Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 March 22; 270(1515): 653–664.
PMCID: PMC1691281

The evolution of mate choice and mating biases.


We review the current status of three well-established models (direct benefits, indirect benefits and sensory drive) and one newcomer (antagonistic chase-away) of the evolution of mate choice and the biases that are expressed during choice. We highlight the differences and commonalities in the underlying genetics and evolutionary dynamics of these models. We then argue that progress in understanding the evolution of mate choice is currently hampered by spurious distinctions among models and a misguided tendency to test the processes underlying each model as mutually exclusive alternatives. Finally, we suggest potentially fruitful directions for future theoretical and empirical research.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (287K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Jones TM, Quinnell RJ, Balmford A. Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Sep 7;265(1406):1651–1657. [PMC free article]
  • Kokko H. Should advertising parental care be honest? Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Oct 7;265(1408):1871–1878. [PMC free article]
  • Sheldon BC, Merila J, Qvarnström A, Gustafsson L, Ellegren H. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):297–302. [PMC free article]
  • Wilkinson GS, Taper M. Evolution of genetic variation for condition-dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Aug 22;266(1429):1685–1685. [PMC free article]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society