PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of tobcontTobacco ControlVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Tob Control. 2003 June; 12(2): 221–226.
PMCID: PMC1747709

The descriptive epidemiology of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts: an analysis of the protection of restaurant customers and workers

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the range of restaurant smoking regulations in the 351 cities and towns in Massachusetts, and to analyse the level of protection from secondhand smoke exposure guaranteed by these regulations.

Design: We obtained the local restaurant smoking regulations for each town, analysing them in terms of the protection of restaurant workers, bar workers, and adult and youth restaurant customers.

Main outcome measure: The percentage of restaurant patrons and workers and bar workers who are protected from secondhand smoke exposure by the current smoking regulations in Massachusetts.

Results: As of June 2002, 225 towns had local restaurant smoking regulations. Of these, 69 (30.7%) do not allow smoking in restaurants, 10 (4.4%) restrict smoking to adult only restaurants, 64 (28.4%) restrict smoking to enclosed, separately ventilated areas, and 82 (36.4%) restrict smoking to areas that need not be enclosed and separately ventilated. Of the 174 towns that, at a minimum, restrict smoking to bar areas or separately ventilated areas, 35 (20.1%) allow variances. Overall, 60 towns, covering only 17.7% of the population, completely ban smoking in restaurants. As a result, 81.3% of adult restaurant customers, 81.2% of youth customers, 82.3% of restaurant workers, and 87.0% of bar workers are not guaranteed protection from secondhand smoke in restaurants.

Conclusions: Despite the widespread adoption of local restaurant smoking regulations in Massachusetts, the majority of restaurant customers and workers remain unprotected from secondhand smoke exposure. In light of this, public health practitioners must stop compromising the protection of customers and workers from secondhand smoke exposure in restaurants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Glantz SA, Parmley WW. Passive smoking and heart disease. Epidemiology, physiology, and biochemistry. Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):1–12. [PubMed]
  • Gerlach KK, Shopland DR, Hartman AM, Gibson JT, Pechacek TF. Workplace smoking policies in the United States: results from a national survey of more than 100,000 workers. Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):199–206. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Siegel M. Involuntary smoking in the restaurant workplace. A review of employee exposure and health effects. JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):490–493. [PubMed]
  • Jenkins RA, Counts RW. Occupational exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: results of two personal exposure studies. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):341–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hammond SK. Exposure of U.S. workers to environmental tobacco smoke. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 May;107 (Suppl 2):329–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wortley Pascale M, Caraballo Ralph S, Pederson Linda L, Pechacek Terry F. Exposure to secondhand smoke in the workplace: serum cotinine by occupation. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jun;44(6):503–509. [PubMed]
  • Miesner EA, Rudnick SN, Hu FC, Spengler JD, Preller L, Ozkaynak H, Nelson W. Particulate and nicotine sampling in public facilities and offices. JAPCA. 1989 Dec;39(12):1577–1582. [PubMed]
  • Jarvis MJ, Foulds J, Feyerabend C. Exposure to passive smoking among bar staff. Br J Addict. 1992 Jan;87(1):111–113. [PubMed]
  • Maskarinec MP, Jenkins RA, Counts RW, Dindal AB. Determination of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in restaurant and tavern workers in one US city. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Jan-Feb;10(1):36–49. [PubMed]
  • Besaratinia A, Maas LM, Brouwer EMC, Moonen EJC, De Kok TMCM, Wesseling GJ, Loft S, Kleinjans JCS, Van Schooten FJ. A molecular dosimetry approach to assess human exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in pubs. Carcinogenesis. 2002 Jul;23(7):1171–1176. [PubMed]
  • Siegel M, Carol J, Jordan J, Hobart R, Schoenmarklin S, DuMelle F, Fisher P. Preemption in tobacco control. Review of an emerging public health problem. JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):858–863. [PubMed]
  • Siegel Michael. The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: a review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23:45–71. [PubMed]
  • Chriqui JF, Frosh M, Brownson RC, Shelton DM, Sciandra RC, Hobart R, Fisher PH, el Arculli R, Alciati MH. Application of a rating system to state clean indoor air laws (USA). Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11(1):26–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lewit EM, Hyland A, Kerrebrock N, Cummings KM. Price, public policy, and smoking in young people. Tob Control. 1997;6 (Suppl 2):S17–S24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bartosch WJ, Pope GC. The economic effect of smoke-free restaurant policies on restaurant business in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):53–62. [PubMed]
  • Bartosch William J, Pope Gregory C. Local enactment of tobacco control policies in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941–943. [PubMed]
  • Bartosch WJ, Pope GC. Local restaurant smoking policy enactment in Massachusetts. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):63–73. [PubMed]
  • Klonoff EA, Landrine H, Alcaraz R, Campbell RR, Lang DL, McSwan KL, Parekh B, Norton-Perry G. An instrument for assessing the quality of tobacco-control policies: the ACT-L scale. Prev Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;27(6):808–814. [PubMed]
  • Brownson RC, Eriksen MP, Davis RM, Warner KE. Environmental tobacco smoke: health effects and policies to reduce exposure. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:163–185. [PubMed]
  • Dearlove Joanna V, Glantz Stanton A. Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making. Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):257–265. [PubMed]
  • Ying JY, Abernathy T, Choi BC. A comprehensive evaluation of the 1993 city of Toronto smoking by-laws. Can J Public Health. 1995 Jan-Feb;86(1):32–36. [PubMed]
  • Stanwick RS, Thomson MP, Swerhone PM, Stevenson LA, Fish DG. The response of Winnipeg retail shops and restaurants to a bylaw regulating smoking in public place. Can J Public Health. 1988 Jul-Aug;79(4):226–230. [PubMed]
  • Chapman S, Borland R, Lal A. Has the ban on smoking in New South Wales restaurants worked? A comparison of restaurants in Sydney and Melbourne. Med J Aust. 2001 May 21;174(10):512–515. [PubMed]
  • Cheadle AD, Psaty BM, Curry S, Wagner E, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kristal AR, Patrick D. Assessing the validity of a survey of the restaurant health promotion environment. Am J Health Promot. 1994 Nov-Dec;9(2):88–91. [PubMed]
  • Hyland A, Cummings KM, Wilson MP. Compliance with the New York City Smoke-Free Air Act. J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):43–52. [PubMed]
  • Magzamen S, Glantz SA. The new battleground: California's experience with smoke-free bars. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):245–252. [PubMed]
  • Miller Caroline, Wakefield Melanie, Kriven Sophie, Hyland Andrew. Evaluation of smoke-free dining in South Australia: support and compliance among the community and restaurateurs. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Feb;26(1):38–44. [PubMed]

Articles from Tobacco Control are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group