|Home | About | Journals | Submit | Contact Us | Français|
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Syntaxins 1 through 4 are SNAP receptor (SNARE) proteins that mediate vesicular trafficking to the plasma membrane. In retina, syntaxins 1 and 3 are expressed at conventional and ribbon synapses, respectively, suggesting that synaptic trafficking functions differ among syntaxin isoforms. To better understand syntaxins in synaptic signaling and trafficking, we further examined the cell- and synapse-specific expression of syntaxins 1 through 4 in the mouse retina by immunolabeling and confocal microscopy.
Each isoform was expressed in the retina and showed a unique distribution in the synaptic layers of the retina, with little or no colocalization of isoforms. Syntaxin 1 was present in amacrine cell bodies and processes and conventional presynaptic terminals in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Syntaxin 2 was present in amacrine cells and their processes in the IPL, but showed little colocalization with syntaxin 1 or other presynaptic markers. Syntaxin 3 was found in glutamatergic photoreceptor and bipolar cell ribbon synapses, but was absent from putative conventional glutamatergic amacrine cell synapses. Syntaxin 4 was localized to horizontal cell processes in the ribbon synaptic complexes of photoreceptor terminals and in puncta in the IPL that contacted dopaminergic and CD15-positive amacrine cells. Syntaxins 2 and 4 often were apposed to synaptic active zones labeled for bassoon.
These results indicate that each syntaxin isoform has unique, non-redundant functions in synaptic signaling and trafficking. Syntaxins 1 and 3 mediate presynaptic transmitter release from conventional and ribbon synapses, respectively. Syntaxins 2 and 4 are not presynaptic and likely mediate post-synaptic trafficking.
Syntaxins comprise a large family of membrane-associated proteins that play a critical role in vesicular trafficking and exocytosis. Syntaxins associate with members of the SNAP-25 protein family on the target membrane and with members of the VAMP/synaptobrevin family located in the vesicular membrane to form the SNAP receptor (SNARE) core complex that serves to dock the vesicle to the target membrane and acts as a scaffold for the recruitment of other proteins needed for fusion of the vesicular and target membranes [for review see refs [1,2]]. A large number of syntaxin isoforms have been identified and are associated with specific target membranes and organelles within the cell, such as endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, trans-Golgi network, endosomes, and plasma membrane, and are thought to contribute to the specificity of vesicular trafficking between different organelles and subcellular compartments [[3-5]; reviewed in [1,6]]. Syntaxins 1 through 4 specifically associate with the plasma membrane and regulate vesicular trafficking for exocytosis or for insertion of proteins into the plasma membrane [[4,7-10]; reviewed in [1,6]].
A critical role for syntaxins and the other SNARE proteins in nervous tissue is to mediate the fusion of synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic plasma membrane for neurotransmitter exocytosis. Syntaxin 1 is the best-studied of the syntaxins, and is the principal isoform associated with synapses in the brain [[3,4], reviewed in [1,6]]. Syntaxin 1 has been localized ultrastructurally to asymmetric type 1 presynaptic terminals in the brain, but is typically absent from symmetric type 2 synapses , suggesting that more than one syntaxin isoform may be involved in synaptic trafficking. Syntaxins 2 through 4 also are expressed in brain  but their functions remain unclear. These isoforms are best known for roles in non-synaptic exocytosis and trafficking to the plasma membrane elsewhere in the body [[7-10]; reviewed in [1,6]].
In the retina, both syntaxin 1 and syntaxin 3 are present in presynaptic terminals and are differentially distributed among functionally distinct synapses . Syntaxin 1 is expressed at conventional amacrine cell synapses with transient release characteristics. Syntaxin 3 is found in the glutamatergic ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells, which support very rapid and sustained release, likely via compound fusion of synaptic vesicles [13-15]. Thus, synaptic transmission in the retina is not strictly dependent on syntaxin 1, but also can be mediated by other plasma membrane-associated syntaxin isoforms. Furthermore, the synapse-specific distribution of syntaxins 1 and 3 suggests that the syntaxin isoform present in a terminal may help to shape a synapse's functional attributes. Whether syntaxins 2 and 4 mediate synaptic trafficking in the retina or elsewhere in the central nervous system is unknown.
Many presynaptic proteins associated with neurotransmitter release, and their isoforms, are differentially distributed among synapses. The synapse-specific distribution of many of these proteins is especially well characterized in the retina [e.g., [12,16-23]]. This differential distribution of presynaptic proteins is thought to fine tune the characteristics of neurotransmitter release from the presynaptic terminal. Thus, understanding patterns of presynaptic protein expression at different types of synapses can provide insight into functional differences among different types of synapses. These synapse-specific expression patterns also can serve as a functionally relevant anatomical tool for the identification of specific synapses and circuits.
To better understand the potential functional roles of the syntaxins associated with trafficking to the plasma membrane in the synaptic circuits of the retina, we have examined the cell and synapse-specific distribution of syntaxins 1–4 in the mouse retina using single- and double-labeling immunohistochemistry at the conventional light and confocal microscopic levels. Each syntaxin isoform shows a unique distribution in the synaptic layers of the retina, with little overlap of isoforms, suggesting that each syntaxin isoform has unique trafficking functions.
Immunoblotting of retinal and brain membrane homogenates showed that each anti-syntaxin antibody recognized a single protein band of the appropriate size (Fig. (Fig.1),1), indicating that each of the four syntaxin isoforms associated with vesicular trafficking to the plasma membrane was present in the mouse retina and brain. Although syntaxins 1 through 4 were all expressed in retina and in brain, relative expression levels differed between brain and retina in an isoform-specific manner. Retina and brain showed roughly similar expression of syntaxin 1, retina expressed more syntaxin 3 than brain, and brain expressed more syntaxin 2 and syntaxin 4 than retina.
Each syntaxin isoform showed a unique distribution in the retina and was localized primarily to the synaptic layers (Fig. (Fig.1).1). Syntaxin 1 labeling was widely distributed in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) and in amacrine cell bodies, but was present only in very few terminals in the outer plexiform layer (OPL). A prominent characteristic of syntaxin 1 labeling was its presence in discrete puncta embedded in a background of diffuse labeling. Syntaxin 2 labeling also was widely distributed in the IPL and in the cell bodies of amacrine cells, but was more punctate in appearance than labeling for syntaxin 1. There was little labeling for syntaxin 2 in the OPL, similar to syntaxin 1. Labeling for syntaxin 3 was present in the cell bodies, inner segments and synaptic terminals of photoreceptors, in bipolar cell bodies and axons, and numerous terminals in the IPL. Syntaxin 4 labeling was the most restricted of all the isoforms and was present in numerous puncta in the OPL, a distinct stratum of puncta at the distal edge of the IPL and in other puncta scattered deeper in the IPL. Syntaxin 4 labeled puncta also were observed in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and some blood vessels (see below).
The isoform-specific differences in expression level and localization suggest that each syntaxin isoform has unique trafficking functions in the retina. To better understand the distribution and potential functional roles of the various syntaxin isoforms in the retina, we performed double-labeling for each syntaxin isoform in combination with a variety of cell and synapse-specific markers with known distribution in the retina.
Syntaxin 1 and 3 isoforms have been examined in retina previously . Syntaxin 1 has been localized to the conventional synapses of amacrine cells, while syntaxin 3 has been localized to glutamatergic ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells .
Double labeling for syntaxin 1 and synapsin I, a marker specific for conventional synapses made by amacrine cells , confirmed the localization of syntaxin 1 to amacrine cells and their processes and synapses in the IPL. Labeling for syntaxin 1 and synapsin I colocalized extensively (Fig. (Fig.2),2), confirming the presence of syntaxin 1 at conventional amacrine cell synapses. A substantial portion of syntaxin 1 labeling was diffusely distributed in the IPL and did not correspond precisely to synapsin I labeled puncta, suggesting that syntaxin 1 labeling was not restricted only to the synaptic active zone.
Previous results indicate that syntaxin 3 is associated with the glutamatergic ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells . However, it is not known whether syntaxin 3 is present in the synapses of a recently identified "glutamatergic" amacrine cell that expresses vesicular glutamate transporter 3 (VGLUT3) [24-26], which would imply a functional association of syntaxin 3 with glutamatergic transmission rather than with ribbon synapses exclusively. To test this, we examined colocalization of syntaxin 3 with several markers specific for conventional synapses, glutamatergic ribbon synapses, and VGLUT3.
Double labeling for syntaxin 3 and syntaxin 1 directly demonstrated that syntaxin 1 and 3 were restricted to different terminals, although there often was close apposition of syntaxin 3- and syntaxin 1-containing terminals (Fig. (Fig.3).3). Double labeling for syntaxin 3 and the conventional synapse marker synapsin I produced similar results (not shown) indicating that syntaxin 3 was absent from most conventional synapses. Double labeling for syntaxin 3 and vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (VGLUT1), which is expressed at all photoreceptor and bipolar cell ribbon synapses [27,28], confirmed directly that syntaxin 3 was expressed at the glutamatergic ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells (Fig. (Fig.4).4). All photoreceptor and bipolar cell terminals showed double labeling for VGLUT1 and syntaxin 3, indicating that syntaxin 3 was, in fact, expressed in all ribbon synaptic terminals. Syntaxin 3 labeling, however, was distributed more broadly than VGLUT1 labeling, suggesting that syntaxin 3 was not strictly confined to the active zone.
The recent discovery of a small population of putative glutamatergic amacrine cells expressing VGLUT3 [24-26], raised the issue of whether syntaxin 3 also might be expressed at conventional glutamatergic synapses in the retina in addition to ribbon synapses. Double labeling showed that syntaxin 3 was not expressed at conventional synapses of VGLUT3 amacrine cells, although close apposition of some VGLUT3-positive and syntaxin 3-positive terminals was observed (Fig. (Fig.5).5). This result confirmed that syntaxin 3 was associated specifically with the release machinery of ribbon synapses and not with glutamatergic transmission in the retina in general.
Syntaxin 2 labeling was found in amacrine cell bodies and numerous puncta in the IPL and was grossly similar to the distribution of syntaxin 1 labeling (see Fig. Fig.1),1), suggesting that syntaxin 2 was expressed by amacrine cells. Amacrine cells are typically inhibitory, with about half of the amacrine cell population being GABAergic and about half being glycinergic [15,29]. To assess whether syntaxin 2 might be associated specifically with either GABAergic or glycinergic neurotransmission, retinal sections were double labeled for syntaxin 2 and either the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) or glycine transporter 1 (GlyT1) to identify GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells, respectively (Fig. (Fig.6).6). Syntaxin 2 labeling colocalized extensively with labeling for GAD-65 and GlyT1 in amacrine cell bodies, indicating that both GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cell types expressed syntaxin 2 (Fig. 6A–C and 6G–I). Within the IPL, where the GABAergic and glycinergic synapses of the amacrine cells reside, there was scant colocalization of labeling for syntaxin 2 and GAD-65, which labels the presynaptic terminals of most GABAergic amacrine cells (Fig. 6D–F). Similarly, syntaxin 2 labeling showed only limited colocalization with GlyT1 labeling (Fig. 6J–L), although colocalization of syntaxin 2 and GlyT1 labeling was seen more frequently than colocalization of syntaxin 2 and GAD-65.
The localization of syntaxin 2 labeling to amacrine cells, suggested that syntaxin 2 potentially might have some redundancy with syntaxin 1. This was directly examined by double labeling for syntaxin 2 and syntaxin 1. Some colocalization of syntaxin 1 and syntaxin 2 labeling was observed in the IPL (Fig. 7A–C). Inspection by confocal microscopy at higher magnification, however, showed that syntaxin 2 labeling was largely independent of syntaxin 1 labeling (Fig. 7D–F), although discrete syntaxin 2-positive puncta sometimes did colocalize with diffuse labeling for syntaxin 1. The differences in subcellular distribution between syntaxin 1 and syntaxin 2 suggest that these two isoforms are non-redundant, even though they are co-expressed by amacrine cells.
The subcellular localization of syntaxin 2 suggested that it might be located in synaptic terminals lacking syntaxin 1, or that it might not be localized to a presynaptic compartment. To clarify this issue, double labeling for syntaxin 2 and known presynaptic markers was performed (Fig. (Fig.8).8). There was little colocalization of labeling for syntaxin 2 and the conventional synapse marker synapsin I, although close apposition of labeled puncta was common (Fig. 8A–C). Likewise, double labeling for syntaxin 2 and the presynaptic active zone protein, bassoon, showed little colocalization but often showed apposition (Fig. 8D–F). Double labeling for syntaxin 2 and VGLUT1 confirmed that syntaxin 2 was not present in the ribbon synapses of bipolar cells, although puncta labeled for syntaxin 2 were often closely apposed to bipolar cell terminals (Fig. 8G–I). Double labeling for syntaxin 2 and synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) using a pan-specific antibody that recognizes the SV2 isoforms at both ribbon and conventional synapses , also showed little evidence of colocalization with syntaxin 2 (not shown). Together, these results indicate that syntaxin 2 was only rarely expressed in presynaptic conventional terminals and was not expressed presynaptically at bipolar cell ribbon synapses.
Double labeling for syntaxin 2 and known ganglion cell and Müller glial cell markers showed no colocalization (microtubule-associated protein-1, MAP-1; glutamine synthetase, respectively. Not shown). These results, together with the results above, confirmed that syntaxin 2 labeling was restricted to amacrine cells and their processes in the IPL.
Labeling for syntaxin 4 was the most restricted of all the isoforms examined (Figs. (Figs.11 and and9).9). Syntaxin 4 labeling was present in numerous small puncta in the OPL (Fig. (Fig.9A).9A). These puncta were distributed individually in the distal OPL or in clusters more proximally (Fig. (Fig.9B),9B), similar to the distribution of rod and cone terminals. In the IPL, a thin stratum of syntaxin 4-positive puncta was present at the INL/IPL border, with a few other syntaxin 4-positive puncta scattered more proximally in the inner portion of the IPL (Fig. (Fig.9A).9A). Syntaxin 4 also was present in strings of small puncta in the INL that resembled the processes of interplexiform cell processes coursing vertically toward the OPL, however, the precise origins of these processes is unknown (Fig. (Fig.9C).9C). Syntaxin 4 labeling also was found in the walls of blood vessels, and was especially prominent in relatively large diameter vessels along the inner surface of the retina (Fig. (Fig.9A9A).
To determine the relationship of the syntaxin 4 positive puncta to photoreceptor terminals in the OPL, we examined double labeling for syntaxin 4 and markers associated with photoreceptor terminals (Fig. (Fig.10).10). Labeling for syntaxin 4 and post-synaptic density protein-95 KDa (PSD-95), which outlines the plasma membrane of rod and cone terminals , showed that small syntaxin 4 positive puncta in the distal OPL were associated with rod terminals and the larger syntaxin 4-positive clusters in the proximal OPL were associated with cone terminals (Fig. 10A–C). Examination at high magnification revealed that syntaxin 4 positive puncta were enveloped by rod and cone terminals and often appeared as a doublet or a crescent (Fig. 10D–F, respectively). Rod terminals enveloped one to four puncta; cone terminals enveloped numerous puncta. Patches of syntaxin-4 positive processes were often visible immediately below cone terminals and often connected to the puncta enveloped within the terminal (Fig. 10G–I), suggesting that syntaxin 4 labeling was associated with processes from second-order neurons. Labeling for syntaxin 4 and VGLUT1 were located adjacent to one another but did not colocalize (Fig. 10J–L), indicating that syntaxin 4 was not present within some highly localized pool of synaptic vesicles in the photoreceptor terminals. Syntaxin 4 labeling also did not colocalize with the synaptic ribbon markers kinesin 2  or bassoon  (Fig. 10M–O; kinesin 2 shown), although the syntaxin 4-positive puncta were closely apposed to ribbons and often followed the contours of the ribbons. Together, these results indicate that syntaxin 4 is not present presynaptically in the rod or cone terminals, but is localized to processes of second-order neurons postsynaptic to the rod and cone terminals, including processes located within the ribbon synaptic complexes.
A series of double labeling experiments combining labeling for syntaxin 4 with known markers for specific subsets of second-order neurons or their synapses was performed to identify precisely which second-order neurons expressed syntaxin 4 (Fig. (Fig.11).11). Double labeling for syntaxin 4 and calbindin, a marker for mouse horizontal cells , showed extensive colocalization of syntaxin 4 and calbindin labeling in the horizontal cell processes, directly demonstrating that syntaxin 4 was present in horizontal cell processes at the ribbon complexes of rods and cones (Fig. 11A–C). Double labeling for syntaxin 4 and Goα, a marker for ON-cone and rod bipolar cells and their dendrites , showed no colocalization, indicating that syntaxin 4 was absent from the dendrites of rod and ON-cone bipolar cells (Fig. 11D–F). The dendrites of the ON-cone and rod bipolar cells often were seen terminating just below and between syntaxin 4 positive puncta in horizontal cell processes. This arrangement precisely matches the ultrastructural arrangement of ON bipolar cell dendrites and horizontal cell processes in the ribbon synaptic complexes. Double labeling for syntaxin 4 and peanut agglutinin (PNA), which labels the flat contacts on the base of cone terminals, showed that syntaxin 4 was not present in the dendrites of OFF-cone bipolar cells where they form flat contacts onto the cone terminals (Fig. 11G–I). Together, these results indicate that syntaxin 4 is specifically localized to the post-synaptic processes of horizontal cells occupying the lateral position at the ribbon synaptic complex, but not in the dendrites of ON bipolar cells in the ribbon complexes or OFF-cone bipolar cell dendrites at flat contacts.
To better understand the potential functions of syntaxin 4 in the inner retina, double labeling for syntaxin 1, synapsin 1, SV2, and VGLUT1 was performed to characterize the relationship between the syntaxin 4-positive puncta and conventional and ribbon synaptic terminals in the IPL (Fig. (Fig.12).12). Labeling for syntaxin 4 only rarely showed any colocalization with any of these presynaptic markers in either the INL or IPL, however syntaxin 4-positive puncta were often apposed to conventional and ribbon synaptic terminals. Consistent with these findings, syntaxin 4 labeling was often apposed to active zones labeled for bassoon, but did not colocalize bassoon itself (Fig. (Fig.13).13). These results suggest syntaxin 4 in the IPL is located primarily in postsynaptic terminals.
The plexus of syntaxin 4 puncta at the INL/IPL border is located precisely where dopaminergic amacrine cells and a population of GABAergic amacrine cells positive for CD15 have their plexes in the IPL [34,35], suggesting that the syntaxin 4-positive puncta in the IPL might arise from or interact with these cell types. Double labeling for syntaxin 4 and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a marker for the dopaminergic amacrine cells, showed that the syntaxin 4 puncta co-stratified with processes from dopaminergic amacrine cells (Fig. 14A–C). Close examination of the arrangement of TH and syntaxin 4 labeling showed that the syntaxin 4 labeling was not present in processes arising from the dopaminergic cells, although there was contact between the processes of the dopaminergic amacrine cells and the syntaxin 4 puncta (Fig. 14D–F). In addition, syntaxin 4-positive puncta in the INL were often apposed to the cell body and short processes that emerged from the dopaminergic cells into the INL (Fig. 14A–C). A similar arrangement between the processes and cell bodies of the CD15-positive cells and the syntaxin 4-positive puncta in the distal IPL was observed (Fig. 14G–L). These results suggest that the dopaminergic and CD15-positive amacrine cells ramifying in the distal IPL may provide input to the syntaxin 4-positive puncta.
Double labeling for syntaxin 4 and the ganglion cell marker MAP-1 showed that syntaxin 4 labeling in the IPL was not associated with post-synaptic terminals of ganglion cell dendrites (Fig. 15A–C). Similarly, double labeling for syntaxin 4 and glutamine synthetase, a marker for Müller glial cells, showed no colocalization (Fig. 15D–F). Together with the results above, these findings suggest that the syntaxin 4-positive puncta in the INL and IPL do not arise from ganglion, bipolar or Müller cells, but are likely to arise from unidentified amacrine and/or interplexiform cells.
All four syntaxin isoforms associated with trafficking to the plasma membrane are expressed in the synaptic layers of the retina. Each isoform displays a unique distribution in the synaptic layers, with little colocalization of isoforms at the subcellular level, although they may be co-expressed within a cell. These findings strongly suggest that each syntaxin isoform mediates different trafficking events in the retina, and under normal conditions at least, serve different functions with little redundancy between isoforms. Syntaxins 1 and 3 are both presynaptic, but are found at different synapses. Syntaxins 2 and 4 generally do not appear to be presynaptic and are likely to have primary functions other than regulating neurotransmitter release.
The distribution of trafficking proteins and their isoforms reflects functional differences. The distribution of several presynaptic proteins show distributions in the retina that differ according to the functional characteristics of synaptic release at conventional and ribbon synapses. Synapsins and rabphilin are present only in conventional retinal synapses [19,36]. Complexins III and IV and SV2B are found exclusively at ribbon synapses [20,23]. The expression of synaptotagmin isoforms, key vesicular Ca++ sensors that regulate vesicle fusion , also can differ among conventional and ribbon synapses [16,38]. Content of presynaptic active zone cytomatrix proteins, such as piccolo and bassoon, also may not be uniform among synapses [[17,18], but also see ] and, at ribbon synapses at least, can be spatially segregated within an individual synapse [18,40]. Proteins associated with endocytosis, including dynamin, clathrin and amphiphysin, also are differentially distributed among ribbon and conventional synapses in a manner consistent with differences in the mode of endocytosis [41-46]. There is considerable diversity in post-synaptic trafficking as well, as post synaptic terminals exhibit a complex synapse-specific array of transmitter receptors and subunits, signaling, scaffolding and anchoring proteins [47-49]. Thus, the differential distribution of syntaxin isoforms observed here is likely to reflect functional differences in pre-synaptic, postsynaptic, and possibly, extrasynaptic compartments within the synaptic layers of the retina.
There was no substantial colocalization of any syntaxin isoforms in either synaptic layer, although co-expression of syntaxin 1 and 2 were co-expressed in amacrine cells. Co-expression of multiple syntaxin isoforms that mediate trafficking to the plasma membrane is common, but the isoforms typically are spatially segregated to different subcellular compartments and mediate different trafficking functions [e.g., [7,8,50-52]; reviewed in [1,6]]. This is consistent with the current findings for syntaxin 1 and 2 which were co-expressed in amacrine cells, but differentially distributed at the subcellular level. Thus, each syntaxin isoform is likely to mediate a unique set of cell- and/or synapse-specific vesicular trafficking events in the synaptic layers of the retina, with little functional redundancy.
The large variety of syntaxin isoforms and their localization to specific subcellular compartments is thought to contribute to the specificity of vesicular trafficking to appropriate target membranes. Syntaxins can interact promiscuously with other SNAREs in vitro, but in vivo each syntaxin isoform has preferred binding partners [4,5,10,53]. Thus, the specific binding partners available to complex with syntaxin also may contribute to the regulation of membrane fusion and targeting. Presynaptic proteins that interact with syntaxins, including VAMPs and complexins, show synapse-specific distribution in the synaptic layers of the retina [20-22,54]. Munc-13, another protein that interacts with syntaxins, also may show differential distribution among retinal synapses, although this is controversial [40,55]. The distribution of these proteins do not precisely parallel the distribution of the various syntaxins, suggesting many possible combinations may exist that could shape the complex, synapse-specific characteristics of synaptic vesicle trafficking and exocytosis. For example, the distribution of complexin isoforms, small presynaptic proteins that bind to syntaxin and stabilize the fusion core complex , does not match syntaxin isoform distribution [[20,54], this report]. Complexins 1 and 2 are differentially distributed among amacrine cells, which co-express syntaxin 1 and 2. Complexins 1 and/or 2 are also found in horizontal cells, which express syntaxin 4. Complexins 3 and 4 are unique to ribbon synapses but are expressed in a cell-specific manner among the ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells, which all contain the same syntaxin, syntaxin 3.
The functional consequences of cellular and subcellular segregation of the various syntaxin isoforms in the plexiform layers of the retina are not yet known, as direct functional data are currently lacking. Potential trafficking functions that may be associated specifically with each syntaxin isoform in the retina are discussed below.
The current study directly confirms that syntaxins 1 and 3 are the principal presynaptic syntaxins in the retina [; this report] and extend previous findings by directly demonstrating that syntaxins 1 and 3 do not colocalize and that syntaxin 3 is present in all retinal ribbon synapses.
Our double-labeling studies confirm that the synaptic localization of syntaxin 1 is restricted to conventional synaptic terminals which show transient release characteristics and typically release an inhibitory amino acid transmitter, GABA or glycine, in the retina [15,29]. These results are consistent with previous reports in retina [12,23,36,57-59]. In contrast, syntaxin 3 was found exclusively at ribbon synapses of photoreceptors and bipolar cells, which are complex synapses organized around a lamellar synaptic ribbon and show very high, sustained rates of glutamate release, likely mediated by compound vesicle fusion [13,14]. This is consistent with previous results . Syntaxin 3 may confer some specific advantage for rapid compound fusion of multiple vesicles for rapid transmitter release from photoreceptor terminals. Syntaxin 3 is known to localize to the membrane of secretory vesicles in the acinar cells of the pancreas and gastric parietal cells [8,60]. The current study also directly establishes that syntaxin 3 is not present at the putative glutamatergic conventional synapses of the VGLUT3 amacrine cells [24-26], indicating that syntaxin 3 is not specifically associated with glutamatergic transmission. Thus, syntaxins 1 and 3 segregate specifically according to the architectural and functional characteristics of the synapses.
Syntaxins 1 and 3 also were found extrasynaptically. Syntaxin 1 was diffusely distributed along amacrine cell processes, consistent with previous reports indicating that syntaxin 1 is not strictly localized to the synaptic active zone [e.g., [11,61]]. Extrasynaptic functions of syntaxin 1 in the retina are uncertain, but several possibilities exist. One possibility is a role in exocytosis of neuropeptides via dense cored vesicles, which can be released from any part of a neuron [62-65]. Such a role would be consistent with the well-known expression of a variety of neuropeptides by amacrine cells [66,67]. Another potential function for extrasynaptic syntaxin 1 is trafficking and regulation of transporters and channels. Syntaxin 1 associates specifically with a variety of neurotransmitter transporters [e.g., [68-74]] and ion channels [e.g., [75-77]]. Extrasynaptic syntaxins also have important roles in process growth and remodeling during neural development [78-81], and might have similar roles in process remodeling or plasticity associated with normal retinal function or pathology. Extrasynaptic pools of syntaxin 3 were present in photoreceptor inner segments and the cell bodies and axons of photoreceptors and bipolar cells. The function of syntaxin 3 in the photoreceptor inner segments is unclear, but an attractive candidate function is trafficking of outer segment proteins, such as opsins, which are trafficked via vesicles to the apical portion of the inner segment for assembly of outer segment discs [82-84]. Somatic pools of syntaxin 3 may be associated with standard "housekeeping" trafficking needs.
Syntaxin 2 is expressed in amacrine cells and their processes in the IPL, similar to syntaxin 1. Syntaxin 2, however, does not colocalize with syntaxin 1, suggesting that syntaxins 1 and 2 are functionally complementary to one another despite being expressed by the same cells. Consistent with these findings, syntaxin 2 shows very little colocalization with conventional or ribbon presynaptic markers. These results indicate that syntaxin 2 must have principal functions other than presynaptic transmitter release despite its localization to the IPL.
One particularly attractive candidate function for syntaxin 2 in the IPL is trafficking of post-synaptic components, such as neurotransmitter receptors. Such a function would be consistent with the frequent apposition of syntaxin 2 to presynaptic terminals labeled for syntaxin 1 or syntaxin 3. However, this function has never been tested directly either in retina or in brain and the current study does not establish unequivocally whether syntaxin 2 is specifically localized to post-synaptic terminals. It is clear, however, that syntaxin 2 is not localized exclusively to postsynaptic terminals, as it is also found in the cell body and does not always align precisely with presynaptic markers. Thus, syntaxin 2 might serve extrasynaptic trafficking functions instead of, or in addition to, postsynaptic functions. A potential extrasynaptic function for syntaxin 2 is trafficking of proteins with neural functions that are not strictly localized to the synapse, such as transporters, ion channels or extrasynaptic transmitter receptors. Again, these functions have not been tested directly, but would be consistent with the colocalization of labeling for syntaxin 2 and GlyT1 in the IPL. Further studies to localize syntaxin 2 at the ultrastructural level would aid in resolving precisely which cellular compartments syntaxin 2 is present in within the processes of the amacrine cells.
Elsewhere in the body syntaxin 2 is known for mediating fusion of large secretory vesicles for exocytosis of proteins from non-neural cells [85-87]. By extension, syntaxin 2 might have a similar function in the IPL and mediate release of neuropeptides from amacrine cell processes via dense-cored vesicles as suggested above for syntaxin 1. Other important functions mediated by syntaxin 2 elsewhere in the body include cytokinesis  and the regulation of epithelial morphogenesis during development as a secreted, rather than an intracellular, protein [reviewed in [89,90]]. However, it seems unlikely that syntaxin 2 would have comparable functions in the adult retina.
Syntaxin 4 had the most restricted distribution of all the isoforms studied, and is expressed specifically in horizontal cell processes at synaptic ribbon complexes in the terminals of rods and cones, and in small puncta in the IPL and INL. Syntaxin 4 also is found in non-neural cells associated with the retinal vasculature. The functions of syntaxin 4 in the retina have never been studied, but the distribution of syntaxin 4 did not overlap with the other syntaxin isoforms, strongly suggesting non-redundant functions. The lack of colocalization between syntaxin 4 and presynaptic markers for conventional and ribbon synapses indicate that the primary function of syntaxin 4 is not likely to be pre-synaptic transmitter release. On the other hand, syntaxin 4 was often found in puncta apposed to presynaptic markers, including synaptic ribbons and the active-zone protein bassoon, suggesting potential key functions in post-synaptic trafficking.
Syntaxin 4 in the OPL was restricted to the post-synaptic processes of horizontal cells, and was not found in bipolar cell dendrites or photoreceptor terminals. The presence of syntaxin 4 at the tips of horizontal cell processes in the ribbon synaptic complexes of rods and cones is intriguing. Photoreceptors provide glutamatergic input to horizontal cell processes flanking the synaptic ribbon via AMPA receptors [91,92]. The localization of syntaxin 4 to this site would be consistent with a role in local post-synaptic trafficking of neurotransmitter receptors and/or other signaling proteins to the horizontal cell plasma membrane, but this potentially important function has not been explored. Syntaxin 4 also might mediate trafficking of neurotransmitter transporters to the cell surface. Syntaxin 4 is critical to translocation of other transporter proteins, particularly glucose transporters, to the cell surface in response to receptor-mediated signals in non-neural cells [e.g., [93-95]] and also has been shown to mediate neurotransmitter transporter trafficking to the cell surface in cultured glioma cells .
Horizontal cell processes in the ribbon synaptic complex also provide inhibitory feedback to photoreceptors [; reviewed in ]. The manner in which this feedback is provided is controversial. Horizontal cells have been suggested to provide this feedback by several different mechanisms: via the neurotransmitter GABA ; via electrical currents created by connexin hemi-channels [100,101], and by regulation of the pH in the synaptic cleft [98,102,103]. The presence of syntaxin 4 in the tips of horizontal cell processes could be interpreted as evidence for the existence of vesicular GABA release from adult horizontal cells. Support for this idea is provided by the expression of the vesicular GABA transporter and, sometimes, GAD and GABA in adult mammalian horizontal cells [104-107]. In addition, complexin 1 and/or 2, which interact specifically with syntaxins, are present in horizontal cells . However, several key components needed for vesicular synaptic release of GABA, such as presynaptic active zones, SNAP-25, VAMP, and synaptotagmin family members have not been specifically identified in mature horizontal cell processes in the ribbon synaptic complex to date.
The current study showed only weak, diffuse labeling for syntaxin 1 in the OPL, consistent with previous reports [12,23,36,57-59]. In contrast, Hirano et al.  reported syntaxin 1 labeling in horizontal cell processes in the rabbit retina. This labeling may correspond to the weak syntaxin 1 labeling observed in the current and previous studies. The reasons for the relative differences in syntaxin 1 labeling intensity are not clear but may include species differences or subtle differences in labeling and visualization techniques. The high intensity of syntaxin 4 labeling relative to syntaxin 1 labeling in the OPL, however, suggests that syntaxin 4 is the predominant syntaxin for plasma membrane trafficking in horizontal cells. Resolution of the existence of GABAergic feedback from mammalian horizontal cells to photoreceptors and the potential roles of syntaxins 1 and 4 will require further investigation.
In the IPL, syntaxin 4 appears to be associated with processes from a small subset of amacrine and/or interplexiform cells, as double labeling showed no expression of syntaxin 4 in the processes of bipolar, ganglion or Müller cells. Most syntaxin 4 labeling in the IPL was concentrated in puncta at the INL/IPL border. These puncta do not arise from the dopaminergic or the CD15-positive GABAergic amacrine cells that stratify at this level of the IPL, but do appear to make contact with those cell types. The functional role of syntaxin 4 in the IPL is uncertain, but syntaxin 4 does not colocalize with presynaptic markers and is unlikely to have a major function in transmitter release. In contrast, syntaxin 4 was observed apposed to presynaptic active zones labeled for bassoon suggesting that syntaxin 4 in the IPL likely functions in postsynaptic trafficking or extrasynaptic transport functions.
The synaptic layers of the retina show complex and diverse expression of syntaxin isoforms associated with trafficking to the plasma membrane. Each isoform shows a unique distribution in the synaptic layers, with little colocalization of isoforms at the cellular or subcellular level. These findings strongly suggest that each syntaxin isoform mediates different trafficking events in the synaptic layers of the retina and, under normal conditions at least, have little functional redundancy. Syntaxins 1 and 3 are both presynaptic, but are found at different synapses, Syntaxins 2 and 4 generally are not presynaptic and are likely to have principal functions in mediating post-synaptic and extrasynaptic trafficking rather than mediating neurotransmitter release.
All studies were performed using the retina of adult mice (C57BL/6). Mice were kept on a 12 hour light:12 hour dark cycle. Food and water were available at all times. Light or dark-adapted mice were euthanized by rapid cervical dislocation, and the eyes were rapidly enucleated. The corneas were removed or punctured and the eyes were immersed immediately in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 15 minutes to overnight at 4°C. Best results were obtained using eyecups fixed for 15–30 minutes. Eyecups were rinsed in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS, embedded in OCT mounting medium, and fast frozen in liquid nitrogen. Frozen sections (10–15 μm thickness) were collected onto gelatin-coated or electrostatically-charged slides and stored at -20°C until use. All animal procedures conformed to US Public Health Service and Institute for Laboratory Animal Research guidelines and were approved by the local Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Several monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies with well-characterized specificity for specific syntaxin isoforms were used in these studies. Anti-syntaxin 1 was a mouse monoclonal antibody (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis MO; diluted 1:500–1:1000) . Anti-syntaxin 2 was a rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against the cytoplasmic domain of syntaxin 2 (Synaptic Systems, Göttingen Germany; diluted 1:100–1:200) . Anti-syntaxin 3 was a rabbit polyclonal antibody directed against the cytoplasmic domain of syntaxin 3 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO; diluted 1:750–1:1000) [5,109]. Anti-syntaxin 4 was a rabbit polyclonal antiserum directed against amino acids 2–23 of mouse syntaxin 4 (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA; diluted 1:100–1:200) [95,110]. Specificity of the syntaxin antibodies and antisera was confirmed by western blotting (see Fig. Fig.1).1). Pre-adsorption of anti-syntaxin-4 with its peptide antigen eliminated labeling. An extensive panel of well-characterized cell- and synapse-specific marker antibodies and lectins was used for double labeling studies to further characterize syntaxin isoform distribution. Details of primary antisera and antibodies are provided in Table Table11.
Secondary antisera were raised in goat or sheep and were specific for IgGs from rabbit mouse, guinea pig or goat, or mouse IgM, according to the primary antibodies used. Secondary antisera were conjugated to Cy3 or Cy5 (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) or AlexaFluor488 or AlexaFluor633 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and were used at a dilution of 1:200–1:500. All antibodies and lectins were diluted using "blocker" containing: 10% normal goat serum + 5% bovine serum albumin + 1% fish gelatin + 0.1–0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.4).
Immunoblotting of mouse retinal and brain membrane homogenates was performed as described previously for analysis of retinal synaptic proteins [22,38]. Membrane homogenates of skeletal muscle and liver also were prepared as an additional positive control for syntaxin 4. Briefly, tissues were isolated and membrane homogenates were made by sonication and centrifugation. Proteins were then resolved by SDS-PAGE using 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to PVDF membranes, which were blocked, incubated in primary antibody, rinsed and incubated in secondary antibody. Labeled proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence.
Immunolabeling and imaging of cryosections was performed as described previously [22,23,28]. Briefly, cryosections were thawed, treated with 1% NaBH4 to reduce autofluorescence, and treated with blocker to reduce non-specific labeling. Blocker was removed and primary antibody or, for double labeling experiments, a combination of primary antibodies from different hosts was applied for 2 days at 4°C. Cryosections were rinsed, then incubated in fluorescently labeled secondary antibody for 45 minutes to 1 hour at room temperature. After incubation with secondary antibody, sections were rinsed extensively, then coverslipped using Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or Prolong Gold (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to retard bleaching of the fluorescent labels. Specificity of labeling methods was confirmed by omitting primary antibody or substituting normal rabbit serum for primary antibody. To assure that there was no bleedthrough of signals between fluorescence channels, specimens were labeled using only one primary antibody in combination with multiple secondary antibodies. These experiments revealed no bleedthrough between fluorescence channels. On the confocal microscope, bleedthrough between fluorescence channels was eliminated by adjusting laser power and detector sensitivity or by scanning channels sequentially.
Conventional greyscale fluorescence images were digitized from the microscope using frame averaging to reduce noise. Confocal microscopy was performed using a Leica TCS-SP2 confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Exton, PA). In all cases, image scale was calibrated, and brightness and contrast were adjusted if necessary to highlight specific labeling. To assess double labeling, matching images in the AlexaFluor488, Cy3, or Cy5/AlexaFluor633 channels were captured independently, pseudo-colored green, red, or blue and superimposed using Photoshop software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
DMS performed immunolabeling and imaging and drafted the manuscript. RM performed studies and analysis of syntaxin 3. KMS helped design, conduct and interpret western blotting studies. BdP performed studies and analysis of syntaxin 2. All authors have approved the manuscript.
We thank Dr. Kathleen Buckley for the generous gift of pan-SV2 antibody. We also thank Margaret Gondo for assistance in sectioning retinal tissue. This work was supported by a GEAR Award from University of Houston to DMS; an NIH CORE grant to the College of Optometry (P30 EY07751); and an NIH grant to KMS (DA017380). RM was supported by an NIH Summer research grant (EY07088 to University of Houston College of Optometry). BdP was supported by a Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship from University of Houston.