A controlled balance between initiation and downregulation of immune responses (peripheral tolerance) is important for maintaining immune homeostasis, whereas dysfunctional immune regulation may lead to chronic inflammation or autoimmunity [
29]. The CD4
+CD25
+ regulatory T cells have been shown to suppress autoimmunity in several animal models [
2]. To evaluate the role of the CD4
+CD25
+ regulatory T cells in PGIA, three approaches were used. First, the numbers of the CD4
+CD25
+ cells in spleens of susceptible versus resistant or ovalbumin immunized mice were assessed by flow cytometry at day 14 following immunization. No significant change in the numbers of the CD4
+CD25
+cells was observed among experimental groups tested (Fig. ). Moreover, the levels of expression of CTLA-4 in the CD4
+CD25
+ cells was similar between groups. These data suggest that the CD4
+CD25
+ cells may not be involved in the development of PGIA. Although the immune system had been perturbed by immunization, CD4
+ T cells isolated 14 days after immunization of each group did not show significant increase in CD25 expression as compared with that in naïve mice, suggesting that T cells activated by immunization had become resting memory T cells.
To further evaluate the role of the CD4
+CD25
+ cells in PGIA, an adoptive transfer system was employed. Different ratios of activated effector cells (CD25-depleted spleen cells) to CD4
+CD25
+ cells were tested in our cotransfer experiments. No suppression of development of PGIA in SCID mice was observed. Although one could argue that the ratio of effector cells to regulatory cells is not sufficiently great to inhibit disease, we tested a wide range of ratios of effector cells to regulatory cells (5–30 : 1) in our transfer system, and similar results were observed. We did not observe any inhibition at the ratios used in the present study. However, we cannot completely exclude the possibility that 1–4 : 1 ratios may be required for suppression of PGIA. In view of the published literature, this is unlikely because most studies of this type used ratios greater than 20 : 1 [
6]. This finding is further supported by the evidence that adoptive transfer of CD25-depleted splenocytes from arthritic mice does not exacerbate disease in SCID mice. The CD4
+CD25
+ T cells are functionally normal because the CD4
+CD25
+ cells can significantly inhibit the proliferation of the CD4
+CD25
- cells induced by TCR stimulation (Fig. , left panel). No alteration in IL-10 and TGF-β production could be detected in two transfer groups (Fig. ). Taken together, our data suggest that the CD4
+CD25
+ regulatory T cells may not regulate the development of PGIA.
We found that CD28-deficient mice, which have a low frequency of CD4
+CD25
+ T cells, are resistant to PGIA. Although one may argue that, in the absence of CD28, T-cell priming by proteoglycan immunization may be defective. However, CD28-deficient T cells from proteoglycan-immunized animals can proliferate in response to proteoglycan stimulation
in vitro, albeit at a rate lower than that in wild-type T cells, which is consistent with the report by Oliveira-dos-Santos
et al. [
30]. It has been demonstrated that, in the absence of CD28 engagement, T cells require very high TCR occupancy and prolonged stimulation, whereas CD28 costimulation allows T cells to respond to lower degrees of TCR occupancy [
30,
31]. In support of this observation, CD28
-/- mice can still mount immune responses, which vary in magnitude and efficiency depending on the antigen or infectious agent [
30,
32]. Our results and those reported by others [
30] suggest that CD28 may regulate the threshold for T-cell activation. In support of this notion, immunization of CD28-deficient mice with high concentrations of myelin basic protein induces experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis at similar prevalence and severity as in wild-type mice [
30]. Our data suggest that the CD4
+CD25
+ regulatory T cells might be important for controlling spontaneous models of autoimmunity but not for induced models of autoimmunity. In induced models of autoimmunity, the CD28–B7 interaction has been shown to regulate disease susceptibility by rendering autoreactive T cells anergic, or alternatively by upregulating the threshold for autoreactive T-cell activation [
30]. Furthermore, we previously showed that impaired Fas-mediated activation-induced cell death (AICD) of autoreactive T-helper-1 cells may be responsible for the development of PGIA [
20]. Therefore, AICD and/or T-cell anergy, but not the CD4
+CD25
+ regulatory T cells, may be responsible for deletion or inactivation of autoreactive T cells in autoimmune arthritis.