PMCCPMCCPMCC

Search tips
Search criteria 

Advanced

 
Logo of jgimedspringer.comThis journalToc AlertsSubmit OnlineOpen Choice
 
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 May; 17(5): 387–397.
PMCID: PMC1495039

Alcohol Use Disorders in Primary Care

Do Gender-specific Differences Exist?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe how alcohol use disorders (AUDs) affect women, focusing on gender-specific implications for primary care physicians (PCPs).

DESIGN

An overview of literature from 1966 to 2000 identified by a medline, PsychINFO and HealthSTAR/Ovid Healthstar database search using key words “women,”“alcohol” and “alcoholism.”

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Although the prevalence of AUDs is greater in men than in women, women with AUDs are more likely to seek help, but less likely to be identified by their physicians. Psychiatric comorbidities (especially depression and eating disorders) are more common in women with AUDs than in men with AUDs. A past history of sexual and/or physical abuse places a woman at increased risk for AUDs. Women have a greater sensitivity to alcohol, have an accelerated progression from alcohol toxicity, and have increased mortality at lower levels of consumption compared to men. Women and men who are light-to-moderate drinkers have lower coronary artery disease mortality than do abstainers or heavy drinkers. Risk of breast cancer is increased in women who drink ≥1 drinks daily. Common barriers to treatment include: fear of abandonment by partner; fear of loss of children; and financial dependency. Brief interventions have been shown to be effective in reduction of alcohol consumption in women with at-risk drinking. It is unclear if women-only treatment programs improve outcomes.

CONCLUSION

PCPs should be alert to gender-specific differences for women with AUDs.

Keywords: alcoholism, female, primary care, gender effects

Alcohol is the drug of choice among American women. Six million women meet the diagnostic criteria for current abuse or dependence. Until recently, most research, prevention and treatment efforts have been extrapolated from men to women without evidence of whether important and significant gender differences may exist. Within primary care settings, a large proportion of both male and female patients, (approximately 10% to 20%, depending on the severity of the disorder studied), suffer from alcohol use disorders (AUDs).13

Women are more likely than men to seek help for alcohol problems in health care settings, yet are less likely to be identified and diagnosed.46 For many of these women the visit to their primary care provider may be an important opportunity for screening and potential entry into treatment. Research has shown that screening and brief interventions for AUDs in women by primary care providers are effective in reducing future alcohol consumption.7,8 Given the high prevalence of female patients with AUDs and the fact that currently fewer than half of such cases are properly identified,5,9 primary care physicians (PCPs) need to take a more active role in identifying such patients.

The objective of this paper is to describe how AUDs affect women, the known gender-specific differences in AUDs, and implications for PCPs. Specifically, we will review known differences between men and women suffering from AUDs by epidemiology, genetics, biology, presentation, definition and screening, social context, course and medical consequences, psychiatric comorbidity, victimization and violence, and treatment. Our review of this enormous literature is necessarily selective and we pay greatest attention to those areas of clinical significance to PCPs.

METHODS

An overview of literature from 1966 to 2000 identified by a medline, PsychINFO and HealthSTAR/Ovid Healthstar database search using key words “women,”“alcohol,” and “alcoholism.” Gender-specific data from cohort studies of general population or large clinical samples are primarily reviewed.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

General Population

More than 4 times as many American women die of substance abuse–related disease than of breast cancer.10 Increased overall mortality occurs in women who drink more than 2 drinks daily.11 In 1993, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism estimated that nearly 6 million American adult women (or about 6% of the adult female population) suffered from AUDs within a 12-month period.12 By comparison, approximately 14% of men were reported to have serious alcohol problems.

The National Comorbidity Study investigated the prevalence of psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorders in a population-based representative sample of individuals 15 to 54 years old in the United States.13 Consistent with other large population-based studies,14,15 substance use disorders were more prevalent in men than in women; the gender differential for alcohol dependence was larger than for drug dependence. Depending on the method of data collection and population studied, the ratio of AUDs in men to women ranges from about 2:1 to 3:1. Recent data,1620 however, suggest that the gender gap between both adolescent girls and boys and older women and men may be narrowing.

Medical Settings

The prevalence of AUDs among female patients in medical settings is substantially higher than are prevalence rates within the general population of women. Rates of lifetime alcohol abuse or dependence among women in primary care settings have ranged from 23% to 25%.21,22 Within outpatient gynecology practices, prevalence rates of current alcohol abuse or dependence have ranged from 12% to 20%.2327 Inpatient surveys have revealed prevalence estimates of alcohol-related problems in women of 8% to 12%, depending on the service.9

GENETICS

The evidence for a genetic influence on addiction in women is somewhat mixed. Early studies comparing identical and fraternal twins involved only male subjects.28,29 Later research from Denmark showed a probable genetic influence for men but was inconclusive for women.30 Some of these studies indicated that environmental factors may be more important in both the development of and protection from alcohol problems in women.3133

The Stockholm adoption study, which involved 1,775 adults adopted by nonrelatives early in life, has yielded much information on heredity patterns of alcohol problems in both men and women.3436 The authors of this study were able to distinguish 2 patterns of heredity relevant to women. The more common type of inheritance, called type 1, was seen in both sexes. This type is characterized by adult onset and less severe alcohol abuse. Alcohol abuse by either biological father or mother, or both, increased risk for alcohol problems by a factor of 3 in these adoptees. In addition, researchers identified a less common, male-only pattern, type 2. This type was characterized by severe, early-onset alcohol abuse associated with criminality in both biological father and son, and revealed stronger hereditary influence than type 1. Neither the biological mothers nor the daughters of these fathers had an increased incidence of alcohol problems, although the daughters had a high incidence of multiple physical illnesses.

Kendler et al.37 performed a twin study in women that revealed a concordance for alcoholism consistently higher in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twin pairs and a heritability of 50% to 60%. In summary, it seems reasonable to conclude that a genetic influence is probable in some, but not all women with AUDs and that there may very well be different patterns of heritability in women compared to men.37,38

BIOLOGY

Women's physiology—lower average body weight, less total body water, lower concentration of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase and variations in hormones—all contribute to greater sensitivity to alcohol, increased blood alcohol levels, and greater alcohol-related morbidity given equivalent drinking careers compared to men.38,39 Because of the above stated physiologic variations, women become intoxicated after drinking smaller quantities of alcohol than men.39 Hormonal fluctuations with menstrual cycle have been correlated with changes in blood alcohol levels.40

It has also been suggested that differing organization and modulation of neurotransmitters, (particularly neurosteroids), in the male and female brain may influence the response to alcohol.34

In recognition of these differences, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) has defined at-risk drinking for women as more than 7 drinks (either 12 oz of beer, 5 oz of wine, or 1.5 oz of liquor) per week or 3 drinks per occasion, as opposed to 14 drinks per week or 4 drinks per occasion for men (Table 1).41

Table 1
Gender-specific Definitions for Moderate Drinking and At-risk Drinking*

PRESENTATION

Clear gender differences exist with respect to how men and women with alcohol problems present for clinical care. While men are much more likely to enter alcohol treatment via social programs (e.g., such as drunk-driving rehabilitation, public-intoxicant intervention programs, and employee-assistance programs) or peer-oriented settings (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous), women more frequently visit a physician or mental health care provider prior to treatment entry.4,42 Because women with alcohol problems are more likely to present initially within the health care setting, the ratio of men to women with alcohol problems within the outpatient setting is much narrower than in the general population (1.5:1 compared to about 2–3:1, respectively).

Women with AUDs are more likely than are men with AUDs to present to their PCP repeatedly with nonspecific health complaints, nervousness, anxiety, or insomnia.43 Surveys of both patients and health care providers have shown that although women are often seeking care as a “cry for help,” health care providers do not screen adequately for problem alcohol use in women.6 Unless specifically questioned about alcohol use, these women may be misdiagnosed with another primary psychiatric condition.

Physicians prescribe psychoactive drugs more readily to women than to men with the same complaints.44 Thus, women presenting with alcohol problems are not only less likely to be screened for AUDs but also more likely to be prescribed additional sedative drugs, potentially leading to secondary addictions.45

DEFINITION AND SCREENING

Multiple research studies exist to support the health benefits of screening and intervention for alcohol problems.8,46Table 1 reviews categories and definitions of patterns of alcohol use. The diagnostic differentiation of use, abuse, and dependence has been operationally refined and repeatedly shown to be reliable and valid.47,48 Although historically physicians were trained to focus on alcohol abuse and dependence, recent recommendations by the NIAAA encourage PCPs to screen for lower levels of alcohol consumption that place patients at risk of abuse and dependence and future adverse health consequences.41,49

The United States Preventive Services Task Force has endorsed the use of self-report screening tests for AUDs in the primary care setting.50Table 2 presents descriptions of the most commonly used alcohol screening questionnaires in primary care (the CAGE questionnaire, the AUDIT, and the TWEAK questionnaire). Many studies evaluating efficacy of screening instruments vary by level of severity of AUD addressed and lack of inclusion of women and minorities, making them difficult to compare.

Table 2
Alcohol Screening Questionnaires*

A recent systematic review by Fiellin et al.7 evaluated the accuracy of screening methods for alcohol problems in primary care. On the basis of the studies included in this review, the authors concluded that the literature supports screening for less-severe alcohol problems such as at-risk (see Table 1), hazardous (at risk for adverse consequences from alcohol), and harmful (alcohol is causing physical or psychological harm, but criteria are not met for dependence) drinking by means of the AUDIT and screening for lifetime and current abuse or dependence disorders by means of the CAGE. As these authors identified, one of the limitations of their review included either the lack of inclusion of women or failure to report gender distribution in the primary study.

Bradley et al.51 performed the first systematic review and description of performance of alcohol screening questionnaires in female patients. This analysis reviewed the literature for studies that included data for women comparing brief alcohol screening questionnaires with valid criterion standards for heavy drinking (≥2 drinks per day) or alcohol abuse or dependence in U.S. general clinical populations. The screening questionnaires and cut points that were found to have the best operating characteristics in women are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3
Performance of Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women for Alcohol Abuse and Dependence*

While the CAGE was relatively insensitive in predominantly white female populations (the lower range of sensitivities), the TWEAK and AUDIT performed adequately in African-American or white women, using lower cut points than usual. Although it is not clear from this data (given the limited number of studies and subgroup analyses) which screening test is optimal in women, for all instruments it is recommended that the cut points for a positive response in women should be lowered to the following: TWEAK: ≥2 points; AUDIT: ≥4 points; CAGE: ≥1 point. In addition, if a positive screen is obtained, further questioning about quantity and frequency of drinking should be pursued.41

SOCIAL CONTEXT

Stigma

Perhaps more important than the role of biology and heredity in AUDs in women may be social context. Women may be less likely to divulge hazardous levels of alcohol use to their physicians.52 Although there is clearly a negative stigma attached to AUDs for both men and women, societal and cultural norms and expectations may make this admission more problematic for women.5356 Much of the stigma attached to women when they drink is related to failure to fulfill societal expectations about femininity and role of caretaker and mother.57 This stigmatization may lead to increased isolation and decreased opportunities for identification and treatment.

Role Models and Partners

There is some evidence that environmental influences have a greater influence on predisposing and perpetuating AUDs in women than in men. Alcoholic women are more likely to have had nonrelated alcoholic role models in their lives and are more likely to have alcoholic partners than are alcoholic men.53 Alcoholic women are more likely to be left by their partners, especially at the time of entry into treatment, than are alcoholic men.53 Fear of the loss of a partner and potential loss of custody of children are important social barriers to women seeking help for alcohol problems.

Drinking Patterns and Consequences

Women with alcohol problems have different drinking patterns and societal consequences as a result of drinking compared to men. Women first drink to intoxication at a later age and more often drink alone at home; men are more likely to drink away from home and more often drive after drinking.58 Women are much more likely to attribute their drinking to a traumatic event or stressor and often view their drinking as self-medication.53

Women experience different and increased psychosocial problems at lower levels of alcohol consumption than men.59 While men are more likely to have their drinking affect their jobs and career paths, women are more likely to initially experience disruptions in relationships and family life.60 Women with alcohol problems have less-frequent involvement in the criminal justice system as a result of their drinking, yet as the primary caregivers of children, have the additional worry of prosecution and loss of child custody if their problem is identified.

While some studies have revealed that working outside the home has provided increased opportunity to drink and has narrowed the gender gap, others have shown a protective effect.60 There has also been speculation that women currently employed in historically male-dominated professions (e.g., medicine, business) are at increased risk for alcohol problems.61

Demographics

A woman is somewhat more at risk for an AUD if she is childless, separated, or divorced and less at risk if she is married.61,62 Women who are not married but living with a partner are 50% more likely to drink heavily than married women. Women in their 30s to 60s are most at risk when they are divorced or widowed, not employed, and have no children living at home. Similar to their male counterparts, white women are more likely to report problem drinking than are Hispanic and African-American women, respectively. Interestingly, the more acculturated to U.S. culture a minority woman is, the more likely she is to drink heavily.

COURSE AND MEDICAL CONSEQUENCES

Telescoping

Biologic differences in metabolism may lead to a phenomenon known as “telescoping.”63 Telescoping is defined as an accelerated medical, physiologic, and psychologic progression of alcoholism in women compared to men given the same duration and intensity of drinking careers. This results in a faster progression between major landmarks associated with alcoholism (e.g., regular drinking, loss of control, loss of job and relationships). In addition, women are more likely to have alcoholic liver disease after shorter and less-intense drinking careers than men,11,6466 and a greater proportion of alcoholic women die from cirrhosis than do alcoholic men.67 If the concept of telescoping holds true in women suffering from alcohol problems, there is a much narrower window for intervention before disease progression in women compared to men, making screening potentially more beneficial.

Mortality

Mortality rates are higher among women than men who drink heavily.6870 A meta-analysis of cohort studies evaluating the relationship between alcohol consumption and mortality found that women have higher all-cause mortality at lower levels of alcohol consumption than men, (2 to 3 drinks/day compared to 4 or more drinks per day).71 Overall increased mortality in women has been demonstrated with intake of 2.5 drinks daily compared to women nondrinkers.11 Similar to men, however, data from the Nurses Health Study11 revealed strong evidence for a U-shaped relation between alcohol intake and mortality. In comparison to abstinence and heavier drinking, women with light-to-moderate alcohol consumption had a significantly reduced risk of death.

Heart Disease

Multiple large prospective studies11,7276 assessing alcohol consumption and mortality have revealed that women, like men, experience decreased risk of coronary artery disease events (fatal and nonfatal) with light-to-moderate (usually <2 drinks daily) alcohol consumption, largely confined to women at greatest risk for coronary artery disease. Among younger women and those without risk factors for coronary heart disease, however, protection has not been observed for light-to-moderate drinking, and heavier drinking has been shown to substantially increase mortality, largely due to cirrhosis and breast cancer.68 Mukamul et al., identified that self-reported moderate alcohol consumption in the year prior to myocardial infarction was associated with reduced mortality following infarction after adjusting for multiple confounders, including gender.77

Despite the fact that the mean lifetime dose of alcohol in women alcoholics is less than that of male alcoholics, there are data to suggest that toxic effects of alcohol on the heart (cardiomyopathy and myopathy) are as prevalent in women as men.78 A recent study79 including a large cohort of elderly persons (mean age, 73.7 years; 58.8% female) revealed moderate alcohol consumption associated with decreasing risk for congestive heart failure after controlling for a number of factors, including gender.

Given that current data are obtained from observational studies and known potential harmful effects of alcohol, it is unreasonable at this time to endorse any level of drinking for protection of coronary artery disease.

Breast Cancer

Heavy alcohol consumption has also been shown to place women at increased risk of death from breast cancer.11 While the link of alcohol consumption with breast cancer includes some conflicting data, several very large studies,8084 including a recent meta-analysis,85 have revealed a range of 10% to 30% increased risk in women reporting consuming at least 1 drink daily compared to nondrinkers.11,83,86,87

Osteoporosis

Alcohol abuse is often considered a risk factor for osteoporosis, based on the frequent finding of low bone mass, decreased bone formation, and increased fracture incidence in alcoholics. Present data, however, suggest that there may be significant gender differences in terms of the effect of alcohol on bone. Overall, the evidence generally supports a detrimental effect of chronic alcohol abuse on the skeleton of a subpopulation of men (especially elderly men) and a neutral or generally beneficial effect for moderate alcohol consumption, especially in postmenopausal women.8894 It has been postulated that this putative beneficial effect in postmenopausal women may be due to a reduction in the increase in bone remodeling that in part mediates age-related bone loss. In contrast, however, studies assessing alcohol and osteoporosis in premenopausal women have shown increased risk for osteoporosis.95,96

Ovarian Cancer

Data revealing both increased risk and protection against ovarian cancer from alcohol consumption have also been reported.86,9799 A recent study100 reviewed the incidence of ovarian cancer among a cohort of alcoholic women in Sweden and found an overall decreased incidence of about 14% among women with a diagnosis of alcoholism. This finding was especially strong among women <60 years of age. The suggested mechanism may be related to reductions in gonadotropin levels in alcoholic women.

Reproductive Health Consequences

Women who drink heavily may have more painful, heavy, and irregular menses compared to women who drink less.101 Heavy alcohol consumption has also been associated with increased rates of infertility, although causality has not been established.102104 Increased rates of spontaneous abortions have been shown in women who drink more than 2 drinks daily.105

Other Health Consequences

Women may also suffer greater acute and chronic cognitive impairment from lower levels of alcohol consumption than do men.106109 Ammendola et al.110 evaluated a sample of male and female alcoholics for evidence of peripheral neuropathy. After adjusting for total lifetime dose of ethanol and other risk factors for neuropathy, the results revealed a significantly higher sensitivity of women from the toxic effects of ethanol on peripheral nerve fibers compared to men.

PSYCHIATRIC COMORBIDITY

Affective Disorders

Within the general population, it has been clearly established that affective disorders are much more prevalent in women compared to men. Similarly, women with AUDs suffer from a significantly higher prevalence of affective disorders compared to men with AUDs.111115 In addition, it has been demonstrated that the onset of psychiatric disorders precedes the onset of substance abuse more often in women than in men.115117 Women with AUDs report more frequent suicide attempts than men with AUDs, as well as 4 times the frequency of suicide attempts compared to women without AUDs.118

Although treatment for coexistent psychiatric comorbidity concomitantly with treatment for alcohol abuse has become the standard of care, many women with AUDs remain undiagnosed and untreated for a major affective disorder. Since the prevalence of these disorders is higher in women than in men, undertreatment of these comorbidities remains a significant obstacle to success in sobriety for women.

Eating Disorders

There is substantial evidence that alcoholism and eating disorders co-occur at high rates.119,120 Cross-sectional studies of women with eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa and bulimia, have documented prevalence of alcohol and other substance abuse at rates much higher than those reported in the general female population.121,122 Conversely, women with substance abuse disorders report higher rates of eating disorders.123 A common underlying pathology hypothesis is supported by the finding that patients with eating disorders are more likely to have family histories of alcohol and other drug abuse.124,125

VICTIMIZATION AND VIOLENCE

Alcohol leads to increased vulnerability and potential for violence, especially toward women alcoholics. Unfortunately, women with alcohol disorders are frequently the partners of alcohol abusers and become victims of aggression. Women at greatest risk for injury from domestic violence include those whose male partners abuse alcohol or drugs.126 Multiple studies have established both a higher incidence of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse as well as increased vulnerability to future abuse and violence in women with AUDs.54,56,127130 Breslau et al.131 reviewed sequelae of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in women and found that women with PTSD suffered increased risk for major depression and AUDs.

TREATMENT

Barriers

Barriers for women seeking help or treatment for AUDs are distinct from those for men and may include: lack of income or underinsurance; fear of abandonment by their husband or partner after help seeking; lack of child care during treatment; exclusion of pregnant women from treatment programs; lack of transportation secondary to overall lower levels of socioeconomic status; and fear of loss of custody of children.4,55,56,132134 Barriers for men seeking treatment have been shown to be more closely related to loss of career and financial instability.

Brief Intervention

In the primary care setting, Fleming et al.8 reported the first direct evidence for efficacy of a brief intervention being associated with sustained reductions in alcohol consumption by women of childbearing age. An intervention consisting of two 15-minute physician-delivered counseling visits that included advice, education, and contracting using a scripted workbook resulted in a significant treatment effect, reducing both 7-day alcohol use and binge drinking episodes over the 48-month follow-up period. Interestingly, gender was observed to be a strong independent predictor, with women demonstrating a nearly 2-fold greater relative reduction in alcohol consumption than men who had received the intervention.

Wilk et al.46 performed a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of brief intervention in heavy drinkers in a variety of settings (outpatient, residential, inpatient). This analysis revealed that heavy drinkers who received a brief intervention were twice as likely to moderate their drinking 6 to 12 months after the intervention compared to heavy drinkers who received no intervention. When specific subcategories of heavy drinkers were analyzed, there was a greater likelihood of alcohol moderation after brief intervention for women compared to men. Previous data have also shown that women have higher rates of abstinence when treated in a medical setting compared to a peer-oriented setting (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous).62

Inpatient Treatment

Until recently, most substance abuse treatment programs were male-oriented, focusing primarily on re-entry into the workplace and less on strengthening or renewing emotional relationships and improving self-esteem, factors that have been shown to be more important to women in recovery.135 Current data are conflicting on whether better outcomes actually result from specialized female-only programs compared to traditional programs. One preliminary study revealed improved 2-year outcomes for women in a women-only treatment program compared to a traditional program.136 A second study, however, did not support this finding.137 It is unclear if these contradictory findings about the efficacy of women-only treatment programs are due to comparing women with varying levels of addiction severity and co-morbidities, small numbers, or inadequate follow-up.

Relapse and Recovery

Women in recovery from alcohol treatment report a high frequency of persistent life problems and may require additional surveillance and therapeutic attention to prevent post-treatment relapse. Snow and Anderson138 evaluated factors influencing relapse and recovery among alcohol- and drug-addicted women and found that depression was a major trigger for relapse, as were co-occurring addictions and current violent partnerships.

SPECIAL POPULATIONS OF WOMEN

Lesbians

Cochran et al.139 examined alcohol use patterns among adults interviewed in the 1996 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Alcohol use patterns did not differ between heterosexual and homosexual men. Homosexually active women, however, reported using alcohol more frequently and in greater amounts and experienced greater alcohol-related morbidity than did exclusively heterosexually active women.

Elderly Women

Older women represent the largest single group of health care users in this country.140 Twelve percent of older women regularly drink in excess of recommended guidelines and are considered at-risk drinkers. Older women are also the largest users of sedatives and narcotic analgesics.141 The fact that many of these patients suffer from multiple comorbidities, may take multiple prescription medications, and are at risk for falls and fractures,142 underscores that these women have specific risks and vulnerabilities to alcohol use and should be aggressively screened for AUDs.

Preconception and Pregnant Women

Clearly, women who are thinking about pregnancy or who are pregnant are at significant risk of complications from AUDs. Preconception counseling about risks of alcohol is essential to all women of childbearing age because of the risk associated with drinking before pregnancy is recognized. Although a full discussion of the toxic effects of alcohol on pregnancy is beyond the scope of this article, effects of alcohol in pregnancy include: fetal alcohol syndrome, persistent neurobehavioral deficits, and low-birth-weight infants. In the most recent National Survey of Family Growth, 34% of U.S. women drank alcohol during pregnancy.143 The prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome is 1.95 per 1,000 live births and is much higher (4.7 per 1,000 births) among daily drinkers.144

Barriers for pregnant women with AUDs seeking treatment include: lack of treatment programs willing to accept pregnant women; lack of availability of child care for other children; and fear of criminalization and loss of child custody.

SUMMARY

In summary, clear gender-specific differences exist between women and men suffering from AUDs. These differences are summarized in Table 4. Because women with AUDs commonly seek help in health care settings, the PCP's office is an ideal setting for screening, brief interventions, or referrals to treatment for women suffering from alcohol problems.

Table 4
Alcohol Use Disorders in Primary Care: Summary of Gender-specific Differences

PCPs should be aware of lower recommended alcohol consumption levels for women compared to men as well as increased sensitivity to alcohol at lower levels. Identification of an affective disorder, eating disorder, or history of childhood or adult abuse should trigger PCPs to be more aggressively surveillant for AUDs in female patients. Because women with AUDs are more likely than men to have partners with AUDs, attention should be given to partners' roles in the etiology and maintenance of women's alcohol problems. Women, like men, who are light-to-moderate drinkers may experience some protection from cardiovascular disease; however, this needs to be balanced by increased risk of breast cancer, especially in younger women and those at lower risk of coronary artery disease.

Important areas for further research include: genetic studies focusing on distinguishing patterns of AUD inheritance in men and women; research specifically aimed at identifying why women have increased vulnerability to alcohol in nonreproductive organ systems; and the potential for gender differences in the performance of screening instruments for AUDs.

Given the numerous important differences that have been identified between women and men with AUDs, it seems prudent that treatment programs integrate known gender differences into their treatment models. Clearly, more systematic research evaluating outcomes of gender-specific treatment programs is needed. This research should include diverse ethnic, older, and nonpregnant women. Hopefully, increased awareness of and sensitivity to known differences as well as further research may result in improved quality of care and outcomes for female patients with AUDs.

REFERENCES

1. Volk RJ, Steinbauer JR, Cantor SB, Holzer CE., III The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a screen for at-risk drinking in primary care patients of different racial/ethnic backgrounds. Addiction. 1997;92:197–206. [PubMed]
2. Piccinelli M, Tessari E, Bortolomasi M, et al. Efficacy of the alcohol use disorders identification test as a screening tool for hazardous alcohol intake and related disorders in primary care: a validity study. BMJ. 1997;314:420–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Adams WL, Barry KL, Fleming MF. Screening for problem drinking in older primary care patients. JAMA. 1996;276:1964–67. [PubMed]
4. Weisner C, Schmidt L. Gender disparities in treatment for alcohol problems. JAMA. 1992;268:1872–76. [PubMed]
5. Amodei N, Williams JF, Seale JP, Alvarado ML. Gender differences in medical presentation and detection of patients with a history of alcohol abuse or dependence. J Addict Dis. 1996;15:19–31. [PubMed]
6. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Poses RM, Schnoll SH, Lawton MJ. Physician detection of drinking problems in patients attending a general medicine practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:517–21. [PubMed]
7. Fiellin D, Reid MC, O'Connor P. Screening for alcohol problems in primary care: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1977–89. [PubMed]
8. Fleming MF, Barry KL, Manwell LB, Johnson K, London R. Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers: a randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices. JAMA. 1997;277:1039–45. [PubMed]
9. Moore RD, Bone LR, Geller G, Mamon JA, Stokes EJ, Levine DM. Prevalence, detection and treatment of alcoholism in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 1989;261:403–7. [PubMed]
10. Blumenthal SJ. Women and substance abuse: a new national focus. NIDA Conference on Substance Abuse in Women 1997. Available at: http://www.nida.nih.gov. Accessed February 1, 2000.
11. Fuchs CS, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Alcohol consumption and mortality among women. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1245–50. [PubMed]
12. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Eighth Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 1993.
13. Kessler RC, Crum RM, Warner LA, Nelson CB, Schulenberg J, Anthony JC. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8–19. [PubMed]
14. NIAAA. Alcohol Consumption and Related Problems: Alcohol and Health Monograph. Rockville, Md: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1982. pp. 3–52.
15. Hilton ME. Regional diversity in U.S. drinking practices. In: Clark WB, Hilton ME, editors. Alcohol in America: Drinking Practices and Problems. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1991. pp. 256–79.
16. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US) National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Population Estimates, 1996. Washington: SAMHSA, Office of Applied Studies; 1997. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 97–3137.
17. Fillmore KM. When Angels Fall…: Women's Drinking as Cultural Preoccupation and as a Reality. In: Wilsnack SC, Beckman LJ, editors. Alcohol Problems in Women: Antescedents, Consequences, and Intervention. New York: Guilford Press; 1984. pp. 7–36.
18. Grant BF, Harford TC, Chou P, et al. Prevalence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence: United States, 1988. Alcohol Health Res World. 1991;15:91–6.
19. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Przybeck TR, Regier DA. Alcohol Disorders in the Community: A Report from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area. In: Rose RM, Barrett J, editors. Alcoholism: Origins and Outcomes. New York: Raven Press; 1988. pp. 15–29.
20. Wilsnack SC, Klassen AD, Schur BE, Wilsnack RW. Predicting onset and chronicity of women's problem drinking: a five-year longitudinal analysis. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:305–18. [PubMed]
21. Buchsbaum DG, Buchanan RG, Centor RM, Scholl SH, Lawton MJ. Screening for alcohol abuse using CAGE scores and likelihood ratios. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:774–77. [PubMed]
22. Fleming MF, Barry KL. A three-sample test of a masked alcohol screening questionnaire. Alcohol Alcohol. 1991;26:81–91. [PubMed]
23. Halliday A, Bush B, Cleary P, Aronson M, Delbanco T. Alcohol abuse in women seeking gynecologic care. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:322–26. [PubMed]
24. Tobin MD, Schmidt PJ, Rubinow DR. Reported alcohol use in women with premenstrual syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1503–04. [PubMed]
25. Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Infertility in women and moderate alcohol abuse. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1429–32. [PubMed]
26. Walker E, Katon W, Harrop-Griffiths J, Holm L, Russo J, Hickok LR. Relationship of chronic pelvic pain to psychiatric diagnoses and childhood sexual abuse. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145:75–80. [PubMed]
27. Perper MM, Breitkopf LJ, Breitstein R, Cody RP, Manowitz P. MAST scores, alcohol consumption, and gynecological symptoms in endometriosis patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993;17:272–78. [PubMed]
28. Holden C. Probing the complex genetics of alcoholism. Science. 1991;251:163–4. [PubMed]
29. Russell M, Henderson C, Blume SB. Children of Alcoholics: A Review of the Literature. New York: Children of Alcoholics Foundation; 1985.
30. Schuckit MA, Li TK, Cloninger CR, Deitrich RA. Genetics of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1985;9:475–92. [PubMed]
31. Cadoret RJ, Troughton E, O'Gorman TW, Heywood E. An adoption study of genetic and environmental factors in drug abuse. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43:1131–36. [PubMed]
32. Wilsnack SC. Patterns and trends in women's drinking: Recent findings and some implications for prevention. Paper presented to the Working Group for Prevention Research on Women and Alcohol, Prevention Research Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda. Maryland, September 13–14, 1993.
33. Pickens RW, Svikis DS, McGue M, Lykken DT, Heston LL, Clayton PJ. Heterogeneity in the inheritance of alcoholism: a study of male and female twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48:19–28. [PubMed]
34. Cloninger CR. Neurogenetic adaptive mechanism in alcoholism. Science. 1987;236:410–16. [PubMed]
35. Bohman M, Sigvardsson S, Cloninger CR. Maternal inheritance of alcohol abuse: cross-fostering analysis of adopted women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38:965–69. [PubMed]
36. Sigvardsson S, Bohman M, Cloninger CR. Replication of the Stockholm Adoption Study of Alcoholism. Confirmatory cross-fostering analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53:681–87. [PubMed]
37. Kendler KS, Heath AC, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Eaves LJ. A population-based twin study of alcoholism in women. JAMA. 1992;268:1877–82. [PubMed]
38. Hill SY, Smith TR. Evidence for genetic mediation of alcoholism in women. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1991;3:159–74. [PubMed]
39. Frezza M, di Padova C, Pozzato G, Terpin M, Baraona E, Lieber CS. High blood alcohol levels in women: the role of decreased gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity and first-pass metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:95–9. [PubMed]
40. Hahn HKJ, Burch RE. Impaired ethanol metabolism with advancing age. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1983;7:299–301. [PubMed]
41. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. The Physician's Guide to Helping Patients With Alcohol Problems. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1995. NIH publication no 95–3769.
42. Frank JB, Weihs K, Minerva E, Lieberman DZ. Women's mental health in primary care. Med Clin North Am. 1998;82:359–89. [PubMed]
43. Thom B. Sex differences in help-seeking for alcohol problems, 1: barriers to help-seeking. Br J Addict. 1986;81:777–88. [PubMed]
44. Svarstad BL, Cleary PD, Mechanic D, Robers PA. Gender differences in the acquisition of prescribed drugs. Med Care. 1987;25:1089–98. [PubMed]
45. Parran T., Jr Prescription drug abuse: a question of balance. Med Clin N Am. 1997;81:967–78. [PubMed]
46. Wilk AI, Jensen NM, Havighurst TC. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials addressing brief interventions in heavy alcohol drinkers. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:274–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
47. American Psychiatric Association Task Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. pp. 175–272.
48. Schuckit MA, Hesselbrock V, Tipp J. A comparison of DSM-III, DSM-IV and ICD-10 substance use disorders diagnoses in 1992 men and women subjects in the COGA study. Addiction. 1994;89:1629–38. [PubMed]
49. Reid MC, Fiellin DA, O'Connor PG. Hazardous and harmful drinking in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:1681–89. [PubMed]
50. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. pp. 567–82.
51. Bradley KA, Boyd-Wickizer J, Powell SH, Burman ML. Alcohol screening questionnaires in women: a critical review. JAMA. 1998;280:166–71. [PubMed]
52. Williams AB, O'Connor PG. Substance abuse issues. In: Kelly P, Holman S, Rothenberg R, Holzemer SP, editors. Primary Care of Women and Children with HIV Infection: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Boston, Mass: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 1995. pp. 217–38.
53. Lex BW. Gender differences and substance abuse. Adv Subst Abuse. 1991;4:225–96.
54. Fillmore KM. The social victims of drinking. Br J Addict. 1985;80:307–14. [PubMed]
55. Beckman LJ, Amaro H. Personal and social differences faced by women and men entering alcoholism treatment. J Stud Alcohol. 1986;47:135–46. [PubMed]
56. Blume SB. Women and alcohol. A review. JAMA. 1986;256:1467–70. [PubMed]
57. Gomberg ESL. Alcoholic women in treatment: the question of stigma and age. Alcohol Alcohol. 1988;23:507–14. [PubMed]
58. Miller WR, Cervantes EA. Gender and patterns of alcohol problems: pretreatment responses of women and men to the Comprehensive Drinker Profile. J Clin Psychol. 1997;53:263–77. [PubMed]
59. Wechsler H, Dowdall GW, Davenport A, Rimm EB. A gender-specific measure of binge drinking among college students. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:982–85. [PubMed]
60. Ames GM, Rebhun LA. Women, alcohol and work: interactions of gender, ethnicity and occupational culture. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:1649–63. [PubMed]
61. Richman JA, Rospenda KM. Gender roles and alcohol abuse. Costs of noncaring for future physicians. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180:619–26. [PubMed]
62. Piazza NJ, Vrbka JL, Yeager RD. Telescoping of alcoholism in women alcoholics. Int J Addict. 1989;24:19–28. [PubMed]
63. Randall CL, Roberts JS, Del Boca FK, Carroll KM, Connors GJ, Mattson ME. Telescoping of landmark events associated with drinking: a gender comparison. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;60:252–60. [PubMed]
64. Parrish KM, Dufour MC, Stinson FS, Harford TC. Average daily alcohol consumption during adult life among decedents with and without cirrhosis: the 1986 National Mortality Followback Survey. J Stud Alcohol. 1993;54:450–56. [PubMed]
65. Mezey E, Oesterling JE, Potter JJ. Influence of male hormones on ethanol elimination in man. Hepatology. 1988;8:742–4. [PubMed]
66. Becker U, Deis A, Sorensen TI, et al. Prediction of risk of liver disease by alcohol intake, sex and age: a prospective population study. Hepatology. 1996;23:1025–9. [PubMed]
67. Mishra L, Sharma S, Potter JJ, Mezey E. More rapid elimination of alcohol in women as compared to their male siblings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989;13:752–54. [PubMed]
68. Hanna E, DuFour MC, Elliot S, Stinson F, Harford TC. Dying to be equal: women, alcohol and cardiovascular disease. Br J Addict. 1992;87:1593–97. [PubMed]
69. Lindberg S, Agren G. Mortality among male and female hospitalized alcoholics in Stockholm 1962–1983. Br J Addict. 1988;83:1193–200. [PubMed]
70. Smith EM, Cloninger CR, Bradford S. Predictors of mortality in alcoholic women: a prospective follow-up study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1983;7:237–43. [PubMed]
71. Holman CDJ, English DR, Milne E, Winter MG. Meta-analysis of alcohol and all-cause mortality: a validation of NHMRC recommendations. Med J Aust. 1996;164:141–5. [PubMed]
72. Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Friedman GD. Alcohol and mortality. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117:646–54. [PubMed]
73. Poikolainen K. Alcohol and mortality: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:455–65. [PubMed]
74. Serdula MK, Koong SL, Williamson DF, et al. Alcohol intake and subsequent mortality: findings from the NHANES I follow-up study. J Stud Alcohol. 1995;56:233–9. [PubMed]
75. Garg R, Wagener DK, Madans JH. Alcohol consumption and risk of ischemic heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1211–6. [PubMed]
76. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. A prospective study of moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of coronary disease and stroke in women. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:267–73. [PubMed]
77. Mukamal KJ, Maclure M, Muller JE, Sherwood JB, Mittleman MA. Prior alcohol consumption and mortality following acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2001;285:1965–70. [PubMed]
78. Urbano-Marquez A, Estruch R, Fernandez-Sola J, Nicolas JM, Pare JC, Rubin E. The greater risk of alcoholic cardiomyopathy and myopathy in women compared to men. JAMA. 1995;274:149–54. [PubMed]
79. Abramson JL, Williams SA, Krumholz HM, Vaccarino V. Moderate alcohol consumption and risk of heart failure among older persons. JAMA. 2001;285:1971–77. [PubMed]
80. Longnecker MP. Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and review. Cancer Causes Control. 1994;5:73–82. [PubMed]
81. Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. Moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1174–80. [PubMed]
82. Schatzkin A, Jones DY, Hoover RN, et al. Alcohol consumption and breast cancer in the Epidemiologic Follow-up Study of the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1169–73. [PubMed]
83. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. Alcohol and breast cancer in women. JAMA. 1998;279:535–40. [PubMed]
84. Harris RE, Wynder EL. Breast cancer and alcohol consumption: a study in weak associations. JAMA. 1988;259:2867–71. [PubMed]
85. Ellison RC, Zhang Y, McLennan CE, Rothman KJ. Exploring the relation of alcohol consumption to risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:740–47. [PubMed]
86. Tonnesen H, Moller H, Anderson JR, Jensen E, Juel K. Cancer mortality in alcohol abusers. Br J Cancer. 1994;69:327–32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
87. Kuper H, Ye W, Weiderpass E, et al. Alcohol and breast cancer risk: the alcoholism paradox. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:949–51. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
88. Orwoll ES, Klein RF. Osteoporosis in men. Endocr Rev. 1995;16:87–116. [PubMed]
89. Odvina CV, Safi I, Wojtowicz CH, et al. Effect of heavy alcohol intake in the absences of liver disease on bone mass in black and white men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:2499–503. [PubMed]
90. Kelepouris N, Harper KD, Gannon F, Kaplan FS, Haddad JG. Severe osteoporosis in men. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:452–60. [PubMed]
91. Felson DT, Zhang Y, Hannan MT, Kannel WB, Kiel DP. Alcohol intake and bone mineral density in elderly men and women. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:485–92. [PubMed]
92. Orwoll ES, Bauer DC, Vogt TM, Fox KM. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Axial bone mass in older women. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:187–96. [PubMed]
93. Holbrook TL, Barrett-Connor E. A prospective study of alcohol consumption and bone mineral density. BMJ. 1993;306:1506–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
94. Stevenson JC, Lees B, Devenport M, Cust MP, Ganger KF. Determinants of bone density in normal women: risk factors for osteoporosis. BMJ. 1989;298:924–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
95. Hernandez-Avila M, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC. Caffeine, moderate alcohol intake, and risk of fractures of the hip and forearm in middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:157–63. [PubMed]
96. Laitinen K, Karkkainen M, Lalla M, et al. Is alcohol an osteoporosis-inducing agent for young and middle-aged women? Metabolism. 1993;42:875–81. [PubMed]
97. La Vecchia C, Negri E, Franceschi S, Parazzini F, Gentile A, Fasoli M. Alcohol and epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1025–30. [PubMed]
98. Sigvardsson S, Hardell L, Przybeck TR, Cloninger R. Increased cancer risk among Swedish female alcoholics. Epidemiology. 1996;7:140–3. [PubMed]
99. Gwinn ML, Webster LA, Lee NC, Layde PM, Rubin GL. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Alcohol consumption and ovarian cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:759–66. [PubMed]
100. Lagiou P, Ye W, Wedren S, et al. Incidence of ovarian cancer among alcoholic women: a cohort study in Sweden. Int J Cancer. 2001;91:264–6. [PubMed]
101. Wilsnack SC, Klassen AD, Wilsnack RW. Drinking and reproductive dysfunction among women in a 1981 national survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1984;8:451–8. [PubMed]
102. Grodstein F, Goldman MB, Cramer DW. Infertility in women and moderate alcohol use. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1429–32. [PubMed]
103. Bahamondes L, Bueno JG, Hardy E, Vera S, Pimentel E, Ramos M. Identification of main risk factors for tubal infertility. Fertil Steril. 1994;61:478–82. [PubMed]
104. Perper MM, Breitkopf LJ, Breitstein R, Cody RP, Manowitz P. MAST scores, alcohol consumption, and gynecological symptoms in endometriosis patients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993;17:272–8. [PubMed]
105. Harlap S, Shiono PH. Alcohol, smoking, and incidence of spontaneous abortions in the first and second trimester. Lancet. 1980;2:173–6. [PubMed]
106. Niaura RS, Nathan PE, Frankenstein W, Shapiro AP, Brick J. Gender differences in acute psychomotor, cognitive and pharmacokinetic response to alcohol. Addict Behav. 1987;12:345–56. [PubMed]
107. Acker C. Neuropsychological deficits in alcoholics: the relative contributions of gender and drinking history. Br J Addict. 1986;81:395–403. [PubMed]
108. Mann K, Batra A, Gunthner A, Schroth G. Do women develop alcoholic brain damage more readily than men. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:1052–56. [PubMed]
109. Hommer D, Momenan R, Rawlings R, et al. Decreased corpus callosum size among alcoholic women. Arch Neurol. 1996;53:359–63. [PubMed]
110. Ammendola A, Gemini D, Iannaccone S, et al. Gender and peripheral neuropathy in chronic alcoholism: a clinical-electroneurographic study. Alcohol Alcohol. 2000;35:368–71. [PubMed]
111. Hesselbrock MN, Meyer RC, Keener JJ. Psychopathology in hospitalized alcoholics. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42:1050–55. [PubMed]
112. Cornelius JR, Jarrett PJ, Thase ME, et al. Gender effects on the clinical presentation of alcoholics at a psychiatric hospital. Compr Psychiatry. 1995;36:435–40. [PubMed]
113. Helzer JE, Rokins LN, McEvoy L. Post-traumatic stress disorder in the general population: findings of the epidemiologic catchment area survey. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1630–34. [PubMed]
114. Kessler RC, Crum RM, Warner LA, Nelson CB, Schulenberg J, Anthony JC. Lifetime co-occurrence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the national comorbidity survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:313–21. [PubMed]
115. Schuckit MA, Tipp JE, Bergman M, Reich W, Hesselbrock VM, Smith TL. Comparison of induced and independent major depressive disorders in 2,945 alcoholics. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:948–56. [PubMed]
116. Kessler RC, Nelson CB, McGonagle KA, Edlund MJ, Frank RG, Leaf PJ. The epidemiology of co-occurring addictive and mental disorders: implications for prevention and service utilization. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1996;66:17–31. [PubMed]
117. Dunne FJ, Galatapoulus C, Schipperheijn JM. Gender differences in psychiatric morbidity among alcohol misusers. Compr Psychiatry. 1993;34:95–101. [PubMed]
118. Gomberg ESL. Suicide risk among women with alcohol problems. Addict Nurs Network. 1989;1:3–7.
119. Bulik CM. Drug and alcohol abuse by bulimic women and their families. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:1604–06. [PubMed]
120. Sinha R, O'Malley SS. Alcohol and eating disorders: implications for alcohol treatment and health services research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24:1312–9. [PubMed]
121. Beary MD, Lacey JH, Merry J. Alcoholism and early disorder in women of fertile age. Br J Addict. 1986;81:685–89. [PubMed]
122. Kassett JA, Gershon ES, Maxwell ME, et al. Psychiatric disorders in the first-degree relatives of probands with bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry. 1989;146:1468–71. [PubMed]
123. Stein M, Cyr M. Women and substance abuse. Med Clin North Am. 1997;81:979–98. [PubMed]
124. Brisman J, Siegel M. Bulimia and alcoholism: two sides of the same coin. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1984;1:113–18. [PubMed]
125. Jones DA, Cheshire N, Moorhouse H. Anorexia nervosa, bulimia and alcoholism – association of eating disorder and alcohol. J Psychiatr Res. 1992;19:377–80. [PubMed]
126. Kyriacou DN, Anglin D, Taliaferro E, et al. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence against women. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1892–8. [PubMed]
127. Miller BA, Downs WR, Testa M. Interrelationships between victimization experiences and women's alcohol use. J Stud Alcohol. 1993;11(suppl):109–17. [PubMed]
128. Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R, Resnick HS, Saunders BE, Best CL. A 2-year longitudinal analysis of the relationships between violent assault and substance abuse in women. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997;65:834–47. [PubMed]
129. Deykin EY, Buka SL. Prevalence and risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder among chemically dependent adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:752–7. [PubMed]
130. Windle M, Windle RC, Scheidt DM, Miller GB. Physical and sexual abuse and associated mental disorders among alcoholic inpatients. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:1322–8. [PubMed]
131. Breslau N, Davis GC, Peterson EL, Schultz L. Psychiatric sequelae of posttraumatic stress disorder in women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54:81–7. [PubMed]
132. Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Alcohol Treatment. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press; 1990. pp. 23–41.
133. Roman PM. Women and Alcohol Use: A Review of the Research Literature. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1988.
134. Reed BG. Developing women-sensitive drug dependence treatment services: why so difficult? J Psychoactive Drugs. 1987;19:151–64. [PubMed]
135. Under the Rug: Substance Abuse and the Mature Woman. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University; June 1998. June 1998 Available at: http://www.casacolumbia.org. Accessed March 12, 2002.
136. Dahlgren L, Willander A. Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialized female unit versus a mixed male/female treatment facility. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989;13:499–504. [PubMed]
137. Copeland J, Hall W, Didcott P, Biggs V. A comparison of a specialist women's alcohol and other drug treatment service with two traditional mixed sex services: client characteristics and treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993;32:81–92. [PubMed]
138. Snow D, Anderson C. Exploring the factors influencing relapse and recovery among drug and alcohol addicted women. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2000;38:8–19. [PubMed]
139. Cochran SD, Keenan C, Schober C, Mays VM. Estimates of alcohol use and clinical treatment needs among homosexually active men and women in the U.S. population. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:1062–71. [PubMed]
140. Blow FC. Treatment of older women with alcohol problems: meeting the challenge for a special population. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000;24:1257–66. [PubMed]
141. Wysowski DK, Baum C. Outpatient use of prescription sedative-hypnotic drugs in the United States, 1970 through 1989. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1779–83. [PubMed]
142. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Schaffner W, Baugh DK, Melton LJ., III Psychotropic drug use and the risk of hip fracture. N Engl J Med. 1987;316:363–9. [PubMed]
143. Mosher WD, Bachrach CA. Understanding US fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988–1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996;28:4–12. [PubMed]
144. Abel EL. An update on incidence of FAS: FAS is not an equal opportunity birth defect. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1995;17:437–43. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine