Understanding cellular adaptation to hypoxia is central to the design of treatments for injury caused by ischemia–reperfusion, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Cell damage during acute hypoxia is thought to be caused by imbalances such as decreased pH, altered calcium homeostasis, increased intracellular osmotic pressure, and mitochondrial damage, resulting directly and indirectly from decreased ATP (
Hochachka and Somero, 2002;
Corbucci et al, 2005). Humans have complex physiological systems for regulating oxygen homeostasis that involve multiple spatial scales and cell types and have been delicately tuned during evolution. However, at the cellular level, hypoxia resistance mechanisms most likely evolved very early and appear to be highly conserved among species (
O'Farrell, 2001).
Lending support to this hypothesis, several genes have been discovered in the fruitfly
Drosophila melanogaster that are similar in sequence and function to human genes for regulation of metabolism, signaling, and transcription during hypoxia (
Piacentini and Karliner, 1999;
Wingrove and O'Farrell, 1999;
Lavista-Llanos et al, 2002;
Pan and Hardie, 2002). Although hypoxia defenses in flies and humans seem to be quite similar at the level of individual genes, stark contrasts exist at the phenotype level.
Drosophila have a remarkable tolerance to hypoxia that is the subject of an increasing amount of investigation (
O'Farrell, 2001;
Haddad, 2006). In contrast to humans, who can only survive a few minutes without oxygen, flies can fully recover from up to 4 h in complete anoxia (
Haddad et al, 1997). Differences in anaerobic generation of ATP are likely to be part of the reason for the disparity in hypoxia tolerance between humans and flies; however,
Drosophila anaerobic metabolism is not well known.
Aerobic energy metabolism in insect flight muscle is similar to that of humans in most respects; however, there are some major differences that distinguish the species, such as the use of proline as an energy source, heavy reliance on the α-glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle, and the use of arginine as an alternative to creatine for ATP buffering (
Gilmour, 1961). Anaerobic energy pathways in
Drosophila are likely to deviate from those of humans as well. In human muscle, glycolysis is the major anaerobic energy pathway and lactate is the only end product of anaerobic metabolism (
Nelson, 2000;
Wadley et al, 2006). Many terrestrial insects yield lactate and alanine as anaerobic end products, but other species have been known to produce a wide array of other products during hypoxia, including sorbitol, succinate, glycerol, α-glycerol-3-phosphate, pyruvic acid, and fatty acids (
Hoback and Stanley, 2001). The specific end products for
Drosophila are not known; however, the wide diversity of insect biochemistry suggests that exotic pathways for anaerobic energy production may also exist in flies (
Gilmour, 1961;
Hoback and Stanley, 2001).
Regardless of the pathways used, anaerobic metabolism must be regulated over the long term to balance pH, ATP production, redox potential (most importantly, NADH/NAD
+), and coupling metabolites. Although strategies for maintaining these balances are known for many organisms (
Hochachka, 1980), quantitative systems models can increase mechanistic understanding. A major advantage of a mathematical model is that conservation of mass is enforced; therefore, all elements and charges are balanced within the system, including electron transport, cofactor concentration, and protons (pH). The constraint-based method uncovers the space of all possible steady-state solutions under a set of physiochemical limitations imposed on the system (
Palsson, 2004). These network models are useful both for performing detailed
in silico experiments and for discovering more general systems-level properties (
Almaas et al, 2004;
Reed and Palsson, 2004).
Focusing on Drosophila flight muscle, we used NMR metabolomic analysis to discover end products of anaerobic energy metabolism. We then added all pathways that might produce these compounds, linked them to existing Drosophila genes, and built them into a constraint-based model of fly energy metabolism. Simulations were used to select specific anaerobic pathways from a number of alternatives by optimizing for ATP production. Metabolite fluxes measured by NMR were integrated into the model and simulations were conducted to investigate production of ATP, H+, and glucose during hypoxia. Simulations were compared with those of classical anaerobic energy pathways in mammals to generate hypotheses for mechanisms of hypoxia tolerance in flies.