Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Tob Control. 2003 December; 12(4): 411–413.
PMCID: PMC1747798

No association of smoke-free ordinances with profits from bingo and charitable games in Massachusetts


Background: Because it is widely played, claims that smoking restrictions will adversely affect bingo games is used as an argument against these policies. We used publicly available data from Massachusetts to assess the impact of 100% smoke-free ordinances on profits from bingo and other gambling sponsored by charitable organisations between 1985 and 2001.

Methods: We conducted two analyses: (1) a general linear model implementation of a time series analysis with net profits (adjusted to 2001 dollars) as the dependent variable, and community (as a fixed effect), year, lagged net profits, and the length of time the ordinance had been in force as the independent variables; (2) multiple linear regression of total state profits against time, lagged profits, and the percentage of the entire state population in communities that allow charitable gaming but prohibit smoking.

Results: The general linear model analysis of data from individual communities showed that, while adjusted profits fell over time, this effect was not related to the presence of an ordinance. The analysis in terms of the fraction of the population living in communities with ordinances yielded the same result.

Conclusion: Policymakers can implement smoke-free policies without concern that these policies will affect charitable gaming.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fichtenberg Caroline M, Glantz Stanton A. Effect of smoke-free workplaces on smoking behaviour: systematic review. BMJ. 2002 Jul 27;325(7357):188–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Samuels B, Glantz SA. The politics of local tobacco control. JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110–2117. [PubMed]
  • Traynor MP, Begay ME, Glantz SA. New tobacco industry strategy to prevent local tobacco control. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479–486. [PubMed]
  • Scollo M, Lal A, Hyland A, Glantz S. Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):13–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Glantz SA. Smoke-free restaurant ordinances do not affect restaurant business. Period. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):vi–ix. [PubMed]
  • Hyland A, Cummings KM. Restaurant employment before and after the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):22–27. [PubMed]
  • Glantz SA, Charlesworth A. Tourism and hotel revenues before and after passage of smoke-free restaurant ordinances. JAMA. 1999 May 26;281(20):1911–1918. [PubMed]
  • Glantz SA, Smith LR. The effect of ordinances requiring smoke-free restaurants on restaurant sales. Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1081–1085. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group