Using the rodent vibrissa motor system, we provided evidence for a novel mammalian mechanism of rhythm generation that underlies movements. Like CPGs, this system does not rely on cortical inputs (
Gao et al. 2003;
Lovick 1972;
Semba and Komisaruk 1984) or sensory feedback (
Welker 1964) to generate rhythmic output. However, whereas mammalian CPGs are typically composed of networked interneurons that generate the motor pattern and subsequently drive motoneurons, in the vibrissa system, our results suggest that rhythmic movements are generated by the motoneurons themselves in response to tonic input from serotonergic pre-motoneurons. The involvement of vMNs in the rhythmogenesis, the necessity of 5-HT for generating movements and sufficiency of 5-HT to generate the motor pattern are unique to this mammalian model of motor control.
In support of the postulate that 5-HT is necessary for rhythmic whisking are our findings that 5-HT receptor antagonists suppress both voluntary whisking (
Hattox et al. 2003) as well as ICMS-evoked whisking (
Cramer and Keller 2006). The finding that the activity of putative 5-HT pre-motoneurons co-varies with whisking frequency () is also in agreement with this postulate. Available evidence suggests that 5-HT interactions with vMNs are also sufficient for generating rhythmic whisking: 5-HT (or its receptor agonists) applied at different concentrations evoke a range of rhythmic firing rates in vMNs (
Hattox et al. 2003, ), an effect that is suppressed by 5-HT receptor antagonists (
Hattox et al. 2003). These pharmacological manipulations are resistant to suppression of glutamatergic and GABAergic receptors, suggesting that these serotonergic effects are specific to vMNs. This effect appears unique to vMNs as an earlier investigation into the effects of 5-HT on facial motoneurons, that did not restrict sampling to any particular sub-nucleus, did not observe 5-HT evoked rhythmic firing (
McCall and Aghajanian 1979). Similarly, 5-HT does not evoke rhythmic firing in guinea pig trigeminal motoneurons (
Hsiao et al. 1997). Thus, whereas in other motor systems the actions of 5-HT on motoneurons is described as modulatory, capable of shaping an on-going rhythm but not responsible for the rhythm generation itself (
Heckman et al. 2004), in the vibrissa motor system 5-HT is both necessary and sufficient for generating the whisking motor pattern and thus capable of generating rhythmic whisking.
Our results indicate that 5-HT acts through a graded facilitation of a persistent inward current (PIC) within vMNs. PICs are voltage dependent membrane currents that resist inactivation (
Heckman et al. 2005;
Schwindt and Crill 1980). In many motoneurons, including vMNs (Figs. and ) these currents are facilitated by 5-HT, frequently through the activation of 5-HT
2 receptors (
Harvey et al. 2006a;
Heckman et al. 2005;
Perrier and Hounsgaard 2003). Although these currents are considered to modulate ongoing firing in other motoneurons, in vMNs their presence is associated with the
generation of rhythmic firing. We found that concentrations of a 5-HT
2 receptor agonist that produced a graded facilitation in PIC magnitude also generated a progressive increase in firing rates in vMNs, suggesting a causal relationship between the two phenomena. The action of riluzole on the agonist-induced firing rates supports this causal relationship. Riluzole, which selectively antagonizes persistent sodium currents at low concentrations (2 to 5 μM,
Wu et al. 2005) caused a similarly graded suppression in both PIC magnitude and firing rate of vMNs. Together, these data support the hypothesis that vMNs generate whisking rhythms in response to serotonergic drive.
ICMS-evoked whisking displayed a relatively long onset latency (). This delay may reflect the kinetics of the transduction cascades initiated following activation of metabotropic 5-HT
2 receptors on vMNs. In addition, 5-HT axon terminals in the facial nucleus, as in other brain regions, are thought not to form classical chemical synapses. Rather, activation of 5-HT receptors is thought to occur through the slow diffusion of 5-HT and the activation of extrasynaptic receptors (
De-Miguel and Trueta 2005). We have recently reported that increasing ICMS intensity significantly decreases whisking onset latency, most likely by increasing the output from 5-HT pre-motoneurons (
Cramer and Keller 2006), consistent with the postulate that extrasynaptic transmission contributes to the delayed whisking. It is pertinent that the long latencies between cortical activation and EMG onset are consistent with our previous studies in behaving rats (
Friedman et al. 2006).
The mechanisms responsible for terminating whisking remain to be determined. Inhibitory inputs are effective in rapidly terminating PICs (
Heckman et al. 2005), suggesting that inhibitory inputs to vMNs may be involved. Indeed, we have previously found that both the onset and offset of a whisking epoch is preceded by a brief increase in activity in vMCx (
Friedman et al. 2006), suggesting vMCx sends commands to both start and stop a whisking epoch.
Exploratory whisking occurs at frequencies between 5 to 15 Hz (
Berg and Kleinfeld 2003), a range that is encompassed by the agonist induced firing rates (Figs. and ). The correspondence between vMN firing rates
in vitro and whisking frequencies
in vivo suggests that, during voluntary whisking, vMNs fire a single action potential per whisk. Previously, we demonstrated that some vMNs do indeed fire in a one-to-one manner during ICMS-evoked whisking (
Cramer and Keller 2006). Some vMNs, however, fire bursts of action potentials per whisk. The failure to evoke a similar bursting firing pattern in vMNs
in vitro may result from the reduced nature of this preparation. In particular, the partial truncation of the dendritic tree, where the channels that carry PICs are thought to reside (
Heckman et al. 2003), might impact the ability of the vMNs to burst
in vitro. In addition, non-serotonergic inputs present in the intact animal but missing
in vitro may be essential for bursting in vMNs.
vMNs in the lateral facial nucleus are densely innervated by serotonergic neurons, many of which receive direct projections from the vibrissa motor cortex (vMCx,
Hattox et al. 2003;
Hattox et al. 2002). The highest density of serotonergic inputs to vMNs appears to originate from the rostral (juxtafacial) lateral paragigantocellularis nucleus (LPGi,
Hattox et al. 2002), and stimulation of these neurons produces vibrissa movements (
Hattox et al. 2003). These observations suggest that serotonergic LPGi neurons are strategically placed to act as the source of 5-HT used by vMNs to generate whisking. Indeed, our results indicate that the activity of neurons within this nucleus is positively correlated with whisking frequency. However, because LPGi contains a subset of non-5-HT neurons (
Bellintani-Guardia et al. 1996), we cannot conclusively determine the identity of the neurons we recorded from and therefore referred to them as putative serotonergic pre-motoneurons.
The circuits described above suggest that the endogenous source of 5-HT used by vMNs can be activated and regulated by vMCx. In support of this we found that during rhythmic whisking evoked by ICMS of vMCx, the activity of putative serotonergic pre-motoneurons was positively correlated with the whisking frequency (). We have shown previously that this stimulation-evoked whisking is suppressed by 5-HT receptor antagonists (
Cramer and Keller 2006), further supporting the hypothesis that voluntary control of the whisking rhythm is achieved by actions of vMCx on 5-HT pre-motoneurons.
Additional lines of evidence support the role of vMCx in regulating whisking through a 5-HT-dependent mechanism. The activity of vMCx neurons does not co-vary with whisking frequency, suggesting that vMCx does not directly drive vMNs (
Carvell et al. 1996). Increased vMCx activity does, however, precede both the onset of whisking and changes in whisking kinematics (
Friedman et al. 2006). These observations are consistent with vMCx modulating the activity of a subcortical structure, such as serotonergic pre-motoneurons, to initiate and modulate whisking. A role for the motor cortex as a coordinator of movement patterns is supported by studies in primates, demonstrating that the motor cortex may control higher-order movement parameters, such as ethologically relevant motor behaviors, rather than activation of individual muscles or movements (
Graziano 2006).
During voluntary whisking, vibrissae often move in unison (
Carvell and Simons 1990;
Gao et al. 2001). Although the synchrony between vibrissae in the same whisker pad (
Sachdev et al. 2002) and bilaterally (
Towal and Hartmann 2006) does not occur during all behaviors, the prevalence of such synchrony suggests the presence of underlying coordinating mechanisms. Since the facial nucleus is thought not to contain interneurons (
Courville 1966), and since facial motoneurons do not have axon collaterals (
Fanardjian et al. 1983), unilateral synchrony may be achieved through electrical coupling. Electrical coupling through gap junctions enhances synchronous activity in neurons (
Connors and Long 2004) and is important for generating coordinated output from motoneuron pools (
Kiehn and Tresch 2002;
Tresch and Kiehn 2000). The presence of gap junction proteins in the facial nucleus (
Rohlmann et al. 1993) further suggests that the unilateral synchronous movements of vibrissae results from the coordinated discharge of electrically coupled vMNs. Such a mechanism is supported by findings in the developing mouse hindbrain, where 5-HT generates widespread synchronous activity that is abolished by gap junction blockers (
Hunt et al. 2006). Alternatively, synchronous whisking, both unilateral and bilateral, may be achieved through the action of pre-motoneurons. These may include pre-motoneurons in LPGi, as these project bilaterally to vMNs (
Hattox et al. 2003;
Hattox et al. 2002), or pre-motoneurons in one of the numerous nuclei that project to vMNs (
Hattox et al. 2002).
Many of the nuclei that project to vMNs contain non-serotonergic neurons, whose role in the regulation of whisking remains to be established (
Hattox et al. 2002). Within these nuclei may reside a more classically composed whisking CPG that delivers rhythmic inputs to the motoneurons. vMNs also receive direct, albeit sparse inputs from the vMCx (
Grinevich et al. 2005), and although vMCx is not necessary for whisking (
Gao et al. 2003;
Lovick 1972;
Semba and Komisaruk 1984), it has been proposed that vMCx is capable of generating the whisking rhythm itself on a cycle-by-cycle basis (
Berg and Kleinfeld 2003). Additionally, in some pathological states vMCx activity is phased-locked to individual whisks (
Castro-Alamancos 2006). In light of these observations, it is unlikely that any one mechanism operates in isolation to generate the full range of vibrissal movements. Nevertheless, our findings support the hypothesis that vMNs require only serotonergic inputs to generate the whisking motor pattern. The involvement of vMNs in rhythmogenesis and the necessary and sufficient role of 5-HT in generating the whisking motor pattern, establish this network as a novel mechanism for the generation of movements in mammals.