exhibited a CTLA-4 (CD152)high, CD25high, CCR7+, CD27+, CD62L+, CD28+ phenotype (Fig. 3a), similar to that of natural Tregs in humans [33; 34; 35]. Thus, transient FOXP3 expression by activated T-cells corresponds to not only transient suppressor (“Treg”) functionality but also immunophenotypic features similar to natural Tregs. These results suggest that, in humans, natural Tregs, induced Tregs or transient Tregs may be similar or highly related populations with the major difference being the location or timing of their origin.
It has been recently shown that low CD127 (IL-7 receptor) expression may be a specific marker for natural FOXP3+ Tregs [17; 36]. Thus, we evaluated CD127 status on transient Tregs (Fig. 3b). We observed that the induced Tregs downregulated CD127 and were CD127low (but not negative) when they were FOXP3+. This is strikingly similar to the CD127low phenotype of natural Tregs. They continued to remain CD127low even as they became FOXP3−. Hence, even CD127 does not appear to differentiate natural Tregs from transiently induced FOXP3+ Tregs.
FOXP3 in humans exists as at least two isoforms, in contrast to mice where only one isoform has been described . To see whether there were differences in isoform expression in natural vs. induced/transient Tregs, we used commercially available antibodies to quantify the relative amounts of FOXP3 in human T-cell populations. We observed expression of both the full-length as well as the Δ2 isoform in ex vivo-sorted natural Tregs and induced Tregs arising from various sorted subsets (Fig. 4). We also observed downregulation of both isoforms (data not shown).
As FOXP3 expression occurs during activation, we wanted to determine the relationship between transient Treg function and T-cell effector functions. Thus, we quantified the longitudinal expression of specific effector cytokines following activation, in flow-sorted CFSElowCD25+ cells from allostimulated T-cell cultures (Fig. 5). Interestingly, IFN-γ message was observed in the initial stages of activation, whereas FOXP3 and IL-10 were co-expressed at later time points. IFN-γ expression was also lowest when FOXP3 and IL-10 expression were highest. Of note, TNF-α also showed high levels of expression at this time, suggesting that different effector functions were differentially regulated during activation. IL-2 and IL-4 messages were either low or undetectable at the peak of FOXP3 expression (not shown). Similar dynamics were observed even when bulk populations from allo- or anti-CD3-stimulated cultures were used instead of flow-sorted, activated cells.
While CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs have been extensively evaluated, much less is known about the biology of CD8+FOXP3+ T-cells. Human CD8+ T-cells have been found to express FOXP3 [18; 24; 37; 38; 39]. We thus wanted to determine if activated CD8+ T-cells also show kinetics of FOXP3 expression and suppressive activity similar to CD4+ T-cells. Ex vivo, we did not detect appreciable FOXP3 expression on either CD8+CD25− or CD8+CD25+ T-cells. Starting with either CD3+CD25− T-cells or purified CD8+CD25− T-cells, we observed distinct FOXP3 upregulation in response to allo- or anti-CD3 stimulation (Fig. 6a and data not shown). Similar to CD4+ T-cells, virtually all the responding CD8+ T-cells expressed FOXP3, followed by eventual downregulation. Bead-sorted CD8+CD25+ T-cells from early cultures showed robust in vitro suppression of autologous CD4+CD25− T-cells, comparable to that of CD4+ Tregs (Fig. 6b). Similarly, flow-sorted dividing CD8+ T-cells from early cultures also showed robust in vitro suppression, which was partially reversed at later time points (Fig. 6c; p<0.05). Activated CD8+ T-cells also expressed both isoforms of FOXP3 (Fig. 4). Thus, the property of inducing transient FOXP3+ Tregs is not restricted to CD4+ T-cells, but may be a state attained by virtually all activated T-cells.
It is known that CD25+FOXP3+ T-cells with regulatory properties can be induced following activation [10; 11; 12; 13]. For example, using PCR-based analysis, it has been demonstrated that CD4+CD25− T-cells can generate FOXP3+ regulatory T-cells . However, it was widely proposed that these cells arose from a contaminating population of natural Tregs [14; 15; 16]. Moreover, the proportion of activated T-cells that become FOXP3+ and the stability and significance of such expression are poorly understood. In general, FOXP3+ T-cells are thought to be a unique subset of stable, regulatory T-cells.
In this study, we have demonstrated that virtually all activated CD4+CD25−FOXP3− T-cells attain a transient phase of FOXP3 expression and regulatory activity. We also show that these FOXP3+ cells must arise from CD4+CD25− T-cells and that this phenomenon occurs regardless of the stimulus used to activate these cells. While previous studies have shown that FOXP3+ T-cells can be induced from CD4+CD25−FOXP3− T-cells, it is thought that only a small subset of approximately 10–20% of the activated T-cells express FOXP3. Recent studies using anti-FOXP3 antibodies to detect FOXP3 expression have used either PBMC [18; 24] or PBMC depleted of CD25+ T-cells [18; 40] to study activation-induced FOXP3 expression. In those studies, cells evaluated for FOXP3 also included non-activated T-cells in the culture. The use of CFSE in our assay system clearly shows that, even in anti-CD3-stimulated cultures, not all T-cells undergo activation and proliferation. This allowed us to accurately gate on activated T-cell populations, demonstrating that all activated T-cells, rather than a minor subset, undergo this change. Transient FOXP3 expression is better visualized following allostimulation compared to anti-CD3 stimulation as only a percentage of the responding cells are activated by the allostimulus. The use of the CFSE-based approach also allowed us to visualize the non-dividing (unstimulated) cells as an internal control for CD25 and FOXP3 expression. Depending on the geometry of the culture (flask versus tubes) and the nature of the stimulus (anti-CD3 or antiCD3+antiCD28 versus MLR versus antigen), the kinetics of activation and consequently FOXP3 expression were different. Thus, if only a single time point is evaluated, one would reach a restricted conclusion about the number of cells that express FOXP3. Moreover, the actual day of peak expression is less important than the overall phenomenon of transient upregulation followed by downregulation. Our results support the conclusion that induction of a FOXP3+ Treg state is not a rare or unusual event, but rather the norm.
Importantly, most of the activated FOXP3+ cells downregulate FOXP3 and by day 10–14, only a subset of that population remains FOXP3+. We show that regulatory activity decreases at later time points when FOXP3 expression has plateaued. These results suggest that FOXP3 expression correlates with suppressive activity and that suppressive ability is a transient property of all activated CD4+ T-cell populations. It is possible that FOXP3 expression could be coincident with suppressive activity, rather than mechanistically involved in this function. However, regardless of its direct involvement, FOXP3 expression and regulatory function appear to be a transient phenomenon in all T-cells. Even when starting with naïve CD4+ T-cells, the same pattern is observed, suggesting that activation might be a way of producing Tregs in the periphery where every dividing T-cell has the potential to a become effector/memory T-cell and/or a Treg. Presumably, with multiple rounds of activation, a higher proportion of cells may be sustained as Tregs, as might happen in the setting of chronic infections, such as HCV and HIV [41; 42; 43; 44]. More importantly, our results also suggest that mere depletion of circulating Tregs may not be adequate therapy for tumors and infections. Not only would newer Tregs be produced during sustained antigenic stimulation, but the therapeutic approach may also carry the risk of eliminating potential effector T-cells. In these situations, tilting the balance from Treg sustenance toward effector T-cell induction may be a plausible immunotherapeutic intervention. In contrast to chronic viral infections, several autoimmune diseases are characterized by a functional deficit in CD4+ and/or CD8+ Tregs. From our studies, one might presume that the activation of autoreactive T-cells must also result in the generation of FOXP3+, transient Tregs. It is plausible that sustained autoreactivity, leading to autoimmunity, may be a defect in the sustenance of induced autoreactive Tregs in the periphery, rather than merely a global deficit in thymic Treg generation. Factors that promote such functional sustenance will be of great interest in future therapeutic strategies.
It has long been known that natural Tregs show an activated T-cell phenotype and efforts are still underway to identify a specific marker for Tregs that is not expressed by activated T-cells. Every putative “specific” Treg marker proposed thus far eventually turned out to be expressed by activated T-cells as well. We show here that induced Tregs also show an immunophenotype that is similar to that of natural Tregs. We propose that the similarities between Tregs and activated T-cells may, in fact, not be a coincidence. A major subset of circulating human Tregs may simply reflect the long-term sustenance of a subpopulation of activated cells. We found no obvious differences in the suppressive activity or phenotype between natural and induced Tregs, suggesting that these may be related populations with the location and timing of origin being the main difference between them.
In this study, we also evaluated effector functions in the context of FOXP3 expression, by flow-sorting pure populations of activated cells at multiple time points post-stimulation. IFN-γ expression preceded and inversely correlated with FOXP3 expression. FOXP3 expression coincided with peak IL-10 production and TNF-α production in these cultures. Thus, we show that effector function and regulatory function can occur in the same T-cell population. These results suggest that therapeutic attempts to increase Tregs may paradoxically increase potentially harmful effector responses. We speculate that this could be one of the plausible explanations for the results of the recent clinical trial using an anti-CD28 superagonist TGN1412, which attempted to expand Tregs but resulted in severe multiorgan failure [45; 46; 47]. Prior studies has shown increased Treg induction by this agent [48; 49]. However, based on our results, these may have potentially been transient Tregs, rather than a stable Treg population, a notion supported by recent studies using this agent in a humanized mouse system . This underscores the importance of understanding the biology of induced Tregs and its relationship with effector functionality.
CD8+ T-cells have been shown to possess regulatory activity distinct from that of natural CD4+CD25+FOXP3+Tregs [39; 51]. Though a definitive CD8+ counterpart of the natural CD4+CD25+ Tregs has not been described, FOXP3 expression has been detected in CD8+ T-cells under various conditions [18; 24; 37; 38; 39]. One of our key findings is that CD8+ T-cells also show similar dynamics, where all activated CD8+ T-cells (in the presence or absence of CD4+ T-cells) express FOXP3 and exhibit regulatory activity transiently. It remains to be seen if the induced CD8+FOXP3+ Tregs persist in the periphery for any significant length of time compared to the CD4+FOXP3+ Tregs.
These findings strongly suggest that activation-induced FOXP3 expression and regulatory activity may be a broad T-cell phenomenon. Thus, upon T-cell activation, a FOXP3+ state may be coincident with or proximal to effector functionality. Presumably, such a mechanism might allow T-cells with the highest affinity (those that presumably generate the first or the strongest response following an immune stimulus) to effectively suppress lower affinity responses in their milieu . It id currently unclear whether the attainment of such a FOXP3+ transient Treg state is an essential step toward attaining fully regulated effector functionality.
In summary, we have shown that virtually all activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells transiently upregulate FOXP3 and acquire suppressive properties. Thus, during an active immune process, most of the FOXP3+ cells could, in fact, represent effector T-cells that can downregulate FOXP3 and lose regulatory activity. Thus, neither FOXP3 expression nor in vitro suppressive ability is an indication of stable Treg function and these readouts should not be used to designate a cell as a permanent Treg. These observations warrant the re-evaluation of prior data relating to the role of Tregs in various human diseases.
We thank Drs. Ellen Vitetta, Mihail Firan and Mr. Ethan Baughman for review and discussions and Ms. Bonnie Darnell for assistance with flow sorting.
This work was supported by grants (to N.J.K.) from the NIH and National MS Society (NMSS). N.J.K. is a Harry Weaver Neuroscience Scholar of the NMSS.
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.