Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 December 22; 270(1533): 2531–2542.
PMCID: PMC1691551

The interpretation of biological surveys.


Biological surveys provide the raw material for assembling ecological patterns. These include the properties of parameters such as range, abundance, dispersion, evenness and diversity; the relationships between these parameters; the relationship between geographical distributions and landscape structure; and the co-occurrence of species. These patterns have often been used in the past to evaluate the role of ecological processes in structuring natural communities. In this paper, I investigate the patterns produced by simple neutral community models (NCMs) and compare them with the output of systematic biological surveys. The NCM generates qualitatively, and in some cases quantitatively, the same patterns as the survey data. It therefore provides a satisfactory general theory of diversity and distribution, although what patterns can be used to distinguish neutral from adaptationist interpretations of communities, or even whether such patterns exist, remains unclear.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (359K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bell G. The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities. Am Nat. 2000 May;155(5):606–617. [PubMed]
  • Bell G. Neutral macroecology. Science. 2001 Sep 28;293(5539):2413–2418. [PubMed]
  • Clark James S, McLachlan Jason S. Stability of forest biodiversity. Nature. 2003 Jun 5;423(6940):635–638. [PubMed]
  • Enquist BJ, Sanderson J, Weiser MD. Modeling macroscopic patterns in ecology. Science. 2002 Mar 8;295(5561):1835–1837. [PubMed]
  • Harper JL, Hawksworth DL. Biodiversity: measurement and estimation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jul 29;345(1311):5–12. [PubMed]
  • Harte J, Kinzig A, Green J. Self-similarity in the distribution and abundance of species . Science. 1999 Apr 9;284(5412):334–336. [PubMed]
  • McGill Brian J. A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):881–885. [PubMed]
  • Ostling A, Harte J, Green J. Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. Science. 2000 Oct 27;290(5492):671–671. [PubMed]
  • Ricklefs RE. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science. 1987 Jan 9;235(4785):167–171. [PubMed]
  • Whitfield John. Neutrality versus the niche. Nature. 2002 May 30;417(6888):480–481. [PubMed]
  • Whittaker RH. Dominance and Diversity in Land Plant Communities: Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science. 1965 Jan 15;147(3655):250–260. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society