The cyanobacterium
Prochlorococcus, an oxygenic phototroph, is the most abundant member of the oceanic phytoplankton community in the tropical and subtropical ocean basins (
Partensky et al, 1999) where it reaches densities as high as 7 × 10
5 cells ml
−1 sea water (
Campbell et al, 1998). Field studies have reported that up to 79% of primary productivity in the North Atlantic is due to
Prochlorococcus (
Li, 1994), showing that this organism plays a key role in the global carbon cycle. Nitrogen (N) concentrations in the oligotrophic ocean are extremely low and sometimes limit phytoplankton growth. For example, ammonium concentrations at the Bermuda Atlantic Time-Series Study (BATS) reach only 20–200 nM during bloom periods (
Lipschultz, 2001).
Prochlorococcus cells may have a particular propensity to become N deficient relative to phosphorus (P) because its cellular requirements for N relative to P are >20N:1P (
Bertilsson et al, 2003) and thus exceed the 16N:1P Redfield ratio classically believed to describe the elemental composition of biomass in the sea (
Redfield, 1958). In support of this hypothesis, field studies have shown that nitrogen enrichment stimulates
Prochlorococcus growth in the North Atlantic (
Graziano et al, 1996).
The
Prochlorococcus strains used in this study, MED4 and MIT9313, represent clades that have different depth distributions in the ocean and thus occupy distinct ecological niches with respect to light and nitrogen. As such, MED4 and MIT9313 belong to ecologically distinct groups, called ecotypes (
Moore et al, 1998). Field studies in the Atlantic revealed that the MED4 ecotype is relatively most abundant in the upper euphotic zone, whereas the MIT9313 ecotype is primarily confined to the base of the euphotic zone at depths around 100 m (
West et al, 2001;
Johnson et al, 2006). In accordance with their different depth distributions, MED4 cultures grow optimally at higher light intensities than MIT9313 (
Moore and Chisholm, 1999).
Nitrogen appears to be an important selective agent driving niche differentiation of strains such as MED4 and MIT9313, as revealed by their distinct nitrogen utilization capabilities (
Moore et al, 2002) and by the N metabolism genes in the MED4 (1.7 Mb) and MIT9313 (2.4 Mb) genomes (
Rocap et al, 2003). MIT9313, for example, has nitrite transport and reduction genes (
Rocap et al, 2003) and grows on nitrite, whereas MED4 does not (
Moore et al, 2002). This interstrain difference correlates with the depth distribution of the MIT9313 ecotype, as a well-defined nitrite maximum is often found in the lower euphotic zone (
Olson, 1981) where this ecotype is most abundant. The MED4 genome contains genes for cyanate transport and reduction and this strain grows on cyanate (
Garcia-Fernandez et al, 2004), whereas the MIT9313 genome lacks these genes (
Rocap et al, 2003). In addition to the above differences, there are similarities in N utilization between MED4 and MIT9313. Both MED4 and MIT9313 have genes for the transport and utilization of ammonium and urea (
Rocap et al, 2003) and grow on them as the sole N source (
Moore et al, 2002). These N sources are rapidly recycled in the nutrient-depleted surface waters. Unlike other phytoplankton, including most marine
Synechococcus, both MED4 and MIT9313 do not grow on nitrate and the gene for nitrate reduction,
narB, is absent from both genomes (
Rocap et al, 2003).
Because of the important role of nitrogen in
Prochlorococcus ecology, the molecular mechanisms regulating the response to changes in ambient nitrogen are of particular interest. Previous studies in other cyanobacteria have shown that the transcription factor NtcA governs widespread transcriptional changes to enable survival during N starvation (
Sauer et al, 1999). NtcA responds to the N status of the cell through changes in the level of the metabolite 2-oxoglutarate, the carbon skeleton used for the assimilation of nitrogen. Cellular levels of 2-oxoglutarate rise during N starvation (
Muro-Pastor et al, 2005), resulting in an increased affinity of NtcA for binding DNA (
Muro-Pastor et al, 2001;
Tanigawa et al, 2002;
Vazquez-Bermudez et al, 2002). NtcA alters transcription by binding the DNA sequence GTA-N8-TAC (
Luque et al, 1994;
Jiang et al, 2000;
Herrero et al, 2001) in the promoters of its targets, which include genes for N assimilation and for the utilization of nitrogen sources other than ammonium (
Vega-Palas et al, 1990;
Luque et al, 1994).
The maintenance of cellular homeostasis requires that other biochemical pathways, such as those for carbon metabolism, also respond to N stress. Likened to the central processing unit (CPU) of the cell (
Ninfa and Atkinson, 2000), the signal transducer P
II has been shown in other cyanobacteria to coordinate the cellular carbon and nitrogen balance. Similar to NtcA, P
II responds to levels of 2-oxoglutarate (
Forchhammer, 1999;
Tandeau de Marsac and Lee, 1999). Increases in 2-oxoglutarate levels enhance P
II phosphorylation (
Forchhammer and Hedler, 1997). P
II controls the activity of transporters for nitrite/nitrate and for bicarbonate (reviewed by
Forchhammer, 2004). The
glnB gene, encoding the P
II protein, is itself transcriptionally activated by NtcA (
Lee et al, 1999). Conversely, full activation of NtcA-regulated genes under N stress requires the
glnB gene product, P
II (
Paz-Yepes et al, 2003), suggesting that P
II and NtcA are functionally interdependent.
Many nitrogen metabolism genes in other cyanobacteria, including
ntcA and
glnB, are conserved in
Prochlorococcus. Although
Prochlorococcus ntcA expression is enhanced under N stress similar to other cyanobacteria (
Lindell et al, 2002), several studies have concluded that aspects of
Prochlorococcus N regulation are different from that of other cyanobacteria. Neither the abundance nor the activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) is changed under N stress (
El Alaoui et al, 2001,
2003). The ammonium transporter
amt1 was found not to be transcriptionally activated during N stress and is proposed not to be NtcA-regulated (
Lindell et al, 2002). The P
II protein is not phosphorylated under any tested conditions (
Palinska et al, 2000). These differences have been proposed to be examples of a general streamlining of genetic regulation, which may represent an adaptation to a homogenous, oligotrophic environment (
Garcia-Fernandez et al, 2004).
We asked how
Prochlorococcus MED4 and MIT9313, which occupy different niches with respect to nutrients and light availability, respond to N stress and growth on different N sources. Our approach combined whole genome microarray analyses for both strains, physiological measurements, sequence analysis, and incorporated comparative genomics information from a previous study (
Su et al, 2005). We identified clusters of genes that were coexpressed along an N starvation time series. Functional associations among genes within certain clusters were found using gene function categories based on homology with other cyanobacteria. Because of the important role of NtcA in governing the N stress response in other cyanobacteria, we examined its role in
Prochlorococcus by correlating the genes differentially expressed during N starvation with NtcA binding site predictions. The lack of
Prochlorococcus P
II phosphorylation has led previous studies to conclude that this organism does not coordinate C and N metabolism in response to changes in nitrogen (
Giordano et al, 2005). We thus explored how changes in ambient N were propagated from N stress sensors to changes in genes controlling carbon metabolism. These findings are assimilated into a systems-level model comparing the transcriptional response to N stress in MED4 and MIT9313. Finally, we discuss how interstrain similarities and differences in N regulation give insight into the mechanisms by which niche partitioning occurs among
Prochlorococcus strains in the ocean.