Eukaryotic cells maintain equilibrium between the load of client proteins their ER must process and the capacity of the organelle to carry out this function. A threat to this equilibrium is referred to as ER stress and is counteracted by two distinct adaptations collectively referred to as the unfolded protein response (UPR) (
7,
8). The first of these adaptations attenuates protein biosynthesis, to immediately relieve the load on the organelle. The second increases the synthesis of components of the machinery by which the ER processes client proteins (upregulating chaperones, glycosylation enzymes, oxidases, and other ER resident proteins). Several mediators of UPR signaling have been identified recently. Their activity is consistent with a model whereby the cell tries to defend a certain chaperone reserve. When this functional reserve is challenged, it appears, the cell senses ER stress and responds by activating the UPR (
9,
10). Accordingly, the level of chaperones and other ER components is a measure of the level of ER stress the cell is under.
High levels of sustained ER stress can also lead to programmed cell death, and some of the mediators of this response have recently been identified. One, caspase-12, an ER-associated cell death effector, is specifically activated by proteolytic processing during ER stress. Another, the transcription factor CHOP, is strongly upregulated during ER stress. Mutations in either of the corresponding genes inhibit cell death caused by ER stress without otherwise affecting the UPR (
11,
12). IRE1, one of the direct mediators of the UPR, activates Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and can also promote cell death (
13,
14). It appears, therefore, that cell death during ER stress results from the activity of dedicated components.
It had been noted earlier that the islet cells in the Akita mice express higher levels of the ER chaperone BiP, a marker of ER stress (
4). Now, Oyadomari and colleagues show that
CHOP is also activated in the Akita mouse islets (
3). Neither of these findings is particularly surprising, given the impact of the
Ins2C96Y mutation on insulin 2 folding. Insulin is a major ER client protein in β cells, and one might imagine that expression of high levels of a mutant insulin protein could severely tax the folding capacity of the organelle and elicit ER stress. The crucial question in this system is whether ER stress contributes to β cell death and the development of diabetes mellitus. A positive answer could not be taken for granted, as ER stress is a physiological phenomenon in many cells (including β cells) and can be well compensated for by physiological adaptations (
15). Furthermore, there are other plausible reasons for islet cell death and diabetes mellitus in the Akita mouse. For example, the mutant insulin may impair the processing or secretion of wild-type insulin, by specific dominant negative mechanisms.
To examine the role of ER stress in islet cell death and diabetes mellitus, Oyadomari and colleagues (
3) bred the Akita mutation onto the
CHOP knockout background. The
CHOP gene is induced by ER stress through a signaling pathway that involves activation of the pancreas ER kinase (PERK) and phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2α.
CHOP encodes a transcription factor that promotes programmed cell death (
11,
16), and the authors reasoned that if ER stress–mediated cell death plays a role in the phenotype of the Akita mouse, a background mutation in
CHOP could ameliorate its features. This is exactly what they observed:
CHOP–/–;Ins2C96Y/WT mice had preserved islet cell mass, less β cell apoptosis, delayed onset of hyperglycemia, higher pancreatic insulin content, and greater body weight than
CHOP–/+;Ins2C96Y/WT or
CHOP+/+;Ins2C96Y/WT mice. Because
CHOP activation is a nonspecific feature of ER stress, these results suggest that the mutant insulin 2 protein accumulating in the ER of the β cell exerts at least some of its effects as a nonspecific proteotoxin.
While
CHOP is strongly activated by ER stress, other stress signals such as oxidative stress and amino acid deprivation that bypass the ER altogether can also induce
CHOP gene expression (
17,
18); therefore it is formally possible that the contribution of
CHOP to death of the Akita β cells also reflects the activity of other stress pathways operating in these cells. However, the role of
CHOP in promoting cell death in response to these other forms of stress remains unproven. It is also important to note that the
CHOP mutation provided no measurable benefit to the severely affected homozygous
Ins2C96Y/C96Y mice. This last observation suggests the existence of
CHOP-independent ER stress–mediated cell death pathways or other unrelated mechanisms causing dysfunction of the homozygous mutant β cells.
The aforementioned caveats aside, it is interesting to relate the observations described here to the possible role of nonspecific ER proteotoxicity in the pathogenesis of other genetic diseases and perhaps in other forms of diabetes mellitus. There are several human diseases caused by gain-of-function mutations affecting the folding of abundantly expressed ER client proteins (Table ). Death or dysfunction of cells expressing the mutant protein goes a long way toward explaining the phenotype in these ER stress–associated genetic disorders, whereas interference of the mutant allele with the function of the wild-type one may be less important. In some cases, such as the
PLP gene associated with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher leukodystrophy, or the
PMP22 and
P0 genes associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, the null state has a very different and sometimes weaker phenotype than does the dominant mutation affecting protein folding (
19,
20). These findings are consistent with the idea that cell dysfunction or death by mechanisms related to those described here by Oyadomari and colleagues (
3) might play a role in the pathogenesis of important human diseases.
| Table 1Diseases potentially associated with ER proteotoxicity |
Loss of β cell function plays an important role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its causes remain unknown. Insulin biosynthesis is likely to result in a significant physiological load on the β cell. This load is certainly increased by insulin resistance, a universal feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The findings of Oyadomari and colleagues suggest that critical levels of ER stress can contribute to β cell death and the development of diabetes mellitus. The β cell may be especially sensitive to ER stress, as mice and humans lacking PERK, a critical component of the ER stress response, develop spontaneous diabetes mellitus at a very young age (reviewed in ref.
21). Together, these findings suggest that ER stress–mediated cell death or dysfunction may play a role in the development of common forms of diabetes mellitus. It may be possible to test this hypothesis by measuring the effect of
CHOP or
Caspase-12 mutations on the progressive diabetic phenotype of
Db/Db (or
Ob/Ob) C57BL/6KsJ mice. The latter provide good mouse models for the β cell attrition in human type 2 diabetes mellitus (
22).
Evidence reviewed here for the possible role of ER stress–mediated programmed cell death and dysfunction in the pathogenesis of important human diseases suggests that the mediators of this response may be targets for therapeutic intervention. Enthusiasm for targeting the CHOP and Caspase-12 pathways should be tempered by the realization that mutations in either gene do not fully protect against cell death caused by ER stress. The phenotype of mutations that block CHOP’s upstream activators, PERK and phosphorylated eIF2α, reveals some of the complexities involved:
PERK–/– cells and cells with mutations that prevent phosphorylation of PERK’s substrate, eIF2α, are unable to activate CHOP expression in response to ER stress (
18,
23), yet both are dramatically hypersensitive to ER stress (
15,
23,
24). PERK phosphorylation of eIF2α contributes substantially to both translational and transcriptional control in the UPR (
15,
23). Therefore, the phenotype of the
PERK and
eIF2α mutations noted above demonstrates the important role of protective mechanisms against ER stress. These observations also suggest that augmenting these protective responses may be as important as blocking the known mediators of ER stress–induced cell death. In this broader context, the paper by Oyadomari and colleagues (
3) should serve as a stimulus for further research into basic mechanisms of the ER stress response.
See the article"