PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brjopthalBritish Journal of OphthalmologyVisit this articleSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
 
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 December; 85(12): 1470–1476.
PMCID: PMC1723806

The importance of genes and environment for ocular refraction and its determiners: a population based study among 20-45 year old twins

Abstract

AIMS—To estimate the heritability for ocular refraction and its determiners in a population based cohort of 20-45 years old twins.
METHODS—114 twin pairs (53 monozygotic and 61 dizygotic) participated. Refraction was determined in cycloplegia and eye dimensions were measured with ultrasound. Educational length was assessed. The heritability was estimated employing aetiological model fitting. Evidence of gene-environment interaction was analysed. Correlations between intrapairwise differences in educational length and in refraction were evaluated.
RESULTS—The heritability was between 0.89 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.96) for refraction, total refraction, axial length, and radius of corneal curvature. Phenotypic variation was mostly due to additive genetic effects. Refraction revealed evidence of gene-environment interaction (r = −0.29 to −0.32; p <0.05). The heritability for anterior chamber depth and lens thickness was between 0.88 and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.81, 0.96) and dominant genetic effects were the most likely explanation. There was no correlation between age and intrapairwise differences in refraction. The dizygotic twins had significant larger intrapairwise differences in educational length (p <0.05), but the differences were not correlated with differences in refraction.
CONCLUSIONS—The results indicate a high heritability for ocular refraction and its determiners and thus suggest that environmental impact on refraction is not significant. However, the epidemiological association between educational length (near work) and myopia, the evidence of increasing myopia prevalence within a few generations, and the theory of gene-environment interaction imply that some individuals might be genetically liable to develop myopia if exposed to certain environmental factors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Angle J, Wissmann DA. The epidemiology of myopia. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Feb;111(2):220–228. [PubMed]
  • Mohan M, Pakrasi S, Garg SP. The role of environmental factors and hereditary predisposition in the causation of low myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1988;185:54–57. [PubMed]
  • Kinge B, Midelfart A, Jacobsen G, Rystad J. The influence of near-work on development of myopia among university students. A three-year longitudinal study among engineering students in Norway. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000 Feb;78(1):26–29. [PubMed]
  • Teasdale TW, Goldschmidt E. Myopia and its relationship to education, intelligence and height. Preliminary results from an on-going study of Danish draftees. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1988;185:41–43. [PubMed]
  • Fledelius HC. Myopia prevalence in Scandinavia. A survey, with emphasis on factors of relevance for epidemiological refraction studies in general. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1988;185:44–50. [PubMed]
  • Sorsby A, Leary GA, Fraser GR. Family studies on ocular refraction and its components. J Med Genet. 1966 Dec;3(4):269–273. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Alsbirk PH. Refraction in adult West Greenland Eskimos. A population study of spherical refractive errors, including oculometric and familial correlations. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1979 Feb;57(1):84–95. [PubMed]
  • Johnson GJ, Matthews A, Perkins ES. Survey of ophthalmic conditions in a Labrador community. I. Refractive errors. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Jun;63(6):440–448. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • SORSBY A, FRASER GR. STATISTICAL NOTE ON THE COMPONENTS OF OCULAR REFRACTION IN TWINS. J Med Genet. 1964 Sep;1(1):47–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lin LL, Chen CJ. A twin study on myopia in Chinese school children. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1988;185:51–53. [PubMed]
  • Teikari J, O'Donnell JJ, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M. Genetic and environmental effects on oculometric traits. Optom Vis Sci. 1989 Sep;66(9):594–599. [PubMed]
  • Teikari J, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, O'Donnell J. Study of gene-environment effects on development of hyperopia: a study of 191 adult twin pairs from the Finnish Twin Cohort Study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1990;39(1):133–136. [PubMed]
  • Valluri S, Minkovitz JB, Budak K, Essary LR, Walker RS, Chansue E, Cabrera GM, Koch DD, Pepose JS. Comparative corneal topography and refractive variables in monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999 Feb;127(2):158–163. [PubMed]
  • McGue M, Bouchard TJ., Jr Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex. Behav Genet. 1984 Jul;14(4):325–343. [PubMed]
  • Kyvik KO, Christensen K, Skytthe A, Harvald B, Holm NV. The Danish Twin Register. Dan Med Bull. 1996 Dec;43(5):467–470. [PubMed]
  • Blackie CA, Harris WF. Refraction and keratometry: departures from and transformations toward multivariate normality. Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Jun;74(6):452–458. [PubMed]
  • van ALPHEN G. On emmetropia and ametropia. Opt Acta (Lond) 1961;142(Suppl):1–92. [PubMed]
  • Chen CJ, Cohen BH, Diamond EL. Genetic and environmental effects on the development of myopia in Chinese twin children. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1985 Aug;6(1-2):353–359. [PubMed]
  • Schwartz JT. A monozygotic cotwin control study of a treatment for myopia. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 1976;25:133–136. [PubMed]
  • Schwartz JT. Results of a monozygotic cotwin control study on a treatment for myopia. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1981;69(Pt 100):249–258. [PubMed]
  • Jensen H. Myopia progression in young school children. A prospective study of myopia progression and the effect of a trial with bifocal lenses and beta blocker eye drops. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1991;(200):1–79. [PubMed]
  • Jensen H. Myopia in teenagers. An eight-year follow-up study on myopia progression and risk factors. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995 Oct;73(5):389–393. [PubMed]

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Histograms showing the distribution of ocular refraction and its determiners in right eyes. The Gaussian curves are based on the measured values.
Figure 2
Intrapairwise correlation, Pearson's rp (95% CI) for refraction, axial length, and anterior chamber depth) in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic twins (DZ). Right eyes. Age and sex dependent determiners were adjusted before the heritability analysis. (A) ...
Figure 3
Intrapairwise correlation, Pearson's rp (95% CI) for lens thickness (A, B) and mean radius of corneal curvature (Rad cc) (C, D) in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic twins (DZ). Right eyes. Age and sex dependent determiners were adjusted before the heritability ...
Figure 4
Analysis of gene-environment interaction for ocular refraction. Monozygotic twins. (A) Right eye, r = −0.32, p <0.05, n = 52 (Spearman rank correlation). (B) Left eye, r = −0.29, ...
Figure 5
Refraction versus educational length: only pairs were both twins contributing information. (A) Right eye, r = −0.33, p <0.01. (B) Left eye, r = −0.34, p <0.01).

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group