Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of transbThe Royal Society PublishingPhilosophical Transactions BAboutBrowse By SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 June 29; 358(1434): 1163–1170.
PMCID: PMC1693201

Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: implications for transgene flow.


Plant evolutionary biologists' view of gene flow and hybridization has undergone a revolution. Twenty-five years ago, both were considered rare and largely inconsequential. Now gene flow and hybridization are known to be idiosyncratic, varying with the specific populations involved. Gene flow typically occurs at evolutionarily significant rates and at significant distances. Spontaneous hybridization occasionally has important applied consequences, such as stimulating the evolution of more aggressive invasives and increasing the extinction risk for rare species. The same problems have occurred for spontaneous hybridization between crops and their wild relatives. These new data have implications for transgenic crops: (i) for most crops, gene flow can act to introduce engineered genes into wild populations; (ii) depending on the specific engineered gene(s) and populations involved, gene flow may have the same negative impacts as those observed for traditionally improved crops; (iii) gene flow's idiosyncratic nature may frustrate management and monitoring attempts; and (iv) intercrop transgene flow, although rarely discussed, is equally worthy of study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (176K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Colwell RK, Norse EA, Pimentel D, Sharples FE, Simberloff D. Genetic engineering in agriculture. Science. 1985 Jul 12;229(4709):111–112. [PubMed]
  • Dale Philip J, Clarke Belinda, Fontes Eliana M G. Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):567–574. [PubMed]
  • Daniell Henry. Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):581–586. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ehrlich PR, Raven PH. Differentiation of populations. Science. 1969 Sep 19;165(3899):1228–1232. [PubMed]
  • Ellstrand NC. When transgenes wander, should we worry? Plant Physiol. 2001 Apr;125(4):1543–1545. [PubMed]
  • Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7043–7050. [PubMed]
  • Ellstrand NC, Devlin B, Marshall DL. Gene flow by pollen into small populations: Data from experimental and natural stands of wild radish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Nov;86(22):9044–9047. [PubMed]
  • Gressel J. Tandem constructs: preventing the rise of superweeds. Trends Biotechnol. 1999 Sep;17(9):361–366. [PubMed]
  • Hails RS. Genetically modified plants - the debate continues. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jan;15(1):14–18. [PubMed]
  • Hodgson John. Doubts linger over Mexican corn analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jan;20(1):3–4. [PubMed]
  • Schoen DJ, Stewart SC. Variation in Male Fertilities and Pairwise Mating Probabilities in Picea glauca. Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):141–152. [PubMed]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society