Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 December 22; 271(1557): 2595–2603.
PMCID: PMC1691900

Paying for nectar with wingbeats: a new model of honeybee foraging.


Honeybees acquire wing damage as they age and older foraging honeybees accept lavender inflorescences with fewer flowers. These indicate the operation of some kind of optimal response, but this cannot be based on energy because energy expenditure does not change as the wings get damaged. However, wingbeat frequency increases with wing damage. A deterministic analytical model was constructed, based on the assumptions that bees have a limited total number of wingbeats that the flight motor can perform and that they maximize lifetime energy profit by conserving the number of wingbeats used in foraging. The optimal response to wing damage is to reduce the threshold number of flowers needed to accept an inflorescence. The predicted optimal gradient between wing damage (wingbeat frequency) and acceptance threshold (number of flowers on an inflorescence) was close to the observed gradient from field data. This model demonstrates that wear and tear is a significant factor in optimal foraging strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bautista LM, Tinbergen J, Kacelnik A. To walk or to fly? How birds choose among foraging modes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(3):1089–1094. [PubMed]
  • Feuerbacher Erica, Fewell Jennifer H, Roberts Stephen P, Smith Elizabeth F, Harrison Jon F. Effects of load type (pollen or nectar) and load mass on hovering metabolic rate and mechanical power output in the honey bee Apis mellifera. J Exp Biol. 2003 Jun;206(Pt 11):1855–1865. [PubMed]
  • Ollason JG, Ren N. Taking the rough with the smooth: foraging for particulate food in continuous time. Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Dec;62(4):313–327. [PubMed]
  • Pietras Cynthia J, Locey Matthew L, Hackenberg Timothy D. Human risky choice under temporal constraints: tests of an energy-budget model. J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Jul;80(1):59–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vásquez RA, Kacelnik A. Foraging rate versus sociality in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 22;267(1439):157–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williams CS. The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):673–681. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society