Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of injprevInjury PreventionVisit this articleVisit this journalSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Inj Prev. 2005 February; 11(1): 43–47.
PMCID: PMC1730187

Ability of parents to recall the injuries of their young children


Objective: To estimate the ability of parents to recall the injuries of their children.

Design: Comparison of parent recall with computerized medical records.

Setting: A health maintenance organization in Washington State during 2003.

Subjects: Parents of children younger than 6 years.

Main outcome measures: The ratio of recalled injuries to injuries in computerized data.

Results: Telephone interviews were completed with a parent of 1672 young children who had computerized medical data for at least one injury in the last year. Counting the three most recent treated injuries, the 1672 children had 1896 separate new injuries in the year before interview and parents recalled 1150 of these: recall ratio 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 0.63). The recall ratio decreased from 0.82 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.85) for injuries one day before interview to 0.37 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.40) at 365 days before interview. For 341 major injuries the recall ratio was 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.84), for 202 minor injuries treated in an emergency department or hospital it was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.82), for 597 minor injuries treated in urgent care it was 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.73), and for 756 minor injuries treated in a clinic it was 0.43 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.47).

Conclusions: Recall decreased with time. Recall was best for major injuries, intermediate for minor injuries treated in a hospital, emergency department, or urgent care center, and worst for minor injuries treated in a clinic.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (78K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Branum Amy M, Collman Gwen W, Correa Adolfo, Keim Sarah A, Kessel Woodie, Kimmel Carole A, Klebanoff Mark A, Longnecker Matthew P, Mendola Pauline, Rigas Marc, et al. The National Children's Study of environmental effects on child health and development. Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):642–646. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Newton KM, Wagner EH, Ramsey SD, McCulloch D, Evans R, Sandhu N, Davis C. The use of automated data to identify complications and comorbidities of diabetes: a validation study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;52(3):199–207. [PubMed]
  • Mullooly J, Drew L, DeStefano F, Chen R, Okoro K, Swint E, Immanuel V, Ray P, Lewis N, Vadheim C, et al. Quality of HMO vaccination databases used to monitor childhood vaccine safety. Vaccine Safety DataLink Team. Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Jan 15;149(2):186–194. [PubMed]
  • Barlow WE, Davis RL, Glasser JW, Rhodes PH, Thompson RS, Mullooly JP, Black SB, Shinefield HR, Ward JI, Marcy SM, et al. The risk of seizures after receipt of whole-cell pertussis or measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):656–661. [PubMed]
  • Cash WS, Moss AJ. Optimum recall period for reporting persons injured in motor vehicle accidents. Vital Health Stat 2. 1972 Apr;(50):1–33. [PubMed]
  • Harel Y, Overpeck MD, Jones DH, Scheidt PC, Bijur PE, Trumble AC, Anderson J. The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents. Am J Public Health. 1994 Apr;84(4):599–605. [PubMed]
  • Mock C, Acheampong F, Adjei S, Koepsell T. The effect of recall on estimation of incidence rates for injury in Ghana. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;28(4):750–755. [PubMed]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group