Search tips
Search criteria 


Logo of pubhealthrepPublic Health Reports
Public Health Rep. 2004 Nov-Dec; 119(6): 577–584.
PMCID: PMC1497669

Evaluating the performance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention core Health-Related Quality of Life scale with adolescents.


OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's core Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scale using data from 5,520 public high school students. METHODS: The 1997 South Carolina Youth Risk Behavior Survey was the source of data. Chi-square analysis was applied to assess scale construct validity. Adjusted multiple logistic regression with selected tobacco and substance use variables was used to assess known-groups validity of the scale's Healthy Days index (items regarding poor physical and mental health days during the past 30 days). RESULTS: Construct validity was supported for the core HRQOL scale by the associations between self-perceived health and physical health, mental health, and activity limitation days. A greater number of poor physical health days, poor mental health days, or activity limitation days was associated with poorer self-perceived health (p<0.0001); however, correlation coefficients for the associations between self-perceived health and physical health days (r=0.24; p<0.001), self-perceived health and mental health days (r=0.26; p<0.0001), and self-perceived health and activity limitation days (r=0.23; p<0.0001), although significant, were low in magnitude. Logistic regression analyses conducted with the Healthy Days index revealed significant (p<0.05) HRQOL differences between users and non- users of tobacco and other substance use variables. As hypothesized, as the usage of each substance increased, reported poor HRQOL days increased, supporting the known- groups validity of the scale. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that the HRQOL scale items are valid and potentially useful for adolescent surveillance. The results, however, are mixed regarding the inclusion of self-perceived health as a measure of HRQOL for adolescents, given the low correlation coefficients for the associations between self-perceived health and the other HRQOL scale items. These results suggest that adolescents may be rating two separate dimensions of health when rating their self-perceived health and HRQOL. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in different adolescent populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):877–884. [PubMed]
  • Andresen EM, Catlin TK, Wyrwich KW, Jackson-Thompson J. Retest reliability of surveillance questions on health related quality of life. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):339–343. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hennessy CH, Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Scherr PA, Brackbill R. Measuring health-related quality of life for public health surveillance. Public Health Rep. 1994 Sep-Oct;109(5):665–672. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Brener ND, Collins JL, Kann L, Warren CW, Williams BI. Reliability of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Mar 15;141(6):575–580. [PubMed]
  • Irwin Charles E, Jr, Burg Scott J, Uhler Cart Courtney. America's adolescents: where have we been, where are we going? J Adolesc Health. 2002 Dec;31(6 Suppl):91–121. [PubMed]
  • Mossey JM, Shapiro E. Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly. Am J Public Health. 1982 Aug;72(8):800–808. [PubMed]
  • Idler EL, Kasl SV, Lemke JH. Self-evaluated health and mortality among the elderly in New Haven, Connecticut, and Iowa and Washington counties, Iowa, 1982-1986. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):91–103. [PubMed]
  • Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997 Mar;38(1):21–37. [PubMed]
  • Segovia J, Bartlett RF, Edwards AC. The association between self-assessed health status and individual health practices. Can J Public Health. 1989 Jan-Feb;80(1):32–37. [PubMed]
  • Vingilis E, Wade TJ, Adlaf E. What factors predict student self-rated physical health? J Adolesc. 1998 Feb;21(1):83–97. [PubMed]
  • Vingilis Evelyn R, Wade Terrance J, Seeley Jane S. Predictors of adolescent self-rated health. Analysis of the National Population Health Survey. Can J Public Health. 2002 May-Jun;93(3):193–197. [PubMed]
  • Wade TJ, Pevalin DJ, Vingilis E. Revisiting student self-rated physical health. J Adolesc. 2000 Dec;23(6):785–791. [PubMed]
  • Bradley C. Importance of differentiating health status from quality of life. Lancet. 2001 Jan 6;357(9249):7–8. [PubMed]
  • Smith KW, Avis NE, Assmann SF. Distinguishing between quality of life and health status in quality of life research: a meta-analysis. Qual Life Res. 1999 Aug;8(5):447–459. [PubMed]
  • Raat H, Landgraf JM, Bonsel GJ, Gemke RJBJ, Essink-Bot ML. Reliability and validity of the child health questionnaire-child form (CHQ-CF87) in a Dutch adolescent population. Qual Life Res. 2002 Sep;11(6):575–581. [PubMed]
  • Scales PC. Reducing risks and building developmental assets: essential actions for promoting adolescent health. J Sch Health. 1999 Mar;69(3):113–119. [PubMed]
  • Valois RF, Zullig KJ, Huebner ES, Drane JW. Relationship between life satisfaction and violent behaviors among adolescents. Am J Health Behav. 2001 Jul-Aug;25(4):353–366. [PubMed]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications