A multitude of T3SS effectors have been identified on the
S. flexneri virulence plasmid that contribute to invasion of the host epithelial cell. However, only a few genes have been shown to play a role in the postinvasion aspects of
S. flexneri pathogenesis; these genes are
icsA,
mxiE,
ospG, and
ipaH (
6,
17,
19,
39,
48). Recent studies have shown that a large number of putative
S. flexneri T3SS effectors encoded on the virulence plasmid are regulated by MxiE, including many of the Osp proteins (
17,
25,
30). It appears that most of the Osp proteins are secreted by the bacteria (
2); however, the function of the majority of these proteins is still unknown. It is clear from this study that OspF and OspC1 function after invasion with respect to
S. flexneri pathogenesis similar to other MxiE-regulated proteins (
6,
19,
25,
39).
It was shown previously that the T3SS is essential for
Shigella-induced PMN transepithelial migration (
31); however, the effectors involved in this phenomenon were not identified. In this study, we identified two T3SS effectors, OspF and OspC1, that contribute to the PMN transepithelial migration phenotype of
Shigella virulence. Moreover, the deficiency in PMN migration was directly correlated to a deficiency in activation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway in cells infected with Δ
ospC1 and Δ
ospF mutants. When we evaluated the Δ
ospC1 and Δ
ospF mutants with the Serény test, the Δ
ospC1 mutant caused reduced inflammation and swelling, and the infection did not advance as quickly as a wild-type
S. flexneri infection. In fact, one guinea pig cleared the infection with the Δ
ospC1 mutant. These observations show that the
S. flexneri T3SS effectors OspF and OspC1 are required for essential postinvasion aspects of virulence associated with
S. flexneri infection.
Modulation of the MEK/ERK pathway by T3SS effectors is a common characteristic of infection by gram-negative pathogens.
Salmonella spp. secrete SptP that interacts with the Raf protein upstream of MEK and ERK1/2, resulting in down-regulation of the MEK/ERK pathway during the early stages of infection (
27).
Yersinia spp. secrete a protease called YopJ that deubiquinates a number of targets in the cytoplasm and, consequently, leads to down-regulation of the MEK/ERK pathway (
61). Finally, a functional T3SS of
Bordetella bronchiseptica is required for down-regulation of the MEK/ERK pathway (
43). However, these are examples of MEK/ERK down-regulation. The results that we report here suggest that the
S. flexneri effectors OspF and OspC1 are required for up-regulation of the MEK/ERK pathway. While enteropathogenic
E. coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic
E. coli (EHEC) have been shown to activate the MEK/ERK pathway, this has not be attributed to T3SS effectors (
51). It was recently shown that
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium macrophage infection activates the MEK/ERK pathway in a
Salmonella pathogenicity island 2-dependent manner; however, the T3SS effector responsible is unknown (
56). Therefore, OspF and OspC1 represent the first T3SS effectors shown to play a role in MEK/ERK pathway activation.
Carboxy-terminal and amino-terminal protein tagging strategies demonstrated that both OspF and OspC1 are T3SS-dependent effectors that localize to the nucleus and cytoplasm of HeLa cells. Nuclear localization is also not a novel phenotype for secreted bacterial proteins. There are two distinct classes of proteins secreted by gram-negative bacteria that localize and function within the nucleus of the host cell. First, some bacteria secrete proteins that target the nucleus to modulate the cell cycle of the eukaryotic cell. These proteins have been classified as cyclomodulins and include proteins such as cytolethal distending toxin (secreted by many gram-negative species) and Cif of EPEC and EHEC (
37). While we have not observed any evidence that OspF and OspC1 are cyclomodulins (Zurawski and Maurelli, unpublished), we still cannot conclude that these proteins have an effect on cell division.
A second class of gram-negative secreted proteins that target the nucleus of the host cell have a role in suppressing the inflammatory response of the immune system typically caused by lipopolysaccharide. For example, YopM of
Yersinia pestis localizes to the nucleus and reduces the amount of interleukin-15 (IL-15) secreted by host cells (
18).
Xanthomonas campestris pathovar vesicatoria, a pathogen of tomato and pepper plants, secretes XopD that targets the nucleus and hydrolyzes small ubiquitin-related modifier-conjugated proteins to interfere with the plant defense response (
14). Finally, IpaH
9.8 from
S. flexneri (
55) and its homologue SspH1 from
Salmonella (
11) also localize to the nucleus of mammalian cells. IpaH
9.8 and SspH1 both down-regulate the inflammatory response postinvasion (
11). Specifically, IpaH
9.8 binds to the human UAF35 splicing factor to interfere with the transcription of a number of inflammatory response genes that are up-regulated during
Shigella invasion (
39). These genes include the IL-8, RANTES, colony-stimulating factor 1, and IL-1β genes. The down-regulation of the innate immune response postinvasion is also the function of another
Shigella Osp protein, OspG. OspG interacts with ubiquinated proteins to prevent phospho-IκBα degradation and NF-κB activation induced by tumor necrosis factor alpha stimulation (
19). While it is possible that OspF and OspC1 modulate cytokine production given their nuclear localization, we did not see a decrease in IL-8 secretion levels in cells infected with the Δ
ospF or Δ
ospC1 mutants (unpublished results).
The ectopic expression of RFP-OspF allowed greater fluorescence intensity to visualize OspF and its dynamic localization inside HeLa cells, particularly its colocalization with microtubules. Cytoskeletal targets are a common target for modulation by bacterial pathogens and for
Shigella T3SS effectors. IpaH
9.8 requires microtubules for nuclear import, and VirA disrupts microtubules to enhance invasion (
55,
60). OspF may use microtubules to mediate its transport to the nucleus, like IpaH
9.8. On the other hand, the localization of OspF to microtubules could be the result of an interaction with a host target protein(s). Many eukaryotic proteins involved in organelle transport and cell division interact with microtubules, but the fact most relevant to this study is that MEK and ERK1/2 interact with microtubules (
44,
46). Because MEK/ERK pathway components and OspF have a common localization and because
Shigella-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation requires OspF, it is possible that OspF directly interacts with components of the MEK/ERK pathway. We are currently investigating this possibility.
Homologues of
ospF are found in at least two other gram-negative bacterial species (
2,
26). One of these homologues is
spvC, which is found on the pSLT virulence plasmid of
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and resides in an operon that encodes the T3SS effector SpvB (
28). SpvC is required for full
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium virulence in mice (
28), but nothing else is known about its function.
Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 also has an OspF homologue, HopAI1, which has recently been shown to be involved in the down-regulation of the innate immune response in the tomato plant, and overexpression of transfected copies of the
hopAI1 gene generates disease-like symptoms in plants (
26). However, the contribution of HopAI1 is unclear and may be redundant, as a deletion mutation does not result in a measurable difference in the plant's immune response (
26). The immune response of a guinea pig infected with the Δ
ospF mutant of
S. flexneri also displayed no discernible difference in the Serény test compared to the immune response of a guinea pig infected with 2457T. Therefore, OspF and HopAI1 may both have redundant functions in their hosts, and a more sensitive assay to measure the effect of mutation on virulence is required. For example, an altered virulence phenotype for the Δ
ospF mutant was not observed until we used the PMN migration assay. Additional studies are required to characterize similar and different functions of SpvC, HopAI1, and OspF.
OspC1 exhibits about 75% homology with the OspC2, OspC3, and OspC4 proteins of
S. flexneri (
2). This level of similarity also occurs for the OspC genes from other
Shigella spp. However, the contribution of the OspC2, OspC3, and OspC4 proteins to virulence after invasion may be different from the contribution of OspC1 for three reasons. First,
ospC2,
ospC3, and
ospC4 are regulated solely by VirB and not by MxiE (
25). Therefore, there should be more OspC1 than its homologues inside the host cells because of the MxiE activation (
17,
25,
30). Second, OspC2 to OspC4 are 96% homologous to each other, while OspC1 is more divergent evolutionarily (
2). Third, T84 cells infected with a Δ
ospC2 mutant do not show a reduction in PMN transepithelial migration in the way that the Δ
ospC1 strain does (unpublished observations). It is conceivable that OspC proteins have similar but redundant functions and that OspC1 has the greatest effect on the host. Evidence that supports redundancy comes from the fact that
ospC4 found in
S. flexneri serotype 5 M90T has a point mutation that generates a stop codon, perhaps suggesting that
S. flexneri is evolving to remove the other OspC effectors (
2).
In conclusion, in this study we found for the first time that OspF and OspC1 are T3SS effectors secreted by
S. flexneri and that these effectors are required for
Shigella-induced MEK/ERK pathway activation and PMN transepithelial migration. PMN transepithelial migration is an important aspect not only of
Shigella virulence but also of
Salmonella, EPEC, and EHEC virulence (
32,
51). The results of this study also underscore the fact that T3SS effectors can mediate virulence phenotypes shared by enteric pathogens. Therefore, future studies of molecular mechanisms by which OspF and OspC1 induce host cell signaling not only should improve our understanding of
Shigella virulence but also may highlight a paradigm that is shared by other gram-negative, pathogenic bacteria.