Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Tob Control. 2004 March; 13(Suppl 1): i41–i47.
PMCID: PMC1766145

Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America


Objective: To describe how the tobacco industry developed a network of consultants to promote ventilation as a "solution" to secondhand smoke (SHS) in the USA.

Methods: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents.

Results: As with its other strategies to undermine the passage of clean indoor legislation and regulations, the tobacco industry used consultants who represented themselves as independent but who were promoting the industry's ventilation "solution" strategies under close, but generally undisclosed, industry supervision. The nature of the industry's use of ventilation consultants evolved over time. In the 1980s, the industry used them in an effort to steer the concerns about indoor air quality away from secondhand smoke, saying SHS was an insignificant component of a much larger problem of indoor air quality and inadequate ventilation. By the 1990s, the industry and its consultants were maintaining that adequate ventilation could easily accommodate "moderate smoking". The consultants carried the ventilation message to businesses, particularly the hospitality business, and to local and national and international regulatory and legislative bodies.

Conclusion: While the tobacco industry and its consultants have gone to considerable lengths to promote the tobacco industry's ventilation "solution", this strategy has had limited success in the USA, probably because, in the end, it is simpler, cheaper, and healthier to end smoking. Tobacco control advocates need to continue to educate policymakers about this fact, particularly in regions where this strategy has been more effective.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (208K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fichtenberg Caroline M, Glantz Stanton A. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dearlove JV, Bialous SA, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places. Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Drope J, Chapman S. Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588–594. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ong EK, Glantz SA. Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749–1757. [PubMed]
  • Ong EK, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study. Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1253–1259. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1566–1570. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Bero LA. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):515–542. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Hanauer P, Slade J, Bero LA, Glantz SA. Environmental tobacco smoke. The Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA. 1995 Jul 19;274(3):248–253. [PubMed]
  • Bero LA, Galbraith A, Rennie D. Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):612–617. [PubMed]
  • Barnoya J, Glantz S. Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project". Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):305–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Muggli ME, Forster JL, Hurt RD, Repace JL. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419–1423. [PubMed]
  • Muggli Monique E, Hurt Richard D, Blanke D Douglas. Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303–314. [PubMed]
  • Hirschhorn N, Bialous SA, Shatenstein S. Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):247–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Jenkins RA, Palausky A, Counts RW, Bayne CK, Dindal AB, Guerin MR. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in sixteen cities in the United States as determined by personal breathing zone air sampling. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1996 Oct-Dec;6(4):473–502. [PubMed]
  • Hammond SK. Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):329–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Shopland DR, Gerlach KK, Burns DM, Hartman AM, Gibson JT. State-specific trends in smoke-free workplace policy coverage: the current population survey tobacco use supplement, 1993 to 1999. J Occup Environ Med. 2001 Aug;43(8):680–686. [PubMed]
  • Gerlach KK, Shopland DR, Hartman AM, Gibson JT, Pechacek TF. Workplace smoking policies in the United States: results from a national survey of more than 100,000 workers. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bryan-Jones Katherine, Bero Lisa A. Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):585–592. [PubMed]
  • Bialous S Aguinaga, Glantz SA. ASHRAE Standard 62: tobacco industry's influence over national ventilation standards. Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):315–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bialous SA, Yach D. Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):96–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chapman S, Penman A. "Can't stop the boy": Philip Morris' use of Healthy Buildings International to prevent workplace smoking bans in Australia. Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12 (Suppl 3):iii107–iii112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Neilsen K, Glantz SA. A tobacco industry study of airline cabin air quality: dropping inconvenient findings. Tob Control. 2004 Mar;13 (Suppl 1):i20–i29. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group