Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procbThe Royal Society PublishingProceedings BAboutBrowse by SubjectAlertsFree Trial
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 September 7; 267(1454): 1751–1757.
PMCID: PMC1690740

Colony sex ratios vary with queen number but not relatedness asymmetry in the ant Formica exsecta.


Split-sex-ratio theory assumes that conflict over whether to produce predominately males or female reproductives (gynes) is won by the workers in haplodiploid insect societies and the outcome is determined by colony kin structure. Tests of the theory have the potential to provide support for kin-selection theory and evidence of social conflict. We use natural variation in kinship among polygynous (multiple-queen) colonies of the ant Formica exsecta to study the associations between sex ratios and the relatedness of workers to female versus male brood (relatedness asymmetry). The population showed split sex ratios with about 89% of the colonies producing only males, resulting in an extremely male-biased investment ratio in the population. We make two important points with our data. First, we show that queen number may affect sex ratio independently of relatedness asymmetry. Colonies producing only males had greater genetic effective queen number but did not have greater relatedness asymmetry from the perspective of the adult workers that rear the brood. This lack of a difference in relatedness asymmetry between colonies producing females and those producing only males was associated with a generally low relatedness between workers and brood. Second, studies that suggest support for the relatedness-asymmetry hypothesis based on indirect measures of relatedness asymmetry (e.g. queen number estimated from relatedness data taken from the brood only) should be considered with caution. We propose a new hypothesis that explains split sex ratios in polygynous social insects based on the value of producing replacement queens.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (204K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bourke AF, Green HA, Bruford MW. Parentage, reproductive skew and queen turnover in a multiple-queen ant analysed with microsatellites. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Feb 22;264(1379):277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chapuisat M. Characterization of microsatellite loci in Formica lugubris B and their variability in other ant species. Mol Ecol. 1996 Aug;5(4):599–601. [PubMed]
  • Chapuis M, Keller L. Testing kin selection with sex allocation data in eusocial hymenoptera . Heredity (Edinb) 1999 May;82(Pt 5):473–478. [PubMed]
  • Chapuisat M, Sundström L, Keller L. Sex-ratio regulation: the economics of fratricide in ants. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Aug 22;264(1385):1255–1260. [PMC free article]
  • Clark AB. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science. 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):163–165. [PubMed]
  • Evans JD. Relatedness threshold for the production of female sexuals in colonies of a polygynous ant, Myrmica tahoensis, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jul 3;92(14):6514–6517. [PubMed]
  • Mueller UG. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science. 1991 Oct 18;254(5030):442–444. [PubMed]
  • Mueller UG, Eickwort GC, Aquadro CF. DNA fingerprinting analysis of parent-offspring conflict in a bee. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24;91(11):5143–5147. [PubMed]
  • Sundstrom L, Chapuisat M, Keller L. Conditional Manipulation of Sex Ratios by Ant Workers: A Test of Kin Selection Theory. Science. 1996 Nov 8;274(5289):993–995. [PubMed]
  • Trivers RL, Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society