Metaplastic carcinoma is a rare malignancy of the breast, characterised by its high‐grade nature. In this report, a large series of 34 cases was assembled, and we evaluated the biological parameters and clinical outcome between the squamoid carcinomas and the sarcomatoid or spindle cell carcinomas (fig 2) for similarity.
Figure 2Spindle cell carcinoma, with the tumour cells showing plump and pleomorphic nuclei and brisk mitotic activity. Haematoxylin and eosin staining, ×200.
Most metaplastic carcinomas are sporadic, but there may be a slight propensity for metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma to arise from pre‐existing lesions, including papillomas, complex sclerosing lesions and nipple adenomas.16,17
Metaplastic or spindle cell carcinomas arising from such lesions can show a varying degree of malignancy, ranging from low to high grade. This type of lesion should also be differentiated from the so‐called reactive spindle cell nodule, which is believed to be benign and may also complicate pre‐existing lesions such as papillomas or complex sclerosing lesions.18
In this series of 34 sporadic metaplastic carcinomas, we identified 24 cases of metaplastic carcinoma with a sarcomatoid or spindle cell component, with 14 (58%) of the 24 cases being biphasic and 10 (42%) of the 14 cases being monophasic. This is essentially in agreement with the rates of 11–33% reported in the literature.3,10,13,19
In all the cases, levels of hormone receptors (oestrogen and progesterone receptors) and expression of the cerbB2 oncogene were low, with oestrogen and progesterone receptors being positive in only 4 (12%) and 3 (9%) of the 34 cases, respectively. Expression of the cerbB2 oncogene was also low, being only positive in 5 (15%) of the 34 cases. The generally low percentage of expression of the hormone receptors is in agreement with the 0–25% reported in the literature.9,12
Expression of cerbB2 warrants further discussion, as a low cerbB2 expression had been reported in metaplastic carcinoma. In our series of biphasic and monophasic tumours, only 2 (8%) of the 24 cases were positive for cerbB2; an even lower figure of 0% had been reported9
in the literature. This is in contrast with the general impression that in high‐grade (grade 3) breast carcinomas, the cerbB2 positivity rate is about 35%,20,21
thus suggesting that metaplastic carcinoma may be biologically different from high‐grade IDC.
The expression of Ki‐67 and p53 among the three groups of metaplastic carcinomas in our series, with a 10% positivity as the cut‐off, was high, with 6 (60%) of 10 cases, 6 (43%) of 14 cases and 7 (70%) of 10 cases, respectively, showing > 10% positivity for epithelial‐only, biphasic and monophasic metaplastic carcinomas. For p53, >10% staining was seen in 4 (40%) of 10 cases of epithelial‐only carcinomas, 6 (43%) of 14 cases of biphasic carcinomas and 8 (80%) of 10 cases of monophasic metaplastic carcinomas. Although the expression of p53 and Ki‐67 has not been extensively reported for metaplastic carcinoma of the breast, one sporadic case report noted the expression of these markers.22
Another report on a series of 24 low‐grade spindle cell carcinoma of the breast showed that all the cases were <5% positive for Ki‐67,14
in stark contrast to the observation in this case series. This provides strong evidence for the high grade and aggressive nature of metaplastic carcinoma in general, irrespective of the histological subtypes—whether epithelial‐only, biphasic or monophasic. The biological behaviour of the low‐grade spindle cell carcinoma is probably distinct, and it would be prudent to consider this as a separate entity.
Further evidence of the aggressive nature of all the histological subtypes is apparent from the lymph node status and the follow‐up result of the current cohort. Of the 25 patients who had known, histologically proven axillary status at the time of surgery 14 (56%) patients showed positive axillary lymph node metastases. This is in contrast with the reported incidence of axillary metastasis of 8% in one series,8
but the figure in our study was similar to the 40% of another series.9
This again contrasts with the reported results of the low‐grade spindle cell carcinoma, with the two large series reporting the absence of axillary metastases in all cases.13,14
The morphology of the metastases in most situations recapitulates that of the original tumour. For the epithelial‐only and the monophasic carcinomas, this poses no diagnostic problem in identifying metastasis. In the current cohort, the two adenosquamous carcinomas showed adenosquamous components in the metastases, and the SCC showed squamous or poorly‐differentiated carcinoma in the metastases. Problems may, however, arise for the biphasic carcinoma. In the four cases with metastases, three showed a carcinoma component only in the metastases, and in only one case was the metastasis biphasic. Furthermore, in one case, the metastasis seemed to be more epithelial than the primary tumour which was more spindled (figs 3A,B). Bearing this fact in mind is important, as failure to recognise the possible morphological discrepancy between the primary and metastasis may result in inappropriate treatment and investigations for a possible new primary erroneously perceived.
Figure 3(A) Monophasic sarcomatoid metaplastic breast carcinoma, featuring elongated plump cells with enlarged pleomorphic vesicular nuclei and distinct nucleoli. Admixed inflammatory cells are seen. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, (more ...)
- Metaplastic carcinoma encompasses tumours with mixed epithelial and sarcomatoid components, as well as primary squamous or mixed adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma; the mixed group can be further classified into monophasic (spindle cell only), or biphasic (mixed spindle and carcinoma cells).
- In all types of metaplastic carcinoma, hormone receptors (oestrogen, progesterone) and expression of cerbB2 oncogene are low (<20%), and this may have an implication on treatment options.
- Diagnosing the biphasic and monophasic metaplastic carcinoma requires coexpression of cytokeratin and vimentin. AE1/AE3 remains the most widely used and the most sensitive marker, together with vimentin, for defining the metaplastic spindle cells, particularly for the monophasic subtype.
Follow‐up data were available for 25 patients; 11 dead (14 alive). Among those who died, 8 (73%) died of disease, and of the survivors, 7 (50%) also had evidence of disease at the end of the follow‐up period. Viewed from another perspective, of a total of 25 patients, 15 (60%) had evidence of disease (8 died, 7 were alive). On comparing the parameters between these two groups, we found no differences between hormonal receptor status and the expression of cerbB2, Ki‐67 and p53. The only difference was the percentage of positive axillary lymph node status, which was positive in 9 (75%) of 12 patients with disease compared with 4 (40%) of 10 patients from the disease‐free group.
When we look at the individual subtype of metaplastic carcinomas, the percentage of patients with disease (dead or alive) are 4 (57%) of 7 patients, 8 (89%) of 9 patients and 3 (33%) of 9 patients, respectively, from the groups of epithelial‐only, biphasic and monophasic metaplastic carcinomas. As the number of cases in these categories is small, the significance of this if any, remains unclear. Although the diagnosis of the epithelial‐only subtype (adenosquamous or pure SCC) can be based only on morphological assessment, diagnosing the biphasic and monophasic types of metaplastic carcinoma requires the use of immunohistochemistry. Cytokeratin and vimentin positivity is the defining feature.8
Some authors reported a rather low expression of cytokeratin markers (8/18 (44%) cases for AE1/AE3, and 9/18 (50%) cases for CAM5.2), but if both markers were combined, the pick‐up rate increased to 10 (55%) of 18 cases. Furthermore, the spindle cells were reported to show the highest percentage of expression for myoepithelial markers (34bE12, smooth muscle cell actin).8
Most other recent studies report a higher percentage of AE1/AE3 expression, ranging from 63% to 100%.3,6,7,11,13
Hence, AE1/AE3 remains the most widely used and most sensitive marker, with vimentin, for defining the metaplastic spindle cells, particularly for the monophasic subtype.
In summary, we report a large series of metaplastic carcinomas, by conventional usage. The diagnosis of this group of lesions is by morphology for carcinomas with a squamous component or a pure squamous carcinoma, and by immunohistochemistry for those with a sarcomatoid or spindle cell carcinoma, coexpressing vimentin and cytokeratin. The combined use of AE1/AE3 and CAM5.2 shows a higher sensitivity than each marker alone. All three subtypes may have aggressive biological behaviour, as evidenced by the high percentage of lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis and the rather dismal outcome, as well as the high p53 and Ki‐67 index. The absence of hormonal receptors and cerbB2 oncoprotein expression may further limit oncological treatment options.