PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
 
Br J Gen Pract. May 1, 2006; 56(526): 363–368.
PMCID: PMC1837845
A profile of communication in primary care physician telephone consultations: application of the Roter Interaction Analysis System
Michael Innes, MSc, MRCGP, NHS R&D Primary Care Researcher Development Fellow, John Skelton, BA, MA, RSA, MRCGP, Professor of Clinical Communication, and Sheila Greenfield, BSc, MA, PhD, Senior Lecturer
Department of Primary Care and General Practice, Medical School, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham
Address for correspondence Dr Michael Innes, Stirchley Medical Practice, Sandino Road, Stirchley, Telford TF3 1FB. E-mail: mike.innes/at/nhs.net
Received February 7, 2005; Revised April 22, 2005; Accepted October 11, 2005.
Abstract
Background
Telephone consultations are a part of everyday practice, there is surprisingly little research on the subject.
Aim
To describe the variation of consulting skills within a body of telephone consultations in primary care, highlighting the performance of one method of assessing the process of the consultation — the Roter Interaction Analysis System — with telephone consultations.
Design of study
Cross sectional study of 43 recordings of telephone consultations with GPs.
Setting
One rural county in the Midlands.
Method
Recordings were made of 8 GPs, purposively selected for maximum variance in one region of the UK. Forty-three consultations were coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. From the descriptive categories, six composite categories were compiled reflecting a number of domains of interaction in a consultation: rapport, data gathering, patient education and counselling, partnership building, doctor dominance and patient-centredness. Analysis of variance was undertaken to explain variations between consultations for the different domains. Comparison was made to findings from similar work for face-to-face consultations.
Results
These telephone consultations feature more biomedical information exchange than psychosocial or affective communication. Length of interaction accounts for much of the variation seen between consultations in the domains of rapport, data gathering, patient education and counselling and partnership. Male doctors are more patient centred in this study. There is the suggestion of more doctor dominance and a less patient-centred approach when comparisons are made with previous work on face-to-face consultations.
Conclusions
Although the telephone is increasingly being used to provide care, this study highlights the fact that telephone consultations cannot be taken as equivalent to those conducted face to face. More work needs to be done to delineate the features of telephone consultations.
Keywords: communication, consultation, cross sectional study, Roter Interaction Analysis System, telephone, telemedicine
Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of
Royal College of General Practitioners