PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of skullbasesurgInstructions for AuthorsSubscribe to Skull BaseAbout Skull BaseEditorial BoardThieme Medical PublishingSkull Base An Interdisciplinary Approach ...
 
Skull base surgery. 1997; 7(2): 57–63.
PMCID: PMC1656595

Reconstruction of the Skull Base and Cranium Adjacent to Sinuses with Porous Polyethylene Implant

Preliminary Report

Abstract

Surgical reconstruction of the skull base and cranium adjacent to open paranasal sinuses with alloplastic materials is problematic secondary to an increased risk of implant infection in these locations. The authors report their initial experience with the use of a porous polyethylene implant for closure of defects in these locations in 20 patients, in 14 of these with the implant placed in direct contact with the mastoid or paranasal simuses. The implant is flexible, which facilitates surgical reconstruction of the cranial base, and porous in nature, which enhances soft tissue and bone ingrowth in decrease the risk of infection. The implant is radiolucent on plain roentgenograms and CT, and produces no imaging artifact on MRI. The implant was utilized for a variety of skull base of cranium adjacent to sinus reconstructive applications with no infectious complications, with a follow-up period ranging from 8 to 50 months. This preliminary experience suggests that the alloplast may be a useful adjunct in skull base reconstruction, and further evaluation of its use in this application is warranted.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (3.7M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Couldwell WT, Chen TC, Weiss MH, Fukushima T, Dougherty W. Cranioplasty with the Medpor porous polyethylene flexblock implant. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1994 Sep;81(3):483–486. [PubMed]
  • Dougherty WR, Wellisz T. The natural history of alloplastic implants in orbital floor reconstruction: an animal model. J Craniofac Surg. 1994 Feb;5(1):26–33. [PubMed]
  • Merritt K, Shafer JW, Brown SA. Implant site infection rates with porous and dense materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979 Jan;13(1):101–108. [PubMed]
  • Spector M, Flemming WR, Kreutner A. Bone growth into porous high-density polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976 Jul;10(4):595–603. [PubMed]
  • Homsy CA. Bio-compatibility in selection of materials for implantation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1970 Sep;4(3):341–356. [PubMed]
  • Romano JJ, Iliff NT, Manson PN. Use of Medpor porous polyethylene implants in 140 patients with facial fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 1993 Jul;4(3):142–147. [PubMed]
  • Wellisz T, Dougherty W, Gross J. Craniofacial applications for the Medpor porous polyethylene flexblock implant. J Craniofac Surg. 1992 Sep;3(2):101–107. [PubMed]
  • Rubin PA, Bilyk JR, Shore JW. Orbital reconstruction using porous polyethylene sheets. Ophthalmology. 1994 Oct;101(10):1697–1708. [PubMed]

Articles from Skull Base Surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers