Genomic instability in radial growth phase melanoma cell lines after ultraviolet irradiation

doi:10.1136/jcp.2004.021519

J Clin Pathol. 2005 April; 58(4): 389–396.

doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.021519

PMCID: PMC1770642

Genomic instability in radial growth phase melanoma cell lines after ultraviolet irradiation

M R Hussein,¹^* A K Haemel,²^† O Sudilovsky,³ and G S Wood⁴

¹Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Assuit, Egypt

²Brown Medical School, Providence, RI 02912, USA

³Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

⁴Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin and William S Middleton Memorial Veteran Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA

^*Former address: Institute of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

^†Former address: Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin and William S Middleton Memorial Veteran Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA

Correspondence to:
Dr M R Hussein
Department of Pathology, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt; mrh17/at/swissinfo.org

Accepted September 14, 2004.

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Although ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, apoptosis, and genomic instability are all potentially involved in the pathogenesis of melanoma, in vitro studies investigating these changes in the radial growth phase of this neoplasm are still lacking; therefore, this study was designed to investigate these changes.

Method: An in vitro system consisting of three radial growth phase Wistar melanoma cell lines (WM35, WM3211, and WM1650) was established. Cells were UV irradiated (10 mJ/cm² for UVB and 6 J/cm² for UVA), harvested after UV exposure, and evaluated for viability and apoptosis using Trypan blue and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP digoxigenin nick end labelling assays, respectively. Polymerase chain reaction based microsatellite assays were used to examine the cell lines for the presence of microsatellite instability (MSI) using 21 markers at the 1p, 2p, 3p, 4q, 9p, and 17p regions.

Results: Exposure to UV initiated progressive cell death associated with pronounced apoptosis, with UVA having a greater effect than UVB. MSI was found in UVB (WM35 and WM3211) and UVA (WM35) irradiated cell lines at 1p, 9p, and 17p, but not in non-irradiated cells. The prevalence of MSI was higher after UVB irradiation (14%) than UVA irradiation (4.7%), and was most frequently found at D1S233.

Conclusions: The ability of erythemogenic UV irradiation to induce both apoptosis and MSI in radial growth phase melanoma cells is suggestive of its role in melanoma pathogenesis. This instability may reflect a hypermutability state, oxidative stress induced DNA damage, replication infidelity, or a combination of these factors.

Keywords: Wistar melanoma cell lines, microsatellite instability, apoptosis, ultraviolet irradiation, radial growth phase

Ultraviolet irradiation (UVR) is an important aetiological factor in the development of cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMMs), acting both as an initiator and a promoter in the course of multistep melanoma tumorigenesis.¹ In this regard, exposure to ultraviolet B (UVB) leads to the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and pyrimidine (4–6) pyridone photoproducts. The incorrect repair of these products generates mutations and increases genetic instability.^2,³ Exposure to UVB also leads to transcriptional activation of several oncogenes,⁴ and the generation of photoxidative stress, which inhibits the anti-oxidative defence mechanisms.⁵ In contrast, UVA genotoxicity is induced by the generation of reactive oxygen radicals,⁶ which can cause DNA damage that is potentially tumorigenic.⁷

“Several in vivo studies have revealed the involvement of ultraviolet irradiation, apoptosis, and microsatellite instability in the advanced stages of cutaneous malignant melanoma”

Microsatellites are repetitive DNA sequences of 1–6 base pairs scattered primarily in the non-coding regions of DNA. Neither the factors that restrict them to these regions nor their exact biological roles are clear.⁸ Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a variation in microsatellite pattern length between tumorous and matching non-tumorous tissues.⁸ MSI can be separated into high (MSI-H; > 30% of tested markers), and low (MSI-L; < 30% of tested markers) instability patterns. MSI-H has been described in families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and is associated with mutations in mismatch repair genes. Although MSI-L has also been reported in several tumours,⁸ including benign naevi, melanocytic dysplastic naevi,⁸ primary CMM,^8,⁹ and metastatic CMM,⁸ the underlying mechanisms of this instability pattern are still unknown.

Several in vivo studies have revealed the involvement of UVR,^10–¹² apoptosis, and MSI^8,⁹ in the advanced stages of CMM. In these tumours, several molecular pathways mediate the activation of a variety of prosurvival and proapoptotic proteins that seem to play a role in melanoma tumorigenesis.¹³ However, in vitro studies examining these changes in the early stages of CMM are scarce. Therefore, we used an in vitro system consisting of control (non-irradiated) and irradiated Wistar melanoma (WM) cell lines (non-tumorigenic, radial growth phase cells) to explore cell viability, apoptosis, and genomic instability after UVR. We divided the cell lines into three groups: UVA irradiated, UVB irradiated, and non-irradiated (control) groups. We carried out three sets of experiments to investigate the following questions: (1) what is the effect of a single exposure to UVA or UVB on cell viability? (2) What is the effect of a single exposure to UVA or UVB on apoptosis? (3) What are the genetic alterations in microsatellites associated with a single UVR dose in radial growth phase melanomas?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

Three human WM cell lines (a generous gift from Dr M Herlyn, Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, USA), derived from (non-tumorigenic) radial growth phase CMMs, were established as described by Dr Herlyn (fig 11).). Two cell lines (WM35 and WM3211) were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and insulin (5 mg/ml), and the third one, WM1650, was maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 10 ng/ml TPA (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate).

Figure 1

Three human Wistar melanoma cell lines, derived from (non-tumorigenic) radial growth phase melanomas, were established as described by the supplier. Two cell lines (WM35 and WM3211) were maintained in DMEM medium (more ...)

The rationale for selecting specific UVR dosages

A dose of 10 mJ/cm² UVB was used according to the following rationale: (1) in vivo, doses of UVB in the range of 30 to 150 mJ/cm² (~ 1–5 minimal erythema doses; MED) are normally encountered and (2) erythema induced by solar UVB results from the penetration into the dermis of approximately 10% of the total UVB dosage. Therefore, in vitro UVB doses ranging from 3 to 15 mJ/cm² (or 1–5 MED dermal equivalents) are equivalent to the amount of irradiation reaching melanocytes at the basal layer that is needed to cause sunburn (~ 1 MED).^14,¹⁵ In contrast, for UVA, the transmission through the epidermis is ~ 19% (at wavelength 365 nm), and its MED is 15–20 J/cm². The 6 J/cm² dosage used for UVA is the minimum dose that can induce oxidative stress and compromise the antioxidant enzyme system. Of note, these last two effects are responsible for the potential carcinogenic capability of UVA.^16–¹⁸

UV irradiation

The cells were maintained in tissue culture flasks (25 cm²) until they attained confluence. The cells were then trypsinised, suspended in medium, and seeded into several 100 mm² petri dishes (1 × 10⁵ cells/ml) in phosphate buffer saline. For UVB irradiation, the cells were irradiated under a bank of six FS-40 UVB lamps (Philips, Bloomfield, New Jersey, USA) from which UVB and UVC wavelengths, not normally present in natural solar radiation, were filtered out using Kodacel cellulose film (Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, New York, USA). The light contained radiation in the wavelength of the UVB range (290–320 nm). The total dose of irradiation (10 mJ/cm² for UVB) was calculated using a radiometer (IL-700) with UVB detectors (SED240; International Light Inc, Newburyport, Massachusetts, USA). For UVA irradiation, the cells were irradiated under a bank of two Q-Panel UVA (UVA-340 lamp, ASTMG-53) fluorescent lamps (Q-Panel, Cleveland, Ohio, USA). Most of the radiation from this lamp is in the UVA region (320–400 nm), with a small amount in the UVB spectrum. The total dose of irradiation (6 J/cm² for UVA) was calculated using a radiometer (IL-700) with UVA detectors (SED033; International Light Inc). Immediately after irradiation, the phosphate buffered saline was removed, and the cells were overlaid with fresh medium and returned to the incubator. Controls (non-irradiated cells) were handled similarly, but were not exposed to UV irradiation. The cells were evaluated for viability, apoptosis, and the presence of genetic changes (including MSI and loss of heterozygosity (LOH)) after UV irradiation.

Cell viability

Plasma membrane function and structural integrity were determined by the Trypan blue exclusion test.¹⁹ Briefly, cell suspensions at a high concentration (10⁶ cells/ml) were prepared by trypsinisation, centrifugation, and resuspension. Equal amounts (0.1 ml) of cell suspension and the Trypan blue dye were mixed thoroughly, transferred to the edge of a cover slip, allowed to run into the counting chamber of a haemocytometer, and left for one to two minutes. Both the number of stained cells and the total number of cells were then counted. The percentage of viable cells was determined by calculating the percentage of unstained cells.

Detection of apoptotic cells

To evaluate the apoptotic response after the UV exposure described above, the irradiated and non-irradiated WM cell lines were harvested at 0, 4, 12, and 24 hours after irradiation. We examined apoptosis with the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP digoxigenin nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay before and after irradiation. The TUNEL technique was performed using the commercially available QIA33TDT-FragEL™ kit (Oncogen Research Products, Boston, Massachusetts,USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions. Positive controls were obtained from the manufacturer and consisted of HL-60 promyelocytic leukaemia cells. Some specimens from UV exposed WM cell lines were used as negative controls by substituting distilled water for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase in the protocol, as suggested by others.²⁰ The sections were then examined with a BH-2 Olympus microscope. The cells were then processed for evaluation by transmission electron microscopy (Tecani 10 EM and Gatan MSC with digital micrograph camera).

Selection of microsatellite markers

A panel of 21 microsatellite markers (12 markers at 1p, five at 9p, and one each at 2p, 3p, 4q, and 17p) was obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, Alabama, USA), and their characteristics are available online (http://www.resgen.com/products/HuMPs.php3).

DNA extraction

DNA was extracted from the cell lines using the DNeasy™ tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California, USA), as described by the manufacturer.

PCR based microsatellite assay

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in a 10 μl volume containing 1× PCR buffer (10mM Tris, 50mM KCl (pH 8.3), and 0.02% Tween 20), 0.2 μM each of the unlabelled and ATP [γ-³³P] (ICN Biomedical, California, USA) labelled primers, 1 μl of DNA supernatant, 0.2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (PGC Scientific, Frederick, Maryland, USA), 125 mM each of dNTPs, and 1.5mM MgCl₂. PCR was performed using a “touch down” approach: five minutes at 94°C, followed by 36 to 38 cycles of one minute at 94°C, one minute at 56–60°C, and one minute at 72°C; with a final elongation step for nine minutes at 72°C. A “hot start” was also used by adding Taq DNA polymerase when the temperature in the initial ramp was > 80°C. PCR products were resolved on a 6% Long Ranger sequencing gel (FMC, Rockland, Maine, USA) and exposed to BioMax MR film (Kodak) for 24–72 hours. All PCR reactions and gel loadings were repeated at least twice, and only identical results were reported.

Assessment of MSI

MSI was defined by variations in the DNA banding pattern between irradiated and non-irradiated cell lines. Because we were working on cell lines without matching normal control DNA, only irradiated cell lines presenting with more than two alleles for each locus were considered unstable.²¹ Irradiated cell lines with MSI at one or more loci were scored as MSI positive.⁸ Instability at more than 30% of the tested loci was used as a cut off between MSI-L and MSI-H. Samples without MSI were scored as microsatellite stable (MSS).⁸ During this assay, irradiated cell lines were simultaneously assessed for LOH. The heterozygosity loss was evaluated by comparing the intensities of the two alleles in informative cases. LOH was scored whenever the radiographic signal of one allele was absent or 50% reduced in the tumours, as determined by visual comparison of the allele intensities and use of the SciScan 5000 densitometer.

RESULTS

Effects of UV light on cell viability

The UV treated cells showed rounding up and detachment from the culture plate when compared with the control cells. Comparison of the mean values of viability among irradiated and non-irradiated cell lines revealed two facts: (1) both UVA and UVB induced pronounced cell killing within 24 hours after irradiation; and (2) UVA induced more cell killing than UVB. Similar responses were seen in all three cell lines, and fig 22 provides a summary of the viability assays in WM35. This figure shows that the mean viability was highest in non-irradiated cells, followed by the UVB irradiated cells, with the lowest values being seen in the UVA irradiated cells. The mean viability values of the non-irradiated and irradiated cell lines were significantly different, and the p values were lower for the UVA irradiated group, indicating greater significance (fig 22).

Figure 2

Summary of viability assays in ultraviolet (UV) irradiated WM35 cell lines using Trypan blue dye exclusion test. IR-UVA, UVA irradiated cells; IR-UVB, UVB irradiated cells; NI, non-irradiated.

DNA fragmentation assay (TUNEL)

None of the negative controls stained with the TUNEL technique showed immunoreactivity, whereas positive TUNEL staining was seen in the positive controls. Semiquantitative evaluation of apoptosis by counting the number of TUNEL signal positive cells in both the non-irradiated and UV irradiated cell lines revealed the following two facts: (1) in the control (non-irradiated) cells, few cells showed positive signals at the designated times, whereas UV treated cells showed greatly increased numbers of positively stained cells; and (2) UVA irradiation induced more apoptosis than UVB. A similar response was seen in all three cell lines, and figs 33 and 44 provide a summary of the TUNEL assay results in WM35 cells. These figures reveal that the apoptotic mean values were the highest in the UVA irradiated cells, followed by the UVB irradiated cells, with the non-irradiated cells showing the lowest values. The mean apoptotic values were significantly different between the non-irradiated and irradiated cell lines, with the p values being lower in the UVA irradiated group, indicating greater significance (fig 33).). Positive TUNEL results are indicative, but not proof of, the presence of apoptotic cells, because there are several forms of programmed cell death that can induce DNA degradation in the absence of apoptotic caspase activation. Therefore, the apoptotic activity in our series was also confirmed by the ultrastructural detection of characteristic apoptotic patterns in the irradiated WM cell lines. These features included: (1) incomplete condensation of the chromatin pattern, displaying a microgranular network (fig 5B5B);); (2) condensed chromatin near the periphery, close to the nuclear envelope, seen as one or several large homogenous masses (fig 5C5C,, D); (3) irregularity of the nuclear membrane (fig 5D5D–F);–F); and (4) partially disrupted chromatin, as indicated by the presence of one or more nuclear vacuoles (fig 5C5C,, E, F).

Figure 3

Semiquantitative analysis of TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP digoxigenin nick end labelling) positive WM35 cells after ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. IR-UVA, UVA irradiated cells; (more ...)

Figure 4

Apoptosis in Wistar melanoma cell lines. (A) Negative control; (B–D) apoptosis in cell lines at four, 12, and 24 hours after ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, respectively. TUNEL (terminal (more ...)

Figure 5

(A) Ultrastructural features of non-irradiated melanoma cell lines (original magnification, ×6700). Ultrastructural features of apoptosis in the irradiated Wistar melanoma cell lines included: (1) (more ...)

Frequency of MSI after UVR

MSI was detected in the WM35 and WM3211 cell lines after UVR, but not in WM1650, in duplicate sets of experiments. The allelic pattern in irradiated cells was characterised by the presence of novel bands above or below those present in non-irradiated cells (fig 66).). MSI was found at four loci in the WM35 cells (D1S2734, D1S233, MYCL1, and IFNA) after UVB irradiation and at one locus (D1S233) after UVA irradiation. In the WM3211 cells, MSI was seen after UVB irradiation only, and was found at five loci (D1S2663, D1S233, D1S513, D9S171, and TP53). Overall, the most frequently affected locus was D1S233. In keeping with the MSI-L pattern reported previously by us in excised melanocytic dysplastic naevi and CMM,⁸ the frequency of MSI ranged from 0.0% to 19.0% and from 0.0% to 4.7% after UVB and UVA irradiation, respectively (table 11).

Figure 6

Microsatellite instability (MSI) in Wistar melanoma cell lines. MSI after ultraviolet (UV) B irradiation in (A) WM3211 and (B) WM35 cell lines. (C) MSI (D1S233) (more ...)

Table 1

Microsatellite instability in Wistar melanoma (WM) cell lines

DISCUSSION

Previous studies of excised melanocytic skin tumours revealed the involvement of UVR, apoptosis, and a gradual increase in MSI, which correlated with the progression and increased aggressiveness of these tumours.^22–²⁴ Based on these studies, we hypothesised that UVR contributes to the molecular pathogenesis of CMM arising on sun-exposed skin by causing MSI, which results in mutations in genes involved in neoplastic transformation and tumour progression. To test our hypothesis, we exposed radial growth phase CMM cell lines to UVA and UVB and examined them for viability, the presence of apoptosis, and MSI using TUNEL and PCR based microsatellite assays.

In agreement with other studies, our data revealed that UVR (in the range capable of causing sunburn in vivo) generally induces cell death and a drastic increase in the apoptotic activity in the irradiated WM cell lines,^25–²⁸ suggesting excessive underlying DNA damage beyond the capacity of the repair system.²⁹ This DNA damage may be either in the form of accumulated pyrimidine dimers (induced by UVB) or oxidatively modified bases (induced by UVA). The accumulation of these products as a possible mechanism for the apoptosis seen in WM cell lines concurs with the apoptotic changes induced by UVA and UVB.^28,³⁰ Because DNA absorbs little, if any, UVA, the genotoxicity of UVA is mostly the result of the generation of reactive oxygen radicals,⁶ which have a definitive role in apoptosis.³¹ In support of this principle, exposure to H₂O₂ is a potent inducer of apoptosis in HL-60 cells,³² and oxygen radical scavengers can block DNA nuclear fragmentation and the formation of apoptotic bodies after UVA irradiation.^28,³³

“Ultraviolet irradiation generally induces cell death and a drastic increase in the apoptotic activity in irradiated Wistar melanoma cell lines, suggesting excessive underlying DNA damage beyond the capacity of the repair system”

In vivo, melanoma cells are traditionally thought to be highly radioresistant. However, several factors may have contributed to the response of the melanoma cells to UVR seen in our study. First, the radioresistance of melanoma cells was noted in an in vivo system, where skin microenvironmental factors probably influence the cells and contribute to this resistance. The in vitro system used here is not affected by changes in the skin microenvironment after UV exposure. Second, ionising rather than non-ionising irradiation (UVR) has been used in the radiotherapy of melanoma.

The MSI-L pattern found in irradiated WM cell lines is in keeping with other studies reporting similar changes in excised melanocytic lesions.^8,²² This finding also supports our hypothesis that UVR can induce MSI in these lesions, suggests that MSI can arise early in melanoma pathogenesis, and suggests that UVR may be a driving force in the evolution of at least some CMMs, such as those arising on sun exposed skin. Because MSI may affect the function of the genes in which the microsatellites reside, the presence of MSI in the markers flanking the melanoma susceptibility genes in the 1p and 9p regions warrants further mutational analysis of these genes. Interestingly, UVB produced more MSI than UVA. In this regard, because UVB penetrates less deeply than UVA, the greater effect of UVB on MSI may help explain why most CMMs begin superficially in or near the epidermis.

We suggest three possibilities to support our hypothesis and to explain how UVR was able to induce MSI in the irradiated WM cell lines. First, the presence of MSI after a single exposure to UVR may merely represent a hypermutability state in these cell lines. In this regard, because exposure to UVR in vitro represents a dramatic change in the environment of WM tumour cells, it is conceivable that the cells acquire selective advantages by generating additional mutations, perhaps in the microsatellite repeats, to adjust to the in vitro conditions.³⁴

Second, the presence of MSI after UV exposure may reflect underlying DNA damage by reactive oxygen species. Because UVR inhibits free radical scavenging activity³⁵ and inactivates antioxidant enzymes,^5,³⁶ it enhances DNA damage by reactive oxygen radicals. The generation of these radicals is estimated to be responsible for 20 000 hits to DNA/cell/day,^37–⁴⁰ representing a major source of mutations. The role of oxidative stress in melanoma tumorigenesis is supported by three observations, namely: (1) oxygen radical induced DNA damage is involved in some tumours, such as breast cancers⁴¹; (2) CMM cell lines constitutively produce and accumulate hydrogen peroxide at levels comparable to activated polymorphonuclear lymphocytes⁴²; and (3) exposure of DNA to reactive oxygen species in vitro can induce MSI,⁴³ even in the absence of MMR gene defects, by several mechanisms. One of these mechanisms involves the retardation of DNA polymerase at sites of oxidative base damage, with subsequent strand displacement and misalignment of the growing strands at different positions on the template. Furthermore, strand scission within the microsatellite repeat sequences by reactive oxygen species enhances the possibility of strand misalignment, with the subsequent generation of insertion or deletion loops. The reactive oxygen radicals can also induce single strand breaks in the microsatellite sequences, increasing the formation of slipped strand intermediates.⁴⁴

The third possibility is that the presence of MSI after UV exposure may reflect underlying DNA replication infidelity. As a part of the response to the UV irradiation of WM cell lines, there is accumulation of damaged DNA photoproducts that stimulate the induction of stress induced secreted proteins in the cell lines.⁴⁵ Subsequently, these proteins promote activation of the genes encoding extracellular proteins,⁴⁶ cytokines,⁴⁷ and several yet unidentified proteins. These three protein classes are also involved in inducing replication infidelity, and may favour genetic instability and oncogenic transformation.^4,⁴⁸ In support of this concept, the secretion of these proteins was found to induce genetic instability in mouse T lymphoma cell lines after UVR,⁴ and some of these proteins are constitutively expressed in several cancer prone syndromes⁴⁹ and tumour cell lines.⁵⁰

Take home messages

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation induced pronounced apoptosis in radial growth phase melanoma cells, with UVA having a greater effect than UVB
UV also induced microsatellite instability (MSI) and was more prevalent after UVB than UVA irradiation
Thus, the ability of erythemogenic UV irradiation to induce both apoptosis and MSI in radial growth phase melanoma cells suggests that it plays a role in the pathogenesis of melanoma
This instability may reflect a hypermutability state, oxidative stress induced DNA damage, replication infidelity, or a combination of these factors

The absence of LOH after UV irradiation in WM cells is in agreement with previous studies,⁵¹ and suggests that the initial genetic events after UVR do not include LOH at an early stage. This observation is in accordance with the fact that LOH is usually associated with exposure to ionising irradiation but not to non-ionising irradiation.⁵²

Of note, further experiments on the same cell lines are suggestive of increased malignant potential. In this regard, UVR was able to induce both point mutations in the mismatch repair genes^53,⁵⁴ and ultrastructural changes in keeping with malignant changes. However, determining whether the cells that survive UVR have in fact an increased tumorigenic potential relative to the parental ones (for example, growth as xenografts in immunosuppressed mice) will require additional experiments. The results of our present study will be useful to compare and contrast with such subsequent investigations.

To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to suggest the induction of apoptosis and MSI in WM cell lines after exposure to UVR. However, whether MSI reflects a hypermutability state, oxidative stress induced DNA damage, replication infidelity, or a combination of these three must be determined by further investigations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Merit Review Funding from the Department of Veteran Affairs and NIH grant AR01326. The authors thank Dr S Emancipator for his exceptional guidance and helpful insight throughout this project. We are also grateful to Ms K Kleckner for preparing the tables and figures for submission.

Abbreviations

CMM, cutaneous malignant melanoma
LOH, loss of heterozygosity
MED, minimal erythema dose
MSI, microsatellite instability
MSI-H/L, high/low microsatellite instability
PCR, polymerase chain reaction
TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated dUTP digoxigenin nick end labelling
UVA/B, ultraviolet A/B
UVR, ultraviolet irradiation
WM, Wistar melanoma

REFERENCES

1. Abarca JF, Casiccia CC. Skin cancer and ultraviolet-B radiation under the Antarctic ozone hole: southern Chile, 1987–2000. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2002;18:294–302. [PubMed]

2. Freeman SE, Hacham H, Gange RW, et al. Wavelength dependence of pyrimidine dimer formation in DNA of human skin irradiated in situ with ultraviolet light. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:5605–9. [PubMed]

3. Mitchell DL, Zdzienicka MZ, van Zeeland AA, et al. Intermediate (6–4) photoproduct repair in Chinese hamster V79 mutant V-H1 correlates with intermediate levels of DNA incision and repair replication. Mutat Res 1989;226:43–7. [PubMed]

4. Boesen JJ, Dieteren N, Bal E, et al. A possible factor in genetic instability of cancer cells: stress-induced secreted proteins lead to decrease in replication fidelity. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:2407–13. [PubMed]

5. Fuchs J, Packer L. Ultraviolet irradiation and the skin antioxidant system [published erratum appears in Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1990;7:183]. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1990;7:90–2. [PubMed]

6. Peak MJ, Peak JG, Carnes BA. Induction of direct and indirect single-strand breaks in human cell DNA by far- and near-ultraviolet radiations: action spectrum and mechanisms. Photochem Photobiol 1987;45:381–7. [PubMed]

7. Kochevar IE, Moran M, Lyon N, et al. Effects of systemic indomethacin, meclizine, and BW755C on chronic ultraviolet B-induced effects in hairless mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol 1993;100:186–93. [PubMed]

8. Hussein MR, Sun M, Tuthill RJ, et al. Comprehensive analysis of 112 melanocytic skin lesions demonstrates microsatellite instability in melanomas and dysplastic nevi, but not in benign nevi. J Cutan Pathol 2001;28:343–50. [PubMed]

9. Palmieri G, Cossu A, Ascierto PA, et al. Definition of the role of chromosome 9p21 in sporadic melanoma through genetic analysis of primary tumours and their metastases. The melanoma cooperative group. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1707–14. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

10. Redman JC. Stratospheric ozone depletion. A proposed solution to the problem. Am J Dermatopathol 1987;9:457–8. [PubMed]

11. Elder DE. Human melanocytic neoplasms and their etiologic relationship with sunlight. J Invest Dermatol 1989;92:297S–303S. [PubMed]

12. Donawho CK, Kripke ML. Photoimmunology of experimental melanoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1991;10:177–88. [PubMed]

13. Hussein MR, Haemel AK, Wood GS. Apoptosis and melanoma: molecular mechanisms. J Pathol 2003;199:275–88. [PubMed]

14. Herzinger T, Funk JO, Hillmer K, et al. Ultraviolet B irradiation-induced G2 cell cycle arrest in human keratinocytes by inhibitory phosphorylation of the cdc2 cell cycle kinase. Oncogene 1995;11:2151–6. [PubMed]

15. Kripke ML. Latency, histology, and antigenicity of tumors induced by ultraviolet light in three inbred mouse strains. Cancer Res 1977;37:1395–400. [PubMed]

16. Bruls WA, Slaper H, van der Leun JC, et al. Transmission of human epidermis and stratum corneum as a function of thickness in the ultraviolet and visible wavelengths. Photochem Photobiol 1984;40:485–94. [PubMed]

17. Bruls WA, van der Leun JC. Forward scattering properties of human epidermal layers. Photochem Photobiol 1984;40:231–42. [PubMed]

18. Bruls WA, van Weelden H, van der Leun JC. Transmission of UV-radiation through human epidermal layers as a factor influencing the minimal erythema dose. Photochem Photobiol 1984;39:63–7. [PubMed]

19. Del Bino G, Lassota P, Darzynkiewicz Z. The S-phase cytotoxicity of camptothecin. Exp Cell Res 1991;193:27–35. [PubMed]

20. Bedaiwy MA, Jeremias E, Gurunluoglu R, et al. Restoration of ovarian function after autotransplantation of intact frozen-thawed sheep ovaries with microvascular anastomosis. Fertil Steril 2003;79:594–602. [PubMed]

21. Cottu PH, Muzeau F, Estreicher A, et al. Inverse correlation between RER+ status and p53 mutation in colorectal cancer cell lines. Oncogene 1996;13:2727–30. [PubMed]

22. Hussein MR, Sun M, Roggero E, et al. Loss of heterozygosity, microsatellite instability, and mismatch repair protein alterations in the radial growth phase of cutaneous malignant melanomas. Mol Carcinog 2002;34:35–44. [PubMed]

23. Donawho CK, Kripke ML. Evidence that the local effect of ultraviolet radiation on the growth of murine melanomas is immunologically mediated. Cancer Res 1991;51:4176–81. [PubMed]

24. Hahne M, Rimoldi D, Schroter M, et al. Melanoma cell expression of Fas (Apo-1/CD95) ligand: implications for tumor immune escape. Science 1996;274:1363–6. [PubMed]

25. Friedmann PS, Gilchrest BA. Ultraviolet radiation directly induces pigment production by cultured human melanocytes. J Cell Physiol 1987;133:88–94. [PubMed]

26. Abdel-Malek Z, Swope V, Smalara D, et al. Analysis of the UV-induced melanogenesis and growth arrest of human melanocytes. Pigment Cell Res 1994;7:326–32. [PubMed]

27. Musk P, Parsons PG. Resistance of pigmented human cells to killing by sunlight and oxygen radicals. Photochem Photobiol 1987;46:489–94. [PubMed]

28. Wang Y, Rosenstein B, Goldwyn S, et al. Differential regulation of P53 and Bcl-2 expression by ultraviolet A and B. J Invest Dermatol 1998;111:380–4. [PubMed]

29. Ouhtit A, Muller HK, Davis DW, et al. Temporal events in skin injury and the early adaptive responses in ultraviolet-irradiated mouse skin. Am J Pathol 2000;156:201–7. [PubMed]

30. Godar DE, Lucas AD. Spectral dependence of UV-induced immediate and delayed apoptosis: the role of membrane and DNA damage. Photochem Photobiol 1995;62:108–13. [PubMed]

31. Buttke TM, Sandstrom PA. Oxidative stress as a mediator of apoptosis. Immunol Today 1994;15:7–10. [PubMed]

32. Lennon SV, Martin SJ, Cotter TG. Dose-dependent induction of apoptosis in human tumour cell lines by widely diverging stimuli. Cell Prolif 1991;24:203–14. [PubMed]

33. Verhaegen S, McGowan AJ, Brophy AR, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis by antioxidants in the human HL-60 leukemia cell line. Biochem Pharmacol 1995;50:1021–9. [PubMed]

34. Molenaar JJ, Gerard B, Chambon-Pautas C, et al. Microsatellite instability and frameshift mutations in BAX and transforming growth factor-beta RII genes are very uncommon in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in vivo but not in cell lines. Blood 1998;92:230–3. [PubMed]

35. Fuchs J, Huflejt ME, Rothfuss LM, et al. Impairment of enzymic and nonenzymic antioxidants in skin by UVB irradiation. J Invest Dermatol 1989;93:769–73. [PubMed]

36. Whiteside C, Hassan HM. Role of oxyradicals in the inactivation of catalase by ozone. Free Radic Biol Med 1988;5:305–12. [PubMed]

37. Cerutti PA. Prooxidant states and tumor promotion. Science 1985;227:375–81. [PubMed]

38. Feig DI, Reid TM, Loeb LA. Reactive oxygen species in tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 1994;54:1890s–4s. [PubMed]

39. Ames BN, Shigenaga MK, Hagen TM. Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993;90:7915–22. [PubMed]

40. Beckman KB, Ames BN. Oxidative decay of DNA. J Biol Chem 1997;272:19633–6. [PubMed]

41. Malins DC, Polissar NL, Gunselman SJ. Progression of human breast cancers to the metastatic state is linked to hydroxyl radical-induced DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996;93:2557–63. [PubMed]

42. Szatrowski TP, Nathan CF. Production of large amounts of hydrogen peroxide by human tumor cells. Cancer Res 1991;51:794–8. [PubMed]

43. Jackson AL, Chen R, Loeb LA. Induction of microsatellite instability by oxidative DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:12468–73. [PubMed]

44. Jackson AL, Loeb LA. The mutation rate and cancer. Genetics 1998;148:1483–90. [PubMed]

45. Stein B, Rahmsdorf HJ, Steffen A, et al. UV-induced DNA damage is an intermediate step in UV-induced expression of human immunodeficiency virus type 1, collagenase, c-fos, and metallothionein. Mol Cell Biol 1989;9:5169–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

46. Angel P, Poting A, Mallick U, et al. Induction of metallothionein and other mRNA species by carcinogens and tumor promoters in primary human skin fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 1986;6:1760–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

47. Kirnbauer R, Kock A, Neuner P, et al. Regulation of epidermal cell interleukin-6 production by UV light and corticosteroids. J Invest Dermatol 1991;96:484–9. [PubMed]

48. Schorpp M, Mallick U, Rahmsdorf HJ, et al. UV-induced extracellular factor from human fibroblasts communicates the UV response to nonirradiated cells. Cell 1984;37:861–8. [PubMed]

49. Mallick U, Rahmsdorf HJ, Yamamoto N, et al. 12-O-Tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-inducible proteins are synthesized at an increased rate in Bloom syndrome fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982;79:7886–90. [PubMed]

50. Matsuguchi T, Okamura S, Kawasaki C, et al. Constitutive production of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-6 by a human lung cancer cell line, KSNY: gene amplification and increased mRNA stability. Eur J Haematol 1991;47:128–33. [PubMed]

51. Boni R, Matt D, Burg G, et al. Ultraviolet-induced acute histological changes in irradiated nevi are not associated with allelic loss. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:853–6. [PubMed]

52. Thomas JW, LaMantia C, Magnuson T. X-ray-induced mutations in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:1114–19. [PubMed]

53. Hussein MR, Wood GS. hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene mutations are present in radial growth-phase cutaneous malignant melanoma cell lines and can be induced further by ultraviolet-B irradiation. Exp Dermatol 2003;12:872–5. [PubMed]

54. Hussein MR, Hassan M, Wood GS. Morphological changes and apoptosis in radial growth phase melanoma cell lines following ultraviolet-B irradiation. Am J Dermatopathol 2003;25:466–72. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of
BMJ Group