PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of injprevInjury PreventionVisit this articleVisit this journalSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Inj Prev. 2000 June; 6(2): 148–150.
PMCID: PMC1730612

Measuring injury risk factors: question reliability in a statewide sample

Abstract

Background—Recently (1996–98), Colorado added 15 questions pertaining to injury related risks and behaviors to the behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS). Questions addressed bicycle helmet use, traffic crashes, exposure to violence, suicidal behavior, and gun storage.

Objective—To measure the test-retest reliability of these injury related questions.

Methods—Of 330 BRFSS participants, 229 (69%) were called a second time and reasked nine selected injury questions. Retests were completed 7–28 days after the original interview.

Results—Test-retest agreement was very high (κ >0.80) for bicycle helmet use, domestic police visits, and gun ownership. All other injury risk questions had substantial agreement (κ >0.60).

Conclusions—The injury related questions added to the Colorado BRFSS have high test-retest reliability.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Strömberg U. Should an expected number of cases be an integer? Epidemiology. 1994 Sep;5(5):561–562. [PubMed]
  • Shea S, Stein AD, Lantigua R, Basch CE. Reliability of the behavioral risk factor survey in a triethnic population. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Mar 1;133(5):489–500. [PubMed]
  • Stein AD, Courval JM, Lederman RI, Shea S. Reproducibility of responses to telephone interviews: demographic predictors of discordance in risk factor status. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jun 1;141(11):1097–1105. [PubMed]
  • Stein AD, Lederman RI, Shea S. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire: its reliability in a statewide sample. Am J Public Health. 1993 Dec;83(12):1768–1772. [PubMed]
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed]
  • Maclure M, Willett WC. Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161–169. [PubMed]
  • Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543–549. [PubMed]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group