PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
 
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 February 22; 271(1537): 415–423.
PMCID: PMC1691608

Adaptive changes in harvested populations: plasticity and evolution of age and size at maturation.

Abstract

We investigate harvest-induced adaptive changes in age and size at maturation by modelling both plastic variation and evolutionary trajectories. Harvesting mature individuals displaces the reaction norm for age and size at maturation toward older ages and larger sizes and rotates it clockwise, whereas harvesting immature individuals has the reverse qualitative effect. If both immature and mature individuals are harvested, the net effect has approximately the same trend as when harvesting immature individuals only. This stems from the sensitivity of the evolutionary response, which depends on the maturity state of harvested individuals, but also on the type of harvest mortality (negatively or positively density dependent, density independent) and the value of three life-history parameters (natural mortality, growth rate and the trade-off between growth and reproduction). Evolutionary changes in the maturation reaction norm have strong repercussions for the mean size and the density of harvested individuals that, in most cases, result in the reduction of biomass--a response that population dynamical models would overlook. These results highlight the importance of accounting for evolutionary trends in the long-term management of exploited living resources and give qualitative insights into how to minimize the detrimental consequences of harvest-induced evolutionary changes in maturation reaction norms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (215K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Conover David O, Munch Stephan B. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science. 2002 Jul 5;297(5578):94–96. [PubMed]
  • Dieckmann U, Law R. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):579–612. [PubMed]
  • Dieckmann U, Marrow P, Law R. Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the red queen. J Theor Biol. 1995 Sep 7;176(1):91–102. [PubMed]
  • Heino Mikko, Dieckmann Ulf, Godø Olav Rune. Measuring probabilistic reaction norms for age and size at maturation. Evolution. 2002 Apr;56(4):669–678. [PubMed]
  • Kirkpatrick M, Heckman N. A quantitative genetic model for growth, shape, reaction norms, and other infinite-dimensional characters. J Math Biol. 1989;27(4):429–450. [PubMed]
  • Lorenzen Kai, Enberg Katja. Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):49–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Palumbi SR. Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force. Science. 2001 Sep 7;293(5536):1786–1790. [PubMed]
  • Rand DA, Wilson HB, McGlade JM. Dynamics and evolution: evolutionarily stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Feb 28;343(1035):261–283. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society