Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of procrsmedFormerly medchtJournal of the Royal Society of MedicineProceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine
Proc R Soc Med. 1972 September; 65(9): 757.
PMCID: PMC1644556

Why epidurals are not more widely used.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (182K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Beazley JM, Leaver EP, Morewood JH, Bircumshaw J. Relief of pain in labour. Lancet. 1967 May 13;1(7498):1033–1035. [PubMed]
  • EISEN SM, ROSEN N, WINESANKER H, HELLMAN K, AXELROD HI, ROTENBERG M, RELLE A, SHEFFMAN E. The routine use of lumbar epidural anaesthesia in obstetrics: a clinical review of 9,532 cases. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1960 Jul;7:280–289. [PubMed]
  • Potter N, Macdonald RD. Obstetric consequences of epidural analgesia in nulliparous patients. Lancet. 1971 May 22;1(7708):1031–1034. [PubMed]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Medicine Press