Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of nihpaAbout Author manuscriptsSubmit a manuscriptHHS Public Access; Author Manuscript; Accepted for publication in peer reviewed journal;
Science. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2006 October 23.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC1618874

Mutations in a Human ROBO Gene Disrupt Hindbrain Axon Pathway Crossing and Morphogenesis


The mechanisms controlling axon guidance are of fundamental importance in understanding brain development. Growing corticospinal and somatosensory axons cross the midline in the medulla to reach their targets and thus form the basis of contralateral motor control and sensory input. The motor and sensory projections appeared uncrossed in patients with horizontal gaze palsy with progressive scoliosis (HGPPS). In patients affected with HGPPS, we identified mutations in the ROBO3 gene, which shares homology with roundabout genes important in axon guidance in developing Drosophila, zebrafish, and mouse. Like its murine homolog Rig1/Robo3, but unlike other Robo proteins, ROBO3 is required for hindbrain axon midline crossing.

Molecular mechanisms guide neuronal cell bodies and their axons toward their final destination, thereby generating brain structures as the advancing growth cones are attracted or repelled by guidance molecules. Ipsilaterally projecting axons must resist crossing the midline of the central nervous system, whereas contralaterally projecting axons must cross once and only once. Axon guidance molecules include the roundabout (robo) family of transmembrane receptors, identified in Drosophila mutants in which axons cross and recross the midline (1). Robo proteins activated by chemorepellent Slit prevent axons from inappropriately crossing the midline (24), specify the lateral position of longitudinal pathways (5), and direct cell migration (6). Robo proteins interact with other signaling molecules to modify cytoskeletal assembly and regulate turning of a growing axon (7).

The syndrome of horizontal gaze palsy with progressive scoliosis [HGPPS; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) 607313] with hindbrain dysplasia is a rare human disorder (8, 9). Studies of human genetic disorders affecting eye movement helped define neuronal codes that underlie axon pathfinding (1012). HGPPS is characterized by absence of conjugate horizontal eye movement and scoliosis that often requires surgical intervention early in life (Fig. 1) (13, 14). Horizontal gaze palsy may be due to defects in the abducens nuclei (CN VI), which contain both ipsilaterally projecting motor neurons and contralaterally projecting interneurons, or supranuclear control regions such as the pontine paramedian reticular formation (PPRF) that projects to the abducens and oculomotor nuclei (15 ).

Fig. 1
HGPPS clinical profile. (Top) Photographs of an affected member with HGPPS demonstrating absent horizontal eye movement on attempted gaze to right (left) or left (right) but normal vertical gaze upward (upper) and downward (lower) from the primary position ...

HGPPS is autosomal recessive, and the HG-PPS disease locus in two consanguineous families (fig. S1) is within a 30-centimorgan region on chromosome 11q23–25 (8). We have now identified eight additional consanguineous HG-PPS families (fig. S1 and Table 1). Their HGPPS phenotypes are consistent with linkage to the 11q23–25 locus, and affected individuals are homozygous in the candidate region.

Table 1
Summary of patient ethnic origin and mutations.

To further characterize the functional neuroanatomical defects, we performed neuroimaging and functional evoked-potential studies in these HGPPS patients. Published neuroimaging results have been normal in some but not all cases of HGPPS (9, 15, 16). We carried out high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies in eight patients from four families (pedigrees 1, 2, 4, AX; Table 1; fig. S1). Abnormal flattening of the basis pontis and hypoplasia in the pontine tegmentum were evident on sagittal sections (Fig. 2, A and D). The structural alterations in caudal pons suggested potential involvement of the abducens nuclei, the medial longitudinal fasciculus, and the PPRF (Fig. 2, B and E, and fig. S2). The medulla appeared abnormally butterfly-like, with anterior flattening and an unusual midline cleft (Fig. 2, C and F). The abducens nerves were visualized bilaterally in the extra-axial space (17, 18), and orbital MRI demonstrated normal extraocular muscle configuration and size, as well as the presence of apparently normal intraorbital motor nerves to the medial and lateral rectus muscles (18). Therefore, the absence of bulging of abducens nuclei into the IVth ventricle observed in HGPPS patients likely represents hypoplasia rather than absence of the abducens nuclei. These findings distinguish HGPPS from other congenital eye movement disorders in which absent or aberrant motor nerves are associated with hypoplastic extraocular muscles but normal brain structure (1012).

Fig. 2
Functional anatomical defects in HGPPS. Brain MR images of a normal subject (A to C) and an HGPPS patient (D to F) at comparable anatomical levels. (A and D) Sagittal view. Normal appearance of cortex and corpus callosum (cc) but dysmorphic hindbrain ...

To investigate physiology of the major axon pathways, we conducted evoked-potential studies (Fig. 2, G and H). The longest projecting axon pathway in the mammalian central nervous system, the corticospinal tract, originates in the motor cortex, crosses the midline in the medulla, fasciculates, and descends to synapse on α–motor neurons throughout the spinal cord. Decussation of the corticospinal tract in the medulla is the anatomical basis for voluntary motor control by the contralateral motor cortex. Sensory axons conveying discriminative touch, vibration, and proprioception ascend in the dorsal columns of the spinal cord, decussate as internal arcuate fibers in the medulla, then project via the medial lemniscus to the thalamus. Decussation of these sensory fibers in the medulla forms the anatomical basis for sensory input to the contralateral sensory cortex (19). Spinothalamic pathways for pain and temperature, however, decussate in the cord and are not assessed by normal somatosensory evoked-potential studies.

In normal subjects, contralateral sensorimotor projection is the rule (Fig. 2G) (20). Somatosensory evoked potential studies in all four HG-PPS patients available for study (from pedigrees 1, 2, 4; Table 1, fig. S1, and Fig. 2H) showed abnormally reversed lateralization of these responses, indicating uncrossed ascending dorsal column-medial lemniscal sensory pathways. Similarly, motor evoked-potential studies in these patients demonstrated abnormally ipsilateral muscle responses, reflecting uncrossed descending corticospinal motor pathways. Uncrossed corticospinal and dorsal column-medial lemniscal pathways and the abnormal midline cleft in the medulla observed in these patients suggest the absence of pyramidal and internal arcuate decussations and a role for the HGPPS gene in hindbrain axon pathway crossing and morphogenesis.

To identify the HGPPS gene, we used closely spaced microsatellite markers on 11q23–25. Linkage analysis of two of the pedigrees revealed recombination events in affected individuals that reduced the HGPPS region to 2.4 Mb flanked by microsatellite markers D11S4464 and D11S990 (fig. S1). Annotated genes in the candidate region showed no pathogenic variants (Fig. 3A). However, one predicted 4-kb mRNA, NT_033899.598, was promising because it shares homology with Rig1 in mouse (21) and robo3 in zebrafish (22), both of which are members of the roundabout gene family (Fig. 3B). The 3′ end of NT_033899.598 overlaps with the 1779–base pair (bp) human RBIG1 gene, the product of which shares homology with the cytoplasmic domain of mouse Rig1. Indeed, we identified mutations to establish that this is the HGPPS gene and named it ROBO3 (Table 1). The gene is expressed in fetal human brain (Fig. 3E).

Fig. 3
(A) Physical map of the HGPPS region with annotated genes (UCSC Human Genome Browser July 2003 freeze) screened for mutations. (B) A GenScan-predicted hypothetical gene NT_033899.598 overlaps with AK056544 and BC008623 (also annotated as RBIG1). (C) Refinement ...

The predicted genomic structure of human ROBO3 was refined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of fetal human brain polyadenylated RNA. There appear to be multiple alternative splice forms of ROBO3, with the longest deduced open reading frame consisting of 28 exons, spanning approximately 16,000 bases, and encoding a 1384–amino acid protein (Fig. 3C; GenBank AY509035). Homologous to other members of the roundabout family, the predicted amino acid sequence of ROBO3 contains a putative extracellular segment with five immunoglobulin (Ig)-like motifs and three fibronectin (Fn)-like motifs, a transmembrane segment, and an intracellular segment with three cytoplasmic signaling motifs: CC0, CC2, and CC3 (Fig. 3D). The CC1 motif, which is absent in human ROBO3 and mouse Rig1 but present in other homologs, has been shown to interact with DCC to silence Netrin-1–attractive effects (23).

By sequencing all 28 exons and flanking introns in 10 HGPPS index patients, we identified 10 different homozygous mutations scattered throughout the ROBO3 gene (Fig. 3D and Table 1). In the remaining members of each family, these mutations were homozygous in all affected but in no unaffected individuals and were heterozygous in obligate carriers. By pyro-sequencing, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, and/or restriction digest, the mutations were not found in ethnically mixed control individuals (n = 93 to 197) (Table 1).

We identified one nonsense, one splice site, and two frameshift mutations, all predicted to prematurely terminate the ROBO3 protein. In addition, we identified six missense mutations: four of which result in non-conservative changes in amino acid residues that are evolutionarily conserved. The affected amino acids (24) include L5, I66, G361, and R703, which are highly conserved across many species, and E319 and S705, which are conserved in human and mouse.

Nine of the 10 mutations are located in the extracellular domains of the ROBO3 protein (Fig. 3D). One nonsense (G456X) mutation and three missense mutations (I66L, E319K, G361E) are near or in the Ig-like domains. Two missense (R703P, S705P), one frameshift (insC), and one splice donor site (IVS13+1 G>A) mutation reside in the Fn-like domains. The missense mutations may alter ligand recognition, protein folding, or targeting. Missense mutation L5P is in the predicted signal sequence important for posttranslational membrane targeting and insertion. Although a proline for leucine substitution does not alter the net charge, it may disrupt the secondary structure of the signal sequence. Such a conservative amino acid change has indeed been shown to abolish the surface expression of other proteins (25).

The single intracellular mutation we identified, insG in exon 23, is predicted to incorporate novel sequences following CC2 and result in premature termination of the ROBO3 protein. If stable, the truncated receptor should retain much of the wild-type protein except for the C terminus where CC3 resides. Therefore, it is possible that CC3 is required for the normal function of ROBO3; alternatively, the frameshift mutation may interfere with protein folding and trafficking.

Different mutations throughout the predicted coding region for ROBO3 leading to the same clinical manifestations provide evidence that ROBO3 is the gene responsible for HGPPS. The requirement that mutations be present on both alleles of ROBO3 for the manifestation of HGPPS to occur suggests that the mutations cause loss of gene function.

In situ hybridization demonstrated abundant expression of the ROBO3 gene in the basis pontis in 15-week-old and 19-week-old fetal human brain (Fig. 3E). This observation is consistent with the hindbrain-specific expression of the homologous gene in mouse (21, 26).

Our imaging and electrophysiological data suggest that ROBO3 differs from the other members of the roundabout family mediating repulsive axon guidance in that ROBO3 is required for crossing. Similarly, a role for the murine homolog, Rig1/Robo3, in promoting midline crossing has recently been demonstrated through genetic analysis (27). Notably, removal of mouse Rig1/Robo3 results in a complete failure of commissural axons to cross the midline throughout the spinal cord and the hindbrain. Thus, ROBO3 is required for midline crossing in both mouse and humans. In mouse, it was shown further that Rig1/Robo3 normally allows midline crossing by blocking axonal responses to repulsive midline Slit proteins; this is the opposite function of other Robo proteins, which mediate repulsive Slit signals and thus prevent mid-line crossing. The similarity of the phenotypes observed in humans and in mice with defects in ROBO3 suggests that this divergent mechanism of action of ROBO3 is conserved across evolution.

The hindbrain abnormalities in HGPPS patients have not been completely characterized. The ascending sensory and descending motor pathways normally destined to cross the midline in the medulla failed to do so in HGPPS patients. Yet, neurologically, these patients are remarkably intact, with no apparent weakness, numbness, or incoordination. These findings suggest apparently normal sensorimotor integration and that the axon pathways responded appropriately to short-range and long-range cues to find their targets, albeit contralateral to the targets in normal subjects.

The major disability in this disorder arises from progressive scoliosis. It remains unknown whether the origin of scoliosis is musculoskeletal or neurogenic, but a neurogenic mechanism is possible in light of our structural data. Descending reticulospinal fiber tracts in the reticular formation, along with the corticospinal tract, mediate control signals from the brain to the spinal cord to drive locomotion and regulate muscle tone (28, 29). Our imaging data indicate maldevelopment of these extrapyramidal projections in the reticular formation of HGPPS patients, which could, in turn, lead to progressive scoliosis.

The syndrome of HGPPS provides an exceptional opportunity for the functional characterization of a brain development gene ROBO3 that defines a critical determinant in axon path finding and brain morphogenesis in human. ROBO3, along with its mouse homolog Rig1 (27), expands the role of the robo family of proteins previously known to prevent aberrant crossing.


Supporting Online Material

Patients and Methods

Figs. S1 and S2

Tables S1 to S3



1. Seeger M, Tear G, Ferres-Marco D, Goodman CS. Neuron. 1993;10:409. [PubMed]
2. Kidd T, et al. Cell. 1998;92:205. [PubMed]
3. Brose K, et al. Cell. 1999;96:795. [PubMed]
4. Fricke C, Lee JS, Geiger-Rudolph S, Bonhoeffer F, Chien CB. Science. 2001;292:507. [PubMed]
5. Rajagopalan S, Vivancos V, Nicolas E, Dickson BJ. Cell. 2000;103:1033. [PubMed]
6. Wu W, et al. Nature. 1999;400:331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Patel BN, Van Vactor DL. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002;14:221. [PubMed]
8. Jen J, et al. Neurology. 2002;59:432. [PubMed]
9. Pieh C, Lengyel D, Neff A, Fretz C, Gottlob I. Neurology. 2002;59:462. [PubMed]
10. Nakano M, et al. Nature Genet. 2001;29:315. [PubMed]
11. Al-Baradie R, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1195. [PubMed]
12. Yamada K, et al. Nature Genet. 2003;35:318. published online 2 November 2003. [PubMed]
13. Dretakis EK, Kondoyannis PN. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1747. [PubMed]
14. Sharpe JA, Silversides JL, Blair RD. Neurology. 1975;25:1035. [PubMed]
15. Yee RD, Duffin RM, Baloh RW, Isenberg SJ. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1449. [PubMed]
16. Steffen H, Rauterberg-Ruland I, Breitbach N, Thomsen M, Kolling GH. Neuropediatrics. 1998;29:220. [PubMed]
17. T. M. Bosley, D. D. M. Lin, J. C. Jen, unpublished observations.
18. J. L. Demer, S. S. Karim, E. C. Engle, unpublished observations.
19. Parent A. Carpenter’s Human Neuroanatomy. ed. 9. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 1996.
20. Lesser RP, et al. Neurology. 1987;37:82. [PubMed]
21. Yuan S, Cox L, Dasika G, Lee E. Dev Biol. 1999;207:62. [PubMed]
22. Lee JS, Ray R, Chien CB. Dev Dyn. 2001;221:216. [PubMed]
23. Stein E, Tessier-Lavigne M. Science. 2001;291:1928. [PubMed]
24. Single-letter abbreviations for the amino acid residues are as follows: A, Ala; C, Cys; D, Asp; E, Glu; F, Phe; G, Gly; H, His; I, Ile; K, Lys; L, Leu; M, Met; N, Asn; P, Pro; Q, Gln; R, Arg; S, Ser; T, Thr; V, Val; W, Trp; and Y, Tyr.
25. Lanza F, et al. Br J Haematol. 2002;118:260. [PubMed]
26. Camurri L, Mambetisaeva E, Sundaresan V. Gene Expr Patterns. 2004;4:99. [PubMed]
27. Sabatier C, et al. Cell. 2004;117:157. [PubMed]
28. Kuypers H. Prog Brain Res. 1982;57:381. [PubMed]
29. Kuypers H. Brain Stem Control of Spinal Mechanisms. American Elsevier; New York: 1982. pp. 29–54.
30. Supported by NIH DC05524 (R.W.B.); DC00162 and EY15311 (J.C.J.); MH60233 (D.H.G.); EY12498, EY13583, EY15298, and the Children’s Hospital Mental Retardation Research Center P30 HD 18655 (E.C.E.); and UCLA Neurology (J.C.J.).