Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of ghanamedjLink to Publisher's site
Ghana Med J. 2006 September; 40(3): 99–104.
PMCID: PMC1790848

Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus Among Some Voluntary Blood Donors at the 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Ghana



Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most significant pathogens infecting immunosuppressed individuals. CMV is transmissible through transfusion of blood components.


The goal of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies to CMV among blood donors seen at the 37 Military Hospital Blood Transfusion Unit, (MHBTU) Accra, Ghana.


The seroprevalence of antibodies specific for CMV was tested using CMV IgG/IgM particle agglutination test kit and ELISA.


Of the 264 blood donors, 18 were negative and 246 were positive for CMV IgG antibodies, giving an overall CMV prevalence rate of 93.2%. None of the 264 blood donors was positive for CMV IgM antibodies. About 96% of the donors aged between 30 to 39 years were seropositive for CMV, as against 91.9% in those aged 20–29 years, 88.6% in 40 to 49 years, 75.0% (3 out of 4) in 50 to 59 years, and 100% (1 out 1) in 60–69 years. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the CMV IgG status in different age groups. The blood donors comprised largely of male donors (236 out of 264), making sex comparisons statistically undesirable. However, all the female (n=28) donors were positive for CMV IgG.


Since about 93% of blood donors at the MHBTU are seropositive for CMV, it would be very useful to screen blood donors in Ghana for CMV to identify the very few CMV-seronegative blood donors, and maintain an inventory of them for use as donors.

Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, blood donors, seroprevalence


Transfusion transmitted disease (TTD) is a major challenge to the transfusion services all over the world. The presence of viruses in blood cells or plasma of asymptomatic donors is the major risk factor for transmitting infectious agents through blood transfusion. Other transfusion transmitted agents include bacteria, mycoplasma, and even protozoa. The main viruses associated with transfusion related infections are hepatitis viruses, retroviruses, and cytomegalovirus (CMV)1,2. The risk of transmitting hepatitis viruses, human retroviruses, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T-lymphotropic viruses types I and II has been reduced drastically by screening for the corresponding antibodies before transfusion.

However, CMV, a member of the human herpes family of viruses, transmissible through blood component transfusions is an important cause of concern world-wide. This is because the majority of adults have serological evidence of previous infections by these viruses. CMV is a ubiquitous agent, and seropositivity rates in the adult population over 40 years of age worldwide are 60 to 100%, possibly due to transmission through breastfeeding, sexual contact and spread from children3,4. Like most other herpesviruses, they remain latent in the host after primary infection and persist for lifelong in the organism. Nevertheless, these viruses can be reactivated in immunosuppressed individuals leading to critical outcomes such as interstitial pneumonitis, hepatitis, retinitis, and encephalitis57. Active infection results in serious morbidity and mortality, and many consider CMV to be one of the most serious pathogens affecting immunosuppressed individuals and an important contribution to intrauterine infection810. In one study, the relative risk of CMV disease transmission via blood components from seropositive donors was 0.4% to 12%11. Transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed patients.

The widespread prevalence of CMV seropositivity makes it difficult for some blood banks to maintain sufficient CMV seronegative blood components for patients at risk for CMV disease. Therefore, the most effective way to minimize the risk of CMV transmission in high-risk recipients would be to administer CMV seronegative blood products or leucoreduced blood products12,13. Otherwise, a way out would be to determine the frequency of primary CMV infection among seronegative blood donors14. A previous study in Ghana identified CMV infection (cytomegaloviral eosophagitis and enteritis) as one of the major opportunistic infections in Ghanaian HIV-AIDS patients at autopsy15, without identifying if the infections in these patients were transfusion-related or not.

The 37 Military Hospital is a 600-bed national referral hospital for military personnel and other soldiers from the West Africa sub-region on peace-keeping missions. According to the Military Hospital Blood Transfusion Unit (MHBTU) estimation, the number of blood units transfused at the Hospital in 2002 was 9,000 units. In view of the large number of transfusions carried out at the Hospital and their great potential for transmitting blood associated pathogens to the recipients, it is extremely necessary that the presence of antibodies to CMV among blood donors be determined. Currently, such a procedure has not been established at the MHBTU. Donor blood is screened only for HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) and syphilis. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of antibodies to CMV infection among blood donors at the MHBTU. Such information may be invaluable to health planners at the hospital and policy makers in Ghana.

Subjects and Methods

This study was carried out between the months of January and April 2004 among blood donors at the MHBTU. This unit serves the military personnel, their dependants, surrounding urban population, and also referred cases from other military personnel from other countries on peace-keeping missions in the West African sub-region. In Ghana, blood donors are volunteers and are also sought from family members of patients and friends needing blood transfusion. They are selected based on the following criteria: age between 18 and 60 years; weight >45 kg; haemoglobin >12.5 g/dl; normal blood pressure [BP], pulse, and body temperature; not belonging to any high-risk group (homosexually/heterosexually promiscuous, intravenous drug addicts; patients of sexually transmitted diseases; and no history of any severe current or chronic illnesses). Donors found to be healthy are then permitted to donate blood. Donated blood is routinely screened for HIV 1 & 2, HBsAg, anti-HCV and syphilis antibodies.

Sera were screened for the presence of antibodies to CMV in parallel with a commercially available CMV IgG/IgM particle agglutination test kit (PAT; Serodia Fujirebio Inc. Japan) and ELISA (anti-HCMV recombinant IgG/IgM; Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Positive and negative standard sera, accompanying the kit were included in each assay. The study was approved by the Ethical and Protocol Review Committee of the University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana,

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by calculating the Odds Ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in the comparison of the age group having the lowest seropositivity rate with other age groups, and then performing the Chi-square test. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


Of the 264 blood donors, 236 (89.4%) were males and 28 (10.6%) were females. Their mean age was 32.1 years (range 19 to 64 years). Sera reactive by both the PAT and ELISA test were considered as positive; and those reactive by either PAT or ELISA test, or neither PAT or ELISA test were considered negative. The combined results showed that 18 were negative (16 were non-reactive by both PAT and ELISA test, and 1 each was reactive to only PAT or only ELISA test) and 246 were positive for CMV IgG antibodies, giving an overall CMV prevalence rate of 93.2%. None of the 264 blood donors were reactive for CMV IgM antibodies by either the PAT or ELISA tests.

Table 1 shows the combined results of CMV IgG seropositivity and age of blood donors. About ninety-six (96%) percent of the donors (132 out of 138) aged between 30 to 39 years were serpositive for CMV, as against 91.9% (79 out of 86) in 20 to 29 years, 88.6% (31 out of 35) in 40 to 49 years, and 75.0% (3 out of 4) in 50 to 59 years, and 100% (1 out of 1) in 60 to 69 years. There was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the CMV IgG status in different age groups. The blood donors comprised largely of male donors (236 out of 264), making sex comparisons statistically undesirable. However, all the female (n=28) donors were positive for CMV IgG.

Table 1
Seroprevalence rate of CMV IgG among blood donors of different age groups in Ghana


To our knowledge, this is the first report on the seroprevalence of antibodies to CMV among blood donors in the country. The results of this study showed an overall prevalence rate of 93.2% of CMV IgG among blood donors at the MHBTU, suggestive of ubiquitous past exposure to infection. On the other hand, none of the donors tested positive for CMV IgM, indicating the absence of primary infection. The high seroprevalence rate in adult blood donors reported in this study is comparable to the rates (97% and 96%) reported in Tunisia and India, respectively1618. The high prevalence rate in the country indicates the endemicity of infection, and this perhaps could be related to socio-economic, environmental, and climatic factors19. In the study reported herein, the seroprevalence of CMV IgG among the blood donors varied with age ranging from 91.9% in 20 to 29 year, 95.7% in the 30 to 39 year, to 100% in the 60 to 69 year age groups (Table 1). The decrease in the percentage seropositivity in the 40 to 49 year and 50 to 59 year age groups is likely due to smaller number of blood donors. Despite this limitation, the results are similar to studies reported elsewhere which showed a significantly increased seropositivity with increasing age of blood donors20,21. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P>0.05) in the CMV IgG serostatus with age, when the other age groups were compared to the 50 to 59 year group with lowest seroprevalence.

The American Association of Blood Banks has recommended transfusion from blood donors who are seronegative for CMV or the use of deglycerolized frozen RBCs whenever transfusion is contemplated in high-risk individuals22. These guidelines have helped in drastically minimizing transfusion-transmitted (TT) CMV infection in immunosuppressed recipients in the US. Since about 93% of blood donors at the MHBTU are seropositive for CMV, it would therefore be very useful to screen blood donors in Ghana for CMV to identify the very few CMV-seronegative blood donors, and maintain an inventory of them for use as donors for immunosuppressed individuals. Furthermore, we propose that the future strategies for the prevention and/or reduction of TT-CMV in Ghana should include the routine screening of donor blood for CMV antibodies as a first step, the subsequent identification of the very few CMV-seronegatives, the education and counselling of these CMV-seronegatives on the importance of their status for themselves and the increasing immunosuppressed population and how to maintain their staus, the motivation of these CMV seronegatives for them to become periodic repeat donors, and the maintenance of a database of the epidemiological and contact information of these CMV seronegatives to enable their rapid recall in times of need. This proposed CMV screening of blood donors and the subsequent determination of the actual titres of neutralization antibodies in the numerous CMV-seropositives will ensure the identification of those CMV-seropositives with very high neutralizing antibody titres from whom immunoglobulins can be obtained to treat CMV infections in immunosuppressed individuals, and who will be followed-up and recalled when necessary in the same manner described above for the few CMS-seronegatives.

The above recommendation, though implies a drastic change in blood banking practice in Ghana with financial implications, is timely because transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in immuncsuppressed patients, including premature low-birth weigh infants (<150g) born to CMV-seronegative mothers and HIV-AIDS patients23, whose population increasing in Ghana. Additionally, recent studies have associated chronic CMV infection with prevalent frailty, a state with increased morbidity and mortality in older adults24,25. Ghana must introduce the provision of CMV seronegative blood product support to the above stated vulnerable individuals as soon as possible, since this has been the standard of care since the late 1980s in most developed countries after studies showed this strategy significantly reduced the rate of TT-CMV2628. However, the maintenance of CMV-seropositive and CMV-seronegative “dual inventories” is expensive, and some countries with high CMV seroprevalence have found it difficult to maintain adequate supplies of CMV-seronegative products29, as would be the case for Ghana with a 93% CMV seroprevalence among healthy blood donors herein reported. Thus, alternate methods for the provision of “CMV safe” blood products have been pursued, including the use of leucoreduced blood products which was reported to be comparable to the use of CMV-seronegative blood products for the prevention of TT-CMV infection after marrow transplant30. However, a more recent study has demonstrated that TT-CMV does occur even after leucoreduction, that CMV-seronegative blood products may thus be superior to leucoreduced blood products, and cautioned against the premature abandonment of the use of CMV-negative inventories particularly for the populations at high risk of and vulnerable to CMV disease for an era of “universal” leucoreduction29. It must be noted though that both approaches, of using CMV-seronegative and leucoreduced blood products, may fail and carry a low but definite risk of transmitting CMV infection with “breakthrough” infections occurring at rates as high as 1 to 2%2630, compared to up to 12% TT-CMV infection rate when blood products unscreened for CMV antibodies are used11. A recent study demonstrated that plasma viremia in seroconverting donors may partially explain the low residual risk of CMV transmission by both CMV-seronegative and leucoreduced CMV- seropositive blood products31.

Limitations of the study included the small sample size (which is due to financial constraints in acquiring enough test kits) and the small number of female volunteers presenting at the Blood Bank. Despite this limitation, the general observation is that donated blood at the MHBTU, Accra, Ghana have a high prevalence of antibodies to CMV.


We would like to thank Staff of the Blood Bank, 37 Military Hospital, Accra, Mr. John Tetteh Ocquaye-Mensah, and Mr. Isaac Boamah, Microbiology Department, U.G.M.S., Korle-Bu, Accra, for their excellent technical assistance and for helpful contributions.


1. Herve P. Transfusion safety: emergent or hypothetical risks. Transfus Clin Biol. 2000;7:30–38. [PubMed]
2. Kuhn JP. Transfusion-associated infections with cytomegalovirus and other human herpesviruses. Infusionsther Transfusionmed. 2000;27:138–143.
3. Zhang L, Hanff P, Rutherford C, Churchill C, Crumpacker C. Detection of human cytomegalovirus DNA, RNA and antibody in normal donor blood. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:1002–1006. [PubMed]
4. Hecker M, Qiu D, Marquardt K, Bein G, Hackstein H. Continuous cytomegalovirus seroconversion in a large group of healthy blood donors. Vox Sanguinis. 2004;86:41–44. [PubMed]
5. Drobyski W, Dume W, Burd E, Knox K, Ash R, Horowitz M, Flomenberg N, Carrigan D. Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV) infection in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients; evidence of a marrow suppressive role for HHV 6 in vivo. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:735–739. [PubMed]
6. Manez R, Kusne S, Martin M, Linden P, Irish W, Torre-Cisneros J, Kramer D, Ho M, Starzel TE. The impact of blood transfusion on the occurrence of pneumonitis in primary cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplant. Transplantation. 1993;30:594–597.
7. Rubin RH. Impact of cytomegalovirus infections after an organ transplant recipient in bone marrow recipients. Rev Infect Dis. 1990;12:S754–S766. [PubMed]
8. Hillyer CD, Snydman DR, Berkman EM. The risk of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ and bone marrow recipients: transfusion of blood components. Transfusion. 1990;30:659–666. [PubMed]
9. Griffiths PD, Babboonian C, Rutter D, Peckham C. Congenital and maternal cytomegalovirus infections in a London population. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:135–140. [PubMed]
10. Wen L, Wu S, Lu S. The epidemiological study of human cytomegalovirus infection in pregnant women and maternal foetal transmission in three Chinese metropolis. Chung Hua Fuchar Ko Tsa Chih. 1996;31:714–717.
11. Krajden M, Shankaran P, Bourke C, Lau W. Detection of cytomegalovirus in blood donors by PCR using the digene SHARP signal system assay: effects of sample preparation and detection methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:29–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Roback JD. CMV and blood transfusions. Rev Med Virol. 2002;12:211–219. [PubMed]
13. Preiksaitis JK. The cytomegalovirus-“safe” blood product: is leukoreduction equivalent to antibody screening? Transfus Med Rev. 2000;14:112–116. [PubMed]
14. Preiksaitis JK. Prevention of transfusion-acquired CMV infection: is there a role for NAT? Transfusion. 2003;43:302–305. [PubMed]
15. Ayisi NK, Wiredu EK, Sata T, Nyadedzor C, Tsiagbe VK, Newman M, Cofie CN, Taneguchi K. T-lymphocytopaenia, opportunistic infections and pathological findings in Ghanaian AIDS patients and their sexual partners. East Afr Med J. 1997;74:784–791. [PubMed]
16. Madhavan HN, Prakash K, Agarwal SC. Cytomegalovirus infections in Pondicherry: a serology survey. Indian J Med Res. 1974;62:297–300. [PubMed]
17. Kothari A, Ramachandran VG, Gupta P, Singh B, Talwar V. Seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus among voluntary blood donors in Delhi, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2002;20:348–351. [PubMed]
18. Gargouri J, Elleuch H, Karray H, Rekik H, Hammami A. Prevalence of anti-CMV antibodies in blood donors in the Sfax region (value in blood transfusion) Tunis Med. 2000;78:512–517. [PubMed]
19. De Jong MD, Galasso GJ, Gazzad B, Griffith PD, Jabs DA, Kern ER, Spector SA. Summary of the II international symposium on cytomegalovirus. Antiviral Res. 1998;39:141–162. [PubMed]
20. Galea G, Urbaniak SJ. Cytomegalovirus studies on blood donors in North-East Scotland and a review of UK data. Vox Sang. 1993;64:24–30. [PubMed]
21. Gunter KC, Luban NLC. Transfusion transmitted cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus diseases. In: Rossi EC, Simon TL, Moss GS, Gould SA, editors. Principles of transfusion medicine. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. pp. 717–732.
22. Holland PV, Schmitt PJ. Standards for blood banks and transfusion services. 12th ed. Arlington VA: Committee on standards, American Association of Blood Banks; 1987. pp. 30–31.
23. Trincado D, Rawlinson WD. Congenital and perinatal infections with cytomegalovirus. J Paediatr Child Hlth. 2001;37:187–192.
24. Schmaltz HN, Fried LP, Xue Q-L, Walston J, Leng SX, Semba RD. Chronic cytomegalovirus infection and inflammation are associated with prevalent frailty in community-dwelling older women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:747–754. [PubMed]
25. High KP. Chronic infection and frailty: surrogate markers, associations, and causality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:906–908. [PubMed]
26. Bowden RA, Sayers M, Flournoy N, Newton B, Banaji M, Thomas ED, Meyers JD. Cytomegalovirus immune globulin and seronegative blood products to prevent primary cytomegalovirus infection after marrow transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1006–1010. [PubMed]
27. Miller WJ, McCullough J, Balfour H H, Jr, Haake RJ, Ramsay NK, Goldman A, Bowman R, Kersey J. Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection following bone marrow transplantations: a randomized trial of blood product screening. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1991;7:227–234. [PubMed]
28. Yeager AS, Grumet FC, Hafleigh EB, Arvin AM, Bradley J S, Prober CG. Prevention of transfusion-acquired cytomegalovirus infections in newborn infants. J Paediatr. 1981;98:281–287.
29. Nichols W G, Price T H, Gooley T, Corey L, Boeckh M. Transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus infection after receipt of leukoreduced blood products. Blood. 2003;101:4195–4200. [PubMed]
30. Bowden RA, Slichter SJ, Sayers M, Weisdorf D, Cays M, Schock G, Banaji M, Haake R, Welk K, Fisher L, McCullough J. A comparison of leukocyte-reduced and cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative blood products for the prevention of transfusion-associated CMV infection after marrow transplant. Blood. 1995;86:3598–3603. [PubMed]
31. Drew WL, Tegtmeier G, Alter HJ, Laycock ME, Miner RC, Busch MP. Frequency and duration of plasma CMV viremia in seroconverting blood donors and recipients. Transfusion. 2003;43:309–313. [PubMed]

Articles from Ghana Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Ghana Medical Association