PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of epicurrLink to Publisher's site
 
Epilepsy Curr. 2006 November; 6(6): 203–207.
PMCID: PMC1783487

Do Interictal Spikes Sustain Seizures and Epileptogenesis?

Massimo Avoli, MD, PhD,1,2 Giuseppe Biagini, MD,3 and M de Curtis, MD4

Abstract

Interictal spiking is seen in the EEG of epileptic patients between seizures. To date, the roles played by interictal events in seizure occurrence and in epileptogenesis remain elusive. While interictal spikes may herald the onset of electrographic seizures, experimental data indicate that hippocampus-driven interictal events prevent seizure precipitation. Even less clear than the role of interictal events in seizure occurrence is whether and how interictal spikes contribute to epileptogenesis. Thus, while plastic changes within limbic neuronal networks may result from ongoing interictal activity, experimental evidence supports the view that epileptogenesis is accompanied by a decrease in hippocampus-driven interictal activity.

The EEG of patients presenting with partial seizures is characterized by brief, epileptic spikes that are not associated with evident clinical symptoms. The interictal spiking is valuable for diagnosing the epileptic condition, and when required, for localizing the epileptogenic area. Interictal and ictal discharges in animal models of epileptiform activity consist of similar (but for duration) neuronal depolarizations, leading to sustained action potential firing (14), suggesting that interictal and ictal events may reflect similar neuronal mechanisms. Moreover, interictal spikes may herald the onset of electrographic seizures. However, the precise relationship between interictal and ictal activity remains ambiguous, as careful studies performed in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and in animal models mimicking this condition indicate that the interictal spike rate does not change before seizure onset (57). Finally, it has been proposed that interictal spiking prevents seizure precipitation in some animal models (811).

Even more elusive than interictal–ictal relationship is the role played by interictal spikes in epileptogenesis, which is the process leading to the development of an epileptic condition (12). While it is indisputable that plasticity is a fundamental characteristic of neuronal networks, as epitomized by the kindling phenomenon (13), it is unclear whether changes in synaptic efficacy or formation of new connections result from ongoing interictal activity. Here, we review data indicating that interictal spikes can have both anti- and proseizure actions. In addition, experimental evidence supporting the view that a decrease in hippocampal-driven interictal activity contributes to epileptogenesis in the pilocarpine model of TLE is summarized. The hippocampus (and in particular its CA3 subfield) is the limbic area that is most prone to generate interictal events, at least with in vitro preparations (4).

Antiseizure and Proseizure Actions of Interictal Spikes

Because TLE patients present with seizure discharges in limbic structures, such as the entorhinal cortex (EC) and the hippocampus proper, several electrophysiological studies have been carried out on rodent brain slices that contain reciprocally interconnected portions of hippocampal and parahippocampal areas (4) or with isolated brain preparations (11,14,15). As illustrated in Figure 1A, under appropriate conditions (e.g., when treated with 4-aminopyridine), combined EC–hippocampus slices generate epileptiform discharges resembling interictal and ictal events (4). Interictal activity, which is caused by non-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) glutamatergic mechanisms, originates in the CA3 subfield of the hippocampus, spreads via the CA1/subiculum areas to the EC, and returns to CA3 via the perforant path/dentate gyrus (Figure 1Ba). In contrast, ictal events—dependent on the activation of both NMDA and non-NMDA glutamatergic and GABAA receptors—initiate in the EC and propagate to the hippocampus (Figure 1Bb). The EC is known to be prone to generate seizures in TLE patients (1618). In vitro studies also have shown that ictal discharges disappear within 1–2 hours, while the CA3-driven interictal activity occurs throughout the experiment (Figure 1A). Moreover, cutting the Schaffer collaterals, which connect CA3 to CA1, abolishes interictal spikes in the EC and allows ictal discharges to be reestablished in this area (Figure 1C). Therefore, CA3-driven interictal activity can reduce, rather than sustain, the ability of the EC to generate ictal events (10).

FIGURE 1
A: Spontaneous epileptiform activity recorded at hour 1 and 2 during continuous bath application of 4-AP. Simultaneous field potential recordings were made in the CA3 stratum radiatum, the deep layers of the EC, and the DG cell layer. The interictal discharges ...

The antiseizure action exerted by interictal activity (9,19) can be mimicked by electrical stimuli at rates that are similar to those of the CA3-driven interictal activity (i.e., approximately 1 Hz). In addition, an inverse relationship between ictal and interictal discharges occurs in hippocampal slices when using drugs (e.g., baclofen) that depress interictal spikes (20,21). Evidence from the in vitro isolated guinea pig brain, indicates that periodic interictal spiking in the piriform cortex prevents involvement of this region by seizure-like activity generated in the EC–hippocampus during transient GABAergic impairment (11). Finally, interictal spikes are known to be followed by a prolonged period of inhibition (22) in which the threshold for the generation of an epileptic discharge is increased—an effect found both in models of epileptiform activity (23) and in patients with neocortical epilepsy (24).

The role of interictal spikes, however, is not as straightforward as indicated by the results reviewed above. Early experiments performed using focal discharges induced in vivo by convulsant drugs showed that interictal discharges sometimes accelerate before the onset of seizure (1). Moreover, initial studies in the kindling model suggested that interictal spikes become more frequent as the kindling process evolves and may increase prior to the appearance of spontaneous seizures (25,26). This evidence, however, was not confirmed by continuously monitoring of the EEG in kindled animals (27). More recently, analysis of the epileptiform activity induced by 4-aminopyridine in the EC revealed that local interictal spikes, which are largely contributed by GABAA receptor-mediated conductances, lead to electrographic seizure onset (4). As illustrated in Figure 2 (A and B panels), the onset of an ictal discharge recorded intracellularly from EC neurons is characterized by a long-lasting depolarization, resembling what is seen during an interictal event generated within the EC network. The similarity between the local interictal discharge and the event recorded at seizure onset is further supported by evidence showing that ictal discharge onset consists of a hyperpolarization when the neuron is depolarized with steady current injection (Figure 2C). Thus, in this in vitro model of limbic seizures, ictal depolarizations paradoxically originate from a hyperpolarizing event. Interictal spiking also has been observed ahead of ictal discharges in the isolated guinea pig brain preparation during short-lasting bicuculline treatment (15). Hence, interictal spikes may exert either a protective or precipitating role with respect to seizure generation.

FIGURE 2
A and B: Field and intracellular (potassium-acetate–filled microelectrode) recordings from the EC demonstrate two types of activity during 4-AP application. Slow interictal and ictal discharges are identified with asterisks and an open circle, ...

Interictal Spikes and Epileptogenesis

Interictal spiking is the first sign of an epileptic discharge appearing after status epilepticus (SE) in animals committed to develop seizures (2830). However, it is unknown whether this activity reflects an altered neuronal network unable to impede the ongoing epileptogenic process or a sign of incipient seizure activity. Moreover, investigators ignore whether and how interictal discharges change in their occurrence, shape, and underlying mechanisms during the period that follows SE. Indeed, after pilocarpine-induced SE, CA3-driven interictal activity in unable to control ictal discharges recorded during 4-aminopyridine treatment: electrographic seizures originating in the epileptic EC occur throughout the experiment, while they disappear in slices from nonepileptic control animals (31). In contrast, the kindling phenomenon and the development of mirror foci suggest that activity-dependent changes in synaptic transmission along with formation of new synaptic connections represent potential epileptogenic factors. In this context, recurrent interictal events could play a role in epileptogenesis, perhaps through the induction of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity mechanisms.

A point that merits critical evaluation is the assessment of mechanisms underlying the impairment of hippocampal networks generating interictal activity after SE. It is known that TLE patients display mesial temporal (or Ammon's horn) sclerosis. This condition, which is characterized by a rather selective loss of neurons in specific limbic areas (32,33), also is found in animal models of TLE (3436). Experimental evidence suggests that in the presence of Ammon's horn sclerosis, both cell loss and the consequent synaptic reorganization contribute to epileptogenesis (3740). In the model of self-sustaining SE, lesions are extensive in the hippocampus and CA3 pyramidal cells numbers are reduced to approximately 50% of control values (41). However, in spite of such damage, the hippocampus is still able to generate interictal spikes (29). A decrease in hippocampal network function associated with cell damage also occurs in pilocarpine-treated epileptic animals (31,4). Recurrent limbic seizures persist in this model when mossy fiber sprouting, but not neuronal damage, is reduced by protein synthesis inhibition (42). Therefore, neuronal damage after SE may play a role in epileptogenesis.

In line with the hypothesis that neuronal damage may influence epileptogenesis following SE, cell damage and synapse loss in the CA3/CA1 areas of pilocarpine-treated animals appear to be associated with decreased control exerted on EC excitability by hippocampal output activity. Moreover, it recently has been shown that decreased hippocampal output activity in epileptic animals reflects a diminished excitatory transfer to CA3 pyramidal cells (43,44). The hypothesis has been tested with intrinsic optical signal imaging of the stimulus-induced responses in slices of pilocarpine-treated epileptic rats, demonstrating that intrinsic optical signals in CA3 were lower than in nonepileptic control slices following dentate gyrus stimulation. However, comparable responses were observed in both epileptic and nonepileptic animals when stimuli were delivered directly in CA3 (45). This decreased network-driven excitation may affect the ability of CA3 to generate effective interictal outputs that are able to control epileptiform synchronization in the EC, thus contributing to epileptogenesis.

Conclusions

The control of EC epileptiform excitability by hippocampal output activity suggests that interictal discharges may interfere with ictal events. If true, rhythmic, low-frequency stimulation of an epileptic brain may protect against seizures. This evidence, however, is at odds with what has been obtained in some models of epileptiform discharge, in which interictal events lead to electrographic seizures. The discrepancy may be explained by viewing interictal spiking as a heterogeneous phenomenon that reflects the involvement of different neuronal networks and mechanisms (e.g., synaptic conductances) in different regions of an epileptic brain. Finally, detailed studies of interictal spiking occurring after SE are required before attempting to establish its role in epileptogenesis.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; grant 8109), the Mariani Foundation (grant 06-50), the Savoy Foundation for Epilepsy, and Citizens United for Cure in Epilepsy (CURE).

References

1. Dichter MA, Ayala GF. Cellular mechanisms of epilepsy: A status report. Science. 1987;237:157–164. [PubMed]
2. Jefferys JGR. Basic mechanisms of focal epilepsies. Exp Physiol. 1990;75:127–162. [PubMed]
3. de Curtis M, Avanzini G. Interictal spikes in focal epileptogenesis. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;63:541–567. [PubMed]
4. Avoli M, D'Antuono M, Louvel J, Köhling R, Biagini G, Pumain R, D'Arcangelo G, Tancredi V. Network and pharmacological mechanisms leading to epileptiform synchronization in the limbic system in vitro. Prog Neurobiol. 2002;68:167–207. [PubMed]
5. Gotman J. Relationships between interictal spiking and seizures: Human and experimental evidence. Can J Neurol Sci. 1991;18:573–576. [PubMed]
6. Lange HH, Lieb JP, Engel J, Jr, Crandall PH. Temporo-spatial patterns of pre-ictal spike activity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;56:543–555. [PubMed]
7. Gotman J, Marciani MG. Electroencephalographic spiking activity, drug levels and seizure occurrence in epileptic patients. Ann Neurol. 1985;17:597–603. [PubMed]
8. Engel J, Jr, Ackermann R. Interictal EEG spikes correlate with decreased, rather than increased, epileptogenicity in amygdaloid kindling. Brain Res. 1982;241:75–86. [PubMed]
9. Swartzwelder SH, Lewis DV, Anderson WW, Wilson WA. Seizure-like events in brain slices: Suppression by interictal activity. Brain Res. 1987;410:362–366. [PubMed]
10. Barbarosie M, Avoli M. CA3-driven hippocampal-entorhinal loop controls rather than sustain in vitro limbic seizures. J Neurosci. 1997;17:9308–9314. [PubMed]
11. Librizzi L, de Curtis M. Epileptiform ictal discharges are prevented by periodic interictal spiking activity in the guinea-pig olfactory-limbic cortex. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:382–389. [PubMed]
12. Pitkanen A, Sutula TP. Is epilepsy a progressive disorder? Prospects for new therapeutic approaches in temporal-lobe epilepsy. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1:173–181. [PubMed]
13. Morimoto K, Fahnestock M, Racine RJ. Kindling and status epilepticus models of epilepsy: Rewiring the brain. Prog Neurobiol. 2004;73:1–60. [PubMed]
14. Paré D, de Curtis M, Llinas RR. Role of the hippocampal entorhinal loop in temporal lobe epilepsy: Extra and intracellular study in the isolated guinea pig brain. J Neurosci. 1992;12:1867–1881. [PubMed]
15. Uva L, Librizzi L, Wendling F, de Curtis M. Propagation dynamics of epileptiform activity in the hippocampal-parahippocampal region of the isolated guinea pig brain. Epilepsia. 2005;46:1914–1925. [PubMed]
16. Rutecki PA, Grossman RG, Armstrong D, Irish-Loewen SJ. Electrophysiological connections between the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex in patients with complex partial seizures. J Neurosurg. 1989;70:667–775. [PubMed]
17. Spencer SS, Spencer DD. Entorhinal-hippocampal interactions in temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1994;35:721–727. [PubMed]
18. Bartolomei F, Khalil M, Wendling F, Sontheimer A, Regis J, Ranjeva JP, Guye M, Chauvel P. Entorhinal cortex involvement in human mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: An electrophysiologic and volumetric study. Epilepsia. 2005;46:677–687. [PubMed]
19. Bragdon AC, Kojima H, Wilson WA. Suppression of interictal bursting in hippocampus unleashes seizures in the entorhinal cortex: A proepileptic effect of lowering [K+]o and raising [Ca+2]o. Brain Res. 1992;590:128–135. [PubMed]
20. Watts AE, Jefferys JGR. Effects of carbamazepine and baclofen on 4-aminopyridine-induced epileptic activity in rat hippocampal slices. Brit J Pharmacol. 1993;108:819–823. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Motalli R, Louvel J, Tancredi V, Kurcewicz I, Wan-Chow-Wah D, Pumain R, Avoli M. GABA(B) receptor activation promotes seizure activity in the juvenile rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:638–647. [PubMed]
22. de Curtis M, Manfridi A, Biella G. Activity-dependent pH changes and periodicity of spontaneous interictal spikes. J Neurosci. 1998;15:7543–7551. [PubMed]
23. de Curtis M, Librizzi L, Biella G. Discharge threshold is enhanced for several seconds after a spontaneous interictal spike in a model of focal epileptogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;14:374–378.
24. de Curtis M, Lo Russo G, Tassi L, Mai R, Cossu M, Francione S. Enhanced discharge threshold after an interictal spike in human focal epilepsy. Eur J Neurosci. 2005;22:2971–2977. [PubMed]
25. Wada JA, Sato M, Corcoran ME. Persistent seizure susceptibility and recurrent spontaneous seizures in kindled cats. Epilepsia. 1974;15:465–478. [PubMed]
26. Pinel JP, Rovner LI. Electrode placement and kindling-induced experimental epilepsy. Exp Neurol. 1978;58:335–346. [PubMed]
27. Gotman J. Relationships between triggered seizures, spontaneous seizures and interictal spiking in the kindling model of epilepsy. Exp Neurol. 1984;84:259–273. [PubMed]
28. Hellier JL, Patrylo PR, Dou P, Nett M, Rose GM, Dudek FE. Assessment of inhibition and epileptiform activity in the septal dentate gyrus of freely behaving rats during the first week after kainate treatment. J Neurosci. 1999;19:10053–10064. [PubMed]
29. Mazarati A, Bragin A, Baldwin R, Shin D, Wilson C, Sankar R, Naylor D, Engel J, Wasterlain CG. Epileptogenesis after self-sustaining status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2002;43(suppl 5):74–80. [PubMed]
30. Shah MM, Anderson AE, Leung V, Lin X, Johnston D. Seizure-induced plasticity of h channels in entorhinal cortical layer III pyramidal neurons. Neuron. 2004;44:495–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. D'Antuono M, Benini R, Biagini G, D'Arcangelo G, Barbarosie M, Tancredi V, Avoli M. Limbic network interactions leading to hyperexcitability in a model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:634–639. [PubMed]
32. Du F, Whetsell WO, Abou-Khalil B, Blumenkopf B, Lothman EW, Schwarcz R. Preferential neuronal loss in layer III of the entorhinal cortex in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 1993;16:223–233. [PubMed]
33. Mathern GW, Babb TL, Armstrong DL. Hippocampal sclerosis. In: Engel J, Pedley TA, editors. Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. pp. 133–155.
34. Du F, Eid T, Lothman EW, Köhler C, Schwarcz R. Preferential neuronal loss in layer III of the medial entorhinal cortex in rat models of temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci. 1995;15:6301–6313. [PubMed]
35. Ben-Ari Y. Limbic seizure and brain damage produced by kainic acid: Mechanisms and relevance to human temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuroscience. 1985;14:375–403. [PubMed]
36. Turski WA, Cavalheiro EA, Schwarz M, Czuczwar SJ, Kleinrok Z, Turski L. Limbic seizures produced by pilocarpine in rats: Behavioral, electroencephalographic and neuropathological study. Behav Brain Res. 1983;9:315–335. [PubMed]
37. Houser CR, Miyashiro JE, Swartz BE, Walsh GO, Rich JR, Delgado-Escueta AV. Altered patterns of dynorphin immunoreactivity suggest mossy fiber reorganization in human hippocampal epilepsy. J Neurosci. 1990;10:267–282. [PubMed]
38. Mikkonen M, Soininen H, Kalvianen R, Tapiola T, Ylinen A, Vapalahti M, Paljarvi L, Pitkanen A. Remodeling of neuronal circuitries in human temporal lobe epilepsy: Increased expression of highly polysialylated neural cell adhesion molecule in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:923–934. [PubMed]
39. Williamson A, Patrylo PR, Spencer DD. Decrease in inhibition in dentate granule cells from patients with medial temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 1999;45:92–99. [PubMed]
40. Arellano JI, Munoz A, Ballesteros-Yanez I, Sola RG, DeFelipe J. Histopathology and reorganization of chandelier cells in the human epileptic sclerotic hippocampus. Brain. 2004;127:45–64. [PubMed]
41. Mazarati AM, Wasterlain CG, Sankar R, Shin D. Self-sustaining status epilepticus after brief electrical stimulation of the perforant path. Brain Res. 1998;801:251–253. [PubMed]
42. Longo B, Vezzani A, Mello LE. Growth-associated protein 43 expression in hippocampal molecular layer of chronic epileptic rats treated with cycloheximide. Epilepsia. 2005;46(suppl 5):125–128. [PubMed]
43. Goussakov IV, Fink K, Elger CE, Beck H. Metaplasticity of mossy fiber synaptic transmission involves altered release probability. J Neurosci. 2000;20:3434–3441. [PubMed]
44. Trevino M, Gutierrez R. The GABAergic projection of the dentate gyrus to hippocampal area CA3 of the rat: Pre- and postsynaptic actions after seizures. J Physiol. 2005;567:939–949. [PubMed]
45. Biagini G, D'Arcangelo G, Baldelli E, D'Antuono M, Tancredi V, Avoli M. Impaired activation of CA3 pyramidal neurons in the epileptic hippocampus. Neuromol Med. 2005;7:325–342.
46. Barbarosie M, Louvel J, Kurcewicz I, Avoli M. CA3-Released entorhinal seizures disclose dentate gyrus epileptogenicity and unmask a temporoammonic pathway. J Neurophysiol. 2000;83:1115–1124. [PubMed]
47. Lopantsev V, Avoli M. Participation of GABAA-mediated inhibition in ictallike discharges in the rat entorhinal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1998;79:352–360. [PubMed]

Articles from Epilepsy Currents are provided here courtesy of American Epilepsy Society