PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of brmedjLink to Publisher's site
 
Br Med J. 1974 September 7; 3(5931): 600–603.
PMCID: PMC1611630

Blood Pressure in a Scottish Town

Abstract

As part of a general health screening survey in the Burgh of Renfrew blood pressure was measured in 3,001 subjects (78·8% of those eligible) aged 45 to 64. In 468 (15·6%) diastolic blood pressure was 100 mm Hg or more. A year later the mean blood pressure for those of the population re-examined showed no change, there being an equal number of subjects with increased and decreased pressures. The prognostic significance of those showing the larger fluctuations remains to be determined through medical-record linkage.

Examination of the general practitioners' medical records of 422 of the 468 subjects with diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more showed that 255 had no previous documented hypertension. Of the remainder 73 were receiving antihypertensive therapy. Examination of the records of subjects whose blood pressure was under 100 mm Hg showed that 55 were receiving antihypertensive treatment and that another 113 had previously been recorded as having a diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more by their general practitioner. Altogether at least 636 (21·2%) of those who were examined had been considered at some time to have evidence of hypertension.

The prevalence of undetected hypertension in the general population has important implications for the resources of the National Health Service if current trials show benefit to the health of the community from treating “mild” as well as “moderate” hypertension.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (919K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Evans JG, Rose G. Hypertension. Br Med Bull. 1971 Jan;27(1):37–42. [PubMed]
  • HAMILTON M, THOMPSON EM, WISNIEWSKI TK. THE ROLE OF BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL IN PREVENTING COMPLICATIONS OF HYPERTENSION. Lancet. 1964 Feb 1;1(7327):235–238. [PubMed]
  • HAMILTON M, PICKERING GW, ROBERTS JA, SOWRY GS. Arterial pressures of relatives of patients with secondary and malignant hypertension. Clin Sci. 1963 Feb;24:91–108. [PubMed]
  • Vessey MP, Doll R. Investigation of relation between use of oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease. A further report. Br Med J. 1969 Jun 14;2(5658):651–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hawthorne VM. An epidemiological method to improve tuberculosis control. Scott Med J. 1969 Jul;14(7):222–227. [PubMed]
  • Kannel WB, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, McKee PA, Feinleib M. Role of blood pressure in the development of congestive heart failure. The Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 1972 Oct 19;287(16):781–787. [PubMed]
  • Langfeld SB. Hypertension: deficient care of the medically served. Ann Intern Med. 1973 Jan;78(1):19–23. [PubMed]
  • Lorimer AR, Macfarlane PW, Provan G, Duffy T, Lawrie TD. Blood pressure and catecholamine responses to 'stress' in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Cardiovasc Res. 1971 Apr;5(2):169–173. [PubMed]
  • Reid DD, Brett GZ, Hamilton PJ, Jarrett RJ, Keen H, Rose G. Cardiorespiratory disease and diabetes among middle-aged male Civil Servants. A study of screening and intervention. Lancet. 1974 Mar 23;1(7856):469–473. [PubMed]
  • ROSE GA, HOLLAND WW, CROWLEY EA. A SPHYGMOMANOMETER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS. Lancet. 1964 Feb 8;1(7328):296–300. [PubMed]
  • ROSE G. STANDARDISATION OF OBSERVERS IN BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT. Lancet. 1965 Mar 27;1(7387):673–674. [PubMed]
  • Truett J, Cornfield J, Kannel W. A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in Framingham. J Chronic Dis. 1967 Jul;20(7):511–524. [PubMed]
  • Weiss NS. Relation of high blood pressure to headache, epistaxis, and selected other symptoms. The United States Health Examination Survey of Adults. N Engl J Med. 1972 Sep 28;287(13):631–633. [PubMed]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group