The metal oxyanion chromate (CrO
42−) is a widespread environmental contaminant due to its prevalent use in industrial and defense applications such as tanning, electroplating, paint pigment manufacturing, stainless steel welding, and nuclear weapons production (
25,
26). The hexavalent form of chromium, Cr(VI), is highly soluble and toxic, with chronic exposure leading to mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Cr(VI)-induced apoptosis, for example, was demonstrated in p53 human bronchoalveolar cells (
46), and Cr(VI) exposure results in a spectrum of genomic damage in cultured cells including DNA single-strand and double-strand breaks, binding of amino acids and proteins to DNA, DNA interstrand cross-links, and Cr-DNA adducts (
11,
27,
28,
43,
47,
53,
59,
64,
65). Cr toxicity is also associated with the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates during the intracellular partial reduction of Cr(VI) to the unstable intermediate Cr(V) by various in vivo nonspecific reductants (e.g., glutathione, NADH, NADPH, and cysteine) or cellular one-electron reductases (
16,
27,
50). The other most stable, common form of chromium, trivalent Cr(III), is considered less toxic than Cr(VI) because of its tendency to form insoluble hydrated Cr
3+ complexes, which cannot cross cell membranes. However, Cr(III) was shown to cause DNA damage and inhibit topoisomerase DNA relaxation activity in bacteria (
40).
The adverse biological impact of Cr(VI) is attributable to the cellular uptake process. Chromate is transported across eukaryotic and prokaryotic cellular membranes via surface anion transport systems, namely, the sulfate transport system (
16,
36,
38). Microorganisms have evolved diverse resistance mechanisms to cope with chromate toxicity. These detoxification strategies include biosorption, diminished intracellular accumulation through either direct obstruction of the ion uptake system or active chromate efflux, precipitation, and reduction of Cr(VI) to the less toxic, less mobile Cr(III) (reviewed in reference
16). Plasmid-determined resistance to chromate, for example, has been shown to occur in bacteria, including species of
Pseudomonas (
9,
17,
49) and
Alcaligenes (
36). A hydrophobic protein with 12 proposed transmembrane-spanning domains, designated ChrA, was found to be responsible for the plasmid-specified resistance phenotype in these organisms (
16,
18,
37) and appears to function as a secondary transport system for the extrusion of chromium ions (
3).
The in situ microbial catalysis of Cr(VI) reduction to sparingly soluble, less bioavailable Cr(III) has been proposed as a potential remediation strategy for Cr(VI)-contaminated subsurface environments.
Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, a facultatively anaerobic γ-proteobacterium, possesses diverse metal-reducing capabilities, including the ability to transform Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (
34,
56). As a result, its potential utility in the bioremediation of dissolved metal ions prompted the complete sequencing of the
S. oneidensis MR-1 genome (
23). Predicting the utility of
S. oneidensis MR-1 for remediating metal-contaminated sites requires an understanding of the gene/protein components and cellular pathways enabling heavy metal resistance and biotransformation. In addition, the efficacy of in situ chromate bioremediation will depend on the capacity of remediating bacteria to cope with and perhaps minimize the cellular effects of heavy metal toxicity. Knowledge of the molecular and physiological response of MR-1 to Cr(VI) toxicity, in particular prolonged or chronic exposures, remains limited, however.
The primary goal of this work was to gain insight into global changes in the mRNA and protein expression patterns that occur in S. oneidensis MR-1 cells at a time point (in this case, 24 h) marked by the complete removal of chromate from the culture medium. We refer to this prolonged exposure to Cr(VI) and its derivatives as a “chronic” challenge to distinguish it from acute exposures before the onset of Cr(VI) reduction. Both transcriptome profiling and whole-cell proteomic analysis revealed that the predominant molecular response to chronic chromate exposure in complex medium was the induction of prophage-related genes and their encoded products as well as a number of functionally undefined hypothetical genes clustered within the lambda- and mu-like integrated phage regions of the MR-1 genome. In addition, a number of genes and/or their corresponding proteins with annotated functions in DNA metabolism (topB, hsdM-2, uvrD, and recO), electron transport (NADH dehydrogenase gene cluster, SO3056, and SO4360), cell division (era, ftsAZ, and ftsL), biosynthesis of murein (peptidoglycan) sacculus (rodA, mreD, murE, murF, murG, and mraY), and protein fate and general environmental stress responses (htpG, SO3391, hslVU, ibpA, groES, and groEL) were induced, while genes encoding regulatory, chemotaxis, motility, and transport/binding proteins were generally repressed. The accompanying physiological response to chronic Cr(VI) exposure included marked changes in cellular morphology as revealed by scanning confocal microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM). This study combines cell imaging, transcriptional measurement, and proteomic characterization to provide insight into the response and susceptibility of S. oneidensis MR-1 to 24-h chromate exposure.