Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of straninfSexually Transmitted InfectionsVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Sex Transm Infect. 2004 December; 80(Suppl 2): ii43–ii48.
PMCID: PMC1765856

Consistency in the reporting of sexual behaviour by adolescent girls in Kenya: a comparison of interviewing methods


Objectives: To investigate in a district in Kenya the level and consistency of reporting of sexual behaviour among adolescent girls randomly assigned to two modes of survey interview: face to face interview and audio computer assisted self-interview (ACASI).

Methods: The analysis is based on a subsample of over 700 never married girls aged 15–21 years in Kisumu, Kenya, drawn from a population based survey of over 2100 respondents. A questionnaire with 69 questions was used, two thirds of which were considered sensitive, including questions about risky sexual behaviour, alcohol and drug use, contraceptive practice, pregnancy, induced abortions, and births.

Results: ACASI produced significantly higher reporting of sex with a relative, stranger, or older man, and higher reporting of coerced sex. However, differences by mode for ever had sex and sex with a boyfriend were not significant. Relative to ACASI, the interviewer administered mode produced highly consistent reporting of sexual activity, both within the main interview and between the main and exit interviews.

Conclusions: Both the mode of survey administration and the probing for various behaviours significantly affect the observed prevalence of sexual activity. The ACASI results suggest that adolescent girls in Kenya have more complex and perilous sex lives than traditional face to face surveys of sexual activity indicate. The level of consistency in the interviewer mode is argued to be suspect, particularly given the much lower levels of reporting, relative to ACASI, for types of sexual partners and coerced sexual activity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Glynn JR, Caraël M, Auvert B, Kahindo M, Chege J, Musonda R, Kaona F, Buvé A. Why do young women have a much higher prevalence of HIV than young men? A study in Kisumu, Kenya and Ndola, Zambia. AIDS. 2001 Aug;15 (Suppl 4):S51–S60. [PubMed]
  • Mensch Barbara S, Hewett Paul C, Erulkar Annabel S. The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: a methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography. 2003 May;40(2):247–268. [PubMed]
  • Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998 May 8;280(5365):867–873. [PubMed]
  • Fu H, Darroch JE, Henshaw SK, Kolb E. Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 May-Jun;30(3):128–138. [PubMed]
  • Macalino Grace E, Celentano David D, Latkin Carl, Strathdee Steffanie A, Vlahov David. Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002 Oct;14(5):367–378. [PubMed]
  • Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, Navaline H, Valenti F, Holte S, Gross M, Sheon A, Miller H, Cooley P, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Jul 15;152(2):99–106. [PubMed]
  • Williams ML, Freeman RC, Bowen AM, Zhao Z, Elwood WN, Gordon C, Young P, Rusek R, Signes CA. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Educ Prev. 2000 Jun;12(3):199–213. [PubMed]
  • Des Jarlais DC, Paone D, Milliken J, Turner CF, Miller H, Gribble J, Shi Q, Hagan H, Friedman SR. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1657–1661. [PubMed]
  • Boekeloo BO, Schiavo L, Rabin DL, Conlon RT, Jordan CS, Mundt DJ. Self-reports of HIV risk factors by patients at a sexually transmitted disease clinic: audio vs written questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 1994 May;84(5):754–760. [PubMed]
  • Johnson AM, Copas AJ, Erens B, Mandalia S, Fenton K, Korovessis C, Wellings K, Field J. Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment. AIDS. 2001 Jan 5;15(1):111–115. [PubMed]
  • Copas AJ, Johnson AM, Wadsworth J. Assessing participation bias in a sexual behaviour survey: implications for measuring HIV risk. AIDS. 1997 May;11(6):783–790. [PubMed]
  • Millstein SG, Irwin CE., Jr Acceptability of computer-acquired sexual histories in adolescent girls. J Pediatr. 1983 Nov;103(5):815–819. [PubMed]
  • Buvé A, Caraël M, Hayes RJ, Auvert B, Ferry B, Robinson NJ, Anagonou S, Kanhonou L, Laourou M, Abega S, et al. Multicentre study on factors determining differences in rate of spread of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: methods and prevalence of HIV infection. AIDS. 2001 Aug;15 (Suppl 4):S5–14. [PubMed]
  • Mensch BS, Clark WH, Lloyd CB, Erulkar AS. Premarital sex, schoolgirl pregnancy, and school quality in rural Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 2001 Dec;32(4):285–301. [PubMed]

Articles from Sexually Transmitted Infections are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group