PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of skullbasesurgInstructions for AuthorsSubscribe to Skull BaseAbout Skull BaseEditorial BoardThieme Medical PublishingSkull Base An Interdisciplinary Approach ...
 
Skull base surgery. 1997; 7(2): 69–75.
PMCID: PMC1656591

Advantages of a New, Atraumatic, Self-Retaining Electrode for Direct Cochlear Nerve Monitoring

Abstract

Direct cochlear nerve monitoring during posterior fossa surgery offers the surgeon real-time information concerning auditory stams. However, routine utilization of this monitoring technique has been hampered by electrode designs that have not allowed the maintenance of a consistent contact between the nerve and electrode. We report on our experience with a new electrode designed to maintain consistent, atraumatic contact with the cochlear nerve and discuss the advantages of this electrode over existing wick and ball type electrodes.

The utilization of this electrode during 18 posterior fossa surgeries, performed at Kaiser Permanenie Hospital, San Diego, including 8 vestibular schwannoma resections, allowed for consistent recording of high amplitude cochlear compound action potentials. Long-term exposure to pulsating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) did not displace the electrode. Minimal cochlear nerve action potential amplitude change was noted with the electrode imrnersed in CSF. The electrode caused no trauma to the nerve, even in cases where it was accidentally dislodged from the nerve. It is hoped that by overcoming the problems previously associated with direct cochlear nerve monitoring, this electrode will allow for increased use of this advantageous monitoring technique. As a by product of the real-time data provided to the surgeon, we anticipate increased rates of hearing preservation during cerebellopontine angle surgery.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Glasscock ME, 3rd, Hays JW, Minor LB, Haynes DS, Carrasco VN. Preservation of hearing in surgery for acoustic neuromas. J Neurosurg. 1993 Jun;78(6):864–870. [PubMed]
  • Cohen NL, Lewis WS, Ransohoff J. Hearing preservation in cerebellopontine angle tumor surgery: the NYU experience 1974-1991. Am J Otol. 1993 Sep;14(5):423–433. [PubMed]
  • Nadol JB, Jr, Chiong CM, Ojemann RG, McKenna MJ, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, Levine RA, Ronner SF, Glynn RJ. Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope. 1992 Oct;102(10):1153–1158. [PubMed]
  • Radtke RA, Erwin CW, Wilkins RH. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology. 1989 Feb;39(2 Pt 1):187–191. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR, Møller MB. Does intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials reduce incidence of hearing loss as a complication of microvascular decompression of cranial nerves? Neurosurgery. 1989 Feb;24(2):257–263. [PubMed]
  • Nedzelski JM, Chiong CM, Cashman MZ, Stanton SG, Rowed DW. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: value of monitoring cochlear nerve action potentials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Dec;111(6):703–709. [PubMed]
  • Lalwani AK, Butt FY, Jackler RK, Pitts LH, Yingling CD. Facial nerve outcome after acoustic neuroma surgery: a study from the era of cranial nerve monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Nov;111(5):561–570. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR. Monitoring auditory function during operations to remove acoustic tumors. Am J Otol. 1996 May;17(3):452–460. [PubMed]
  • Lambert PR, Ruth RA. Simultaneous recording of noninvasive ECoG and ABR for use in intraoperative monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Jun;98(6):575–580. [PubMed]
  • Fischer G, Fischer C, Rémond J. Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 1992 Jun;76(6):910–917. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR, Jannetta PJ. Monitoring auditory functions during cranial nerve microvascular decompression operations by direct recording from the eighth nerve. J Neurosurg. 1983 Sep;59(3):493–499. [PubMed]
  • Silverstein H, Norrel H, Hyman SM. Simultaneous use of CO2 laser with continuous monitoring of eighth cranial nerve action potential during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984 Feb;92(1):80–84. [PubMed]
  • Silverstein H, McDaniel AB, Norrell H. Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery using intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring. Am J Otol. 1985 Nov;Suppl:99–106. [PubMed]
  • Silverstein H, McDaniel A, Norrell H, Haberkamp T. Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery with intraoperative direct eighth cranial nerve monitoring: Part II. A classification of results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Oct;95(3 Pt 1):285–291. [PubMed]
  • Linden RD, Tator CH, Benedict C, Charles D, Mraz V, Bell I. Electrophysiological monitoring during acoustic neuroma and other posterior fossa surgery. Can J Neurol Sci. 1988 Feb;15(1):73–81. [PubMed]
  • Colletti V, Bricolo A, Fiorino FG, Bruni L. Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery. Skull Base Surg. 1994;4(1):1–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • ZappiaJJ, Wiet RJ, O'Connor CA, Martone L. Intraoperative auditory monitoring in acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Jul;115(1):98–106. [PubMed]
  • Wazen JJ. Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function: experimental observations and new applications. Laryngoscope. 1994 Apr;104(4):446–455. [PubMed]
  • Møller AR, Jho HD, Jannetta PJ. Preservation of hearing in operations on acoustic tumors: an alternative to recording brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Neurosurgery. 1994 Apr;34(4):688–693. [PubMed]
  • Kuroki A, Møller AR. Microsurgical anatomy around the foramen of Luschka in relation to intraoperative recording of auditory evoked potentials from the cochlear nuclei. J Neurosurg. 1995 Jun;82(6):933–939. [PubMed]

Articles from Skull Base Surgery are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers