PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of pubhealthrepLink to Publisher's site
 
Public Health Rep. 2001 Sep-Oct; 116(5): 449–463.
PMCID: PMC1497365

Measuring socioeconomic status/position in studies of racial/ethnic disparities: maternal and infant health.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Theoretical and empiric considerations raise concerns about how socioeconomic status/position (abbreviated here as SES) is often measured in health research. The authors aimed to guide the use of two common socioeconomic indicators, education and income, in studies of racial/ethnic disparities in low birthweight, delayed prenatal care, unintended pregnancy, and breastfeeding intention. METHODS: Data from a statewide postpartum survey in California (N = 10,055) were linked to birth certificates. Overall and by race/ethnicity, the authors examined: (a) correlations among several measures of education and income; (b) associations between each SES measure and health indicator; and (c) racial/ethnic disparities in the health indicators "adjusting" for different SES measures. RESULTS: Education-income correlations were moderate and varied by race/ethnicity. Racial/ethnic associations with the health indicators varied by SES measure, how SES was specified, and by health indicator. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions about the role of race/ethnicity could vary with how SES is measured. Education is not an acceptable proxy for income in studies of ethnically diverse populations of childbearing women. SES measures generally should be outcome- and population-specific, and chosen on explicit conceptual grounds; researchers should test multiple theoretically appropriate measures and consider how conclusions might vary with how SES is measured. Researchers should recognize the difficulty of measuring SES and interpret findings accordingly.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • McKenzie KJ, Crowcroft NS. Race, ethnicity, culture, and science. BMJ. 1994 Jul 30;309(6950):286–287. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Krieger N, Fee E. Measuring social inequalities in health in the United States: a historical review, 1900-1950. Int J Health Serv. 1996;26(3):391–418. [PubMed]
  • Lee PR, Moss N, Krieger N. Measuring social inequalities in health. Report on the Conference of the National Institutes of Health. Public Health Rep. 1995 May-Jun;110(3):302–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rivara F, Finberg L. Use of the terms race and ethnicity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Feb;155(2):119–119. [PubMed]
  • Abramson JH, Gofin R, Habib J, Pridan H, Gofin J. Indicators of social class. A comparative appraisal of measures for use in epidemiological studies. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(20):1739–1746. [PubMed]
  • Ford G, Ecob R, Hunt K, Macintyre S, West P. Patterns of class inequality in health through the lifespan: class gradients at 15, 35 and 55 years in the west of Scotland. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Oct;39(8):1037–1050. [PubMed]
  • Power C, Hertzman C, Matthews S, Manor O. Social differences in health: life-cycle effects between ages 23 and 33 in the 1958 British birth cohort. Am J Public Health. 1997 Sep;87(9):1499–1503. [PubMed]
  • Power C, Matthews S. Origins of health inequalities in a national population sample. Lancet. 1997 Nov 29;350(9091):1584–1589. [PubMed]
  • Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Pamuk ER. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and maternal health behavior. Am J Prev Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(2):108–115. [PubMed]
  • Parker JD, Schoendorf KC, Kiely JL. Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and low birth weight, small for gestational age, and premature delivery in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 1994 Jul;4(4):271–278. [PubMed]
  • Hauser RM. Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Dev. 1994 Dec;65(6):1541–1545. [PubMed]
  • Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:341–378. [PubMed]
  • Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988;10:87–121. [PubMed]
  • Kaufman JS, Cooper RS, McGee DL. Socioeconomic status and health in blacks and whites: the problem of residual confounding and the resiliency of race. Epidemiology. 1997 Nov;8(6):621–628. [PubMed]
  • Bass SM, Groër MW. Relationship of breastfeeding and formula-feeding practices with infant health outcomes in an urban poor population. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 1997 Sep;11(2):1–9. [PubMed]
  • Raisler J, Alexander C, O'Campo P. Breast-feeding and infant illness: a dose-response relationship? Am J Public Health. 1999 Jan;89(1):25–30. [PubMed]
  • Braveman P, Egerter S, Marchi K. The prevalence of low income among childbearing women in California: implications for the private and public sectors. Am J Public Health. 1999 Jun;89(6):868–874. [PubMed]
  • Braveman P, Pearl M, Egerter S, Marchi K, Williams R. Validity of insurance information on California birth certificates. Am J Public Health. 1998 May;88(5):813–816. [PubMed]
  • Braveman P, Marchi K, Egerter S, Pearl M, Neuhaus J. Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: the importance of prepregnancy factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):874–880. [PubMed]
  • Nothnagle M, Marchi K, Egerter S, Braveman P. Risk factors for late or no prenatal care following Medicaid expansions in California. Matern Child Health J. 2000 Dec;4(4):251–259. [PubMed]
  • Manstead AS, Proffitt C, Smart JL. Predicting and understanding mothers' infant-feeding intentions and behavior: testing the theory of reasoned action. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983 Apr;44(4):657–671. [PubMed]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of Association of Schools of Public Health