Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 December 22; 271(1557): 2605–2611.
PMCID: PMC1691904

Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions.


Mutually beneficial interactions between flowering plants and animal pollinators represent a critical 'ecosystem service' under threat of anthropogenic extinction. We explored probable patterns of extinction in two large networks of plants and flower visitors by simulating the removal of pollinators and consequent loss of the plants that depend upon them for reproduction. For each network, we removed pollinators at random, systematically from least-linked (most specialized) to most-linked (most generalized), and systematically from most- to least-linked. Plant species diversity declined most rapidly with preferential removal of the most-linked pollinators, but declines were no worse than linear. This relative tolerance to extinction derives from redundancy in pollinators per plant and from nested topology of the networks. Tolerance in pollination networks contrasts with catastrophic declines reported from standard food webs. The discrepancy may be a result of the method used: previous studies removed species from multiple trophic levels based only on their linkage, whereas our preferential removal of pollinators reflects their greater risk of extinction relative to that of plants. In both pollination networks, the most-linked pollinators were bumble-bees and some solitary bees. These animals should receive special attention in efforts to conserve temperate pollination systems.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (584K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi AL. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature. 2000 Jul 27;406(6794):378–382. [PubMed]
  • Bascompte Jordi, Jordano Pedro, Melián Carlos J, Olesen Jens M. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383–9387. [PubMed]
  • Gilbert F, Gonzalez A, Evans-Freke I. Corridors maintain species richness in the fragmented landscapes of a microecosystem. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Apr 7;265(1396):577–582. [PMC free article]
  • Holsinger KE. Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7037–7042. [PubMed]
  • Hughes JB, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Population diversity: its extent and extinction. Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):689–692. [PubMed]
  • Kondoh Michio. Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1388–1391. [PubMed]
  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):804–808. [PubMed]
  • Memmott Jane, Waser Nickolas M. Integration of alien plants into a native flower-pollinator visitation web. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Dec 7;269(1508):2395–2399. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Newman MEJ. Assortative mixing in networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2002 Nov 11;89(20):208701–208701. [PubMed]
  • Sala OE, Chapin FS, 3rd, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1770–1774. [PubMed]
  • Solé RV, Montoya JM. Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2039–2045. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watanabe ME. Pollination worries rise as honey bees decline. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1170–1170. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society