Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of transbThe Royal Society PublishingPhilosophical Transactions BAboutBrowse By SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 September 29; 357(1425): 1153–1170.
PMCID: PMC1693026

Population growth rate and its determinants: an overview.


We argue that population growth rate is the key unifying variable linking the various facets of population ecology. The importance of population growth rate lies partly in its central role in forecasting future population trends; indeed if the form of density dependence were constant and known, then the future population dynamics could to some degree be predicted. We argue that population growth rate is also central to our understanding of environmental stress: environmental stressors should be defined as factors which when first applied to a population reduce population growth rate. The joint action of such stressors determines an organism's ecological niche, which should be defined as the set of environmental conditions where population growth rate is greater than zero (where population growth rate = r = log(e)(N(t+1)/N(t))). While environmental stressors have negative effects on population growth rate, the same is true of population density, the case of negative linear effects corresponding to the well-known logistic equation. Following Sinclair, we recognize population regulation as occurring when population growth rate is negatively density dependent. Surprisingly, given its fundamental importance in population ecology, only 25 studies were discovered in the literature in which population growth rate has been plotted against population density. In 12 of these the effects of density were linear; in all but two of the remainder the relationship was concave viewed from above. Alternative approaches to establishing the determinants of population growth rate are reviewed, paying special attention to the demographic and mechanistic approaches. The effects of population density on population growth rate may act through their effects on food availability and associated effects on somatic growth, fecundity and survival, according to a 'numerical response', the evidence for which is briefly reviewed. Alternatively, there may be effects on population growth rate of population density in addition to those that arise through the partitioning of food between competitors; this is 'interference competition'. The distinction is illustrated using a replicated laboratory experiment on a marine copepod, Tisbe battagliae. Application of these approaches in conservation biology, ecotoxicology and human demography is briefly considered. We conclude that population regulation, density dependence, resource and interference competition, the effects of environmental stress and the form of the ecological niche, are all best defined and analysed in terms of population growth rate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (363K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Abrams PA, Ginzburg LR. The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Aug;15(8):337–341. [PubMed]
  • Beddington JR, May RM. Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment. Science. 1977 Jul 29;197(4302):463–465. [PubMed]
  • Bjørnstad ON, Grenfell BT. Noisy clockwork: time series analysis of population fluctuations in animals. Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):638–643. [PubMed]
  • Bulmer MG. The statistical analysis of density dependence. Biometrics. 1975 Dec;31(4):901–911. [PubMed]
  • Clark CW. The economics of overexploitation. Science. 1973 Aug 17;181(4100):630–634. [PubMed]
  • COLE LC. Sketches of general and comparative demography. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1957;22:1–15. [PubMed]
  • Coulson T, Catchpole EA, Albon SD, Morgan BJ, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Crawley MJ, Grenfell BT. Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1528–1531. [PubMed]
  • Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):405–410. [PubMed]
  • Euler L. A general investigation into the mortality and multiplication of the human species. Theor Popul Biol. 1970 Nov;1(3):307–314. [PubMed]
  • Fujiwara M, Caswell H. Demography of the endangered North Atlantic right whale. Nature. 2001 Nov 29;414(6863):537–541. [PubMed]
  • Hengge-Aronis R. Interplay of global regulators and cell physiology in the general stress response of Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999 Apr;2(2):148–152. [PubMed]
  • Hudson PJ, Dobson AP, Newborn D. Prevention of population cycles by parasite removal. Science. 1998 Dec 18;282(5397):2256–2258. [PubMed]
  • Karels TJ, Boonstra R. Concurrent density dependence and independence in populations of arctic ground squirrels. Nature. 2000 Nov 23;408(6811):460–463. [PubMed]
  • Krebs Charles J. Two complementary paradigms for analysing population dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1211–1219. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Sinclair AR, Smith JN, Dale MR, Martin K, Turkington R. Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science. 1995 Aug 25;269(5227):1112–1115. [PubMed]
  • Leirs H, Stenseth NC, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Verhagen R, Verheyen W. Stochastic seasonality and nonlinear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent. Nature. 1997 Sep 11;389(6647):176–180. [PubMed]
  • Lutz Wolfgang, Qiang Ren. Determinants of human population growth. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1197–1210. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S. The end of world population growth. Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):543–545. [PubMed]
  • Pearl R, Reed LJ. On the Rate of Growth of the Population of the United States since 1790 and Its Mathematical Representation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1920 Jun;6(6):275–288. [PubMed]
  • Pech R, Hood GM, McIlroy J, Saunders G. Can foxes be controlled by reducing their fertility? Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(1):41–50. [PubMed]
  • Saether B, Tufto J, Engen S, Jerstad K, Rostad OW, Skâtan JE. Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird. Science. 2000 Feb 4;287(5454):854–856. [PubMed]
  • Saether Bernt-Erik, Engen Steinar, Matthysen Erik. Demographic characteristics and population dynamical patterns of solitary birds. Science. 2002 Mar 15;295(5562):2070–2073. [PubMed]
  • Sinclair ARE, Krebs Charles J. Complex numerical responses to top-down and bottom-up processes in vertebrate populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1221–1231. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stephens PA, Sutherland WJ. Consequences of the Allee effect for behaviour, ecology and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):401–405. [PubMed]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society