PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Tob Control. 2005 April; 14(2): 118–126.
PMCID: PMC1748015

The limits of competing interest disclosures

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of conflict of interest disclosure policies by comparing a competing interests disclosure statement that met the requirements established by the journal in a 2003 article on health effects of secondhand smoke based on the American Cancer Society CPS-I dataset with internal tobacco industry documents describing financial ties between the tobacco industry and authors of the study.

Design: Descriptive analysis of internal tobacco industry documents retrieved from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library, University of California, San Francisco.

Results: Meeting the requirements for financial disclosure established by the journal did not provide the reader with a full picture of the tobacco industry's involvement with the study authors. The tobacco industry documents reveal that the authors had long standing financial and other working relationships with the tobacco industry.

Conclusion: These findings are another example of how simply requiring authors to disclose financial ties with the tobacco industry may not be adequate to give readers (and reviewers) a full picture of the author's relationship with the tobacco industry. The documents also reveal that the industry funds research to enhance its credibility and endeavours to work with respected scientists to advance its goals. These findings question the adequacy of current journal policies regarding competing interest disclosures and the acceptability of tobacco industry funding for academic research.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (178K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Enstrom James E, Kabat Geoffrey C. Environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco related mortality in a prospective study of Californians, 1960-98. BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1057–1057. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Enstrom James E, Kabat Geoffrey C. Misleading BMJ USA editorial. BMJ. 2003 Dec 20;327(7429):E266–E267. [PubMed]
  • Chaudhry Samena, Schroter Sara, Smith Richard, Morris Julie. Does declaration of competing interests affect readers' perceptions? A randomised trial. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1391–1392. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hong Mi-Kyung, Bero Lisa A. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413–1416. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barnoya J, Glantz S. Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project". Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):305–314. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van Kolfschooten Frank. Conflicts of interest: can you believe what you read? Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):360–363. [PubMed]
  • Campbell P. Declaration of financial interests. Nature. 2001 Aug 23;412(6849):751–751. [PubMed]
  • Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS. Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):205–218. [PubMed]
  • Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS, Stott P, Kyle G. Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: a pilot study of 14 publications. Sci Eng Ethics. 1996 Oct;2(4):395–410. [PubMed]
  • Thun Michael J. Passive smoking: tobacco industry publishes disinformation. BMJ. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):502–505. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Enstrom JE. Rising lung cancer mortality among nonsmokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Apr;62(4):755–760. [PubMed]
  • Janerich DT, Thompson WD, Varela LR, Greenwald P, Chorost S, Tucci C, Zaman MB, Melamed MR, Kiely M, McKneally MF. Lung cancer and exposure to tobacco smoke in the household. N Engl J Med. 1990 Sep 6;323(10):632–636. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Bero LA. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):515–542. [PubMed]
  • Enstrom JE, Heath CW., Jr Smoking cessation and mortality trends among 118,000 Californians, 1960-1997. Epidemiology. 1999 Sep;10(5):500–512. [PubMed]
  • Enstrom JE. Smoking cessation and mortality trends among two United States populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Sep;52(9):813–825. [PubMed]
  • Fontham ET, Correa P, Reynolds P, Wu-Williams A, Buffler PA, Greenberg RS, Chen VW, Alterman T, Boyd P, Austin DF, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in nonsmoking women. A multicenter study. JAMA. 1994 Jun 8;271(22):1752–1759. [PubMed]
  • Fields N, Chapman S. Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug;57(8):571–578. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kabat GC, Wynder EL. Lung cancer in nonsmokers. Cancer. 1984 Mar 1;53(5):1214–1221. [PubMed]
  • Kabat GC, Stellman SD, Wynder EL. Relation between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in lifetime nonsmokers. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul 15;142(2):141–148. [PubMed]
  • Bero LA, Galbraith A, Rennie D. Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):612–617. [PubMed]
  • Koo LC, Kabat GC, Rylander R, Tominaga S, Kato I, Ho JH. Dietary and lifestyle correlates of passive smoking in Hong Kong, Japan, Sweden, and the U.S.A. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(1):159–169. [PubMed]
  • Muggli Monique E, Hurt Richard D, Blanke D Douglas. Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303–314. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Bero LA. Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA. 1998 May 20;279(19):1566–1570. [PubMed]
  • Barnes DE, Bero LA. Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control. 1997 Spring;6(1):19–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Scollo M, Lal A, Hyland A, Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):13–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Muggli ME, Forster JL, Hurt RD, Repace JL. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419–1423. [PubMed]
  • Hirschhorn N, Bialous SA, Shatenstein S. Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis. Tob Control. 2001 Sep;10(3):247–252. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Boyd Elizabeth A, Lipton Shira, Bero Lisa A. Implementation of financial disclosure policies to manage conflicts of interest. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004 Mar-Apr;23(2):206–214. [PubMed]
  • Malone RE, Bero LA. Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Aug;57(8):546–548. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group