Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Tob Control. 2002 March; 11(Suppl 1): i62–i72.
PMCID: PMC1766067

Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies


Methods: Data for this study come from tobacco industry documents contained in the Youth and Marketing database created by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute and available through http://, supplemented with documents obtained from

Results: Tobacco company documents provide clear evidence on the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette smoking, describing how tax related and other price increases lead to significant reductions in smoking, particularly among young persons. This information was very important in developing the industry's pricing strategies, including the development of lower price branded generics and the pass through of cigarette excise tax increases, and in developing a variety of price related marketing efforts, including multi-pack discounts, couponing, and others.

Conclusions: Pricing and price related promotions are among the most important marketing tools employed by tobacco companies. Future tobacco control efforts that aim to raise prices and limit price related marketing efforts are likely to be important in achieving reductions in tobacco use and the public health toll caused by tobacco.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (254K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK, Steger C, Leavell N-R. Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 (Suppl 1):I5–17. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Malone RE, Balbach ED. Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tob Control. 2000 Sep;9(3):334–338. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grossman M, Chaloupka FJ. Cigarette taxes. The straw to break the camel's back. Public Health Rep. 1997 Jul-Aug;112(4):290–297. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Slater S, Chaloupka FJ, Wakefield M. State variation in retail promotions and advertising for Marlboro cigarettes. Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):337–339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Saffer H, Chaloupka F. The effect of tobacco advertising bans on tobacco consumption. J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):1117–1137. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group