1. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2002;126:651–80. [PubMed] 2. Graham-Kevan N, Archer J. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence. J Interpers Violence. 2003;18:1247–70. [PubMed]
3. Johnson MP, Ferraro KJ. Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: making distinctions. J Marriage Fam. 2000;62:948–63.
4. Lauritsen JL, Schaum RJ. The social ecology of violence against women. Criminology. 2004;42:323–58.
5. White JW, Smith PH, Koss MP, Figueredo AJ. Intimate partner aggression—what have we learned? Comment on Archer. Psychol Bull. 2000;126:690–6. [PubMed]
6. Dobash RE, Dobash RP. Violence against wives: a case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press; 1979.
7. Gelles RJ, Straus MA. Determinants of violence in the family: toward a theoretical integration. In: Burr W, Hill R, Nye I, Reiss I, editors. Contemporary theories about the family. Vol. 1. New York: Free Press; 1979.
8. Gelles RJ, Straus MA. Partner violence: the causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Simon – Schuster; 1989.
9. Straus MA. Wife beating: how common and why? Victimology. 1978;2:443–458.
10. Johnson MP. Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1995;57:283–94.
11. DeMaris A, Benson ML, Fox GL, Hill T, Van Wyk J. Distal and proximal factors in domestic violence: a test of an integrated model. J Marriage Fam. 2003;65:652–67.
12. Fox GL, Benson ML, DeMaris A, Van Wyk J. Economic distress and intimate violence: testing family stress and resource theories. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64:793–807.
13. Macmillan R, Gartner R. When she brings home the bacon: labor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. J Marriage Fam. 1999;61:947–58.
14. Straus MA, Gelles RJ. Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed in two national surveys. J Marriage Fam. 1986;48:465–79.
15. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Washington: National Institutes of Justice; 2000. NCJ183781.
16. Miles-Doan R. Violence between spouses and intimates: does neighborhood context matter? Social Forces. 1998;77:623–46.
17. DeKeseredy WS, Alvi S, Schwartz MD, Perry B. Violence against and harassment of women in Canadian public housing: an exploratory study. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol. 1999;36:499–516.
18. Van Wyk JA, Benson ML, Fox GL, DeMaris A. Detangling individual-, partner-, and community-level correlates of partner violence. Crime Delinq. 2003;49:412–38.
19. Sameroff AJ, Seifer R, Zax M, Barocas R. Early indicators of developmental risk: Rochester Longitudinal Study. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13:383–93. [PubMed]
20. Brennan PA, Raine A. Biosocial bases of antisocial behavior: psychological, neurological, and cognitive factors. Clin Psych Rev. 1994;17:589–604.
21. Voydanoff P, Donnelly BW. Economic distress, family coping, and quality of family life. In: Voydanoff P, Majka L, editors. Families and economic distress. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1988.
22. Straus MA, Gelles RJ, Steinmetz SK. Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. New York: Doubleday/Anchor; 1980.
23. Conger RD, Elder GH, Jr, Lorenz FO, Conger KJ, Simons RL, Whitbeck LB. Linking economic hardship to marital quality and instability. J Marriage Fam. 1990;52:643–56.
24. Fox GL, Chancey D. Sources of economic distress: Individual and family outcomes. J Fam Issues. 1999;19:725–49.
25. Babcock JC, Waltz J, Jacobson NS, Gottman JM. Power and violence: the relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:40–50. [PubMed]
26. Sugarman DB, Hotaling GT. Violent men in intimate relationships: an analysis of risk markers. J Appl Social Psychology. 1989;19:1034–48.
27. Byrne JM, Sampson RJ. The social ecology of crime. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
28. Messner SF, Tardiff K. Income inequality and levels of homicide: an analysis of urban neighborhoods. Criminology. 1986;24:297–313.
29. Sampson RJ. Neighborhood family structure and the risk of personal victimization. In: Byrne JM, Sampson R, editors. The social ecology of crime. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986.
30. Sampson RJ, Groves WB. Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory. Am J Sociol. 1989;94:774–802.
31. Shaw CR, McKay HD. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1942.
32. Bursik RJ. Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: problems and prospects. Criminology. 1988;26:519–51.
33. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Earls F. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am Sociol Rev. 1999;64:633–60.
34. Sampson RJ, Wilson WJ. Toward a theory of race, crime, and urban inequality. In: Hagan J, Peterson RD, editors. Crime and inequality. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1995.
35. Benson ML, Fox GL, DeMaris A, Van Wyk J. Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. J Quantitative Criminology. 2003;19:207–35.
36. Benson ML, Wooldredge J, Thistlethwaite AB, Fox GL. The correlation between race and domestic violence is confounded with community context. Soc Probl. 2004;51:326–42.
37. Garrett A, Libby H. Theory and research on the outcomes and consequences of child abuse and neglect. Proceedings of the Child Abuse Intervention Planning Meeting; 1997 Oct 3; Washington, DC. Washington: National Institute of Justice; 1997.
38. Sweet JA, Bumpass LL. Madison (WI): Center for Demography and Ecology; University of Wisconsin–Madison. [cited 2006 Mar 29];The National Survey of Families and Households B Waves 1 and 2: data description and documentation. 1996 Available from: URL: http://ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htm. 39. Census Bureau (US); U.S. Census 1990. [cited 2006 Apr 4];Washington: Department of Commerce, Economics, and Statistics Administration (US), U.S. Census Bureau. 1998 Available from: URL: http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen1990.html.
40. Sweet JA, Bumpass LL, Call V. Center for Demography and Ecology. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin; 1988. The design and content of the National Survey of Families and Households. NSFH Working Paper #1.
41. Wikstrom P-OH, Loeber R. Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well-adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, individual risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology. 2000;38:1109–42.
42. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997;277:918–24. [PubMed] 43. Ehrensaft MK, Moffitt TE, Caspi A. Clinically abusive relationships in an unselected birth cohort: men’s and women’s participation and developmental antecedents. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003;113:258–71. [PubMed] 44. Capaldi DM, Owen LD. Physical aggression in a community sample of at-risk young couples: gender comparisons for high frequency, injury, and fear. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15:425–40. [PubMed]
45. Rennison CM, Welchans S. Intimate partner violence. Special report. Washington: Department of Justice (US), Bureau of Justice Statistics; 2000. Report No. NCJ178247.
46. Brush LD. Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. Gend Soc. 1990;4:56–67.